• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

PowerColor to Showcase Radeon RX Vega 56 Nano Edition at Computex

Joined
Sep 22, 2017
Messages
889 (2.41/day)
Likes
330
#1
Last month, the attendees at the AMD Ryzen 2000 series launch event in Munich spotted a miniature AMD graphics card. At the time, we thought it was PowerColor's rendition of the highly anticipated Radeon RX Vega Nano. However, the latest press release from the graphics card manufacturer stated otherwise. Apparently, the prototype that was on display in Munich was actually the RX Vega 56 Nano Edition. Unfortunately, PowerColor didn't reveal any technical information about the graphics card that we didn't know already. And so, we're back to the waiting game for a proper RX Vega Nano release.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
884 (0.27/day)
Likes
134
Location
Manteca, Ca
System Name Rebirth
Processor Intel i5 2500k @4.5Ghz
Motherboard Asus P8P67 Pro
Cooling Megahalem 120x25 x2 GT AP-15 Push/Pull
Memory 2x4Gb Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD7950 Vapor-X + MSI HD7950 TF3
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 120 SSD + Seagate 7200.12 1TB + 500gig WD + 3TB Hitachi
Display(s) X-Star Glossy DP2710
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar STX
Power Supply Antec CP-850
Software Microsoft Windows 8 Pro x64
#2
Not interested anymore unless this is a 7nm version.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
22,894 (5.58/day)
Likes
7,162
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,077 (0.89/day)
Likes
1,181
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Whaaaat Kiiiid
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.7GHz
Motherboard ASRock Z170 OC Formula
Cooling Corsair H115i AIO Cooler
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB DDR4
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SC2 @ 2012MHz
Storage Crucial MX300 512GB + OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
Display(s) 27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case NXZT Phantom 820
Audio Device(s) Logitech G933 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse Logitech G900
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXV: 13817, Cinebench: 1033
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
333 (0.40/day)
Likes
141
System Name My PC
Processor 4670K@4.4GHz
Motherboard Gryphon Z87
Cooling CM 212
Memory 2x8GB+2x4GB @2400GHz
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1425MHz OC+, 8GB
Storage Intel 530 SSD 480GB + Intel 510 SSD 120GB + 2x500GB hdd raid 1
Display(s) HP envy 32 1440p
Case CM Mastercase 5
Audio Device(s) Sbz Zxr
Power Supply Antec 620W
Mouse G502
Keyboard G910
Software Win 10 pro
#5
NIce for 299$..
 

Kinestron

New Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Messages
22 (0.11/day)
Likes
6
#6
We investigated, it wasn't a Nano but instead it was a Nano, and we were disappointed. That is how this story reads.

Are there any Nanos on the market right now, 56 or not? I'm not really looking(I would like to get it for $299 though) but don't think anyone has one yet so why the disappointment?
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
528 (0.80/day)
Likes
586
#7
So what's with this comment?
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10156445316744452&id=106063269451

"Not the "Nano" that we were expecting. :("
Well, I agree with them. For Vega Nano I kind of expected cherrypicked silicon at 1070 performance and ~170W of power consumption exactly 1 year ago :):

I'm also sure a Vega Nano with sub 170W and 1070+ performance is possible, but don't expect it at $399 but much more. Why? Because the Vega Nano lineup will probably have the best binned chips to have great performance at low power consumption - same story as with Fury Nano.
But this card looks like RX Vega 56 with short PCB and that is it ... That additional 6-pin connector is the source of my doubts ...
 
Last edited:

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,077 (0.89/day)
Likes
1,181
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Whaaaat Kiiiid
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.7GHz
Motherboard ASRock Z170 OC Formula
Cooling Corsair H115i AIO Cooler
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB DDR4
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SC2 @ 2012MHz
Storage Crucial MX300 512GB + OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
Display(s) 27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case NXZT Phantom 820
Audio Device(s) Logitech G933 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse Logitech G900
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXV: 13817, Cinebench: 1033
#8
We investigated, it wasn't a Nano but instead it was a Nano, and we were disappointed. That is how this story reads.

Are there any Nanos on the market right now, 56 or not? I'm not really looking(I would like to get it for $299 though) but don't think anyone has one yet so why the disappointment?
its we want Vega 64 Nano, doesnt matter if none exist, the original prototype shown by AMD is 64
 
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
562 (0.40/day)
Likes
220
#9
But this card looks like RX Vega 56 with short PCB and that is it ... :(
It's literally Powercolor's short PCB Vega 56 "Red Dragon" with the triple fan cooler replaced with a weaksauce one (and presumably a reduction in clocks to avoid throttling).

IMO they have made this specifically so uneducated buyers will think it's the ~150w Vega Nano that AMD showed last year, quite a scummy move.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
1,875 (0.69/day)
Likes
251
Location
So. Cal.
#10
While I hear you, being a new and one-off special that PowerColor worked and did their own R&D magic (not AMD) then I think for the exclusivity I might say at the $400 MSRP that the Vega 56 released at it has merit... If it has the perf/watt that makes it a good choice for the Mini ATX format/chassis. As long as it competes with GTX 1070's Single Fan Minis (aka: MSI, Gigabyte ITX ~$450) in that segment I see PowerColor has no reason to believe they should sell it for less than competition in the market.
 

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,077 (0.89/day)
Likes
1,181
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Whaaaat Kiiiid
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.7GHz
Motherboard ASRock Z170 OC Formula
Cooling Corsair H115i AIO Cooler
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB DDR4
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SC2 @ 2012MHz
Storage Crucial MX300 512GB + OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
Display(s) 27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case NXZT Phantom 820
Audio Device(s) Logitech G933 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse Logitech G900
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXV: 13817, Cinebench: 1033
#12
Yeah, that is not clear in the article. People don't read every article to know the backstory to every new article. Crazy, I know.
Everyone should know that by now
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
1,875 (0.69/day)
Likes
251
Location
So. Cal.
#15
I might also clarify that all DRAM prices are up since the Vega line came-out. That's a reason that a Vega like this is more pricey today, while so are the GDDR5 equipped cards. That said, again it's weighed against perf/watt (thermals) to say it the cost adder is justified. I've have to re-calculate what such total package cost are for GPU's based on such DRAM is still not at excess level and cost for AIB (AMD in the case of Vega) are not where they where in 2016-2017.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
2,353 (1.53/day)
Likes
1,194
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
#16
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
2,984 (4.77/day)
Likes
2,151
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - stock
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1060 Turbo 6GB ~ 2139 Mhz / 9.4 Gbps
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 1080p TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
#17
the original prototype shown by AMD is 64
I don't think they ever confirmed it was based on Vega 64. I don't think they said anything about it at all , other than showing that prototype.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
801 (0.23/day)
Likes
166
Location
I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
System Name 2 sys spec seperated by "|"
Processor R7 1700 @ 3.9| Xeon 2680
Motherboard Asrock B350M Pro 4 | HP Z620
Cooling Water | Air
Memory 64gb | 128 gb
Video Card(s) EK-FC - RX Vega 64 | quadro K4000\GTX970
Storage 960 Evo 500gb, 860 evo 1tb, PM871 256gb Many Intel SSD's, Seagate barracuda pro 8tb.
Display(s) AOC 28" 4K something
Case Corsair Carbide 88R
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Mouse G500
Keyboard TT Meka G1
Software Ubuntu 17.10
#18
While I hear you, being a new and one-off special that PowerColor worked and did their own R&D magic (not AMD) then I think for the exclusivity I might say at the $400 MSRP that the Vega 56 released at it has merit... If it has the perf/watt that makes it a good choice for the Mini ATX format/chassis. As long as it competes with GTX 1070's Single Fan Minis (aka: MSI, Gigabyte ITX ~$450) in that segment I see PowerColor has no reason to believe they should sell it for less than competition in the market.
200W for the 56 is possible in that form factor, but I doubt it'll be quiet at full blast.
What I CAN tell you is that a 290X at 280W and a Vega 64 at 300W with essentially identical coolers and you notice the average power consumption of the vega is much much lower.
In certain games the vega seems to not want to push, it does so much dynamic mumbo jumbo that I don't mind in most titles but the fastest pace fps games it does not always run full tilt for maximum fpsness.
nothing their driver software cannot fix :)

Having compared GTX1070TI (MSRP) and Vega56 near MSRP I must say the vega56 makes a really good choice, at those prices that is..
I have absolutely nothing bad to say about vega56, Vega64 ain't worth it (I paid GTX1070 price for mine, hence the reason why I have one) and I do not reccomend anyone buying a 64, go for the 56 if you're an amd fan, and consider the 56 if you consider 1070\1070ti.

If they can deliver up to 200W ~ in this form factor it's worth 450 $ easy, if they've gotten binned chips with lower voltages I say hell yes worth it.
90% of the Vega64 performance at 2/3rd of the power consumption
 

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,077 (0.89/day)
Likes
1,181
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Whaaaat Kiiiid
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.7GHz
Motherboard ASRock Z170 OC Formula
Cooling Corsair H115i AIO Cooler
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB DDR4
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SC2 @ 2012MHz
Storage Crucial MX300 512GB + OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
Display(s) 27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case NXZT Phantom 820
Audio Device(s) Logitech G933 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse Logitech G900
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXV: 13817, Cinebench: 1033
#19
I don't think they ever confirmed it was based on Vega 64. I don't think they said anything about it at all , other than showing that prototype.
It was going to be 64 cus like the last nano, they wouldnt downgrade
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
2,481 (1.00/day)
Likes
1,424
System Name Zimmer Frame Rates
Processor Intel i7 920 @ Stock speeds baby
Motherboard EVGA X58 3X SLI
Cooling True 120
Memory Corsair Vengeance 12GB
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 980 Ti Super JetStream
Storage Of course
Display(s) Crossover 27Q 27" 2560x1440
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Don't be silly
Power Supply XFX 650W Core
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Epic
#20
Either way... mid-May 2018, it's pretty hard to get excited about any Vega product now.
 
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
562 (0.40/day)
Likes
220
#21
I don't think they ever confirmed it was based on Vega 64. I don't think they said anything about it at all , other than showing that prototype.
The "prototype" shown at the Vega reveal was a Fury Nano with an updated shroud they threw together to make sure people knew there would be a Vega Nano down the line after a die shrink.

The idea of the eventual Vega Nano being a sub 200w Vega 64 is simply assumed due to the Fury Nano being a sub 200w Fury X.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
2,984 (4.77/day)
Likes
2,151
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - stock
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1060 Turbo 6GB ~ 2139 Mhz / 9.4 Gbps
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 1080p TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
#22
The "prototype" shown at the Vega reveal was a Fury Nano with an updated shroud they threw together to make sure people knew there would be a Vega Nano down the line after a die shrink.

The idea of the eventual Vega Nano being a sub 200w Vega 64 is simply assumed due to the Fury Nano being a sub 200w Fury X.
A 56 CU Vega would be much more appealing. It would maintain higher clocks and lower power consumption. And it would also be more appealing price wise.

Fury Nano didn't really make much sense since it would often throttle, if they were to base it on the Fury it would have probably had the same performance and it would have also been cheaper.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
1,350 (1.15/day)
Likes
413
System Name My all round PC
Processor i5 750
Motherboard ASUS P7P55D-E
Memory 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire 380 OC... sold, waiting for 480 with custom cooler
Storage 256GB Samsung SSD + 2Tb + 1.5Tb
Display(s) Samsung 40" A650 TV
Case Thermaltake Chaser mk-I Tower
Power Supply 425w Enermax MODU 82+
Software Windows 10
#23

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,077 (0.89/day)
Likes
1,181
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Whaaaat Kiiiid
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.7GHz
Motherboard ASRock Z170 OC Formula
Cooling Corsair H115i AIO Cooler
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB DDR4
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SC2 @ 2012MHz
Storage Crucial MX300 512GB + OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
Display(s) 27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case NXZT Phantom 820
Audio Device(s) Logitech G933 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse Logitech G900
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXV: 13817, Cinebench: 1033
#24
The "prototype" shown at the Vega reveal was a Fury Nano with an updated shroud they threw together to make sure people knew there would be a Vega Nano down the line after a die shrink.

The idea of the eventual Vega Nano being a sub 200w Vega 64 is simply assumed due to the Fury Nano being a sub 200w Fury X.
It was definetly not a fury nano in a nrw shroud the rare of the the pcb proves that.

The prototype was a final product
sapphire_radeon_rx_vega_nano_vs._vega_56.jpg

One is the prototype the other is a sapphire pcb vega
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
1,875 (0.69/day)
Likes
251
Location
So. Cal.
#25
Looking at the TDP I'd consider a 15-20% drop from the reference 56 at 210W perhaps achievable. Looking at what the R9 Fury TDP to what the original Nano was able to release as, was more about a 35% reduction in TDP. If this card comes in a 170-180W and can maintain performance with 5-8% level of the Vega 56, I could see it as good competitor to the GTX 1070 in the Mini ITX Single fan package.
 
Top