• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Possible Radeon RX 6700 XT Specs Surface, 12GB the New Mid-Range Memory Size?

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
40,444 (8.34/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
AMD could follow up on its RX 6800 series and RX 6900 XT launches with the RX 6700 series, which logically succeeds the RX 5700 series, and competes with NVIDIA's RTX 3060/Ti. Patrick Schur on Twitter, who has a high hit-rate with specs of upcoming AMD products, put out possible specs of the RX 6700 series. Both are based on the new "Navi 22" silicon, with an interesting set of specifications.

Apparently 12 GB could be AMD's new memory amount for the mid-range. It's unknown whether the 12 GB is running over a 192-bit wide memory interface (6x 16 Gbit chips), or whether AMD is using mixed-density chips over a 256-bit wide memory bus (think 4x 16 Gbit and 4x 8 Gbit), because even the fastest JEDEC-standard GDDR6 chips, running at 16 Gbps, would only yield 384 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is less than the 448 GB/s the RX 5700 series enjoy. Perhaps an Infinity Cache is deployed to make up the difference?



As for power, the RX 6700 XT (described as Navi 22 XT), is expected to have typical graphics power of 186-221 W, while the RX 6700 (Navi 22 XTL), could have 146-156 W TGP), which could mean that at least the RX 6700 could make do with a single 8-pin PCIe power input. VideoCardz predicts that the RX 6700 XT could feature 40 RDNA2 compute units—so 2,560 stream processors; and the RX 6700 featuring 36 (2,304), so the same exact number of shaders as the previous generation. The secret sauce here could be the significantly higher engine clocks, and possibly an Infinity Cache.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
6,334 (4.31/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
Joined
Dec 10, 2014
Messages
900 (0.40/day)
Location
Nowy Warsaw
System Name SYBARIS
Processor AMD Ryzen™ 5 3600
Motherboard MSI Arsenal Gaming B450 Tomahawk
Cooling Cryorig H7 Quad Lumi
Memory Team T-Force Delta RGB 2x8GB 3200CL16
Video Card(s) Colorful GeForce RTX 2060 6G V2
Storage WD Black WD1003FZEX 1TB + Crucial MX500 500GB
Display(s) LG 22MP68VQ-P 22" 75hz IPS
Case In Win Mana 136
Audio Device(s) HyperX Cloud X | iVOOMi iVO-169SUFBT 2.1
Power Supply Cooler Master G550M
Mouse Cooler Master MM711 | Logitech G102 Prodigy | Logitech G402 Hyperion Fury
Keyboard Fantech MK871 RGB TKL Outemu Blue mechanical keyboard
Software Windows 10 Education v2004 x64
With 40CUs it will be faster than a 5700XT.
Eagerly waiting for IPC (or sth) comparison. 6700 XT will be faster because of faster clock rate, yes. But I want @Wizzard to explore generational performance increase.
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
118 (0.26/day)
Not too sure about this one...VRAM requirements are heavily exaggerated these days and its RT performance will not be enough to sway 3060/Ti/70 buyers, especially for Cyberpunk. Will have to be shoved down one budget tier at least (300-350 dollars) to duke it out with the 3050
 

wolf

Performance Enthusiast
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
5,799 (1.16/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 7 3700X 1usmus
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Noctua NH-L12
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 OC/UV + duct
Storage Samsung 970 Evo m.2 NVME
Display(s) 21:9 3440x1440 144hz 1500R VA
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Power Supply Corsair SF600 Gold
Mouse Zowie EC1-A
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow X Chroma
Software case populated with Artic P12's
I can see these cards both being relatively popular when they come out and stock is viable. RDNA2 is shaping up nicely, all things considered, and is going a good way at least reputationally so far in slowly changing the tide.
 
Last edited:

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
1,304 (3.68/day)
Gap to rx 6800 seems to be quite huge though. So I doubt it will come close to rtx3070/2080ti perf, whose are just few percents behind of rx6800 on tpu's tests.

Given Nvidia's own performance claims putting RTX 3060 Ti on par with RTX 3070 | RTX 2080 Ti, and that RX 5700 XT was between RTX 2070 and RTX 2070 Super, there is no reason not to believe that RX 6700 XT will compete with RTX 3070 | RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
4,603 (0.99/day)
Location
Multidimensional
System Name PC Mustard Race
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Stock PBO On
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus B450 ITX
Cooling 4 x 120mm InWin Polaris RGB Fans
Memory 16GB Corsair LPX White 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3060 Ti 8GB
Storage 1TB WD Black M.2 / 2TB Samsung 2.5Inch HDD
Display(s) 4K LG TV 60hz
Case InWin A1 Plus Mini
Audio Device(s) Realtek Audio
Power Supply 650W Gold Rated InWin PSU
Mouse Wireless Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro
Keyboard Wireless Corsair K63
Software Windows 10 Home 64bit
Benchmark Scores Don't do em anymore.
I see the 6700 XT being above the 2080 Super but below the 2080 Ti, could be good if he price is right, but availability is anyone's guess.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
128 (0.04/day)
Given Nvidia's own performance claims putting RTX 3060 Ti on par with RTX 3070 | RTX 2080 Ti, and that RX 5700 XT was between RTX 2070 and RTX 2070 Super, there is no reason not to believe that RX 6700 XT will compete with RTX 3070 | RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti.
RTX 3060Ti has only 38SM and RTX 3070 has 46SM, that's a 21% difference, that's not on par in performance but at least 10% behind.
RTX 3070 is 52% faster in 4K than RX 5700XT, so there is no reason to believe a 40CU N22 will perform on the same level, unless you believe the clockspeed will be over 2.6GHz.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,781 (0.71/day)
Given Nvidia's own performance claims putting RTX 3060 Ti on par with RTX 3070 | RTX 2080 Ti, and that RX 5700 XT was between RTX 2070 and RTX 2070 Super, there is no reason not to believe that RX 6700 XT will compete with RTX 3070 | RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti.

Uhm rtx3060ti is claimed to be slightly faster than 2080Super like rtx3070 is to 2080ti, there's still a 16% performance gap between the two. But rx6800 has 1.5 times more shaders than rumored rx6700xt and that is just 6% faster overall than rtx3070 on TPU's tests(Like rx6800 is ~52% faster than RX5700xt, which sounds too convenient).
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
128 (0.04/day)
Radeon RX 6700 XT with improved RDNA 2 architecture and much more efficient CUs will be on par with RTX 2080 Ti, while with considerably lower power consumption than the original RX 5700 XT.
40CU N22 won't be 50% faster than RX 5700XT to be on par with RTX 2080Ti. From the reviews of big navi, there doesn't seem to be any or very small IPC gain, so the performance would need to come from higher clockspeed and N22 won't have 50% higher clocks than RX 5700XT.
 
Last edited:

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
1,304 (3.68/day)
40CU N22 won't be 50% faster than RX 5700XT to be on par with RTX 2080Ti.

It doesn't need to be 50%, but only 34% faster:
1606208173572.png
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2019
Messages
116 (0.17/day)
System Name My PC
Processor AMD 2700 x @ 4.1Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming
Cooling Zalman CNPS20X
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX Black 32GB DDR4
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 570 PULSE
Storage Adata Ultimate SU800
Case Phanteks Eclipse P500A
Audio Device(s) Logitech G51
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX, 80+ Gold, 550W
Keyboard Roccat Vulcan 121
If it has 40 CU's only -it will be a large performance gap to 6800's 60 cu. AMd should probably release a 50 cu XT and a 40 cu non XT with room to release more cards downstream.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
1,304 (3.68/day)
Navi 21 shows 50-60% performance per watt improvement over Navi 10.


If it has 40 CU's only -it will be a large performance gap to 6800's 60 cu. AMd should probably release a 50 cu XT and a 40 cu non XT with room to release more cards downstream.

If clocks are not taken into consideration.
RX 6800 shows low performance for its specification - I don't know why, though.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
14,244 (6.16/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (34'' 3440x1440x)
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
Not too sure about this one...VRAM requirements are heavily exaggerated these days and its RT performance will not be enough to sway 3060/Ti/70 buyers, especially for Cyberpunk. Will have to be shoved down one budget tier at least (300-350 dollars) to duke it out with the 3050

Mhm, you keep believing son.

AMD is not putting 12GB on cards lower than last year's top end 11GB 2080ti for giggles.

They do it because consoles have a similar amount and games are hardly even ports anymore, its more unified development now than it ever was. It may be hard to believe, but Nvidia might run out of capacity sooner than you can blink. Even the shittiest early console launchgame already wants over 9 GB for 4K (Godfall).

I'm sure they will find a way (driver) around it like they've always done, but it won't benefit performance. There's also still a rabbit in the hat with RTX IO.

Whatever way it develops... its very clear VRAM requirements are going to increase across the board, as they have in the past few generations already. Since Maxwell we have 2,5x the VRAM already (4 > 10GB) and that is only counting the lowest increase on x80 GPUs. With this AMD release, that will expand to 3x. You're living in fantasy land if you think this is just for marketing purposes.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
800 (0.49/day)
AMD is doing to Nvidia in regards to memory what it did to Intel in regards to cores. They are putting products with significantly more VRAM on the market, which encourages devs to make use of it. This in turn is going to put long term pressure on Nvidia as more and more games take advantage of that memory (like Godfall for example). It's a bigger deal for Nvidia as their architecture is far more reliant on fast memory, so adding more is expensive. Not to mention, the signaling requirements. See how close those GDDR6X chips are to the die? To be honest Nvidia should have added more VRAM to it's chips anyways. It's been 3 generations and if you upgrade from a 1080 Ti to a 3080 you are actually loosing 1GB, which is ridiculous. Both have similar launch prices. It's going to be pretty embarrising if AMD's entry level cards have as much VRAM as the 3080.

Not too sure about this one...VRAM requirements are heavily exaggerated these days and its RT performance will not be enough to sway 3060/Ti/70 buyers, especially for Cyberpunk. Will have to be shoved down one budget tier at least (300-350 dollars) to duke it out with the 3050

In the same way that the 1060 3GB was appealing. Might look nice for a year or two until the lack of VRAM kicks in and performance is trashed as a result.

Cyberpunk uses 10GB of VRAM with RT on. Not sure how that will play out on cards with 6-8GB.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
2,987 (0.69/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Mhm, you keep believing son.

AMD is not putting 12GB on cards lower than last year's top end 11GB 2080ti for giggles.

They do it because consoles have a similar amount and games are hardly even ports anymore, its more unified development now than it ever was. It may be hard to believe, but Nvidia might run out of capacity sooner than you can blink. Even the shittiest early console launchgame already wants over 9 GB for 4K (Godfall).

I'm sure they will find a way (driver) around it like they've always done, but it won't benefit performance. There's also still a rabbit in the hat with RTX IO.

Whatever way it develops... its very clear VRAM requirements are going to increase across the board, as they have in the past few generations already. Since Maxwell we have 2,5x the VRAM already (4 > 10GB) and that is only counting the lowest increase on x80 GPUs. With this AMD release, that will expand to 3x. You're living in fantasy land if you think this is just for marketing purposes.

I wonder if their memory bandwith cant make up for the memory deficit.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
128 (0.04/day)
I wonder if their memory bandwith cant make up for the memory deficit.
If a game needs 10GB Vram and your card has only 8GB then 2GB of data will have to be loaded from the system memory RAM, so in that case It won't matter how fast your Vram bandwidth is, because you are not loading the last 2GB of data from the Vram but RAM.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
1,176 (0.36/day)
Location
Romania
System Name "No name"
Processor Ryzen 2700X 50Th Anniversary Edition
Motherboard X570 AORUS Elite
Cooling Noctua U12P
Memory 16GB 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 Ti
Storage Adata 512GB SSD, WD30PURX
Display(s) AOC CQ32G1
Case SilentiumPC Signum SG1V EVO TG ARGB
Audio Device(s) ALC Codec + Maudio AV32 and Fiio E10k + Audiotehnica TAD 400
Power Supply Seasonic G650 650W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard Asus Strix MX Brown
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Now THIS is what I'm talkin' about. I'm excited. Hope it turns out to be true AND affordable/readily available...
Yup, at this point for me, price and availability is all that matters.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
1,741 (0.49/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600X@95W
Motherboard MSI B450 Tomahawk MAX
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx 400 Black
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G373C7K@3333MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 5700 Pulse 8GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 120GB, INTEL 540S SSDSCKKW180H6 180GB, Samsung F1 1TB, Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Zalman Z550
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 sp1 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit
Benchmark Scores CB R15 64bit: single core 173p, multicore 1306p
A smaller infinity cache in Navi22 of what the Navi21 has could make it work for the smaller bandwidth than the Navi10. And efficiency and much higher clockspeeds could make 6700XT match or slightly surpass 2080S performance in 1440P with low power draw for its performance. Which for $400 will be great but if sold for $450 it will be marginally good. Depends on the price of nVidia's 3060Ti ofc. 6700(XT) might become the new 7870 for AMD (budget friendly and great in power/efficiency chip back then).
 
Top