• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Radeon HD 9000 Series Arrives This October: Report

Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
419 (0.18/day)
Likes
116
Processor Intel i7-3820 @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte X79-UD7
Cooling Thermaltake Water Pro 2.0
Memory 16GB DDR3 1866
Video Card(s) Leadtek GeForce GTX 670 Reference
Storage Intel SSD530 120GB OS/BOOT, various mechanical drives for storage
Display(s) 2x Dell U2311H
Case Lian-Li PC-V1000
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence ST
Power Supply Cooler Master Silent Pro Modular 600W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
#51
9000 series GPU to pair with your FX9000 CPU! Vegeta would be proud. :rockout:
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
419 (0.18/day)
Likes
116
Processor Intel i7-3820 @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte X79-UD7
Cooling Thermaltake Water Pro 2.0
Memory 16GB DDR3 1866
Video Card(s) Leadtek GeForce GTX 670 Reference
Storage Intel SSD530 120GB OS/BOOT, various mechanical drives for storage
Display(s) 2x Dell U2311H
Case Lian-Li PC-V1000
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence ST
Power Supply Cooler Master Silent Pro Modular 600W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
#52
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
538 (0.15/day)
Likes
146
System Name HTPC whhaaaat?
Processor 2600k @ 4500mhz
Motherboard Asus Maximus IV gene-z gen3
Cooling Noctua NH-C14
Memory Gskill Ripjaw 2x4gb
Video Card(s) EVGA 1080 FTW @ 2037/11016
Storage 2x512GB MX100/1x Agility 3 128gb ssds, Seagate 3TB HDD
Display(s) Vizio P 65'' 4k tv
Case Lian Li pc-c50b
Audio Device(s) Denon 3311
Power Supply Corsair 620HX
#53
The WCCF/Guru3D/Andwhoeverelseisreprintingthearticle seems to gloss over at least one fairly important fact - the reporting of the Hainan chip as being some performance/enthusiast part when AMD's Dave Baumann has already stated that Hainan is much lower down the product stack
This is quite true, although I reference it as Hainan as that is the accepted rumor-monger place-holder for the chip everyone expects to be 1792sp. In the end it's really just semantics until we know what it's actually called. It seems odd to reference it as simply the successor to Pitcairn.


As for 2304sp, I still do not understand how people believe this will be a native spec. It makes no sense. Not only from a product point of view (the first salvage sku is a 7970 with not needed rops?) but also efficiency.

With 2304 shaders, your mainline efficiency would be at 1111/6000 from a clock/unit pov. The same as 1536 or 768sp and respective smaller buses. Using faster ram doesn't make sense because a clock would not be reached to absorb the bw for efficiency...hence it almost certainly being a salvage part. That doesn't stop them from releasing it first and harolding the full part later as the value high-end second-coming to make as much money as possible off early adopters, but it's just not realistic (especially since 48 rops would allow for 40-44 units) for that to be 'it'. It would be a severe waste of resources.

As for everything else,

Bonaire at 1100/7000 would be essentially equal to 650ti Boost.
Not-Hainan Le/7870 will take on 660...the former probably with 1pci-e connector (150w)
1536 1xxx/6000 would be fairly similar to 760.
1792 11xx/7000 would be very similar to a 770, slightly slower but conceivably use less power (225w).
(Get why nvidia refreshed their lineup as such? AMD is predictable and they preempted each important product with similar-to-better than expected performance.)
780 is clocked expecting a 2560 part at 1000/6000. I think that AMD will take the over/under on that (2304 at 1xxx/6000 and 2560 at 1xxx/7000) hence creating a market between 770/780 and 780/Titan. Truth be told, 780 should be the most efficient with regards to units/rops/bw, but AMD's arch won't be far behind and will be good for clocks/units/bw...and in theory should be able to clock higher within the same tdp because of smaller die size granted somewhat off-set by need for greater external bw (higher mem clock).
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
463 (0.21/day)
Likes
186
Processor i5 4670K - @ 4.8GHZ core
Motherboard MSI Z87 G43
Cooling Thermalright Ultra-120 *(Modded to fit on this motherboard)
Memory 16GB 2400MHZ
Video Card(s) HD7970 GHZ edition Sapphire
Storage Samsung 120GB 850 EVO & 4X 2TB HDD (Seagate)
Display(s) 42" Panasonice LED TV @120Hz
Case Corsair 200R
Audio Device(s) Xfi Xtreme Music with Hyper X Core
Power Supply Cooler Master 700 Watts
#54
which is fine and dandy but at the current power threshold they would need some huge clock speed gains along with the 300 or so shaders to make a huge improvement

its 15% shader increase with no known clock speeds but considering current designs most likely 1100 is the top clock speed to be seen on reference probably more likely to see 1000-1050

so from current looks about 15-20% if that, coupled with the fact there is still no Crossfire fix yet. Lets just say im not impressed, and I am willing to bet if the trail is followed long enough the source who gave this info is full of it.

This means AMD would release a card thats roughly on par with the GTX 780 but far more power hungry and hot, that said a game bundle like before would be nice,

Regardless this news seems a bit suspect. No disrespect you BTA but it just smells a bit to fishy but thats just my opinion.
I think i read somewhere that 7790 had GCN 1.1 due to which it had nice power saving - plus some of 7790 tweaking reached 7990 as well, due to which 7990 doesn't eat double power compared to 7970.
 
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
884 (0.41/day)
Likes
75
Location
US
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard AsRock X370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H60 Liquid Cooling
Memory 16 GB CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 3000 Mhz (Running at 2933)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte G1 GTX 1070
Storage 240 GB Kingston SSD, 7 TB's of HDDs
Display(s) LG 27UD58P-B 27” IPS 4K
Case Phanteks Enthos Pro M
Audio Device(s) Integrated
Power Supply Corsair 750 P2
Mouse Mionix Naos 8200
Keyboard G Skill Ripjaws RGB Mechanical Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro
#55
Maybe this series of cards may actually be new technology instead of Kelper 2.0 from Nvidia
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
893 (0.46/day)
Likes
341
#56
Ahh the 9 series actually reminded me of the legendary 9700 Pro :D
oh man...the memories. that 9800 xt 256 mb ddr2 edition with copper heatsink. saved up for months to get that thing when it released. hands down, best gpu ever. stupidly overpowerful for when it came out though. (late 03?)
put that on a pair of oced 1.5 ghz pIII chips and 2 gb of sdram....man, that machine was awesome. if only the motherboard hadnt died....
 
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
714 (0.39/day)
Likes
501
Location
Nykoebing Mors, Denmark
System Name the little fart
Processor Intel I7-5820K
Motherboard MSI X99S Gaming 7
Cooling Polimatech Megahelem push/pull bitfenix Spectre 120mm pro
Memory 16 GB Crucial Sport 2400Mhz DDR 4
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9 290 Tri-x OC
Storage 1 Crucial MX100 512GB SSD,1 Seagate Momentus XT 500GB, 1 1,5TB WD Black Caviar, 1 4TB WD RED HD
Display(s) IIyama E2607WSD
Case Custom Lian-Li PC-50R
Audio Device(s) Audio boost 2(realtek)
Power Supply Thermaltake DPS G 1050 watt Digital PSU
Software windows 10 64 bit
#57
The best videocard they have EVER made was a gigabyte Maya II 9700 PRO, a true piece of ingeneering. I still have mine laying behind me in the box with a Abit motherboard and a 462(AMD xp 2200, Oc'ed to 3.2Ghz) and it still rocks on win 98 with a good old game.

On to topic, i really hope the new engine CGN 2.0 till be better to take care of the microstuttering thats all that matters for me to get a upgrade.
I have 2x5850 in xfire and to my need in games thats just about enough playing in 1920x1200, but i want a new screen 2550x1440 or even the new kid on the block, the Asus 4K screen, im going to need GFX power in the end.
If 1 cant do it then i have to go xfire again.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Messages
1,327 (0.60/day)
Likes
693
Location
78°55' N, 11°56' E
System Name -aLiEn beaTs-
Processor Intel i7 4770k OC 4.7GHz @ 1.28v | Cache 4.2GHz
Motherboard Asus Z87-Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H90 custom p|p fans
Memory G.skill TridentX 2x8GB DDR3 2400MHz CL10|1T
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 980TI AMP!Omega Factory OC 1418MHz
Storage Intel SSD, Crucial SSD
Display(s) Samsung C27FG73 144HZ
Case CoolerMaster HAF 932 USB3.0
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD @ 2.1 Bose acoustimass 5
Power Supply Chieftec Ntro88+ 650W [52A]
Mouse oldschool Razer Copperhead blu
Keyboard Logitech G19s
Software Windows 10 Pro RS3 64Bit
Benchmark Scores ► ♪♫♪♩♬♫♪♭
#58

erocker

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
42,690 (9.94/day)
Likes
18,561
Processor i7 8700K
Motherboard Asus Maximus Hero X WiFi
Cooling Water
Memory 16GB G.Skill 3200Mhz CL14
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Storage SSD's
Display(s) Nixeus EDG27
Case Thermaltake Core X5
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Zx
Power Supply Corsair H1000i
Mouse Zowie EC1-B
#59
Those graphs speak of more speculation and rumor. Not to mention they don't seem very accurate as far as comparison.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2008
Messages
78 (0.02/day)
Likes
5
#60
It was that 9700 Pro that converted me to ATI Radeon :D[/QUOTE]

I still have my 9800 pro on my bookshelf in fact I also have 2 radeon 4850s one 5870 next to it running out of storage room I'm still using 2 hd 6950s . AMD should send me a thank you note for putting all their kids thru college .
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Messages
1,327 (0.60/day)
Likes
693
Location
78°55' N, 11°56' E
System Name -aLiEn beaTs-
Processor Intel i7 4770k OC 4.7GHz @ 1.28v | Cache 4.2GHz
Motherboard Asus Z87-Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H90 custom p|p fans
Memory G.skill TridentX 2x8GB DDR3 2400MHz CL10|1T
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 980TI AMP!Omega Factory OC 1418MHz
Storage Intel SSD, Crucial SSD
Display(s) Samsung C27FG73 144HZ
Case CoolerMaster HAF 932 USB3.0
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD @ 2.1 Bose acoustimass 5
Power Supply Chieftec Ntro88+ 650W [52A]
Mouse oldschool Razer Copperhead blu
Keyboard Logitech G19s
Software Windows 10 Pro RS3 64Bit
Benchmark Scores ► ♪♫♪♩♬♫♪♭
#61
Those graphs speak of more speculation and rumor. Not to mention they don't seem very accurate as far as comparison.
Maybe, but its aprox. timeline says that real VI 9000 (Q4 2014) is still a looong way to go..
 
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
42 (0.02/day)
Likes
8
System Name Master / Note
Processor Core i5 2310 / Pentium T4200
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2V-B3 / Barebone
Memory 2x2 GB Generic 1333MHz / 2+1GB DDR2 1066Mhz
Video Card(s) HD 7950 Vapor-X
Display(s) Samsung UN32EH6030GXZD 32" / Sansung 932BW 19"
Case Cooler Master Elite 331
Power Supply Antec High Current Gamer 400
Software Windows 7Pro x64 MSDNA / Windows 7 Basic x32
#62
Bonaire at 1100/7000 would be essentially equal to 650ti Boost.
Not-Hainan Le/7870 will take on 660...the former probably with 1pci-e connector (150w)
1536 1xxx/6000 would be fairly similar to 760.
1792 11xx/7000 would be very similar to a 770, slightly slower but conceivably use less power (225w).
(Get why nvidia refreshed their lineup as such? AMD is predictable and they preempted each important product with similar-to-better than expected performance.)
780 is clocked expecting a 2560 part at 1000/6000. I think that AMD will take the over/under on that (2304 at 1xxx/6000 and 2560 at 1xxx/7000) hence creating a market between 770/780 and 780/Titan. Truth be told, 780 should be the most efficient with regards to units/rops/bw, but AMD's arch won't be far behind and will be good for clocks/units/bw...and in theory should be able to clock higher within the same tdp because of smaller die size granted somewhat off-set by need for greater external bw (higher mem clock).
This series sounds like a tunning on the HD 7000 series to get more perf/watt, by the way we saw the improvements on kabini igp and 7790.

I'm waiting a new pricewar... get a ~780 perf. card going to ~350$ would be nice.

And Amd can make an oficial overclocked 9970 edition to troll the Titan :laugh::laugh::laugh:
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
549 (0.25/day)
Likes
113
System Name SIGSEGV
Processor Intel | AMD
Motherboard 1440 FCBGA| X399
Cooling 4 Heatpipes | EK
Memory 16 Gb DDR4 2400 | 32 GB DDR4
Video Card(s) 1060 | MI25 / Vega Frontier | Tesla K
Storage 1TB 7200/256 SSD PCIE | ~ TB
Display(s) 15,5" / 27" LEDTV | No Display
Case Black & Grey
Audio Device(s) Realtek
Power Supply Silverstone 850W | Unrated PSU
Software LinuxMint KDE | XFCE
Benchmark Scores i dont care about scores
#63

Cr. Guru3D
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
1,810 (0.71/day)
Likes
238
Location
So. Cal.
#64
Here's the one thing that makes no sense... What’s the wait? Obviously AMD has had such designs waiting in the wings.

Consider what they got from Malta; although we never knew if those aren't cherry picked Tahiti's, or had true improvements for power. It pretty much indicated once production could provide lower leakage chips... things have the ability to improve. While Bonaire, seemingly good return on performance and power usage, while only receiving GCN 1.1. Perhaps a more sophisticated boost algorithms, true GCN 2.0 enhancements, with higher quality production might be some if not most of this 9XXX series, but why the wait?

Figure even if AMD held off like mid-April; at that point it was "dried in concrete" to everyone what Nvidia had planned, a re-spin their GTX 6XX. Even if AMD held back to that point to finalize product specs and send to fab, wouldn't they receive volumes of die candidates, send to AIB’s and have SKU’s for sale, I though that was like 18-20 weeks meaning more August-Sept.

October’s pushing 6-7 months, what gives?
 

erocker

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
42,690 (9.94/day)
Likes
18,561
Processor i7 8700K
Motherboard Asus Maximus Hero X WiFi
Cooling Water
Memory 16GB G.Skill 3200Mhz CL14
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Storage SSD's
Display(s) Nixeus EDG27
Case Thermaltake Core X5
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Zx
Power Supply Corsair H1000i
Mouse Zowie EC1-B
#65
Here's the one thing that makes no sense... What’s the wait? Obviously AMD has had such designs waiting in the wings.

Consider what they got from Malta; although we never knew if those aren't cherry picked Tahiti's, or had true improvements for power. It pretty much indicated once production could provide lower leakage chips... things have the ability to improve. While Bonaire, seemingly good return on performance and power usage, while only receiving GCN 1.1. Perhaps a more sophisticated boost algorithms, true GCN 2.0 enhancements, with higher quality production might be some if not most of this 9XXX series, but why the wait?

Figure even if AMD held off like mid-April; at that point it was "dried in concrete" to everyone what Nvidia had planned, a re-spin their GTX 6XX. Even if AMD held back to that point to finalize product specs and send to fab, wouldn't they receive volumes of die candidates, send to AIB’s and have SKU’s for sale, I though that was like 18-20 weeks meaning more August-Sept.

October’s pushing 6-7 months, what gives?
Sales of current series is still good. It's about making money afterall.
 
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Messages
5,975 (2.56/day)
Likes
5,280
Location
Hi! I'm from the Internet
System Name Selene / Yoda
Processor Fx 8350 @ 4.4 / Phenom II x6 1090t @ 3.6
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 r4.0 / Gigabyte 890XA-UD3
Cooling H100i / Xig Dark Knight
Memory 4x 8gb G.Skill Snipers / 4x 4gb G.Skill Ares
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9 290x / XfX DD & VisionTek HD6850's C'fired
Storage 256gb ssd, 2x 2tb Wd Blacks & 1x 1tb Wd black / 1x 1tb
Display(s) Dell Ultra Sharp 2408 WFp / Hp w2207
Case Raidmax Vampire / Chieftec Alum. Dragon Blue
Audio Device(s) Onboard Hd Audio / Onboard Hd Audio
Power Supply Corsair TX 850 watt / Corsair TX 750 watt
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Corsair Strafe
Software Win 10 pro / Win Vista Home prem. 64 bit
Benchmark Scores What are benchmarks anyway?
#66
So basically what I am getting from this is that I am good with my 7850's for awhile.

The Ati Rage Fury pro and K6-2 is what pulled me over to the Ati/Amd kingdom and been with them since.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
5,296 (1.79/day)
Likes
1,777
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.5ghz1.525c NB2.44ghz Ht2.64ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 16Gb @1600 cas8
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Asus Dual OC gtx1060 6Gb
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far 6600 3dmark
#67
Sales of current series is still good. It's about making money afterall.
Im personally ! Dreaming! of a 20nm miracle and it would be a miracle.:)
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,502 (1.87/day)
Likes
1,125
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#68
The top cards will have 2 or 3 GB of VRAM I wander...
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
615 (0.30/day)
Likes
75
System Name [WIP]
Processor Intel Pentium G3420 [i7-4790K SOON(tm)]
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling [Corsair H100i]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB-2400-CL10 DDR3
Video Card(s) [MSI AMD Radeon R9-290 Gaming]
Storage Seagate 2TB Desktop SSHD / [Samsung 256GB 840 PRO]
Display(s) [BenQ XL2420Z]
Case [Corsair Obsidian 750D]
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro / Linux Mint 15 / SteamOS
#69
which is fine and dandy but at the current power threshold they would need some huge clock speed gains along with the 300 or so shaders to make a huge improvement

its 15% shader increase with no known clock speeds but considering current designs most likely 1100 is the top clock speed to be seen on reference probably more likely to see 1000-1050

so from current looks about 15-20% if that, coupled with the fact there is still no Crossfire fix yet. Lets just say im not impressed, and I am willing to bet if the trail is followed long enough the source who gave this info is full of it.

This means AMD would release a card thats roughly on par with the GTX 780 but far more power hungry and hot, that said a game bundle like before would be nice,

Regardless this news seems a bit suspect. No disrespect you BTA but it just smells a bit to fishy but thats just my opinion.

1 GCN 1.0 core < 1 GCN 2.0 core

Also, GTX 780, and even GTX 770 for that matter, use more power than a R7970... so I dont know what you mean...
 

crazyeyesreaper

Chief Broken Rig
Staff member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
8,865 (2.67/day)
Likes
3,753
Location
04578
#70


much faster same power draw at 28nm theres no way AMD can increase performance to match while dropping power consumption also know one knows how good GCN 2.0 will it seems to be more of a VLIW 5 to VLIW 4 change to me which resulted in little performance difference

Going from previous AMD gpu changes

at the same process node

they will gain 10-15% max and increase power draw at peak by about 40 watts.

THe GTX 780 is roughly 18-22% faster than the 7970 GHz edition, this would mean going by previous AMD design changes and performance increases that if GCN 2.0 is much like the VLIW 5 vs VLIW 4 change then the new HD9000 series would be slightly slower than the GTX 780 unless AMD is willing to push the power draw much higher.

THis means AMDs gpu will probably peak at 260-270w in a game and hit a maximum of 300-315w in likes of Furmark while being slower. Only way to counter act that would be higher clocks, which requires better binning = higher prices or even higher power consumption.

Having owned every high end AMD gpu since the HD 4000 series, my past experiences tell me AMD will equal the GTX 780 while being slightly cheaper but will run hotter and have a much higher power draw to achieve it.

4870 1gb was 13% slower than the 4890
5870 was 12 % slower than the 6970
7970GHz edition will most likely be roughly the same difference.

4890 was 27% slower than the 5870
6970 was 23% slower than the 7970 GHz edition added 9% on to that for a 31%

Thus looking at past changes at the same manufacturering process it can be expected that the 7970 GHz edition will be around 12-15% slower than the HD 9970 or w.e AMD calls it which as it stands is not enough to make the leap to beating the GTX 780, AMD wont risk pushing out the GPUs untill they can beat it soundly by a few % points in order to prove they are "better"

Regardless it wont matter much if AMD can rival the 780 while being cheaper COnsumers win. I just do not expect the gains everyone else does.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
5,296 (1.79/day)
Likes
1,777
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.5ghz1.525c NB2.44ghz Ht2.64ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 16Gb @1600 cas8
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Asus Dual OC gtx1060 6Gb
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far 6600 3dmark
#71
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_780_TF_Gaming/images/power_peak.gif http://tpucdn.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_780_TF_Gaming/images/power_maximum.gif

much faster same power draw at 28nm theres no way AMD can increase performance to match while dropping power consumption also know one knows how good GCN 2.0 will it seems to be more of a VLIW 5 to VLIW 4 change to me which resulted in little performance difference

Going from previous AMD gpu changes

at the same process node

they will gain 10-15% max and increase power draw at peak by about 40 watts.

THe GTX 780 is roughly 18-22% faster than the 7970 GHz edition, this would mean going by previous AMD design changes and performance increases that if GCN 2.0 is much like the VLIW 5 vs VLIW 4 change then the new HD9000 series would be slightly slower than the GTX 780 unless AMD is willing to push the power draw much higher.

THis means AMDs gpu will probably peak at 260-270w in a game and hit a maximum of 300-315w in likes of Furmark while being slower. Only way to counter act that would be higher clocks, which requires better binning = higher prices or even higher power consumption.

Having owned every high end AMD gpu since the HD 4000 series, my past experiences tell me AMD will equal the GTX 780 while being slightly cheaper but will run hotter and have a much higher power draw to achieve it.

4870 1gb was 13% slower than the 4890
5870 was 12 % slower than the 6970
7970GHz edition will most likely be roughly the same difference.

4890 was 27% slower than the 5870
6970 was 23% slower than the 7970 GHz edition added 9% on to that for a 31%
Vliw 4-5 ,??, I don't see it, and I think all the focus being placed on shaders might mean naught.
To me the details aren't there on gcn2 but I'm expecting a design aimed to differentiate via Hsa tweeks , after all ioummu or whatever it is has arrived and at rev 2 + ie established, and they are pushing hsa hard now , there Will imho be full dx11.2 support in architecture and therein another possible advantage.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
282 (0.12/day)
Likes
62
System Name 3D Vision & Sound Blaster
Processor Intel Core i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz (stock voltage, 60C on hottest core)
Motherboard Gigabyte P67A-D3-B3
Cooling Thermalright Silver Arrow SB-E Special Edition (with 3x 140mm Black Thermalright fans)
Memory Crucial 16GB (2x8GB 1600MHz CL8)
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12288MB Maxwell @1350MHz (from 4890>5870>460>660>680>460)
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD (Steam) + 840 250GB SSD (Origin) + 840 EVO 1TB (work install)
Display(s) Samsung 34" S34E790C (3440x1440) + BenQ XL2420T 120Hz @ 1080p + 24" PHILIPS Touchscreen IPS
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Windowed with 6x 140mm Corsair AFs
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster Recon3D Fatal1ty + Z506 5.1 speakers/Logitech UE9000
Power Supply Corsair RM750i 750W 80PLUS Gold
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech PS/2 keyboard
Software Windows 7 Pro 64bit (not sidegrading to Windoze 10 until I have to...)
Benchmark Scores 2fast4u,bro...
#72
Sounds like a pretty mediocre card -- I sure hope it is more powerful than it sounds (they need it to be at least 80% faster than 7970). 4K resolution monitors/TVs should hit mainstream markets next year at latest and tests done by various websites proved that even a single Titan cannot pull off any decent framerates at that resolution. In fact, even BF4 alpha testing shows that current gen cards fail miserably at getting anywhere close to high settings in next gen games, even at 1080p. Current GPUs have all had great value thus far against current 7+ year old consoles but when next gen consoles hit, Nvidia and AMD need to bring their A-game and at least double the performance of every tier of cards sold for the same price as current gen cards, otherwise nobody will buy them (who wants another repeat of ATI's 2900XT? Nobody, but we all want another Nvidia 8000 series to follow up to next gen consoles).
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
1,810 (0.71/day)
Likes
238
Location
So. Cal.
#73
Sales of current series is still good. It's about making money afterall.
Well things somewhat went in "free-fall" with the 760 release and subsequent stock and price that GTX660Ti had been holding. As soon as folks got a look at the 760, price on GTX660Ti tumbled and pressed the last of the GTX660 to fall on the GTX650Ti Boost.

On the 78XX, now even 7850 2Gb are like $165 -AR and 7870 have been at $180 –AR having to slip with the GTX660 GTX650Ti Boost sell-off. Now yes AMD probably still has substantial chips for both in the channel, you figure all such wafer capacity shouldv'e moved off the Pitcairn and onto Hainan. I think they'll slowly bring them to a trickle to try to re-attain a pricing of $160/$210. As much as the 7790 was to back-fill the 7850 1Gb's, I think they're here to stay, vying what is the GTX650 Boost 1Gb.

I think a bulk of 79XX Sku's started slowly drying up after the 780, with most AIB's holding with just a few nicer Boost/Ghz offerings while maintain acceptable stock levels. Most all the more generic stuff (not Boost/Ghz) have already been waning. I think AMD and there AIB will finish out the summer aiming to recapture most of the what's the respective $270/410 price points.

I don't think AMD can see enjoying making less money on Tahiti/Pitcairn parts, and possibly even some sales being taken by "suppose" new models from Nvidia in the sweet spot of the enthusiast market. Sure if they've huge volume in the channel, but why are they in that position? There's been an abundance of time to work out such a transition. It's as if someone dragged their heels on switching scheduled 28Nm wafer starts from Tahiti to Curacao / Pitcairn to Hainan. The process is the same, they certainly held a schedule wafer starts, the design/engineering has been in place by all accounts, but somehow here they are 5-6 months in a holding pattern. Is it only me that it’s not making sense?

The only thing is if they had made it like August it could be 6 months till a Volcanic Islands, if they stay with October they’ve just a 3 month lull.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,502 (1.87/day)
Likes
1,125
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#74
Sounds like a pretty mediocre card -- I sure hope it is more powerful than it sounds (they need it to be at least 80% faster than 7970).
Hard to believe they will keep the same performance increase like they did back in the day.

3870->4870->5870 Ah good days.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
14,921 (3.36/day)
Likes
5,439
System Name A dancer in your disco of fire
Processor i3 4130 3.4Ghz
Motherboard MSI B85M-E45
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 4 x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Sport 1400Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Crucial BX100 120GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case AeroCool DS Cube White
Power Supply Cooler Master G550M
Mouse Intellimouse Explorer 3.0
Keyboard Dell SK-3205
Software Windows 10 Pro
#75
Hard to believe they will keep the same performance increase like they did back in the day.

3870->4870->5870 Ah good days.
Historically it has been up and down. 80% would be fantastic for sure, but it won't happen and it can't happen.