• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

QNAP Introduces its First 2.5GbE Network Switch

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
39,999 (8.39/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
QNAP Systems, Inc., a leading computing, networking and storage solution innovator, today launched its first 2.5 GbE network switch - the QSW-1105-5T. Featuring five 2.5 GbE ports, plug-and-play set up, automatic loop detection and blocking, and auto-negotiation functions, the QSW-1105-5T allows users to easily build a 2.5 GbE network environment for their home or business.

"For those looking to upgrade their network environment, the QSW-1105-5T 2.5 GbE strikes a balance between performance and cost. Users can instantly upgrade their network environment to 2.5 GbE using existing network cables, allowing them to take advantage of next-generation 2.5 GbE NAS and computers," said Frank Liao, Product Manager of QNAP.



The QSW-1105-5T features five 2.5GbE/NBASE-T RJ45 ports that support 2.5G/ 1G/ 100M transfer speeds. With no complex settings required, the QSW-1105-5T supports auto-negotiation that optimizes transfer speeds and performance for each connected device, while its built-in management mechanism ensures smooth transmission of network packets. It also features network loop detection that can automatically lock looped ports to ensure the network environment quickly resumes normal operation.

The QSW-1105-5T features a fanless design for near-silent operation. The unique ventilated construction assists in cooling while maintaining high performance.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Messages
2,272 (0.88/day)
Location
If I tellz ya, I gotzta, you know the deal....
System Name The Big RED One
Processor i9-9900k, oc'd to 5.2 ghz
Motherboard Asus ROG Maximus Hero Wifi Z390
Cooling Corsair H115i pro AIO 560mm push/pull, 11x Corsair 140mm ML RGB Fans (front, top, sides, rear)
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengence RBG pro DDR4-3200 (4x 8GB) in XMP2
Video Card(s) Evga 2080ti w/15% O/C
Storage 2x WD Black SN750 1TB m.2 + 4TB Crucial SSD + WD 12TB external HDD
Display(s) 2x Samsung 43" LCD's @4k-1440p
Case Thermaltake TT900 Supertower
Audio Device(s) On-board Intel AC9260 wireless, JBL Studio Pro Bluetooth Speakers
Power Supply EVGA G2 SuperNova 850W Modular
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2
Keyboard Logitech G613 mechanical wireless
Software Windows 10 pro 64 bit, with all the unnecessary background shiite turned OFF !
Benchmark Scores Quicker than flies on a dung pile
better late than never, hahaha :D

2.5g isn't exactly next-gen tech IMHO, seeins how it's been around for several years now but laying dormant waiting on more mobo & NIC mfgr's to get off their lazy asses and bring it to the mainstream market...

Also why do the switch/router mfgr's insist on saying that these things have 5 ports, when in fact one of them has to be used for the incoming connection ? kinda deceptive if you ask me ....
 
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
566 (0.39/day)
Location
NJ, USA
System Name Lightbringer
Processor Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Enermax Liqmax Iii 360mm AIO
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32GB (8GBx4) 3200Mhz CL 14
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 5700XT Nitro+
Storage Hp EX950 2TB NVMe M.2, HP EX950 1TB NVMe M.2, Samsung 860 EVO 2TB
Display(s) LG 34BK95U-W 34" 5120 x 2160
Case Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic (White)
Power Supply BeQuiet Straight Power 11 850w Gold Rated PSU
Mouse Glorious Model O (Matte White)
Keyboard Royal Kludge RK71
Software Windows 10
Well, I guess those 2.5g NICs on Z490 boards are finally not a marketing gimmick, although I still think it's ridiculous for the consumer market to go to 2.5g instead of straight to 10gig or at least 5gig based on the fact that SATAIII SSDs are a pretty common feature these days
 

Cheeseball

Not a Potato
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
1,391 (0.32/day)
System Name Custom AMD Rig
Processor AMD Ryzen™ 7 3800X
Motherboard ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)
Cooling EVGA CLC 280mm AIO Liquid Cooler
Memory G.SKILL TridentZ 32GB (8GBx4) F4-3200C16-8GTZR
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 ULTRA GAMING 10GB
Storage 250GB Samsung 970 EVO NVMe, 2TB Inland Premium NVMe, 1TB Crucial MX500 SATA, 4TB WD Blue SATA
Display(s) Acer Nitro XV340CK Pbmiipphzx 34" UWQHD 1440p, LG 27GL650F-B UltraGear 27" 1080p 144 Hz 1ms
Case NZXT H510i Matte White
Audio Device(s) Kanto Audio YU2 and SUB8 Desktop Speakers and Subwoofer, Kingston HyperX Cloud Flight S
Power Supply Corsair RMx Series RM750x 750W
Mouse Kingston HyperX Pulsefire Dart
Keyboard Kingston HyperX Alloy Origins
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit 2004
Also why do the switch/router mfgr's insist on saying that these things have 5 ports, when in fact one of them has to be used for the incoming connection ? kinda deceptive if you ask me ....
?

Because they are five full duplex ports. If you connect 5 PCs they will be able to communicate with each other provided one of them acts as a DHCP server or if you have static IPs manually set. If you mean for WAN/internet connectivity then surely you have to use one of them for the router/modem.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2010
Messages
190 (0.05/day)
This is the only 5-port copper 2.5GbE switch I have seen so far that could be affordable, unmanaged, non-sfp+ and fanless. It looks like a great addition to any network with CAT 5E looking to boost network performance without redoing their cable runs.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Messages
2,272 (0.88/day)
Location
If I tellz ya, I gotzta, you know the deal....
System Name The Big RED One
Processor i9-9900k, oc'd to 5.2 ghz
Motherboard Asus ROG Maximus Hero Wifi Z390
Cooling Corsair H115i pro AIO 560mm push/pull, 11x Corsair 140mm ML RGB Fans (front, top, sides, rear)
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengence RBG pro DDR4-3200 (4x 8GB) in XMP2
Video Card(s) Evga 2080ti w/15% O/C
Storage 2x WD Black SN750 1TB m.2 + 4TB Crucial SSD + WD 12TB external HDD
Display(s) 2x Samsung 43" LCD's @4k-1440p
Case Thermaltake TT900 Supertower
Audio Device(s) On-board Intel AC9260 wireless, JBL Studio Pro Bluetooth Speakers
Power Supply EVGA G2 SuperNova 850W Modular
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2
Keyboard Logitech G613 mechanical wireless
Software Windows 10 pro 64 bit, with all the unnecessary background shiite turned OFF !
Benchmark Scores Quicker than flies on a dung pile
(1) This is the only 5-port copper 2.5GbE switch I have seen so far that could be affordable, unmanaged, non-sfp+ and fanless. (2) It looks like a great addition to any network with CAT 5E looking to boost network performance without redoing their cable runs.
Your 1st statement is true enough, however the 2nd part is not, as indicated on the attached cable comparison chart that I found a while back while at an IEEE seminar :)

If you mean for WAN/internet connectivity then surely you have to use one of them for the router/modem.
Yes this is what I meant :)
 

Attachments

Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
6,870 (1.18/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Not too bad, about $100 in Taiwan.

Well, I guess those 2.5g NICs on Z490 boards are finally not a marketing gimmick, although I still think it's ridiculous for the consumer market to go to 2.5g instead of straight to 10gig or at least 5gig based on the fact that SATAIII SSDs are a pretty common feature these days
The thing is, 2.5Gbps Ethernet controllers are priced nearly at the same level as 1Gbps Ethernet controllers and are physically very similar in terms of size. 5Gbps and 10Gbps controllers, no so much. The latter also produce a lot more heat, whereas 2.5Gbps controllers use about as much power and produce about as much heat as a 1Gbps controller. Oh and 2.5Gbps uses Cat 5e up to 100m, whereas even 5Gbps can only run over Cat 5e up to 55m, but I guess for most home users that won't matter much.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
4,245 (0.88/day)
Location
Geneva, FL, USA
Processor Intel i5-6600
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX
Cooling Cooler Master Geminii S524
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2133 16GB (8GB x 2)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9-380X 4GB
Storage Samsung 950 EVO 250GB (mSATA)
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B 2560x1080 IPS
Case Lian Li PC-Q25
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro
Nice. All three motherboards in my buy later cart have 2.5Gb controllers so I'll certainly consider this switch when that happens.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
249 (0.08/day)
Nice, this is real crap, we are actually halting home NIC evolution with 2.5Gbit.

With SSD in our computers 10Gbit home network should be the next natural step.

10Gbit is real OLD tech now so 2.5Gbit is ridiculous.

Hear people say that there is no demand for 10Gbit BUT THEY ARE WRONG.

People said the same thing about cpu cores when Intel insisted to only do max 4 cores for mainstream, there is no demand for more cpu cores.

Then AMD came with up to 16 cpu cores for main stream and the market just exploded.

If 10Gbit became standard on medium to high end motherboards the accessories market would just explode with massive upgrades with everything from NAS, nic cabels and all kind of network equipment.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
6,870 (1.18/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Nice, this is real crap, we are actually halting home NIC evolution with 2.5Gbit.

With SSD in our computers 10Gbit home network should be the next natural step.

10Gbit is real OLD tech now so 2.5Gbit is ridiculous.

Hear people say that there is no demand for 10Gbit BUT THEY ARE WRONG.

People said the same thing about cpu cores when Intel insisted to only do max 4 cores for mainstream, there is no demand for more cpu cores.

Then AMD came with up to 16 cpu cores for main stream and the market just exploded.

If 10Gbit became standard on medium to high end motherboards the accessories market would just explode with massive upgrades with everything from NAS, nic cabels and all kind of network equipment.
So you would happily pay the $40 premium per motherboard to get 10Gbps? Most people wouldn't. In fact, most people use Wi-Fi...
10Gbps has never been as cheap as it is now per card, but that doesn't mean it has mass consumer appeal.
Not saying that 2.5Gbps does either, but it doesn't really add any cost to motherboards at least.
 

Cheeseball

Not a Potato
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
1,391 (0.32/day)
System Name Custom AMD Rig
Processor AMD Ryzen™ 7 3800X
Motherboard ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)
Cooling EVGA CLC 280mm AIO Liquid Cooler
Memory G.SKILL TridentZ 32GB (8GBx4) F4-3200C16-8GTZR
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 ULTRA GAMING 10GB
Storage 250GB Samsung 970 EVO NVMe, 2TB Inland Premium NVMe, 1TB Crucial MX500 SATA, 4TB WD Blue SATA
Display(s) Acer Nitro XV340CK Pbmiipphzx 34" UWQHD 1440p, LG 27GL650F-B UltraGear 27" 1080p 144 Hz 1ms
Case NZXT H510i Matte White
Audio Device(s) Kanto Audio YU2 and SUB8 Desktop Speakers and Subwoofer, Kingston HyperX Cloud Flight S
Power Supply Corsair RMx Series RM750x 750W
Mouse Kingston HyperX Pulsefire Dart
Keyboard Kingston HyperX Alloy Origins
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit 2004
So you would happily pay the $40 premium per motherboard to get 10Gbps? Most people wouldn't. In fact, most people use Wi-Fi...
10Gbps has never been as cheap as it is now per card, but that doesn't mean it has mass consumer appeal.
Not saying that 2.5Gbps does either, but it doesn't really add any cost to motherboards at least.
I believe for the high-end motherboards, that extra $40 could be worth it, especially since the general idea with having a high-end computer may also mean having a sophisticated network.

I still stand by having a separate USB 3.2 Gen 2(x2) "dongle" that can saturate the 10/20 Gbps purported bandwidth though. At least I would be able to move it from system to system if need be.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,228 (0.95/day)
I don't care if most people are using Wifi on their Ipad, we are not most people.
Most of us here are power users, or at least above the average consumer. If you use your computer for anything productive or a lot of gaming, you need proper networking. Most power users have some kind of NAS or file server, it doesn't take a lot before network speed becomes an annoyance.

But I wouldn't care what's included on motherboards if only 10G add-in cards and switches were affordable. The first time I considered investing in 10G equipment is seriously 10 years ago, prices haven't moved that much.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
6,870 (1.18/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Talked to an ex colleague at QNAP and he doesn't recon we'll see a similar 10Gbps product for under $200 for at least another couple of years... :(
I should point out that he's one of the PMs.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,228 (0.95/day)
Talked to an ex colleague at QNAP and he doesn't recon we'll see a similar 10Gbps product for under $200 for at least another couple of years... :(
I should point out that he's one of the PMs.
Too bad, their QSW-308S ($179) isn't that far off; 3x 10G SFP+ (plus 8 1G RJ45). If only these were RJ45s instead, then it could serve as a decent transition for many.

The best alternatives I've seen so far is;
Asus XG-U2008 ($250) 2x 10G + 10x 1G
Netgear GS110MX ($170) 2x 10G + 10x 1G
Netgear XS505M ($350) 4x 10G
Netgear XS508M ($627) 8x 10G
(All US prices just for reference)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
1,556 (2.52/day)
System Name PowerEdge R730 DRS Cluster
Processor 4x Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cooling Many heckin screamy bois
Memory 480GB ECC DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) Matrox G200eR2
Storage SD Card. Yep, really no other local storage.
Display(s) It's probably a couple of boring Dell Ultrasharps and a sacrificial laptop.
Case 39U 6-rack server room with HEVC and 44KVA UPS
Mouse Maybe
Keyboard Yes!
Software ESXi 6.5 U3
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
99% of all ISPs either provide a 1-box modem/router/switch/wifi-AP, or a two box solution with a seperate modem, and then a generic router/switch/wifi

So what QNAP need to do is make a 2.5G router/switch wifi, because nobody wants to add an additional box to their loop just for 2.5G. Someone has to do it, might as well be QNAP since people wanting faster LAN speeds in their homes are likely to want them for NAS reasons.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,228 (0.95/day)
99% of all ISPs either provide a 1-box modem/router/switch/wifi-AP, or a two box solution with a seperate modem, and then a generic router/switch/wifi

So what QNAP need to do is make a 2.5G router/switch wifi, because nobody wants to add an additional box to their loop just for 2.5G. Someone has to do it, might as well be QNAP since people wanting faster LAN speeds in their homes are likely to want them for NAS reasons.
I disagree.
Firstly, I don't think most people mind an extra box if it provides something useful. Most people do already use multiple boxes, since the bundled Wifi/router/switches are usually crap anyway. And even if there is a built-in switch, it is probably 4 LAN ports, 1 will probably be used for another access point in a better spot, 1 for "TV", and then you have just 2 left.

Personally, my issue with ISP provided equpiment and general consumer grade stuff is lack of standardization of physical dimensions and mounting options. Most of these are impossible to stack, and can't be rackmounted normally. The best option is often to screw them in a rack shelf or use velcro tape.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
1,556 (2.52/day)
System Name PowerEdge R730 DRS Cluster
Processor 4x Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cooling Many heckin screamy bois
Memory 480GB ECC DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) Matrox G200eR2
Storage SD Card. Yep, really no other local storage.
Display(s) It's probably a couple of boring Dell Ultrasharps and a sacrificial laptop.
Case 39U 6-rack server room with HEVC and 44KVA UPS
Mouse Maybe
Keyboard Yes!
Software ESXi 6.5 U3
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
I disagree.
Firstly, I don't think most people mind an extra box if it provides something useful. Most people do already use multiple boxes, since the bundled Wifi/router/switches are usually crap anyway. And even if there is a built-in switch, it is probably 4 LAN ports, 1 will probably be used for another access point in a better spot, 1 for "TV", and then you have just 2 left.

Personally, my issue with ISP provided equpiment and general consumer grade stuff is lack of standardization of physical dimensions and mounting options. Most of these are impossible to stack, and can't be rackmounted normally. The best option is often to screw them in a rack shelf or use velcro tape.
This may be regionally dependent then. 1-box is king in the UK because that's how every major ISP does it and that probably covers like 98+ of the UK market or something like that. Hell, some of our 1-box routers are actually pretty decent!

I've been supporting WFH staff for the last three months and out of several hundred people, not a single one of them has had a separate modem when being asked to restart their modem/router for troubleshooting (Just because the routers are OK doesn't mean the ISPs are any good).

I included 2-box since I know that's a thing that used to happen regularly here over a decade ago and it sounds like that is still very much a normal thing in the US.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
6,870 (1.18/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
99% of all ISPs either provide a 1-box modem/router/switch/wifi-AP, or a two box solution with a seperate modem, and then a generic router/switch/wifi

So what QNAP need to do is make a 2.5G router/switch wifi, because nobody wants to add an additional box to their loop just for 2.5G. Someone has to do it, might as well be QNAP since people wanting faster LAN speeds in their homes are likely to want them for NAS reasons.
:roll: :roll: :roll:

Sorry, but you have no idea what you're talking about here.
I have a 10 port switch (2x 10Gbps), a router, a cable modem (technically a Wi-Fi/router/modem, but set to modem only mode, as it's crap as a router) and two Wi-Fi access points.
So yes, people are willing to have more than one box. I wish I didn't have the cable modem, but hey, it's how I get my internet...
Also also need Wi-Fi on each floor, despite the physical floor space not being that big, the three story house I live in, is built with a lot of concrete and rebar, which means Wi-Fi penetration is crap.

QNAP doesn't make routers and thank god for that, as their NAS software is full of security issues as it is.

This may be regionally dependent then. 1-box is king in the UK because that's how every major ISP does it and that probably covers like 98+ of the UK market or something like that. Hell, some of our 1-box routers are actually pretty decent!

I've been supporting WFH staff for the last three months and out of several hundred people, not a single one of them has had a separate modem when being asked to restart their modem/router for troubleshooting (Just because the routers are OK doesn't mean the ISPs are any good).

I included 2-box since I know that's a thing that used to happen regularly here over a decade ago and it sounds like that is still very much a normal thing in the US.
The UK is also behind most of the world when it comes to internet connectivity and what it costs. I mean, most of the UK is still stuck using ADSL2+ after all...
Yes, most ISPs (that provide hardware) have one box solutions, but it's not suitable for everyone. Also, how much control do you have over your BT box? Zero? Less than zero?
Most ISPs use this to connect remotely to your router.
Some ISPs even have simple backdoor admin logins, there was a huge scandal a few years back in Sweden about this. I doubt it's all that different in other countries where the ISPs support the equipment.
I don't trust my ISP to have a remote connection into my home, but each to their own I guess.
 
Last edited:

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
27,371 (5.02/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Your 1st statement is true enough, however the 2nd part is not, as indicated on the attached cable comparison chart that I found a while back while at an IEEE seminar
Cat5e can do 10Gbps over short distances, ~10m. Cat5e will do 2.5Gbps over the same distances that it does 1Gbps basically, it's part of the reason 2.5Gbps was developed. That chart is old and incorrect.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,228 (0.95/day)
Cat5e can do 10Gbps over short distances, ~10m. Cat5e will do 2.5Gbps over the same distances that it does 1Gbps basically, it's part of the reason 2.5Gbps was developed. That chart is old and incorrect.
Yes, Cat 5e is plenty for 100m of 2.5 Gb/s.
I'm a bit curious about 10 Gb/s though, if I were to try that out I would at least check for packet loss and stability. Upgrading to Cat 6/6A is cheap compared to 10 Gb/s network cards and switches, so someone investing that much might want to upgrade cables too. The only negative is the work effort involved.

But regardless, anyone installing/buying new cables should go Cat 6A, even if they don't plan to use 10 Gb/s for another 5 years. The extra cost is negligible, so why not?
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
1,556 (2.52/day)
System Name PowerEdge R730 DRS Cluster
Processor 4x Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cooling Many heckin screamy bois
Memory 480GB ECC DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) Matrox G200eR2
Storage SD Card. Yep, really no other local storage.
Display(s) It's probably a couple of boring Dell Ultrasharps and a sacrificial laptop.
Case 39U 6-rack server room with HEVC and 44KVA UPS
Mouse Maybe
Keyboard Yes!
Software ESXi 6.5 U3
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
The UK is also behind most of the world when it comes to internet connectivity and what it costs. I mean, most of the UK is still stuck using ADSL2+ after all...
Yes, most ISPs (that provide hardware) have one box solutions, but it's not suitable for everyone. Also, how much control do you have over your BT box? Zero? Less than zero?
Most ISPs use this to connect remotely to your router.
Some ISPs even have simple backdoor admin logins, there was a huge scandal a few years back in Sweden about this. I doubt it's all that different in other countries where the ISPs support the equipment.
I don't trust my ISP to have a remote connection into my home, but each to their own I guess.
ADSL2+ is getting pretty rare now. Hybrid fibre (FTTC) has been price matched to compete-with/phase-out ADSL2+ for around 4-5 years so you wouldn't still be on it unless you were in a low-density population zone where one cabinet has to cover several square km. According to ISPReview, 95% of the UK population had access to FTTC hybrid fibre in Dec 2017 and Mar 2020's figure was 97%

Don't get me wrong, the UK's rollout of true FTTP fibre is pitiful, but at least the overwhelming majority of the UK is getting 20-50Mbps or so and the better-late-than-never initiatives to subsidise FTTP investment from the last few years are starting to pay off. The UK will be behind for good now, but at least it's not that far behind....
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
6,870 (1.18/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Don't get me wrong, the UK's rollout of true FTTP fibre is pitiful, but at least the overwhelming majority of the UK is getting 20-50Mbps or so and the better-late-than-never initiatives to subsidise FTTP investment from the last few years are starting to pay off. The UK will be behind for good now, but at least it's not that far behind....
I remember getting the "stingray" from Alcatel/BT for 512/512Kbps ADSL in the UK, it was amazingly fast at the time, but sadly things went very slow from there.
The UK really bet too heavily on xDSL based technology, much like Australia.
Last time I lived in the UK I paid something stupid for a BT 100Mbps fibre connection and 200Mbps was twice what I was paying.
Anything below 100Mbps can't really be considered decent broadband these days, especially not if the connection is meant for multiple users.

Was stuck in Sweden for a few months and the service changed at my step mums place, but she has 250/100Mbps now for something like £32 a month...
That price doesn't include free hardware though, so I had to get her a router, but as everything is wired with Ethernet, no modem was needed.

I pay something like £22 a month for a 200/30 connection, as I'm stuck with a cable provider as my only sensible option.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
1,556 (2.52/day)
System Name PowerEdge R730 DRS Cluster
Processor 4x Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cooling Many heckin screamy bois
Memory 480GB ECC DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) Matrox G200eR2
Storage SD Card. Yep, really no other local storage.
Display(s) It's probably a couple of boring Dell Ultrasharps and a sacrificial laptop.
Case 39U 6-rack server room with HEVC and 44KVA UPS
Mouse Maybe
Keyboard Yes!
Software ESXi 6.5 U3
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Yup, we had a stingray. 512kbps back when half the planet was still on 56K or slower.
I agree that "broadband" implies a wide pipe - wider than that absolute minimum typical application - and with streaming video using up maybe 4-5MB per user, PC and console gaming being in the gigabytes per install, and cloud-based applications requiring large uploads/downloads on a regular basis - 20Mbps should be considered narrowband.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
1,412 (0.31/day)
Processor RyZen R9 3950X
Motherboard ASRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Coolermaster Master Liquid ML240L RGB
Memory 64GB DDR4 3200 (4x16GB)
Video Card(s) GTX 970
Storage Samsung 1TB SSD
Display(s) Asus VE276Q, VE278Q and VK278Q triple 27” 1920x1080
Case Zulman MS800
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic 650W
Software Windows 10 64bit
Starting to see the QNAP QSW-1105-5T switch show up online from select e-tailers stateside. In some cases it’s a placeholder but some seem to have stock. I think I might get one because they seem to be coming in at MSRP of ~$100 USD. I already have a 10GbE Switch but the QSW-1105-5T can help free up 10GbE ports being used by 2.5GbE and 5GbE devices.

Edit:

Too bad this switch doesn’t have a 10GbE uplink port but it’s not bad for the price IMO. Still, if 2.5GbE has the same energy efficiency as 1GbE and costs roughly the same then this switch is a bit overpriced. I mean a typical 4 or 5 port unmanaged 1GbE Switch would not cost ~$100 USD. You can get an 8 port unmanaged switch for under ~$40 USD.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
127 (0.06/day)
Location
Japan
System Name ChronicleScienceWorkStation
Processor AMD Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard Asrock X399 Taichi
Cooling Noctua U14S-TR4
Memory G.Skill DDR4 3200 C14 16GB*4
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon VII
Storage Samsung 970 Pro*1, Kingston A2000 1TB*2 RAID 0, HGST 8TB*5 RAID 6
Case Lian Li PC-A75X
Power Supply Corsair AX1600i
Software Proxmox 6.2
This is the only 5-port copper 2.5GbE switch I have seen so far that could be affordable, unmanaged, non-sfp+ and fanless. It looks like a great addition to any network with CAT 5E looking to boost network performance without redoing their cable runs.
Actually there does exist some avoidable 10 Gbps switch:

I have been using this for some time, while pretty warm it runs fanless and quietly.
For ~ double the price, you get 4 times higher speed. And in fact, the 10 Gbps parts (NIC) and adapters are too expensive;
I got 5x Intel X520-DA2 for $40 USD each two years ago, and the Intel optical adapters are around $10 each, all genuine parts bought from eBay.
Then fibers are cheap.

Honestly to me 2.5 Gbps looks weird given 10 Gbps isn't much more expensive.
 
Top