• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Price-Performance-Analysis for CPUs & GPUs

Useful: Yes or no?

  • Yes

    Votes: 18 72.0%
  • No

    Votes: 3 12.0%
  • More or less, feedback in topic

    Votes: 4 16.0%

  • Total voters
    25
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
17 (0.00/day)
Likes
2
Location
Germany
#1
Price-Performance-Analysis for CPUs, GPUs & RAM

Hi!

I like to give system builders a help, when it comes to buy or upgrads the system regarding CPU or graphic card(s).

How do CPUs and GPUs rank by performance? What about price-performance-ratio? Which GPU needs the most juice, which one is best while writing an email? This and much more is shown in several charts you will find by clicking one of the links below:

GPUs (post #1 German, post #3 newegg/English)
CPUs (chart #1: sort by performance, chart #2: sort by price-performance-ratio, not yet newegged)
DDR2-RAM | DDR3-RAM (chart #1: Performance default clocks, chart #2: Performance OC, chart #3: highest clocks, chart #4: price-performance-ratio, not yet newegged)

If you have questions concerning the charts or how the data is managed and how we come to those conclusions, I am glad to answer and to translate the relevant information for the non-German people here ;)

Best regards,

dracoonpit
 
Last edited:

dracoonpit

New Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
17 (0.00/day)
Likes
2
Location
Germany
#3
Another quick update: GTX 260 (SLI) and HD 4870 (CF) now included. Nvidia remains performance king, but comparing prices ..

For example, the 4870 is as fast as the GTX 260, but costs about 50 euros less than the GTX 260 (in Germany) which makes it 25% cheaper than a GTX 260. Another example: An 4870 CF setup matches a single GTX 260 comparing price performance ratio.
 

Paulieg

The Mad Moderator
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Messages
11,960 (3.03/day)
Likes
2,846
Location
Wherever I can find the iron.
Processor Haswell i7 4770K
Motherboard Gigabyte z79 UD5H Black Edition
Cooling Cryorig R1 Ultimate
Memory Gskill Trident DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) Asus 7970 Direct CU II
Storage Kingston Hyper Fury 240 SSD/ WD Black 640GB
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply XFX 650w
Software Win 7/Win 10 Tech preview
#4
You may not be getting much of a response since it isn't in english.
 

Kursah

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
10,945 (2.68/day)
Likes
5,055
Location
Missoula, MT, USA
System Name Kursah's Gaming Rig - Haswell Edition | Spartan Home Server 2015
Processor i7 4790k 4.0/4.8 @ 1.26v | i7 4790k 4.0/4.4 @ 1.18v - Both delidded w/CLU
Motherboard Asus Z87-Pro - BIOS 2103 | Asus Z87-Pro - BIOS 2103
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S Push-Pull | Cooler Master 212 EVO Stock - Using NT-H1 and AC MX-4
Memory 16GB (2x8) Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 CL11 | 32GB (4x8) G.Skill DDR3-1600 CL9
Video Card(s) MSI GTX980 Ti Gaming 6G LE @ Stock | Onboard Intel HD 4600
Storage 850EVO 250GB SSD, 960GB SSD, 1x2TB | 840 120GB SSD, RAID10 6x2TB (6TB) + 8TB Backup
Display(s) Samsung 32" TV IPS 1080p, Dell 23" U2312HM IPS 1080p | 19" 4:3 Dell LCD..mostly RDP.
Case Corsair 600C - Stock Fans on Low | Lian Li Lancool PC-K7 - Cougar fans
Audio Device(s) Aune T1 mk1 > AKG K553 Pro + HiFiMAN HE-350 (Equalizer APO + PeaceUI) | Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply EVGA 750G2 Modular + APC 1500VA UPS | EVGA KR500 80+ Bronze + CyberPowerPC 1000VA UPS
Mouse Logitech G502 | Dell USB Laser Mouse
Keyboard Logitech G15 rv2 | Dell USB Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 | Windows Server 2012 R2 (GUI Core,Hyper-V + VMs)
#5
It's definately interesting, I personally like W1Z's take on the same idea for the GPU end of the deal, it's quicker to read and understand, and gives a great point also. But you have a pretty good graph setup also, I just think it needs a baseline of what would be considered you get 100% of what you pay for, then have above and below that, not necessarily in-line with model numbers and such. Keep upthe great work man.

Also welcome to TPU! I look forward to seeing your project grow, I just hope you're willing to dedicate enough time to keep it updated for a while...projects like that need constant attention and updating, if you're going international markets you may have to do different graphs for different regions and such to keep accuracy and flaming down a tad, I don't know what your full project plans are or how many are involved, but it sure looks promising.

:toast:
 

dracoonpit

New Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
17 (0.00/day)
Likes
2
Location
Germany
#6
Thanks for feedback and the friendly words. :toast: At least all of you can compare the performances of the cards with the help of the charts - this information is region-free ;)

The threads are older than a year and are updated every month. At the beginning, we started with a baseline (took the lowest performance card as 100%) as you suggested. The problem: You can not compare cards (or CPUs also) among each other, only to the baseline you choose, in our case, the card with the lowest performance.

Thus we are now using an absolute number: The average FPS of a card gathered from 11 different Game benchmarks.

Quick example:
Average FPS HD3870: 37
Average FPS HD4850: 57
Average FPS HD4870: 70

Using your calcualtor you can do exact statements regarding differences in performance at a given resolution and quality-setting of course. The baseline is your "point of view".

Base HD3870 (100%): HD4850 54% faster - HD4870 89% faster.
Base HD4850 (100%): HD3870 35% slower - HD4870 23% faster.
Base HD4870 (100%): HD3870 47% slower - HD4850 19% slower.

Depending on which card you own or plan to upgrade, you could calculate the performance gains (or losses) which of course vary depending on the cards compared. With this information, you can pick you local prices and calculate, if performance gain meets money to spend. The price performance analysis, like we do it (best bang for the bucks) is another story and of course, prices vary from country to country.

I may do those charts for other regions too - but I do not know good foreign online price comparison sites. It would be very kind, if could show me a few. :)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
1,773 (0.48/day)
Likes
232
Location
Detroit, MI
Processor Intel i7 4790k
Motherboard Gigabyte z97X-Gaming 7
Memory 4x4GB Kingston/Micron DDR3 665mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) AMD HD7930
Storage Intel 180GB SSD (boot), Intel 240GB SSD, 2x Samsung 512GB SSD's, Hitachi 2TB HDD
Display(s) 27" Qnix PLS LCD @1440, 27" Samsung Syncmaster@1080, 24" HP EliteDisplay @1200
Power Supply Corsair Modular HX620w
Software Windows 10 Pro
#8
use newegg.com for price comparisons. Most people in the US use them.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
17 (0.00/day)
Likes
2
Location
Germany
#9
Hi,

Thanks. I will do an update next time also in English for the States with prices grabbed from newegg. :)

Other suggestions for pricegrabbers around the world?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
17 (0.00/day)
Likes
2
Location
Germany
#10
Hi again.

During the last update I wanted to do charts for you people here with prices grabbed from newegg.com. But: What is this "mail in rebate" about? I don't know this from Germany, it does not exist here. So everybody needs to send in such a form and then gets this low price? So what is the price I should do my calculations on?

Thx in advance for reply.
 

sneekypeet

Unpaid Babysitter
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
24,623 (5.78/day)
Likes
9,344
System Name His
Processor Intel i7 5930K
Motherboard Asus Maximus V Extreme
Cooling Thermalright True Spirit 140 BW Rev.A
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum ROG
Video Card(s) nVidia GTX 1080 SLI with EVGA Hybrid coolers.
Storage Samsung 960 Pro / Crucial MX300 750GB / Seagate 1TB Spinner
Display(s) Sony 43" 4K 60hz
Case SilverStone Temjin TJ11
Audio Device(s) Realtek on board > Sony receiver > Cerwin Vega's
Power Supply Thermaltake TPSG 1050W
Mouse Always Changing
Keyboard Always Changing
Software Windows 10 Pro 64
#11
personally I would go with the non mail in rebate pricing.

The way it works is you pay full price, fill out a form and send in the UPC from the box and HOPEFULLY you get your money back. Ususally most people dont get the MIR.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
17 (0.00/day)
Likes
2
Location
Germany
#13
And now they are! Please scroll down to post #3 for the English version. Please leave some feedback, comments, critics, whatever :)
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
17 (0.00/day)
Likes
2
Location
Germany
#14
Hi again,

the charts for graphics cards have been updated. There are now two charts, since our data-source has now updated the testing rig and benchmarks used.

CPU-Update will follow in a few days. :)
 

beesagtig

New Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
237 (0.07/day)
Likes
19
Processor E8400
Motherboard eVGA 780i
Cooling Xigmatec S1283
Memory 4gb OCZ Platinum
Video Card(s) XFX 9800GTX
Storage Seagate 500gb 32mb cache x 2
Display(s) Benq T22IW 1680X1050/Acer AL1716 1280X1024 x 2
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Intergrated
Power Supply CoolerMaster 650W Extreme SLI Ready
Software Vista Home Premium 64bit
#15
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
1,714 (0.46/day)
Likes
182
Processor Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard Asus P5Q-E
Cooling Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s) HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case Antec p180
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software Windows XP
#16
I don't know how the average was calculated, but I have to suggest you use baselines per each game before you calculate the average. Otherwise games with very high frames are almost the only ones contributing to the average. Example:

Game 1: card 1 = 200 fps, card 2 = 160 fps, difference 20%

Game 2: card 1 = 40 fps, card 2 = 50 fps, difference -20% or 20% in card 2's favor.

Simple average:

Card 1 = 120 fps
Card 2 = 105 fps

Difference 15% in card 1's favor. Clearly they should be tied, but the end result shows a clear advantage for the card 1. Introducing more samples won't change that issue, so the average performance is not what it should be, if that is the way the average was calculated. And judging the results and what you said in post #6 I guess that's the way you did it.

For example, that's why the HD4870 X2 is so ahead of the GTX280 in performance in your charts, when in reality is not so much faster. I don't have the time to look at every card, but I'm sure the issue is on all of them.

I will gladly vote this as VERY useful, when that changes and I trully think at heart it really is useful. But as it is now I don't think so.
 

dracoonpit

New Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
17 (0.00/day)
Likes
2
Location
Germany
#17
Charts updated again. As you suggested, I used your feedback for the new cpu charts. newwegg/australian prices not yet updated - sorry.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2005
Messages
4,640 (1.01/day)
Likes
415
Location
Toronto, Canada
System Name old school / new school
Processor 3.0e C0 @ 3.6 / e5200
Motherboard p4p800e-dlx / p5q-DLX
Cooling custom water see sig / air
Memory 2x1g oczPC4000EbPl / 2x2g ocz2rpr1066
Video Card(s) 3850AGP / 4890vaporX
Storage 36g raptor+120g wd / wd 1001fals 1tb
Display(s) BenQ / sharpAQUOS LC-37D64U
Case modded antec plusview / generic
Audio Device(s) audigy 2zs / ASUS Xonar HDAV1.3
Power Supply fan/cable modded powerstream 520 / OCZ 700mxsp
Software Xp pro SP2 / VISTA ultimate OEM
#18
You may not be getting much of a response since it isn't in english.
google translator work's pretty good most of the time :toast: