- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 386 (0.07/day)
| System Name | Will of D |
|---|---|
| Processor | Intel 980x |
| Motherboard | EVGA Classified E759 Limited Edition |
| Cooling | Water bitches |
| Memory | 6GB Corsair Dominator GTX2!!!!! |
| Video Card(s) | 2x EVGA 580 Superclocked |
| Storage | 40GB Kingston V-series SSDx2 in RAID0, 500GB Seagate 7200.10 |
| Display(s) | NEC 3090 and 2x NEC P221w's |
| Case | Custom (mountain mod like) |
| Audio Device(s) | Asus Xonar D2X |
| Power Supply | Anter 1000W TruePower Quattro |
| Software | Win 7 x64 Pro |
So I just got 4 new 2TB WD green drives (well they are not new, but I am in the process of testing them).
Anyway, I am running HDTune error scan on one of them right now via an external USB 2.0 enclosure. The default error scan is at 21 hours running and has gotten through 1833GB of the hard drive. So I think a full 24 hours and it will be done.
My question is this. Is there a big difference between the full error scan and the quick error scan?
The scan rate right now is 25 MB/s which I think is mainly due to the USB enclosure, but I don't want to take my computer apart just yet to plug these things in.
Anyway, I am running HDTune error scan on one of them right now via an external USB 2.0 enclosure. The default error scan is at 21 hours running and has gotten through 1833GB of the hard drive. So I think a full 24 hours and it will be done.
My question is this. Is there a big difference between the full error scan and the quick error scan?
The scan rate right now is 25 MB/s which I think is mainly due to the USB enclosure, but I don't want to take my computer apart just yet to plug these things in.
