• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Probable Radeon HD 8000 Series GPU Specifications Surface

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
41,883 (8.18/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
AMD's Radeon HD 8000 "Sea Islands" family of GPUs may arrive some time in Q2-2013, but they won't arrive without a specifications overhaul. While NVIDIA is counting on performance enhancements to come out of higher clock speeds on existing silicon, while maintaining current (or lower) power-draw, with its "Enhanced Kepler" family of GPUs that will include the "GK110" juggernaut, AMD is counting on physically bigger chips with more components. AMD could step up transistor counts of its chips by as much as 20 percent, on existing 28 nm process.

According to a report, the biggest chip from AMD's fold could pack 5.1 billion transistors, amounting to 2560 stream processors, and an updated raster processing engine, with 48 ROPs ("Tahiti" has 32). While the Radeon HD 8970 maxes out the chip's capabilities, the HD 8950 could feature 256 fewer stream processors, at 2304. It could also go light on the clock speeds. AMD's performance-segment chip, codenamed "Sun" could see a similar stream processor increase to 1792, with the Radeon HD 8870 maxing it out, and HD 8850 featuring 1536. It maintains the memory bus width and raster engine layout of its predecessor.

AMD's mainstream chip, codenamed "Oland," which succeeds "Cape Verde," could address the problem of memory bandwidth, which is giving competing NVIDIA GPUs an upper hand in its segment. It could feature 896 stream processors, and a wider 192-bit GDDR5 memory interface. The Radeon HD 8770 maxes its specifications out, while the Radeon HD 8750 features a slimmer 128-bit memory interface, and 768 stream processors. The authenticity of this information can't be vouched for, but presents the only way in which AMD can end up with a competitive GPU lineup against NVIDIA, over 2013.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:

v12dock

Block Caption of Rainey Street
Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
1,919 (0.41/day)
System Name Computer
Processor 1700X
Motherboard CH6
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory G.Skill 32GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1070
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 Evo Msata
Display(s) LG 23" IPS
Power Supply Seasonic 760 Platinum
Software Windows 8.1 64-Bit
Interesting match against GK110 it seems to be a match against architecture scalability
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
1,929 (0.54/day)
Location
Sydney NSW, Australia
System Name Белая коробка | Alienware 13R3 | Asus T300 Chi | Synology DS418 w/ 4X8TB WD Red | iPhone 12
Processor Intel Core i9-10850K | Intel i7-7700HQ
Motherboard MSi Z490i Unify | Dell/Alienware thing
Cooling NZXT X63 w/ Arctic P14 fans | Double fan
Memory Crucial 2X16GB Ballistix White RGB DDR4 3600mhz | DDR4 2X8GB 2400mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080 VISION | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB, Samsung 860 QVO 2TB | 256gb M.2 SSD, 1TB Intel 760p
Display(s) Gigabyte G34WQC 34" UWQHD 144Hz VA & TIEM 32" QHD 165Hz VA | 13" 1080p IPS & Sony X90J 65" 4K TV
Case Lian Li Q58 White PCIe4.0 | Alienware 13R3
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X3 (HiFiMAN HE-4XX & Sennheiser HD 6XX) | onboard sound -Onkyo 808 Receiver
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum | Dell 180W brick
Mouse Roccat Burst Pro | Roccat Kain 202
Keyboard DIY Geek 64 PCB (Kailh Box Silent Pink - Matcha XDA Keycaps) | Red Square OLD SCHOOL TKL
Software Windows 10 Home | Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores 2018 BMW 125i F20 LCI-2 | M-Sport | Sunset Orange | Shadow Line | Sunroof
Hmm the 8950 looks like it could quite easily match the 8970 providing it can be overclocked nicely.
 
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
4,092 (0.84/day)
Location
Iowa, USA
System Name FUTURE CUBE!
Processor intel Core i5 6600k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z170X-Gaming 7
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE BK
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 3000 Mhz C15 32GB 2x16GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Aorus 1080 Ti
Storage 2x M.2 Samsung Evo 250GB/500GB / WD Blue 500GB / 2x RAID1 Toshiba P300 3TB
Display(s) Samsung C24FG70 1080p 144hz Quantum Dot/ASUS VH226H 1080p 21.5"
Case "THE CUBE" Custom built, pure Red Alder wood
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Core3D/ Logitech Z-2300 200 watts/ Beyerdynamic DT 880
Power Supply Seasonic X Gold 650W
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro
Can't wait its always my favourite time of the year when W1zz does hos reviews on new GPU's. Also these will be out around my bday :)
 
Joined
Oct 16, 2012
Messages
709 (0.22/day)
Location
Malaysia
System Name Cypher-C4
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard MSI B450 Tomahawk Max
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory 32GB Crucial Ballistix Elite 3200MHz
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 1060 Jetstream 6GB
Storage 250GB Crucial MX500 + 2TB Crucial MX500 + 2TB WD Black + 4TB Toshiba + 1TB Samsung F3
Display(s) Acer XV272UP
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D
Audio Device(s) Behringher UMC202HD Audio Interface + Mackie HM-4 + Sennheiser HD 280 Pro + Shure SM58
Power Supply Corsair HX750i
Mouse Steelseries Rival 310
Keyboard Keychron K8 + Kailh BOX Crystal Jade switches + Ducky Good in Blue keycaps
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Thanks for the great news. If the 8000 series is really what I've been hoping for, then I can't wait to get my hands on an HD8950. Coming from a GTX460 to an 8950 is probably the best jump in performance and performance per dollars I've been hoping for :). But let's not get carried away, there is still pricing. I'll almost never spend more than $350 for a video card :shadedshu
 

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,480 (0.72/day)
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Whaaaat Kiiiiiiid!
Processor Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 AORUS Ultra
Cooling Corsair H150i AIO Cooler
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Zotac GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Triple Fan @ 2040MHz
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512GB + Crucial MX300 512GB + OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
Display(s) 27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, + 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case Thermaltake Core X9 Snow
Audio Device(s) Logitech G935 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse Logitech G903 Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G915
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXV: 19329
Last edited:

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,480 (0.72/day)
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Whaaaat Kiiiiiiid!
Processor Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 AORUS Ultra
Cooling Corsair H150i AIO Cooler
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Zotac GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Triple Fan @ 2040MHz
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512GB + Crucial MX300 512GB + OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
Display(s) 27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, + 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case Thermaltake Core X9 Snow
Audio Device(s) Logitech G935 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse Logitech G903 Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G915
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXV: 19329
that chart lost credibility as soon as I saw 140 tmus for 8950
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,901 (0.76/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
The only way that AMD can remain competitive... :laugh:

Who are these jokers? :nutkick:
 
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
1,742 (0.38/day)
Location
on top of that big mountain on mars(Romania)
System Name ( . Y . )
that chart lost credibility as soon as i saw 140 tmus for 8950

+1
and 16 rops with 192 bits for 8770 doesn't make much sense to me not with those low gpu clocks.
Bandwidth calculation for 8900 series its also way off.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
225 (0.05/day)
Processor Phenom II X4 965 BE @4 GHz | NB @2600 MHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 2x 8GB PC12800 @1600 MHz CL7 1T
Video Card(s) Gigabyte HD 7950
Storage 2 x 500 GB -- HD502HJ & WD5000AACS-00ZUB0
Display(s) Iiyama Prolite E2202WS_WVS
Case Corsair Obsidian 550D
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D2 w/ Z-5500
Power Supply Seasonic X-750
Mouse Logitech B100
Keyboard Logitech G15 (blue backlight)
Software Windows 7 - SP1 x64
♫♪ Oland... Oland, I behlieve ! Oland... to de dream... ♫


:D
 

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,813 (1.94/day)
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Pandemic 2020
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 "Gen 2" 2600X
Motherboard AsRock X470 Killer Promontory
Cooling CoolerMaster 240 RGB Master Cooler (Newegg Eggxpert)
Memory 32 GB Geil EVO Portenza DDR4 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS Radeon RX 580 DirectX 12 DUAL-RX580-O8G 8GB 256-Bit GDDR5 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video C
Storage WD 250 M.2, Corsair P500 M.2, OCZ Trion 500, WD Black 1TB, Assorted others.
Display(s) ASUS MG24UQ Gaming Monitor - 23.6" 4K UHD (3840x2160) , IPS, Adaptive Sync, DisplayWidget
Case Fractal Define R6 C
Audio Device(s) Realtek 5.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RMX 850 Platinum PSU (Newegg Eggxpert)
Mouse Razer Death Adder
Keyboard Corsair K95 Mechanical & Corsair K65 Wired, Wireless, Bluetooth)
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Agreed Guru. AMD is still competitive. Each company upends the other when they release new hardware. A shame AMD doesn't see how Nvidia does stuff and then emulate that to an extent. I think predictive branch and that shader clock really helps them out.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
528 (0.13/day)
Location
Inside a mini ITX
System Name ITX Desktop
Processor Core i7 9700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus Pro WiFi Z390
Cooling Arctic esports 34 duo.
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2070 Gaming OC White PRO
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus | Intel SSD 660p
Case NZXT H200
Power Supply Corsair CX Series 750 Watt
According to a report, the biggest chip from AMD's fold could pack 5.1 billion transistors

This chip will be competing with GK110 that has 7.1 Billion transistors. It'll be hard for AMD to beat NVIDIA unless this chip is super efficient. Even if it matches GK110 in gaming performance, GK110 will be much faster in computing tasks.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,649 (0.85/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 500GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
This chip will be competing with GK110 that has 7.1 Billion transistors. It'll be hard for AMD to beat NVIDIA unless this chip is super efficient. Even if it matches GK110 in gaming performance, GK110 will be much faster in computing tasks.
It is evident in the GTX 680 that computing performance makes no difference for 99% of customers ;)
Since the main use for these cards is gaming.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
5,657 (1.54/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Are they going to be priced again in that ridiculous manner like when the 7xxx series was released??
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,649 (0.85/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 500GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Are they going to be priced again in that ridiculous manner like when the 7xxx series was released??
If you look back, the 7970 was actually priced lower than the 7900GTX and X1900XTX.
Factor-in inflation the price actually is not as ridiculous as people makes them to be.
 
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
422 (0.10/day)
Location
Iraq
System Name Simon
Processor Core i7 5820K @ 4.4GHz @1.25v core, 1.9v input, 1.12v system agent, 0.9v cache - 24/7 & P95 stable
Motherboard ASUS X99 Deluxe U3.1, BIOS 3101
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX + 2 x Corsair ML140 Pro Red LED, exhaust @ top panel
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x 8GB 2666 MHz 16, 18, 18, 35, 2T (Stock)
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (OC BIOS), +60 MHz GPU, +450 MHz Memory
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 500 Gb, WD Green + White Label, total 17 TB
Display(s) 3x Samsung CFG73 (24" 1920x1080, 144Hz) in 2D Surround, LG C7 OLED TV (55", 4K, 60Hz)
Case Corsair 760T + Corsair SP120 Perf.Ed. + 3x ML 140 Pro Red + DEMCI Dust Filter Kit + DeepCool RGB LED
Audio Device(s) Creative SB Z, Topping E30 + SMSL SP200, Hifiman 4XX, beyerdynamic 770 Pro 250Ω, Audeze iSine 10
Power Supply Corsair RM1000i + APC BackUPS RS1500 (modded w/ 130 AH Kung Long Batteries) + APC Smart UPS SUA1500i
Mouse Razer Naga Chroma + Reflex Lab Extended Mouse Pad + Xbox One S Controller + 3 x Xbox 360 Controllers
Keyboard Corsiar K70 RGB (2016 Edition) Cherry Mx Red w/ custom Arabic-legend shine-through keycaps
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 - ver. 20H2
Benchmark Scores Onkyo TX-NR626 AV Receiver, speakers: 4x Yamaha NS-M325 + Yamaha NS-C3290 + Proson Libre Sub 8.1
If you look back, the 7970 was actually priced lower than the 7900GTX and X1900XTX.
Factor-in inflation the price actually is not as ridiculous as people makes them to be.

Not if we compare them to the launch price of 5870/5850. AMD did a smart move to gain market share with aggressive pricing back then, but now they think they don't need such strategies anymore. The are wrong IMO.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
528 (0.13/day)
Location
Inside a mini ITX
System Name ITX Desktop
Processor Core i7 9700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus Pro WiFi Z390
Cooling Arctic esports 34 duo.
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2070 Gaming OC White PRO
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus | Intel SSD 660p
Case NZXT H200
Power Supply Corsair CX Series 750 Watt
It is evident in the GTX 680 that computing performance makes no difference for 99% of customers ;)
Since the main use for these cards is gaming.

GK104 was originally designed to be used in mainstream gaming cards. When 7970 didn't perform as nvidia speculated, they saw an opportunity to cut some costs. Since GK104 was good enough to beat 7970, nvidia released it as GTX 680 and delayed the real 680 (GK110).

Gaming is not the only market of these flagship GPUs. Computing also brings in significant revenue. Looking at these specs , I don't think 8970 can beat GK110 in computing.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,649 (0.85/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 500GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
GK104 was originally designed to be used in mainstream gaming cards. When 7970 didn't perform as nvidia speculated, they saw an opportunity to cut some costs. Since GK104 was good enough to beat 7970, nvidia released it as GTX 680 and delayed the real 680 (GK110).
The only problem for this theory is that the chip is named GK110 not GK100.
While the GTX680 is the GK104, going by nVidia's naming convention if GK110 is the original GTX680 it should be named GK100.
There is no evident of the GK100 ever existing, not even an engineering sample is shown.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
528 (0.13/day)
Location
Inside a mini ITX
System Name ITX Desktop
Processor Core i7 9700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus Pro WiFi Z390
Cooling Arctic esports 34 duo.
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2070 Gaming OC White PRO
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus | Intel SSD 660p
Case NZXT H200
Power Supply Corsair CX Series 750 Watt
The only problem for this theory is that the chip is named GK110 not GK100.
While the GTX680 is the GK104, going by nVidia's naming convention if GK110 is the original GTX680 it should be named GK100.
There is no evident of the GK100 ever existing, not even an engineering sample.

The point is if the spec bta reported is true, 8970 is too small to beat GK110 in both gaming and computing. Unless they come up with some ground-breaking innovation which is extremely unprobable atm considering the recent layoffs.
 

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,480 (0.72/day)
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Whaaaat Kiiiiiiid!
Processor Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 AORUS Ultra
Cooling Corsair H150i AIO Cooler
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Zotac GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Triple Fan @ 2040MHz
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512GB + Crucial MX300 512GB + OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
Display(s) 27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, + 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case Thermaltake Core X9 Snow
Audio Device(s) Logitech G935 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse Logitech G903 Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G915
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXV: 19329
The point is if the spec bta reported is true, 8970 is too small to beat GK110 in both gaming and computing. Unless they come up with some ground-breaking innovation which is extremely unprobable atm considering the recent layoffs.

im not so sure NVidia will use GK110 for the 780, its possible of course but they will probably use the GK114, GK110 for server/workstation
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
2,719 (0.52/day)
Processor i5-7600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Pro4
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO w/ AC MX-4
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 Corsair LPX Vengeance 15-15-15-36
Video Card(s) MSI Twin Frozr 1070ti
Storage 240GB Corsair Force GT
Display(s) 23' Dell AW2310
Case Corsair 550D
Power Supply Seasonic SS-760XP2 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Not if we compare them to the launch price of 5870/5850. AMD did a smart move to gain market share with aggressive pricing back then, but now they think they don't need such strategies anymore. The are wrong IMO.

I agree. When the the HD 5xxx came out, I snatched my 5850 for $249. At the time, it was the 2nd most powerful chip from AMD next to the 5870, which sold for around $350-$400.

If I were to upgrade right now using that same $249 I spent before, I would only be upgrading to a 7850/7870. I think I'll wait until there is a sizeable jump in performance from my 5850. I will definitely need a card that will be able to handle Metro: Last Light when it comes out :D
 
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
2,516 (0.60/day)
Location
Canada
System Name m1dg3t | DeathBox | HairPi 3
Processor 3570k @ 4.0 1.15v BIOS | q9550 @ 3.77 1.325v BIOS
Motherboard Asrock z77e iTX | p5q Dlx 2301 BIOS
Cooling Custom Water | D-14 & HR-03gt | Passive HSF
Memory Samsung MV-3V4G3D 4g x 2 @ 1866 1.35v | OcZ RpR 2g x 4 @ 1067 2.2v
Video Card(s) MSi 7950 tf3 @1000 / 1350 | Asus 5870 V2 @ 900 / 1275
Storage Adata sx900 256Gb / WD 2500 HHTZ | WD 1001 FALS x 2
Display(s) BenQ gw2750hm | 46" Sharp Quatron
Case BitFenix Prodigy - m0dd3d | Antec Fusion Remote MAX
Audio Device(s) Onboard Toslink > Yamaha HTR 6290 | Xonar HDAV1.3 > Yamaha DSP z7
Power Supply Ocz mXp700w | Ocz zx850w | Cannakit 5v 2.5a
Mouse Logitech G700s | Logitech G9x - Cable Repaired
Keyboard TT Meka G1 - Black w Cherry Blacks| Logitech G11
Software Win7 Home | Xp sp3 & Vista ultimate | Raspbian
Benchmark Scores Epeen!! Who needs epeen??
GK104 was originally designed to be used in mainstream gaming cards. When 7970 didn't perform as nvidia speculated, they saw an opportunity to cut some costs. Since GK104 was good enough to beat 7970, nvidia released it as GTX 680 and delayed the real 680 (GK110).

Gaming is not the only market of these flagship GPUs. Computing also brings in significant revenue. Looking at these specs , I don't think 8970 can beat GK110 in computing.

I see you are giving up on sciences and concentrating on being a comedian! :)

I agree. When the the HD 5xxx came out, I snatched my 5850 for $249. At the time, it was the 2nd most powerful chip from AMD next to the 5870, which sold for around $350-$400.

If I were to upgrade right now using that same $249 I spent before, I would only be upgrading to a 7850/7870. I think I'll wait until there is a sizeable jump in performance from my 5850. I will definitely need a card that will be able to handle Metro: Last Light when it comes out :D

Picked my 5870 for just over $500, IIRC it was $540 all said and done. Picked my 7950 for $350. Double the performance and more for $150+ less. Wasn't a hard choice for me :eek:
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
1,644 (0.34/day)
System Name Black Killing Machine
Processor Delidded NO IHS mount Intel i7-4770k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z87X-OC
Cooling Swiftech DIR655 pump, Watercool HEATKILLER® GPU-X³ 79X0 Ni-Bl gpu, DT SNIPER CPU block, UT60 420 RAD
Memory Gskill Trident 2400mhz CL9 Samsung IC9
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE HD7950 OC 950mhz Edition, VaporX HD7950
Storage 2xM4 Crucial 64GB RAID 0, 1 OCZ AGILILITY 3 60GB, WDCB 500GB x2RAID0, WD Green, Hitachi 1TB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster 226BW and 24" 120hz BenQ gamer
Case SilverStone Raven rv-02
Audio Device(s) Audio Technica ATH-AD900 headphones, Topping D2 DAC/Headphone AMP
Power Supply Seasonic Platinum 860
Software Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Benchmark Scores http://hwbot.org/user/sonda5/ Delidding is magic. http://valid.canardpc.com/2878462
GK104 was originally designed to be used in mainstream gaming cards. When 7970 didn't perform as nvidia speculated, they saw an opportunity to cut some costs. Since GK104 was good enough to beat 7970, nvidia released it as GTX 680 and delayed the real 680 (GK110).

Sounds like a myth to me.


Looking at the hardware at release the HD79XX series cards had alot more performance potential then the GK104 cards that NVIDIA released. Looking at the hardware the HD79XX cards are superior to GTX 6XX cards. I believe the only reason NVIDIA chose to increase the price of their inferior cards is for profit.


Right now AMD HD79XX cards are better than ever with mature drivers. Good drivers with superior hardware is why AMD HD79XX cards are better than NVIDIA GTX6XX cards.

No matter how good NVIDIA drivers get their hardware will alway cap ultimate performance while AMD has overhead to grow because of superior hardware.
 
Top