• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Radeon HD 9000 Series Arrives This October: Report

Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
835 (0.45/day)
Likes
309
#26
Sheer performance aside AMD should work on the Performance per watt ratio cos the 7xxx aren't very efficient IMO ...

btw the dual GPU will be "9990" ... thats a lot of 9s ... :D
dont forget their overclocked water cooled edition: the ALL NEW RADEON HD 9999.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
2,657 (0.70/day)
Likes
779
Processor Intel i5-2500k @ 3.8GHz
Motherboard ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO w/ AC MX-2
Memory 8GB DDR3 1866 Gskill Snipers 9-10-9-28
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X
Storage 240GB Corsair Force GT
Display(s) 23' Dell AW2310
Case Corsair 550D
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-Fi Fatality Professional
Power Supply Seasonic SS-760XP2 Platinum
Software Windows 7 Pro 64-bit
#27
Radeon 4K 2000 series, of course.
I lol'd hard at that :laugh:

So what this news post is basically telling me is that AMD is skipping the 8xxx naming scheme of the desktop parts and going straight to 9xxx? What about the laptop parts?
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,556 (0.66/day)
Likes
1,459
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name Eternal WIP ][ HP ProLiant server blade
Processor AMD FX-8320 @ 4.4/4.1 GHz ][ 2x Intel Xeon L5520 @ 2.27GHz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z ][ -
Cooling Corsair H55 ][ Stock
Memory 2x4GB Kingston HyperX Genesis @ 1866MHz ][ 4x4 GiB Hynix @ 1333 MHz; ECC on
Video Card(s) 2x MSI GeForce GTX 770 DirectCU II OC ][ None
Storage 1TB WD Black + 1.5TB WD Green + 750GB Samsung + 64GB OCZ Agility 4 ][ 3x 1 TB Hitachi
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H ][ None
Case Antec Nine Hundred ][ it's a server blade, lol
Audio Device(s) Supreme FX II (Integrated); Using optical S/PDIF output ][ none
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i ][ [stock]
Software Gentoo Linux ][ Linux Mint 16
Benchmark Scores 65970 BogoMIPS. Ha. Ha. Ha. >=|
#28
Radeon Iris 100000

(why go with 10k, when they can jump directly to 100k? :p)

Also, I believe their flagship dual-gpu should not be 9990 or 9999. It they should go a bit further, cause an overflow and end up with Radeon HD OVER NINE THOUSAND
 
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
4,586 (1.33/day)
Likes
2,743
Location
Kingston, Ontario Canada
System Name My Rig | Kids Rig
Processor Core i5 3570K @ 4.0 ghz 1.15 vcore | FX 8350 @4 ghz
Motherboard EVGA Z77 FTW 1.21 BIOS |Gigabyte 990FXA UDH (rev 4.0)
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO R2-push/pull with 2x 120mm PWM | CM Hyper 212
Memory Mushkin Blackline 4GB x 2 1600mhz XMP profile |G. Skill 4GB x 2 DDR3 1866mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 480 8gb | Asus Strix R9 390X 8GB
Storage Kingston SSDNOW V300 120/240 GB OS & Games / 1000 GB Data | 320GB OS / 500GB Data & Games
Display(s) Samsung S24D590 24" PLS 5ms 60hz refresh with Enhanced Sync | BenQ GW2270 22" VA 5ms 60hz refresh
Case NZXT 810 Switch |Thermaltake Soprano Snow Edition
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DSX w/ Logitech z623 | Realtek
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 750W 80+ Gold | CoolerMaster GS750M 80+ Bronze
Mouse Razer Diamondback Chroma | Tt Level 10M
Keyboard Razer Ornata Chroma w/ meka-membrane keys | MadCatz S.T.R.I.K.E. TE w/ Kailh brown
Software Windows 10 Pro | Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Thanks to Norton/Lt_JWS/Guitar for the 2nd pc parts :)
#29

crazyeyesreaper

Chief Broken Rig
Staff member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
8,758 (2.72/day)
Likes
3,650
Location
04578
#30
meh I kinda call BS TSMC hasnt ramped up 20nm yet so mostly this looks to be more of AMD following NVIDIA's lead untill they can push out 20nm parts
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2012
Messages
575 (0.27/day)
Likes
188
System Name Main rig
Processor Intel i7-4790K Devils Canyon
Motherboard Asus Z97-A
Cooling Antec Kuhler 620
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengence Pro
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9-290 Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 1TB
Case Corsair 600T
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster X-FI HD Platinum
Power Supply Corsair AX750 Gold
#32
no node shrink till 2nd half of 2014.
 
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Messages
509 (0.22/day)
Likes
165
System Name NZXT 980 Z
Processor 3570K
Motherboard AsRock Z77 O/C Formula
Cooling Custom Liquid
Memory 2133MHz Mushkin Blackline 64g
Video Card(s) 2 X Asus GTX 670 full cover EK blocks
Storage 240 mushkin 2x120 samsungs
Display(s) Asus "24 144Hz
Case Switch 810
Audio Device(s) creative
Power Supply Seasonic platinum
Software w7 steam futuremark
#33
oh no.....i only buy "even" number series'....

ie i had a 4870x2 to460-sli to 6970cfx to 670sli to what would have been 8970cfx....


this sucks:cry:
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,022 (0.37/day)
Likes
226
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
#34
meh I kinda call BS TSMC hasnt ramped up 20nm yet so mostly this looks to be more of AMD following NVIDIA's lead untill they can push out 20nm parts
These are Sea Island parts just so you know.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2012
Messages
575 (0.27/day)
Likes
188
System Name Main rig
Processor Intel i7-4790K Devils Canyon
Motherboard Asus Z97-A
Cooling Antec Kuhler 620
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengence Pro
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9-290 Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 1TB
Case Corsair 600T
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster X-FI HD Platinum
Power Supply Corsair AX750 Gold
#35
Originally these were supposed to be Volcanic Island parts (Tonga, Vesuvius, and Hawaii) and have shown up in driver INFs

It seems they are hosing with the names again.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
2,440 (1.17/day)
Likes
1,352
#36
Wonder if they will be DirectX 11.2 compliant or will they hose us like Nvidia and stick to DirectX 11.0, in AMDs case just stick to DirectX 11.1.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.20/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
#37
I call BS on this until there's an official announcement.
Considering the information was largely disseminated from a WCCF article posted a few days ago, that in turn referenced a Chinese forum post, and is prefaced "AMD might possibly launch their next generation Volcanic Islands GPUs in October 2013" it all sounds less than definitive.
Curacao and Hainan are 28 nm chips according to Guru3D.
The WCCF/Guru3D/Andwhoeverelseisreprintingthearticle seems to gloss over at least one fairly important fact - the reporting of the Hainan chip as being some performance/enthusiast part when AMD's Dave Baumann has already stated that Hainan is much lower down the product stack
 
Last edited:

crazyeyesreaper

Chief Broken Rig
Staff member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
8,758 (2.72/day)
Likes
3,650
Location
04578
#38
Curacao and Hainan are 28 nm chips according to Guru3D.
which is fine and dandy but at the current power threshold they would need some huge clock speed gains along with the 300 or so shaders to make a huge improvement

its 15% shader increase with no known clock speeds but considering current designs most likely 1100 is the top clock speed to be seen on reference probably more likely to see 1000-1050

so from current looks about 15-20% if that, coupled with the fact there is still no Crossfire fix yet. Lets just say im not impressed, and I am willing to bet if the trail is followed long enough the source who gave this info is full of it.

This means AMD would release a card thats roughly on par with the GTX 780 but far more power hungry and hot, that said a game bundle like before would be nice,

Regardless this news seems a bit suspect. No disrespect you BTA but it just smells a bit to fishy but thats just my opinion.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
5,822 (1.54/day)
Likes
618
Processor Core I7 3770K@4.3Ghz
Motherboard AsRock Z77 Extreme
Cooling Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Memory 12Gb G.Skill Sniper
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070
Storage Sandisk SSD + 1TB Seagate Barracuda 7200
Display(s) IPS Asus 26inch
Case Antec 300
Audio Device(s) Xonar DG
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 650 G2
Software Windows 10/Windows 7
#39
agree
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
5,132 (1.79/day)
Likes
1,667
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.8ghz1.525c NB2.64ghz Ht2.84ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 32Gb @1333 cas9
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Rx580 waterblockedEK
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, samsung 40" 1080p
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1000Rmx
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far
#40
which is fine and dandy but at the current power threshold they would need some huge clock speed gains along with the 300 or so shaders to make a huge improvement

its 15% shader increase with no known clock speeds but considering current designs most likely 1100 is the top clock speed to be seen on reference probably more likely to see 1000-1050

so from current looks about 15-20% if that, coupled with the fact there is still no Crossfire fix yet. Lets just say im not impressed, and I am willing to bet if the trail is followed long enough the source who gave this info is full of it.

This means AMD would release a card thats roughly on par with the GTX 780 but far more power hungry and hot, that said a game bundle like before would be nice,

Regardless this news seems a bit suspect. No disrespect you BTA but it just smells a bit to fishy but thats just my opinion.
I like the game bundle u turn dude and these do sound about right as no ones expecting a revolution mere evo init.
 

crazyeyesreaper

Chief Broken Rig
Staff member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
8,758 (2.72/day)
Likes
3,650
Location
04578
#41
well 15% shader increase does not = 15% more performance

in fact many shaders on the AMD cards go unused, so while there is a shader increase its wont impact performance that much

Daves 7950s kinda prove that point they clock as good as my 7970 Direct Cu II did and his 7950s regularly out performed my 7970 in 3Dmark Firestrike and other benchmarks and thats single card vs single card in terms of raw frame rate.

so unless AMD has magically completely redesigned the GCN core for a rehash of 28nm I dont see much of a performance gain.

On average at the same clock speeds a 7950 vs a 7970 is about a 3-6% gap

so if we keep clock speeds the same increase shaders by 300 we get nearly the same margin as between the 7950 and the 7970 as there is between this new chip and the 7970

1792
2048
2304

the increased ROP count could improve performance by how much that remains to be seen
but from 1792 to 2048 there is a 3-6% difference average being around 4%
going from 2048 to 2304 would result most likely in a 5-7% difference so ROP count TMU while increased might offer more performance however I doubt it as the 7870 Tahiti XT can if pushed hard enough via clocks compete with its bigger brothers so we know bandwidth isnt an issue on memory at least.

As such unless they made some major revisions or are getting 15% higher clocks than the GHz edition I dont see performance improving that much. Thus it ends up being slower than the GTX 780 models available now. The dark horse again would be the TMUs and ROPs along with the mysitcal clock speeds if clocks are high enough and some optimizations are done on the back end in a meaningful way they might pull off a decent speed bump like the 4870 vs 4890 however I just dont see it happening.

AMD needs to LEAPFROG Nvidia to make itself relevant in the news not match what they have already.
 
Last edited:

crazyeyesreaper

Chief Broken Rig
Staff member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
8,758 (2.72/day)
Likes
3,650
Location
04578
#43
Maxwell looks to be mid to late 2014. We also have to remember that more and more companies are turning to TSMC including Apple as it tries to leave Samsung behind this will affect GPU shipments as well.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
5,132 (1.79/day)
Likes
1,667
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.8ghz1.525c NB2.64ghz Ht2.84ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 32Gb @1333 cas9
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Rx580 waterblockedEK
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, samsung 40" 1080p
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1000Rmx
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far
#44
well 15% shader increase does not = 15% more performance

in fact many shaders on the AMD cards go unused, so while there is a shader increase its wont impact performance that much

Daves 7950s kinda prove that point they clock as good as my 7970 Direct Cu II did and his 7950s regularly out performed my 7970 in 3Dmark Firestrike and other benchmarks and thats single card vs single card in terms of raw frame rate.

so unless AMD has magically completely redesigned the GCN core for a rehash of 28nm I dont see much of a performance gain.

On average at the same clock speeds a 7950 vs a 7970 is about a 3-6% gap

so if we keep clock speeds the same increase shaders by 300 we get nearly the same margin as between the 7950 and the 7970 as there is between this new chip and the 7970

1792
2048
2304

the increased ROP count could improve performance by how much that remains to be seen
but from 1792 to 2048 there is a 3-6% difference average being around 4%
going from 2048 to 2304 would result most likely in a 5-7% difference so ROP count TMU while increased might offer more performance however I doubt it as the 7870 Tahiti XT can if pushed hard enough via clocks compete with its bigger brothers so we know bandwidth isnt an issue on memory at least.

As such unless they made some major revisions or are getting 15% higher clocks than the GHz edition I dont see performance improving that much. Thus it ends up being slower than the GTX 780 models available now. The dark horse again would be the TMUs and ROPs along with the mysitcal clock speeds if clocks are high enough and some optimizations are done on the back end in a meaningful way they might pull off a decent speed bump like the 4870 vs 4890 however I just dont see it happening.

AMD needs to LEAPFROG Nvidia to make itself relevant in the news not match what they have already.
Besides the usual optimization speal thats true id also like to point to 33% more geometry powers 3 from 2 geometry setup engines.
Also 4 from 2ace engines thats 100% up.

Im not saying it will be epic just you never knoooow , my fingers are crossed , my upgrade
Nerve is twitching.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
1,736 (0.70/day)
Likes
206
Location
So. Cal.
#45
Curacao - 2304 stream processors, 144 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 384-bit
Tahiti – 2048 stream processors, 128 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 384-bit
12.5% increase Sp and TMU’s while a 50% jump in ROP’s

Hainan - 1792 stream processors, 112 TMUs, 32 ROPs, a 256-bit
Pitcairn – 1280 stream processors, 80 TMUs, 32 ROPs, a 256-bit
40% increase Sp and TMU’s while no bump in ROP’s

Just as reference, while "Bonaire" wasn’t actually GCN 2.0 (completely), it probably entailed some of the "learned" improvements.
7790 - 895 stream processors, 56 TMUs, 16 ROPs, 128-bit
7770 - 640 stream processors, 40 TMUs, 16 ROPs, 128-bit
40% increase Sp and TMU’s while no bump in ROP’s. That see's a 20-25% in performance, while a 20% lower Perf/watt from the 7770.

Given that the GTX760 is 20% faster performance, though better Perf/watt by 18% with a 7870 Pitcairn; if what "Hainan" GCN 2.0 offers as enhancement above what "Bonaire" provided with its' 40% bump, a 9870 clocked at 1Ghz and then with Boost should in theory be above the GTX760, while still improved on perf/watt. Then consider "Hainan" would be about 28% smaller die, could AMD offer more than the normal "one-up’s-mans-ship" at $250?

"Curacao" with 12.5%, but that huge jump it ROP’s might be all AMD needs to un-leash the Tahiti from Nvidias’ moniker of "we expected more". 12.5% might not move the TDP up drastically, offering a "Curacao LE" (HD 9950) enough oomph to bounce the GTX770, while then "Curacao XL" gets some strong jabs on the GTX780, with nowhere near the price, while not much more on power than Tahiti.

Then is Volcanic Islands for Q1 2014... erupts on Titan?
 
Last edited:

crazyeyesreaper

Chief Broken Rig
Staff member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
8,758 (2.72/day)
Likes
3,650
Location
04578
#46
Well we will see but essentially we wont see a big jump until 20nm is ready,

The fact is GK110 was tapped out back when GTX 680 launched it may not have been a viable chip to bring to market untill now or NVIDIA could be sand bagging just as AMD probably is due to how long the change from 28nm to 20nm was going to take.

I expect AMD to be late to the part and match the GTX 780 but still be lower than Titan, which results in Nvidia being able to play the fastest single GPU card, AMD can't use crossfire as a PRO: untill they fix it so thats out currently its a wash nothing big till 20nm in 2014.

Normally at this stage AMD would launch a 20nm part as part of the 7000 series to test the manufacturing process but since its not ready thats a no go. Oh well still dont believe this news. I could be wrong would be nice if I was wrong but currently I doubt it.

Granted back with the 7970 launched i called it on TS3 with a few other reviews that 7970 was a misbalanced GPU and didnt make sense

7770 = 640 shaders 128bit bus 16 rops 40 TMUs
7870 = 1280 shaders 256 bit bus 32 rops 80 TMUs
7970 = 1920 shaders 384 bit bus 48 rops 120 TMUs
that would have been the usual way amd steps up and steps down a mid range GPU, where as the 7970 seemed to be a one off to regain the crown instead when it launched. Essentially with AMD having fired key personnel they seemed to have lost that ability to scale up and scale down more effectively and efficiently.

another possible option was 2560 384 bit 48 rops but would have been far to power hungry at the time. This revision may change this but w.e it is seems to be more like GK110 was aka heres the GPU we wanted to release but couldn't.

at about 1800 shaders 32 rops seems to be okay but with the 7970 it can be noticed that while not entirely starved it could indeed benefit.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.20/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
#47
Well we will see but essentially we wont see a big jump until 20nm is ready
Which kind of puts everything in perspective. Are AMD going to release a whole new generation of GPU's only to have that series be superseded in half a calendar year?

TSMC are on record as saying volume production of 20nm is due (presumably) late in Q1 2014, which is also the timeline for GDDR6/DDR4. I'd find it hard to believe that AMD (and likely Nvidia) wouldn't like to jump on that particular train at the earliest opportunity.

The fact is GK110 was tapped out back when GTX 680 launched it may not have been a viable chip to bring to market untill now or NVIDIA could be sand bagging just as AMD probably is due to how long the change from 28nm to 20nm was going to take.
I expect AMD to be late to the part and match the GTX 780 but still be lower than Titan, which results in Nvidia being able to play the fastest single GPU card
Seeing the way Nvidia model their strategy, its not beyond the realms of possibility that they could release a full 2880 core GK110 (in whatever numbers/price), rename the Titan the GTX 880, and the GTX 780 the GTX 870 and still have AMD's top single GPU SKU paired against Nvidia's third best performance card.
Normally at this stage AMD would launch a 20nm part as part of the 7000 series to test the manufacturing process but since its not ready thats a no go. Oh well still dont believe this news. I could be wrong would be nice if I was wrong but currently I doubt it.
TSMC's contract with Apple for A8 production likely fits the bill for initial production for them. Small, relatively simple chips (low transistor count), that yield high quantities from limited wafer production.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
2,998 (0.64/day)
Likes
611
Location
Ancient Greece, Acropolis (Time Lord)
System Name My Red Dragon Gaming PC
Processor AMD FX-8350 @ 4.40GHz w/8-Cores - Bus 277 / 1.35v
Motherboard Asus Crosshair V Formula ROG - Bios v1801
Cooling Corsair H100 Water Cooling (120mm x4 Push/Pull)
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB DDR3-2210 (8GBx2)
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE (ATI) DUAL-X R9 280X 3GB GDDR5 OC + Sapphire Radeon RX 580 8GB Nitro+ LE
Storage Corsair Force 3 SSD 180GB + WD 32MB buffer 1TB HD
Display(s) Asus 24" (VG245H) FHD 75Hz 1ms FreeSyn - Gaming Monitor
Case CoolerMaster HAF 932 - My Custom Red Dragn MOD!
Audio Device(s) SteelSound 5Hv2 8CH HD + EAX® Advanced™ HD 5.0 -SupremeFX X-Fi 2
Power Supply Corsair 750W Gamers Power Supply
Mouse Razer DeathAdder PC Gaming Mouse - Ergonomic Left Hand Edition
Keyboard Logitech G15 Classic Gaming Keyboard
Software Windows 10 x64 Ultimate
Benchmark Scores I have the worlds Fastest PC ever Built - 1980
#49
I am not sure about this HD 9000 series? I mean, they are skipping the HD 8000 series for the performance desktop. I other words, this 9000 series better be at the very least a massive update/design to justify it IMO.
Ahh the 9 series actually reminded me of the legendary 9700 Pro :D
It was that 9700 Pro that converted me to ATI Radeon :D
 

erocker

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
42,465 (10.10/day)
Likes
18,135
Processor i7 8700K
Motherboard Asus Maximus Hero X WiFi
Cooling Water
Memory 16GB G.Skill 3200Mhz CL14
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Storage SSD's
Display(s) Nixeus EDG27
Case Thermaltake Core X5
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Zx
Power Supply Corsair H1000i
Mouse Zowie EC1-B
#50
I am not sure about this HD 9000 series? I mean, they are skipping the HD 8000 series for the performance desktop. I other words, this 9000 series better be at the very least a massive update/design to justify it IMO.

It was that 9700 Pro that converted me to ATI Radeon :D
I think it is more likely they are calling it the 9 series because the 8 series is already taken by pre-built rebrands. Given that is already done, it makes sense.

That being said I have no doubt the new cards will be competitive.