1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Q6600 jumping back and forth from 1.6 ghz and 2.4 ghz??

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by mikel33, Nov 23, 2007.

  1. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,928 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,816
    Location:
    Florida, A.K.A. the Sweatbox
    yea, all that requires is a bump in fsb up to 333, maybe a little voltage.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  2. largon

    largon

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,788 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    434
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Link?
    Those couple silly results with high FSB (>>FSB300) are on QX67/800 procs with multipliers much higher than 9. Good thing you mentioned HWBot - it prefectly proves my point: i975X can't do >>FSB300 with quadcores. With dualcores i975X is much better, it usually reaches a little bit over FSB400.

    HWBot:
    Spi1M max FSB w/ Q6600:
    AW9D @ FSB313
    P5W-DH Dlx @ FSB333

    Spi32M:
    AW9D @ FSB300
    P5W-DH Dlx @ n/a (nobody has submitted a result)

    3DMark06:
    AW9D @ FSB300
    P5W-DH Dlx @ n/a (nobody has submitted a result)

    3DMark05:
    AW9D @ FSB300
    P5W-DH Dlx @ n/a (nobody has submitted a result)

    Spi1M:
    AW9D @ FSB313
    P5W-DH Dlx @ n/a (nobody has submitted a result)


    :rolleyes:
    Random Murderer,
    So is this a "rebound-PWN"?
    Not gonna happen I'm afraid.
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2007
    10 Year Member at TPU
  3. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,928 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,816
    Location:
    Florida, A.K.A. the Sweatbox
    why is that? i've got my proc running 333, and it's a b3. :p
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  4. mikel33 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2007
    Messages:
    96 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Apparently this has opened the flood-gates, lol..

    Nothing against what you say Largon.. but I've spent some money on this system for OC'ing and I HAVE to go with the optimism.. They say it can be done, I believe it.. just need a how-to.
     
  5. largon

    largon

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,788 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    434
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Start by setting vMCH to 1.7V (max?).

    Random Murderer,
    You're on P5W-DH Dlx.
    It sure is a Glenwood board but it's not as FSB limited as AW9D is. He'd be lucky if the board did 3GHz with the quad.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  6. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,928 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,816
    Location:
    Florida, A.K.A. the Sweatbox
    obviously you have not done your research, i have seen quads at 3.6 on this board over at xs, lemme see if i can find a link.

    the thing you hafta remember to do is set the fsb strap to 1066 to loosen up the mch timings a bit and allow for fsb's in the range of 450.

    EDIT: check this out, largon.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  7. mikel33 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2007
    Messages:
    96 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    I'm getting pretty frustrated here.. It's discouraging to hear that I've wasted money.. that I can't OC my moneys worth... that there is no definitave answer on what is or is not possible with 3.0-3.2 Ghz.

    Let's try to get some more imput on this from other AW9D Max users.
     
  8. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,928 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,816
    Location:
    Florida, A.K.A. the Sweatbox
    ok, talk to sneekypeet and ketxxx and w1zzard.
    guys, the 975 chipset isn't as bad at overclocking quads as everyone says, it just requires more work than other chipsets. the 975 chipset is finicky as hell at first, but eventually, with some research, patience, and persistence, it'll lay back and accept it.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  9. Darknova

    Darknova

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    5,053 (1.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Manchester, United Kingdom
    I have to agree here. The 975 is finicky, it's why I went with a P35 board, but you will get at least 3Ghz on that quad no problems. Anything over will require work.
     
    Random Murderer says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  10. largon

    largon

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,788 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    434
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Link or it didn't happen.
    That thread is about P5W-DH not AW9D.

    I'm going to push this just for personal interest, but you're going to have to do better than that thread on XS. Link directly to the post you're talking about, I'm not going to read all those over six thousand posts to find a one post where someone was lucky enough to crank a golden board to FSB400 on a quad.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  11. Darknova

    Darknova

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    5,053 (1.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Manchester, United Kingdom
    Erm...yes, it's about the AW9D, that's the board mikel33 has and is asking about.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  12. largon

    largon

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,788 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    434
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    10 Year Member at TPU
  13. Darknova

    Darknova

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    5,053 (1.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Manchester, United Kingdom
    10 Year Member at TPU
  14. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,928 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,816
    Location:
    Florida, A.K.A. the Sweatbox
    found it, it wasn't xs, it was cpc, and it wasn't 3.6, it was 3514, but still very respectable for a q6600 on a p5w!
    http://www.custompc.co.uk/benchmarks
    result #22.

    EDIT: it WAS xs, and it WAS 3600!
    check it out:
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/member.php?u=12305
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  15. hat

    hat Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    17,959 (4.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,753
    Location:
    Ohio
    Well, in any case, he can at least try and post his results. :toast:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  16. largon

    largon

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,788 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    434
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    There's not much you can do except to try it:
    Set FSB to 333MHz, bump vCore and vMCH a notch or two, run memtest86+ to see if it's safe enough to boot OS.
    :twitch:
    The question is: 1 out of how many P5W-DH 1.04Gs does FSB400 3DM06 stable?
    Anyways, AW9D seems to be far, far away from FSB400.

    btw,
    "AW9D-Max and Core 2 Quad" @ abit Forums
    http://forum.uabit.com/showthread.php?p=892766
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  17. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,928 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,816
    Location:
    Florida, A.K.A. the Sweatbox
    so is this a "rebound-rebound-pwn?" lol, just messin with ya ;)
    ouch, that is t3h suxx0rz for you, mike.
    btw, that was the first and last time you will ever see me use "leet-speak" unless i'm making fun of it :)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  18. hat

    hat Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    17,959 (4.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,753
    Location:
    Ohio
    Some of you take overclocking so seriously. So this guy has a crap combo, at least he can do something with it.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  19. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,928 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,816
    Location:
    Florida, A.K.A. the Sweatbox
    true, the q6600 at stock STILL beats anything amd has right now...:toast:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  20. hat

    hat Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    17,959 (4.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,753
    Location:
    Ohio
    Doubt it. :/
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  21. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,928 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,816
    Location:
    Florida, A.K.A. the Sweatbox
    O RLY?
    look what chip wins two out of three, and the one it came in second in was by such a small amount it doesn't really matter.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  22. tkpenalty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,958 (1.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Australia, Sydney
    Reading this thread sorta disgusts me. Stop arguing about the 975X's overclocking limits, and AMD vs Intel and start helping this guy already-actually we already have.

    We answered your question and honestly, I don't think its really a neccessity to overclock! Honestly the 975X boards are poor overclockers in whole in contrast to the 965, and above. You would have to bump the voltage of the Northbridge considerably, 1.65 or 1.7v, which runs fairly hot in addition.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  23. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    45,474 (10.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12,758
    Location:
    Australalalalalaia.
    if you had done more research, everyone reccomends P35 or X38 chipsets for quad core OCing :) - not the older 975x

    400 FSB is easy for quads on my P35, whereas my 965 and 650i boards stopped in the 300-333 range.

    Just OC as high as you can, and tweak the voltages as low as possible. 2.66Ghz is still faster than the 2.4 stock, and it will run nice and cool with no risk of overheating at such low levels.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  24. mikel33 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2007
    Messages:
    96 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    I don't think I worded my frustration correctly, and I think some of you may have taken it personally. I'm not frustrated with anyone here, and I really really appreciate all of the input everyone has provided!

    I'm only frustrated because I didn't make the best combo decision for my 3.2 wishes and it wasn't cheap. Sorry if anyone took that the wrong way..

    I'd never get frustrated any ANYONE for offering help and advice! :toast:

    I'll see what happens and post my results. :)
     
  25. black light burns

    black light burns New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    151 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Just try the 3ghz first than stress test it and watch temps make sure it is stable. If everything checks out fine start upping it a little more till you feel the temps are too much or it isn't stable.Don't let it go over the max temp recommended by Intel.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)