- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 1,778 (0.30/day)
- Location
- Little Rock, AR
System Name | Gamer |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 3700x |
Motherboard | AsRock B550 Phantom Gaming ITX/AX |
Memory | 32GB |
Video Card(s) | ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming D |
Case | Phanteks Eclipse P200A D-RGB |
Power Supply | 800w CM |
Mouse | Corsair M65 Pro |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
I agree with all of that. It also doesn't have anything to do with what I said.No while i haven't seen it with my own eyes there are experiments, papers in peer reviewed journals and data confirming that statement available. In science you have models that are valid within certain constrains and for all intents and purposes can be proven within certain boundary conditions. Unfortunately we haven't found a general physics model that encapsulates all natural phenomena but as gravity was not defined before the 17th century, or people thought no material can withstand the effects of breaking the sound barrier before WW2 just because we do not have understanding of how things work does not mean they are not possible. There are theories and hypothesis that are put in place and as technology advances they are confirmed or disproved.
I'm talking about the PEOPLE who use science as a dogma instead of seeing it for what it is: an ever-evolving quest for information.