1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Realtemp calibration help!

Discussion in 'RealTemp' started by k@in, Oct 4, 2009.

  1. k@in New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2009
    Messages:
    4 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Well I picked up a Q9550 the other day, and noticed very inconsistent temps. At only 1.288v, coretemp reports core 0 at 80c, 1 at 75c, 2 and 3 at 70c at 100% load. This ratio starts at ~60c. So according to the Realtemp documentation, I should set the TJmax to 90c for the first core, 95c for the second, and leave 100c for the rest?

    I mean, 80c load with only 1.288v can't be right, running a Big Typhoon on it, both CPU and HSF are lapped. Ambient is 68F (20c)
     
  2. burebista

    burebista

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    785 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    435
    Location:
    Romania
    Nope, you don't need calibration you need a better cooling solution or check your mount for BigTyphoon.
    You can do whatever calibration you want but distance to TJMax will be the same and when it will be 2 your CPU will start to throttle. Despite you fancy calibration. :)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  3. k@in New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2009
    Messages:
    4 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Hmm, really? Well it's not like i'm unstable at those temps, but I always thought the BT would be enough. I've mounted and remounted, no change. Will a Ultra120 be better?
     
  4. InTeL-iNsIdE Guest

    is you motherboard got the latest bios maybe the sensors arent reading it right
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  5. k@in New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2009
    Messages:
    4 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Sensors are correct. Bios is 2102, and it has had the same temps in my Maximus Formula, P5Q Pro Turbo, and my P5Q Deluxe.
     
  6. k@in New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2009
    Messages:
    4 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    The thing that bothers me is the clear disparity between the cores - core 0 is always 10c hotter than 2 & 3, and core 1 is always 5c hotter than 2 & 3.
     
  7. unclewebb

    unclewebb RealTemp Author

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2008
    Messages:
    1,062 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    566
    I don't think Intel bothers to set TJMax consistently across all 4 cores of a 45nm Core 2 Quad so I wouldn't worry too much about reported temperature differences between cores.

    Core 0 tends to be the most accurate on most CPUs and 80C is on the hot side for one of these CPUs to run at when overclocking. If you are stable then you don't have to worry about anything but if you're not then it's time to invest in a better cooler or try installing it a few different times to see if these temperatures improve.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)