• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Principled Technologies' Response to Allegations of Horse Manure Data Disingenuous

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
35,745 (8.87/day)
Likes
18,207
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Crypto-plague Survival Kit
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame GTX 1070 Ti Vulcan X
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB + Intel SSD320 120GB + Patriot WildFire 120GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
#1
Principled Technologies Wednesday published its first response to allegations of flawed and misleading "independent" comparison between the $319 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and the 66% pricier $530 (pre-order price) Intel Core i9-9900K, which Intel used in its launch event to woo gamers and investors. In its response, the company elaborated on the reasons why it tested the AMD chip with memory and cooler settings reputed hardware reviewers found sub-optimal. "One goal of this study was to test the CPUs and their graphics subsystems, not the GPUs, so we ran the tests at the most common gaming resolution (62.06%), 1920×1080," reads the response, touting a foregone conclusion that gamers with $500 8-core processors still game at 1920 x 1080. We get that they, like every CPU reviewer, are trying to simulate a CPU-limited scenario, but to justify their settings with Steam Hardware Survey data as "the most common resolution," is a disingenuous argument.

We next see Principled Technologies justify the use of NH-U14S TR4-SP3 cooler on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX. Noctua, in its own TDP Guide for this cooler, states that 250W TDP (which also happens to be the TDP of the 2990WX), is the design limit of this air cooler, and goes as far as to mention that an additional NF-A15 fan, which is not included with the cooler, is recommended to be able to "increase Precision Boost headroom," implying that out of the box, the cooler is already bottlenecking the 2990WX. The Core i9-9980XE, on the other hand, has a rated TDP of 165W, and Noctua provides no additional guidance for 165W TDP Core X family processors, such as the Core i9-7980XE. Principled Technologies' reasoning for memory configuration proves they either continue to lack basic knowledge on AMD Ryzen memory controller limitations, or are deliberately disregarding it in an attempt to cripple AMD chips.



The Principled Technologies response contains no explanation as to why they used four memory modules, or a 4-module + dual-rank module configuration for mainstream desktop processors that feature dual-channel memory controllers. It has been common knowledge for close to two years now, that AMD Ryzen processors offer stunted performance when saddled with dual-rank memory modules, more so when all four memory slots of the motherboard are populated.

Simply mentioning the DRAM clock as 2933 MHz doesn't even paint half the picture. AMD platform motherboard BIOSes are programmed to automatically find stable memory timings for a given memory clock. Principled Technologies is quick to justify using the Wraith Prism cooler for the Ryzen 7 2700X "because AMD says so," but the same AMD document (Reviewer's Guide) that recommends Wraith Prism also provides a detailed account on the limitations of Ryzen's memory controllers. The controllers cannot handle 4-module + dual-rank configurations above DDR4-1866, 4-module single-rank (effectively dual-rank) above DDR4-2400, without severely loosening up memory timings to compensate for lack of stability.

2-module single-rank is not only an AMD-recommended configuration, but also 16 GB remains an overwhelmingly more popular memory amount than 32 GB vide Steam Hardware Survey (the same survey they used to justify 1080p game testing). In 2-module single-rank, a Ryzen processor will let you spool memory clocks all the way up to DDR4-3400, and memory modules exist that achieve that clock with reasonably tight timings.



It's good that Principled Technologies admitted the crime they committed testing the Ryzen 7 2700X with half its cores effectively disabled using the "game mode" toggle in Ryzen Master that no CPU reviewer tests with, and offer to re-test the processor. We wish that while they're at it, they also update their Ryzen Master utility to re-test the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX with Dynamic Local Mode. The comparison with the re-badged Core i9-9980XE significantly will change.

Comparing a $319 processor with a 66% pricier $530 processor is disingenuous to begin with, and the only way you'll find out if the i9-9900K offers that much more performance is to wait for reviews from independent sources. So far there's none.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
23,171 (5.61/day)
Likes
7,341
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
100 (0.17/day)
Likes
41
Location
Tanagra
#4
Seems like they should have just invited a few reputable tech sites over for some hands-on testing. Instead, they contract an obscure company with a bizarre and confusing website. Ironically, Principled Technologies promotes a book “Limit Your Greed,” which even says “nobody wins unless everybody wins.”

Reminds me of CTS-labs debacle. Go visit their website. Under available publications, it only has “AMDFlaws (3/12/2018) - Publication Summary Coming Soon...”
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,951 (1.91/day)
Likes
1,343
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#5
Those idiots are getting too much advertisement recently.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
3,475 (0.99/day)
Likes
723
System Name Money Hole
Processor Core i7 970
Motherboard Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
Cooling Noctua UH-D14
Memory 2133Mhz 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin 998991
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X
Storage Samsung 1TB 850 Evo
Display(s) 3x Acer KG240A 144hz
Case CM HAF 932
Audio Device(s) ADI (onboard)
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
#7
@btarunr PT is an Intel funded consortium much like Sysmark is.

tl;dr: Intel is required to say that benchmarks that favor their stuff unfairly with certain words per FCC settlement of AMD v Intel. Said phrase is found at the end of the PT document. It wasn't an accident. It was Intel up to their old shit again.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,951 (1.91/day)
Likes
1,343
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#8
Horse manure? :laugh::laugh::laugh:
That's the official word for "turd", or better..."bull shit" ? :roll:
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2018
Messages
64 (0.23/day)
Likes
35
#9
"One goal of this study was to test the CPUs and their graphics subsystems, not the GPUs, so we ran the tests at the most common gaming resolution (62.06%), 1920×1080," reads the response, touting a foregone conclusion that gamers with $500 8-core processors still game at 1920 x 1080.

Off topic using this as reference, if you play at any higher res than 1080p (specially 4K), then you don't need a $500 CPU since the GPU will be the bottleneck and having an expensive CPU wont give you more FPS right? As the res increases you should spend more in GPU and less in CPU right? Does it make any sense or I got it wrong?
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
508 (0.18/day)
Likes
124
#10
They also wrote that they opted to use stock coolers on processors that had them included.

And since Intel processors doesn't ship with coolers anymore, they used a Noctua cooler lol.

Have a guess which processors were throttling because of thermal limits of a stock coolers.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
1,145 (0.23/day)
Likes
402
Location
66 feet from the ground
System Name 2nd AMD puppy
Processor Phenom II x4 BE 970-3.6 Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory 16 Gb DDR3:8GB Kingston HyperX Beast + 8Gb G.Skill Sniper(by courtesy of tabascosauz &TPU)
Video Card(s) MSI HD6850 Cyclone;860/1100 Mhz
Storage SSD-840 pro 128 Gb;Seagate 500Gb;WD-1Tb
Display(s) Samsung 2032BW
Case NZXT 820 PHANTOM
Audio Device(s) Audigy SE with Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Cooleer Master RP M520
Mouse Razer copperhead / Gamdias zeus (by courtesy of sneekypeet & TPU)
Keyboard MS Sidewinder x4
Software win7 64bit sp1
Benchmark Scores irrelevant for me
#11
now if they "re-make" the testing it will be foolish from their side to present the real numbers... i expect to see a small improvement only ; is the only way to keep credibility for them...
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
644 (1.03/day)
Likes
223
Processor i7-6700k
Motherboard asus z170i pro gaming
Cooling ekwb custom loop for cpu/gpu running on d5 and 480 rad
Memory 2*16gb ddr4-2400
Video Card(s) msi geforce gtx 1080 ti aero
Storage 250gb 950 pro, 2*500gb samsung 850 evo
Display(s) asus pg279q, eizo ev2736w
Case thermaltake core p5
Power Supply seasonic platinum 660
Mouse logitech g700
Keyboard corsair k60
#12
Offtopic:
Off topic using this as reference, if you play at any higher res than 1080p (specially 4K), then you don't need a $500 CPU since the GPU will be the bottleneck and having an expensive CPU wont give you more FPS right? As the res increases you should spend more in GPU and less in CPU right? Does it make any sense or I got it wrong?
Oh, you will. I currently have an i5-8400 in my gaming box and it tends to occasionally bottleneck GTX 2080 at 1440p and Ultra Settings. There are even built-in benchmarks showing that - Shadow of Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4 and Gears of War 4 as some examples from what I tried recently. It is very game-specific though, most games tend to favor just 2-4 fast threads.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
6,272 (4.20/day)
Likes
5,113
Location
Duiven, Netherlands
Processor i7 8700k 4.8Ghz @ 1.31v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
#13
"One goal of this study was to test the CPUs and their graphics subsystems, not the GPUs, so we ran the tests at the most common gaming resolution (62.06%), 1920×1080," reads the response, touting a foregone conclusion that gamers with $500 8-core processors still game at 1920 x 1080.

Off topic using this as reference, if you play at any higher res than 1080p (specially 4K), then you don't need a $500 CPU since the GPU will be the bottleneck and having an expensive CPU wont give you more FPS right? As the res increases you should spend more in GPU and less in CPU right? Does it make any sense or I got it wrong?
You got it exactly right, but even here on TPU and in many other places people persist in saying 1080p means you have an i3 and a 1060 or something.

Even Steam Survey still showing an overwhelming (!) amount of sub 1440p gamers is 'not relevant enough' somehow. And here's the kicker: on Steam Survey, many of the 'ultrawide' resolutions you see are people who use two separate screens side by side and only game on one ;) Its also completely not true that virtually every gaming oriented monitor out these days is first and foremost high refresh rate even before high resolution... :D

Oh well. Its an editorial disguised as news, let's just keep it at that I guess... The gist of it is still sound.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
553 (0.91/day)
Likes
160
Location
Italy
Processor i7 2600K
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/Gen 3
Cooling ZeroTherm FZ120
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4x4GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 6G Gaming X
Storage Samsung 830 Pro 256GB + WD Caviar Blue 1TB
Display(s) Samsung PX2370 + Acer AL1717
Case Antec 1200 v1
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster X G5
Power Supply Enermax Modu87+ 800W
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Logitech G513
#14
If i was them i'd go putting my head under the sand for good. They fkd up EVERYTHING and they still have the courage to even say a word. The old man interviewed by gamers nexus was utterly ridiculous, and he's one of the founders, i guess he's some kind of expert in damage control stuff, i can't imagine how good the others are at doing damage control, rofl.
 
Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
4,308 (3.45/day)
Likes
1,665
Processor Intel i5-6600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 G.Skill
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 128 and 256GB OCZ Vertex4, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Chieftec BX01
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
#15
I've been reading CPU benchmarks for 20 years and never have I seen a more finicky CPU than these Ryzens. Also, testing gaming performance in gaming mode being a downside is really out there.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
644 (1.03/day)
Likes
223
Processor i7-6700k
Motherboard asus z170i pro gaming
Cooling ekwb custom loop for cpu/gpu running on d5 and 480 rad
Memory 2*16gb ddr4-2400
Video Card(s) msi geforce gtx 1080 ti aero
Storage 250gb 950 pro, 2*500gb samsung 850 evo
Display(s) asus pg279q, eizo ev2736w
Case thermaltake core p5
Power Supply seasonic platinum 660
Mouse logitech g700
Keyboard corsair k60
#16
I've been reading CPU benchmarks for 20 years and never have I seen a more finicky CPU than these Ryzens. Also, testing gaming performance in gaming mode being a downside is really out there.
Game Mode on 2700X is a dick move on PT part. This simply cannot be anything other than malicious compliance. They have enough experience and they should know precisely what it does.
Having Game Mode even available for 2700X is an interesting decision on AMD's part though.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
6,272 (4.20/day)
Likes
5,113
Location
Duiven, Netherlands
Processor i7 8700k 4.8Ghz @ 1.31v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
#17
I've been reading CPU benchmarks for 20 years and never have I seen a more finicky CPU than these Ryzens. Also, testing gaming performance in gaming mode being a downside is really out there.
Its typical AMD, add tons of options and features but forget to restrict them to the use cases where they shine. Total control in the hands of the user, even in obviously counterproductive situations. On the one hand, commendable, and on the other, incredibly stupid and above all: lazy.

Having Game Mode even available for 2700X is an interesting decision on AMD's part though.
Interesting... or a major, easily correctable mistake, of the type AMD has a long history of.
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
10,736 (2.87/day)
Likes
15,144
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Devil
Processor Core i7-4790k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASUS Z97 Deluxe
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F CPU cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Mushkin Redline DDR-3 1866
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080Ti Gaming X
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 2x 2TB WD Black; 1x4TB WD Black;1x 2TB WD Green (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
#18
“Limit Your Greed,” which even says “nobody wins unless everybody wins.”
Awww, how cute. I guess their company leaders grew up in the “competition and hard work are evil” era, where “everybody gets a trophy.”
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2018
Messages
64 (0.23/day)
Likes
35
#19
You got it exactly right, but even here on TPU and in many other places people persist in saying 1080p means you have an i3 and a 1060 or something.

Even Steam Survey still showing an overwhelming (!) amount of sub 1440p gamers is 'not relevant enough' somehow. And here's the kicker: on Steam Survey, many of the 'ultrawide' resolutions you see are people who use two separate screens side by side and only game on one ;) Its also completely not true that virtually every gaming oriented monitor out these days is first and foremost high refresh rate even before high resolution... :D
I can not say about developed countries, but in the third world most people play in 1080p with i3 and 1060 class because that is the highest they can afford.

I believe that a lot of gamers play in 60 Hz TVs (either 1080p or 4K) than in high refresh rates monitors, specially in the third world these monitors are not popular at all. Would be a nice idea that the next TPU poll were if you play above 60 Hz or not.

Offtopic:
Oh, you will. I currently have an i5-8400 in my gaming box and it tends to occasionally bottleneck GTX 2080 at 1440p and Ultra Settings. There are even built-in benchmarks showing that - Shadow of Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4 and Gears of War 4 as some examples from what I tried recently. It is very game-specific though, most games tend to favor just 2-4 fast threads.
2080 is the second fastest GPU and at 1440p is not a bottleneck for CPU sometimes.
Do you have a high refresh rate monitor? If not, what is the point of higher FPS.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
1,089 (0.41/day)
Likes
530
Processor Core i7 7820X @ 4.8GHz
Motherboard Asrock Taichi XE
Cooling Custom loop
Memory 4x8GB Corsair Vengence LED @3000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Aorus GTX 1080 Ti @ +25core +400mem
Storage 960 EVO 1TB, Micron 1100 2TB SSD, OCZ Vector 512GB, 750GB Samsung, 1.5TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Acer XB270HU, Qnix QX2710
Case Corsair Carbide 500R White
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX, Corsair Void Pro RGB
Power Supply EVGA P2 850W
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard Razer Black Widow Ultimate 2016 Edition
Software Win 10 x64
#20
@btarunr PT is an Intel funded consortium much like Sysmark is.

tl;dr: Intel is required to say that benchmarks that favor their stuff unfairly with certain words per FCC settlement of AMD v Intel. Said phrase is found at the end of the PT document. It wasn't an accident. It was Intel up to their old shit again.
Did you know that AMD has commissioned them for work in the past as well? While I can see and agree with everyone taking issue with their testing (under Intel's guidance mind you), it's hardly fair to also paint them as wholly funded by Intel when they are indeed an independent shop.
 
Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
4,308 (3.45/day)
Likes
1,665
Processor Intel i5-6600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 G.Skill
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 128 and 256GB OCZ Vertex4, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Chieftec BX01
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
#21
I can not say about developed countries, but in the third world most people play in 1080p with i3 and 1060 class because that is the highest they can afford.

I believe that a lot of gamers play in 60 Hz TVs (either 1080p or 4K) than in high refresh rates monitors, specially in the third world these monitors are not popular at all. Would be a nice idea that the next TPU poll were if you play above 60 Hz or not.



2080 is the second fastest GPU and at 1440p is not a bottleneck for CPU sometimes.
Do you have a high refresh rate monitor? If not, what is the point of higher FPS.
Yes, tech enthusiasts have a tendency to grow into a bubble where everything they read about is what people everywhere must be using. And everything is available at US pricing.
 
Joined
May 11, 2016
Messages
199 (0.22/day)
Likes
72
#22
PT seems like much more of a marketing firm than benchmarker. Even in their own advertising they make their service offering and niche pretty clear. Also, that they have done reviews in the past for AMD does not change this at all. It just means that AMD has used them for friendly marketing advertising/tests before too.

Most techie folks understand that just about any freshman college IT student could fairly easily run a benchmark. It's not rocket science. About the only hurdle to anyone starting their own benchmark company is just financial access to acquire (at least temporarily) the hardware to test. Setting up a PC to bios defaults, running a benchmark, and recording the results, is something I could have easily done at 13-14 years old as just a semi-techie kid. So the bar is pretty low. And with anything, when you hire what claims to be a 16 year professional corporation to perform what is a fairly simple task, they open themselves up to a lot of negative attention when they mess up. And there were at least 3 or 4 bad oversights/questionable decisions in this testing. Probably not a company I'll focus on when looking at benchmarks for my next CPU purchasing decision.

Intel shares some of this blame too. What it looks they were aiming to do in the first place is disappointing.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
3,475 (0.99/day)
Likes
723
System Name Money Hole
Processor Core i7 970
Motherboard Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
Cooling Noctua UH-D14
Memory 2133Mhz 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin 998991
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X
Storage Samsung 1TB 850 Evo
Display(s) 3x Acer KG240A 144hz
Case CM HAF 932
Audio Device(s) ADI (onboard)
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
#23
Did you know that AMD has commissioned them for work in the past as well? While I can see and agree with everyone taking issue with their testing (under Intel's guidance mind you), it's hardly fair to also paint them as wholly funded by Intel when they are indeed an independent shop.
They're about as independent as Sysmark is. In that Intel supplies the software engineers. AMD, nVidia, and VIA were all also part of Sysmark. We all know how biased Sysmark is, PT is nothing more then Sysmark with a new face.

Is PT owned by Intel? Of course not! They just supply PT with all the software engineers.
 
Top