• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

RTX 3080 Crash to Desktop Problems Likely Connected to AIB-Designed Capacitor Choice

Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
855 (2.41/day)
It is not in my priorities of me to discover NVIDIA's magic oompa-loompa inside chip, because I do not make money from VGA card repairs.
I am aware of your measuring gear, but your accident did stop your exploration at the discovery of what an 8846A can do as by far most modern design.
Anyway this is another story, and a boring one for the readers of this forum.

While @TiN is being a bit aggressive with his words, I ultimately believe he's making the correct point.

From a PDN perspective, the only thing that matters is the frequencies at which power is drawn. It doesn't matter how NVidia's pipelines or local memory or whatever work. What matters is that they draw power at 2.1GHz increments, generating a 2.1GHz "ring frequency" across the power network... at roughly 100+ Amps.

Which will be roughly:

* 2.1GHz (Clockspeed of GPU)
* 5.25 GHz (rough clockspeed of the GDDR6x)
* 75Hz (The 75-Hz "pulse" every time a 75Hz monitor refreshes: the GPU will suddenly become very active, then stop drawing power waiting for VSync).
* Whatever the GHz is for PCIe communications
* Etc. etc. (Anything else that varies power across time)

Satisfying the needs of both a 5GHz and 75Hz simultaneously (and everything else) is what makes this so difficult. On the one hand, MLCC is traditionally considered great for high-frequency signals (like 5GHz). But guess what's considered best for low-frequency (75Hz) signals? You betcha: huge, high ESR Aluminum caps (and big 470 uF POSCAPs or 220uF caps would similarly better tackle lower-frequency problems).

----------

COULD the issue be the 2.1GHz signal? Do we KNOW FOR SURE that the issue is that the PDN runs out of power inside of a nanosecond?

Or is the card running out of power on VSyncs (~75Hz)? If the card is running out of power at that point, maybe more POSCAPs is better.

I wouldn't be convinced MLCC is "better" until someone posts a sub-nanosecond transient on a $50,000 10GHz oscilloscope showing the problem. Heck, I've seen no actual evidence posted in this entire discussion that even suggests the PDN is the issue yet. (Yeah, EVGA says they had issues when making the card. But other companies clearly have a different power-network design and EVGA's issues may not match theirs).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
271 (0.08/day)
I don't get why AIBs went cheap for this board. I mean, it's the second highest-tier GPU! You should never go cheap in that kind of product!

It is in general terms called GREED. Imagine that they save only few cents on a $699 card and still go cheap.

Greed is the one of the most important things we must get rid of in human society if we are to avoid extinction.

TO ALL 3080 OWNERS, DO NOT ACCEPT BIOS UPDATES THAT REDUCES YOUR PERFORMANCE, RETURN YOUR CARD NOW WHILE YOU CAN !!!!!
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
511 (1.53/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
6,595 (4.24/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
The quality people seem to find acceptable has fallen to an all time low, that's the root cause of all this. Had people said no these 800$ POS or however much they cost I can guarantee you Nvidia and AIBs would magically find the just right designs and components to use such that this didn't occur because they'd need to impress people.

But when all they see is "unprecedented demand" all that takes a back seat and next time around you'll get an even shittier and more expensive product.
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2019
Messages
233 (0.36/day)
I'd like to point out that the only guaranteed performance one is paying for is whatever is written on the box, so one can't really take NVIDIA to court if they wanted to just because a firmware update reduced the max auto-OC limits of early batch GPUs (and OC'ing, whether manual or automatic, is considered operating out of spec). The GPUs are still usable at spec. Only that even under ideal conditions, they will not boost as far as later GPU revisions will due to whatever issues are found and corrected with the next major batch.

That said, it doesn't make for good reputation and hurts the brand when some users lose a bit of performance from a firmware update, and will hurt even further given it'll take some time before revised cards are made and released. Then there is the fact that some companies may or may not allow for RMA/exchanges for revised GPUs (although most probably will bend and allow GPU exchanges, if only for publicity purposes). At the very least, the AIBs might be able to re-market the early batch GPUs either as cheaper SI cards for prebuilts for say, Target, Walmart, Best Buy, Dell (non-gaming-oriented lines), foreign equivalents, and so forth, where they're great as stock GPUs, since they do work at stock and just have a lower max OC ceiling.

Personally, I suspect that any major revisions will not make it to mainstream until November/December, or even not until after the new year, since all the early batches (including the "more incoming stock" being promised) were produced according to the original, finalized setup that's currently in the wild, and it'll take a bit of time to sort out the issues and get that change passed in the manufacturing process. And we're still dealing with a human virus that's still hampering the world's recovery.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
6,595 (4.24/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
I'd like to point out that the only guaranteed performance one is paying for is whatever is written on the box, so one can't really take NVIDIA to court if they wanted to just because a firmware update reduced the max auto-OC limits of early batch GPUs (and OC'ing, whether manual or automatic, is considered operating out of spec). The GPUs are still usable at spec. Only that even under ideal conditions, they will not boost as far as later GPU revisions will due to whatever issues are found and corrected with the next major batch.

That's not how it works, a manufacturer can't just say "clock speed higher than zero" or something like that and get away with every value possible afterward. This BS wouldn't last a second in court.

You were sold a product that had a specific performance characteristic which was diminished after a software update because the item was defective, that alone would be enough to win the case. You don't even need to worry about what's written on the box.

And may I remind you of this : https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/2/2...n-throttling-batterygate-class-action-lawsuit
 
Joined
Jun 7, 2020
Messages
240 (0.77/day)
System Name Yin/Yang
Processor Ryzen 7 3700x
Motherboard msi mag x570 tomahawk
Cooling CoolerMaster ML240V2 / asiahorse fs9002 120mm fans
Memory 2 x 16gb g.skill trident z neo 3600
Video Card(s) msi gaming X 2070 super 8gb
Storage 1tb sabrent rocket nvme / 1tb samsung evo 860 sata ssd / 3tb Toshiba hdd
Display(s) lg ultragear 2560x1440 144hz 1ms 27"ips
Case nzxt h510i
Audio Device(s) logitech g635 / creative sound blaster
Power Supply evga supernova 750ga 80 plus gold
Mouse logitech g402 hyperion fury
Keyboard corsair k55
I did not expect the launch to be good or smooth but seemingly this one has been exceptionally terrible...

Early adopters beware...For those of you who did not figure this out a long time ago.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
12,547 (4.42/day)
Location
USA
System Name GPD-Q9
Processor Rockchip RK-3288 1.8ghz quad core
Motherboard GPD Q9_V6_150528
Cooling Passive
Memory 2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Mali T764
Storage 16GB Samsung NAND
Display(s) IPS 1024x600
Joined
Dec 10, 2014
Messages
964 (0.42/day)
Location
Nowy Warsaw
System Name SYBARIS
Processor AMD Ryzen™ 5 3600
Motherboard MSI Arsenal Gaming B450 Tomahawk
Cooling Cryorig H7 Quad Lumi
Memory Team T-Force Delta RGB 2x8GB 3200CL16
Video Card(s) Colorful GeForce RTX 2060 6G V2
Storage WD Black WD1003FZEX 1TB + Crucial MX500 500GB
Display(s) LG 22MP68VQ-P 22" 75hz IPS
Case In Win Mana 136
Audio Device(s) HyperX Cloud X | iVOOMi iVO-169SUFBT 2.1
Power Supply Cooler Master G550M
Mouse Cooler Master MM711 | Logitech G102 Prodigy | Logitech G402 Hyperion Fury
Keyboard Fantech MK871 RGB TKL Outemu Blue mechanical keyboard
Software Windows 10 Education v2004 x64
Joined
Jun 7, 2020
Messages
240 (0.77/day)
System Name Yin/Yang
Processor Ryzen 7 3700x
Motherboard msi mag x570 tomahawk
Cooling CoolerMaster ML240V2 / asiahorse fs9002 120mm fans
Memory 2 x 16gb g.skill trident z neo 3600
Video Card(s) msi gaming X 2070 super 8gb
Storage 1tb sabrent rocket nvme / 1tb samsung evo 860 sata ssd / 3tb Toshiba hdd
Display(s) lg ultragear 2560x1440 144hz 1ms 27"ips
Case nzxt h510i
Audio Device(s) logitech g635 / creative sound blaster
Power Supply evga supernova 750ga 80 plus gold
Mouse logitech g402 hyperion fury
Keyboard corsair k55
TBH I'm just waiting for when AMD fucks up their launch somehow and people start shitting on them.

That wouldn't surprise me at all...I'm hopeful they can do better than this but I certainly wouldn't wager any money on it :D
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2019
Messages
233 (0.36/day)
That's not how it works, a manufacturer can't just say "clock speed higher than zero" or something like that and get away with every value possible afterward. This BS wouldn't last a second in court.

You were sold a product that had a specific performance characteristic which was diminished after a software update because the item was defective, that alone would be enough to win the case. You don't even need to worry about what's written on the box.

And may I remind you of this : https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/2/2...n-throttling-batterygate-class-action-lawsuit

It's a good thing then that on their official pages, the clocks are only officially advertised to a specific range, and that is officially what has been paid for. Take ASUS' Strix 3080 OC for example:

Engine Clock
OC Mode - 1740 MHz (Boost Clock)

Gaming Mode (Default) - GPU Boost Clock : 1710 MHz , GPU Base Clock : 1440 MHz

No where did they promise more than that on the product page. And since most of the crashes seem to be happening above 1800 MHz; closer to the 2 GHz limit, that's already operating "out of spec", and thus they could technically get away with a firmware tweak that hard limits things to say, 1900 MHz since they're only preventing cards from operating too far out of spec. In this instance, they are NOT throttling the performance promised, which is only up to 1740. Your example would have more relevance had the GPUs get a firmware that locks them below the originally advertised clocks, such as a hard limit to 1730 MHz in OC mode.
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2008
Messages
1,614 (0.36/day)
Location
Volos, Greece
System Name ATLAS
Processor Q6600 QUAD
Motherboard ASUS P5QC
Cooling ProlimaTech Armageddon
Memory HYPER-X KHX1600C8D3T1K2 /4GX PC3-12800 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD 5770 VAPOR-X
Storage WD Raptors 73Gb - Raid1 10.000rpm
Display(s) DELL U2311H
Case HEC Compucase CI-6919 Full tower (2003) moded .. hec-group.com.tw
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Music + mods Audigy front Panel (full working)
Power Supply HIPER 4M780 PE 980W Peak
Mouse MX510
Keyboard Microsoft Digital media 3000
Software Win 7 Pro x64 ( Retail )
While @TiN is being a bit aggressive with his words, I ultimately believe he's making the correct point.

From a PDN perspective, the only thing that matters is the frequencies at which power is drawn. It doesn't matter how NVidia's pipelines or local memory or whatever work. What matters is that they draw power at 2.1GHz increments, generating a 2.1GHz "ring frequency" across the power network... at roughly 100+ Amps.

Which will be roughly:

* 2.1GHz (Clockspeed of GPU)
* 5.25 GHz (rough clockspeed of the GDDR6x)
* 75Hz (The 75-Hz "pulse" every time a 75Hz monitor refreshes: the GPU will suddenly become very active, then stop drawing power waiting for VSync).
* Whatever the GHz is for PCIe communications
* Etc. etc. (Anything else that varies power across time)

Satisfying the needs of both a 5GHz and 75Hz simultaneously (and everything else) is what makes this so difficult. On the one hand, MLCC is traditionally considered great for high-frequency signals (like 5GHz). But guess what's considered best for low-frequency (75Hz) signals? You betcha: huge, high ESR Aluminum caps (and big 470 uF POSCAPs or 220uF caps would similarly better tackle lower-frequency problems).

----------

COULD the issue be the 2.1GHz signal? Do we KNOW FOR SURE that the issue is that the PDN runs out of power inside of a nanosecond?

Or is the card running out of power on VSyncs (~75Hz)? If the card is running out of power at that point, maybe more POSCAPs is better.

I wouldn't be convinced MLCC is "better" until someone posts a sub-nanosecond transient on a $50,000 10GHz oscilloscope showing the problem. Heck, I've seen no actual evidence posted in this entire discussion that even suggests the PDN is the issue yet. (Yeah, EVGA says they had issues when making the card. But other companies clearly have a different power-network design and EVGA's issues may not match theirs).

This is an interesting post and a pack of thoughts!
Me and TIN we have some sort of relation as we are both engaging with electrical test and measurement sector for a decade at least.
I am an maintenance electrician involving mostly with industrial electronics and power supply.
We do differentiate by allot as he has specialization and further understanding of electronic circuits how to.
But he should be the one so to inform this forum that GPU circuit analysis this requiring an 100.000 Euro 10GHz or better oscilloscope and special probes them worth 4000 Euro or more its one.
In simple English ... we are both missing the required very damn expensive tools which they are required for in-depth analysis of what is happening.
Therefore it is wise that all of us, to wait for the findings of the well paid engineers them working at the big brands.
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2017
Messages
17 (0.01/day)
Hi all,

Recently there has been some discussion about the EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 series.

During our mass production QC testing we discovered a full 6 POSCAPs solution cannot pass the real world applications testing. It took almost a week of R&D effort to find the cause and reduce the POSCAPs to 4 and add 20 MLCC caps prior to shipping production boards, this is why the EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 series was delayed at launch. There were no 6 POSCAP production EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 boards shipped.

But, due to the time crunch, some of the reviewers were sent a pre-production version with 6 POSCAP’s, we are working with those reviewers directly to replace their boards with production versions.
EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 series with 5 POSCAPs + 10 MLCC solution is matched with the XC3 spec without issues.


Also note that we have updated the product pictures at EVGA.com to reflect the production components that shipped to gamers and enthusiasts since day 1 of product launch.
Once you receive the card you can compare for yourself, EVGA stands behind its products!


Thanks
EVGA
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
12,547 (4.42/day)
Location
USA
System Name GPD-Q9
Processor Rockchip RK-3288 1.8ghz quad core
Motherboard GPD Q9_V6_150528
Cooling Passive
Memory 2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Mali T764
Storage 16GB Samsung NAND
Display(s) IPS 1024x600

OneMoar

There is Always Moar
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
8,070 (2.01/day)
Location
Rochester area
System Name RPC MK2
Processor Intel Core i5 9600K@ 4.8Ghz 1.32V
Motherboard Asrock z390 phantom gaming 4
Cooling Enermax ets-t50
Memory CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 16GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 XC ULTRA GAMING
Storage 512GB Intel 545s ssd 500GB ADATA SU800 ssd 1TB WD blue
Display(s) Cheap VA panel
Case Phanteks P300
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply HX 750i
Mouse M65 Pro RGB
Keyboard K70 RGB
Software Windows 10 +startisback
POSCAP is just a Product from Panasonic IT IS NOT A PARTICULAR TYPE OF CAPACITOR
You need to have two types of Capacitors in the circuit because MLCC's as a General Rule do not have Enough Capacitance and Other types of polymer Capacitors don't have the same filtering/frequency capability

think of it this way the larger poly type caps act as a reservoir and the MLCC handles the heavy lifting of dealing with the extreme changes in demand coming from the gpu core

its entirely possible to build a circuit with nothing but MLCC, But that requires a lot of PCB Space, its expensive, and in the end probly overkill

you can also do it with other types of Caps so long as you keep the Capacitance and frequency requirements in mind

youtubers that don't have electrical degrees should not talk about shit that requires said degree :roll:

what the article should read is this

AIBS screw up PCB design
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
871 (0.19/day)
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
System Name Ryzen/Laptop/htpc
Processor R9 3900X/i7 6700HQ/i7 2600
Motherboard AsRock X470 Taichi/Acer/ Gigabyte H77M
Cooling Corsair H115i pro with 2 Noctua NF-A14 chromax/OEM/Noctua NH-L12i
Memory G.Skill Trident Z 32GB @3200/16GB DDR4 2666 HyperX impact/24GB
Video Card(s) TUL Red Dragon Vega 56/Intel HD 530 - GTX 950m/ 970 GTX
Storage 970pro NVMe 512GB,Samsung 860evo 1TB, 3x4TB WD gold/Transcend 830s, 1TB Toshiba/Adata 256GB + 1TB WD
Display(s) Philips FTV 32 inch + Dell 2407WFP-HC/OEM/Sony KDL-42W828B
Case Phanteks Enthoo Luxe/Acer Barebone/Enermax
Audio Device(s) SoundBlasterX AE-5 (Dell A525)(HyperX Cloud Alpha)/mojo/soundblaster xfi gamer
Power Supply Seasonic focus+ 850 platinum (SSR-850PX)/165 Watt power brick/Enermax 650W
Mouse G502 Hero/M705 Marathon/G305 Hero Lightspeed
Keyboard G19/oem/Steelseries Apex 300
Software Win10 pro 64bit
All this arguing should be funny but it really isn't. At the end of the day this is a defective product that is ridiculously expensive. And I do not understand how some people have the nerve to defend nvidia when we all know the level of control they have over their partners. If you want better quality, vote with your wallets and don't buy this. But you won't because at the end of the day rationality is not something that people use. This behavior is literally the reason we can't have nice things.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
511 (1.53/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
Don't think many actually watched this ^ video. still think Poscap is a type not brand
Just do a Google search, POSCAP are Panasonic only.
 
Joined
Jun 7, 2020
Messages
240 (0.77/day)
System Name Yin/Yang
Processor Ryzen 7 3700x
Motherboard msi mag x570 tomahawk
Cooling CoolerMaster ML240V2 / asiahorse fs9002 120mm fans
Memory 2 x 16gb g.skill trident z neo 3600
Video Card(s) msi gaming X 2070 super 8gb
Storage 1tb sabrent rocket nvme / 1tb samsung evo 860 sata ssd / 3tb Toshiba hdd
Display(s) lg ultragear 2560x1440 144hz 1ms 27"ips
Case nzxt h510i
Audio Device(s) logitech g635 / creative sound blaster
Power Supply evga supernova 750ga 80 plus gold
Mouse logitech g402 hyperion fury
Keyboard corsair k55
youtubers that don't have electrical degrees should not talk about shit that requires said degree :roll:
I get your point, but I would still rather they talk about it..more awareness is a good thing and stuff like this can often accelerate a fix.

what the article should read is this

AIBS screw up pcb design, issue revisions
Didn't the same video that you posted explain within the first couple minutes why/how it's just as much of a reflection on nvidia as the AIBs if not more so?

"The thing is, as far as I'm concerned this is like nvidia screwing up the design guidelines, I wouldn't really throw this on the board partners because as far as I'm aware you can't even ship an nvidia gpu without running it through nvidia's green light program. So if nvidia doesn't approve you pcb design, you can't sell it."
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
1,752 (0.44/day)
All this arguing should be funny but it really isn't. At the end of the day this is a defective product that is ridiculously expensive. And I do not understand how some people have the nerve to defend nvidia when we all know the level of control they have over their partners.
Well, it is halo product plus planned obsolescence all rolled into one. Two birds with one stone. And people don't appreciate enough already.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
6,595 (4.24/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
It's a good thing then that on their official pages, the clocks are only officially advertised to a specific range, and that is officially what has been paid for. Take ASUS' Strix 3080 OC for example:



No where did they promise more than that on the product page. And since most of the crashes seem to be happening above 1800 MHz; closer to the 2 GHz limit, that's already operating "out of spec", and thus they could technically get away with a firmware tweak that hard limits things to say, 1900 MHz since they're only preventing cards from operating too far out of spec. In this instance, they are NOT throttling the performance promised, which is only up to 1740. Your example would have more relevance had the GPUs get a firmware that locks them below the originally advertised clocks, such as a hard limit to 1730 MHz in OC mode.

A vendor must provide specifications that match how the real product sold behaves no matter what. The only real "spec" is written in the BIOS of the card which allows the card to operate within certain parameters, i.e close to 2000Mhz, if it can't do that then it's defective and it can't match it's specification. It's as simple as that. There is no auto-OC, it's all default stock settings that Nvidia and AIBs came up with.

Again, they are simply pushing the limits of advertising, in a real legal matter those figures would never hold up just like it didn't in the Apple case. If the world operated how you think it does, then you could for example sometimes get water from the gas station in your car's tank because the oil company claimed "Up to 95% petrol content" and so that would be fine and no one could ever take them to court. That'd obliviously be completely absurd, companies can't just claim what they want and sell crap with no repercussions.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
6,595 (4.24/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
Top