RTX 4060 real specs VS MY SPECS

[TITAN RTX 4100]

I have an idea for better RTX 4060 specifications that would make it way better. Like, WAY faster.
The current RTX 4060 specs are: 3072 cores, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPS, 8GB GDDR6 17GBps on a 128 bit memory bus. Also using AD107 chip.
My idea for them would be: 4608-4864 cores, at least 144 TMUs, at least 48 ROPS, with 12GB GDDR6X 21GBps on a 192-bit memory bus. Would use at least AD106 chip, but for 4864 cores, and more ROPS and TMUs, would require AD104. Which is not the best to stretch it that far except for performance. Wish they made AD105 with up to 5632 cores, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPS. Even having 192-bit bus may require AD104. A theoretical AD105 should support 192-bit bus too. I generally think that if the RTX 4060 had 4608-4864 cores, and 12GB GDDR6X would make it into an actual improvement over the RTX 3060. Performance could stretch as far as ~15-30% more faster than 3060 Ti possibly. Maybe even more than the 3070! Now THAT would be some true innovation over the RTX 3060 for sure. Plenty of vram, and gamers could get proper 1440p performance for only $330-$350, without DLSS! But of course NVIDIA wouldn't do that.

 

[Toothless]

You basically explained a beefed up 4060ti that would make no sense in their product lineup.

 

[masterdeejay]

Why not double the bandwidth and use the cheap GDDR6?
The much cheaper Intel A750 has 256bit GDDR6 512Gb/s

 

[Belfaborac]

Don't tell us, tell Jensen.

 

[TheoneandonlyMrK]

I disagree, surely the 4090's specs at 4060 pricing would be the Best 4060.
In all seriousness it sounds like someone wants a "4060", Not a 4050 called a 4060.

 

[AusWolf]

So you just want a 4060 Ti, right? Why speculate?

 

[Beginner Micro Device]

Nah, SM and VRAM configurations are completely fine. Just make every Ada GPU 300 MHz slower and shift a tier down. 12% handicapped "4070" (and called "4060 Super" or something along those lines) for ~430 USD would've made a lot of sense.

But we're in the real world where Jensen has been unbothered and he's still de facto unbothered. nVidia have absolutely no need to adjust their products to fulfill customers' needs. AMD don't even try to push them.

 

[Vayra86]

So you just want a 4060 Ti, right? Why speculate?

Not really, the 4060ti has the bandwidth of a broken shoelace.

I don't quite get this topic either tbf. I mean sure, nice fantasy, next.

 

[N/A]

Going from 4070 to 4070 Ti is only 25% faster pointing that it's starved only for ROPs. neither Cuda nor bandwidth. 4080 is starved for cores. So the ideal combination is something in between. Nvidia made a mistake by giving 16 rops to 1536 cores. The basic building block should have been 1280 cores and extrapolate from that. 4090 16384 in its current state is only as good as 4070 doubled 12288 128 rops 24. Many stupid decisions happening this generation. So a 3840 cuda 48 rops on a slower 12 GB would have made sense, same core count and memory as 3060. If 4070 and 4080 follow this trend why not the 4060. Basically half the 4070 ti but retaining the memory and then it would be 25-50% slower.

 

[A&P211]

My idea is to call the 4060, the 4050ti.

 

[AusWolf]

Not really, the 4060ti has the bandwidth of a broken shoelace.

That's true of the bottom half of the whole Ada lineup, if not more.

My idea is to call the 4060, the 4050ti.

My idea is just buy whatever card suits your budget and needs, regardless of what it's called.

 

[Don Zauser]

Nerbos`s 3DMark - Time Spy (GPU) score: 12731 marks with a GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 @ 3060/10301MHzscores getScoreFormatted in the 3DMark - Time Spy (GPU) benchmark. Nerbosranks #211 worldwide and #1 in the hardware class. Find out more at HWBOT.

hwbot.org

this is what you can get from an extreme 4060 oc. just look at "Graphics score"

for bandwidth I would be happy to use the 24gb/s Samsung gddr6

 

[Tomgang]

Nvidia will only do such a thing, if amd gives them enough competition. As long Nvidia dont have to make the 4060 better than it is. It aint going to happen. The only thing Nvidia and Jensen think of is milking costumers for as many money he can get away with.

Rtx 4060 is in some ways, a failure of a card. First of all the downgrade in vram compared to 3060, is bad. But also that it only runs PCIe x8. A problem for people with older systems potentially. For not to forget the lowsy improvement over rtx 3060.

With that said, i have just last week buying a rtx 4060. But only because Gigabyte made this low profile version. Else i would never touch a card like this.

 

[DemonicRyzen666]

Everyone/Reviewer seems to be in love with D.L.S.S
Yet when a new card came out that uses every part of D.L.S.S to gain massive improvements over the last generation parts. (A.K.A RTX 4060 /ti vs RTX 3060 /ti)
Everyone is mad, that its only 15% fast in pure raw performance against the older GPU without all the D.L.S.S. technologies, most complaints are about the price.
It seems like a total contradiction to me to get mad over software technology that everyone & reviewers are currently parsing for its fps improvements & claimed quality improvements just because the price is higher than last generation. Software design & integration isn't a free thing to get working, it takes time & money & research. You are now paying for all that with Ada Lovelace gpus.

 

[AusWolf]

Everyone/Reviewer seems to be in love with D.L.S.S
Yet when a new card came out that uses every part of D.L.S.S to gain massive improvements over the last generation parts. (A.K.A RTX 4060 /ti vs RTX 3060 /ti)
Everyone is mad, that its only 15% fast in pure raw performance against the older GPU without all the D.L.S.S. technologies, most complaints are about the price.
It seems like a total contradiction to me to get mad over software technology that everyone & reviewers are currently parsing for its fps improvements & claimed quality improvements just because the price is higher than last generation. Software design & integration isn't a free thing to get working, it takes time & money & research. You are now paying for all that with Ada Lovelace gpus.

In my opinion, it makes complete sense to get upset for trying to compensate the lack of performance with software. I want performance, not excuses. What doesn't make sense is praising the high end for using software that you don't even need unless you play at 4K or above.

 

[Hyderz]

40 series from a 30 series owner is pretty much a skip,
the 40 series will look like a decent upgrade if you upgrading from a 9/10/16 series and certain 20 series gpu
40 series is way overpriced, now with recent release from amd 7800xt the 4070 has dropped and can be considered
4060/ti is overpriced for what the performance offers.. your spec that you mentioned will probably be $700 4060 card lol which consumers are gonna turn away

 

[N/A]

$50 is not all that substantial and I waited 5 months to get it. $10 a month is basically nothing. I could have played all the games already and forgot about it.
Clearly 4070 is showing signs of fatigue so at this point I would sway away from it , only 11 models left on newegg. it's probably no longer in production,
It's a possibility that Nvidia could be disabling 40% of 4070 Ti and naming it a 4060 Super. 4608 cc / 12GB and 4070 Super because 12GB is basically the bare minimum.
So you could get exactly what you want but again too little too late and time spent in anguish instead of enjoying the new titles for what it's worth.

 

[wolf]

if only the 4070 was called a 4060 like it should have been.. in another timeline perhaps.

Honestly though, while the names are bad/wrong/whatever for much of the line-up, the price is what matters most, and that's where this whole generation is facing poor sales.

 

[TITAN RTX 4100]

I probably need to make a full 40 series revamp topic instead of this. Whoever wants that can give the comment a like if you want to alert me fast, or if you would do it properly, quote this reply and say "yes, I'd like a 40 series full revamp topic".