• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Ryzen 7-1700 Beats Core i7-7700K: AMD

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
39,292 (8.43/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
AMD is very confident that it has a lineup of desktop processors that compete with Intel's best. In its recent Ryzen 7 series launch presentation, the company released benchmark numbers to claim that the $499 Ryzen 7-1800X performs on par with the $1,099 Core i7-6900K, despite a narrower memory bus, and at less than half its price.

More interestingly, the company claims that the Ryzen 7-1700, its third fastest Ryzen part, will be a clear winner against the identically-priced Core i7-7700K ($329). The Ryzen 7-1700 posts up to 46% higher performance than the i7-7700K, and even holds up a slim lead over its rival in tests that are not very multi-threaded.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
524 (0.29/day)
Location
In the middle of nowhere
System Name Scrapped Parts, Unite !
Processor i5-2500 @ 3.3 Ghz//Q9300 @ 2.5 Ghz
Motherboard GA-H67MA-USB3-B3// P35 Neo2-FR
Cooling Stock
Memory 10 GB DDR3 1333 // 3 GB DDR2
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame GeForce GTX1060 Vulcan U 6G // ASUS ENGT 220 1GD3
Storage Hitachi 500 GB, Sony 1TB, KINGSTON 400A 120GB // Samsung 160 GB
Display(s) HP 2009f
Case Xigmatek Asgard Pro // Cooler Master Centurion 5
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply OCZ ModXStream Pro 500 W
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores Minesweeper 30fps, Tetris 40 fps, with overheated CPU and GPU
you saying that AMD 8C/16T win against Intel 4C/8T?
well, duh !

now try that again in single-threaded performance

ps. im not trying to defend Intel here.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.39/day)
you saying that AMD 8C/16T win against Intel 4C/8T?
well, duh !

now try that again in single-threaded performance

ps. im not trying to defend Intel here.
Single thread, as demonstrated in release presentation is the same. They were comparing 6900K with R7 1800X, they run at the same clocks so that means IPC is pretty much identical. It should scale down the same with other processors. Only thing giving 7700K is raw clock which gives it the edge. But at that point, as you can see from my specs, I'd rather have more cores than tiny bit higher clock which you can get on your own through OC anyway.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
181 (0.04/day)
Location
Germany
System Name Clevo W650KK1 | Nokia 7 Plus
Processor i5-8400 uVolted | Snapdagon 660
Motherboard Clevo H170 | -
Cooling Stock w/ AC MX-2 | -
Memory 16GB DDR4 2400 | 4GB LPDDR4
Video Card(s) GTX1050Ti uVolted | Adreno 512
Storage 275GB SSD + 500GB SSHD | 64GB int. + 128GB uSD
Display(s) 15.6" 100Hz + LG 34" 75Hz | 6" 18:9 1080p
Case Clevo W650 | Nokia 7 Plus
Power Supply 180W Delta Electronics | 3800mAh Battery
Mouse Fujitsu LX901 Wireless | -
Keyboard Fujitsu LX901 Wireless | GBoard
Software W10 Pro x64 | Android 10
This is of course to be expected from an 8-core piece. But do not forget that the 7700K comes at 4.5GHz Turbo. That means its turbo is 800MHz higher, and its base frequency is 1.2GHz higher. I wish to see reviews with same clocks to really see what difference Ryzen will make. Those graphs will greatly differ, and in some use cases, the 1700 will be 200% faster, fo sho ;)
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
45 (0.04/day)
Location
Wild Coast, South Africa
I can't wait to see reviews... I'm worried that my recent Intel purchase(2 weeks ago) may not have been a great idea. Oh well, we'll see.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
181 (0.04/day)
Location
Germany
System Name Clevo W650KK1 | Nokia 7 Plus
Processor i5-8400 uVolted | Snapdagon 660
Motherboard Clevo H170 | -
Cooling Stock w/ AC MX-2 | -
Memory 16GB DDR4 2400 | 4GB LPDDR4
Video Card(s) GTX1050Ti uVolted | Adreno 512
Storage 275GB SSD + 500GB SSHD | 64GB int. + 128GB uSD
Display(s) 15.6" 100Hz + LG 34" 75Hz | 6" 18:9 1080p
Case Clevo W650 | Nokia 7 Plus
Power Supply 180W Delta Electronics | 3800mAh Battery
Mouse Fujitsu LX901 Wireless | -
Keyboard Fujitsu LX901 Wireless | GBoard
Software W10 Pro x64 | Android 10
I can't wait to see reviews... I'm worried that my recent Intel purchase(2 weeks ago) may not have been a great idea. Oh well, we'll see.
What did you buy?
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2016
Messages
57 (0.04/day)
the AMD PR machine are definately in high gears.

Faster than 7700k in what? cinebench? thats not very surprising since its multithreaded. However people that buy the 7700k with mostly be gamers, and will the 1700 beat a 7700k in games? i very highly doubt that.

The "games will catch up to the corecount" argument have been heard since i7-920 vs i7-960 but it havent caught up yet. Sure now 4 cores are better than 2, but nothing above this so far.

Im happy AMD is finally showing some actual promise, but they are really laying it on thick.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
7,735 (4.11/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
I can't wait to see reviews... I'm worried that my recent Intel purchase(2 weeks ago) may not have been a great idea. Oh well, we'll see.
If your CPU is fast enough for what you need today, it will be fast enough after Ryzen is released. The only sore point would be if Ryzen comes with a more useful mobo (i.e. more ports for storage/USB/TB or more PCIe lanes).
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
34 (0.01/day)
System Name Rayzen
Processor 2700x
Motherboard asus prime x370-pro
Cooling NH-U12SSE-AM4
Memory G.SKILL TRIDENTZ F4-3200c14D-32G @3000
Video Card(s) RTX 2080 TI
Storage Force MP510
Display(s) SAMSUNG 40" TV
Case CORSAIR CARBIDE series 100R
Power Supply CORSAIR RM 650x
I am a gamer and multitasker (Do both at the same time and most of the time), It is no-brainer that Ryzen is the cpu for me as it gives the best in the three worlds (Single, Threaded and PRICE!) without much compromising on performance in any.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
181 (0.04/day)
Location
Germany
System Name Clevo W650KK1 | Nokia 7 Plus
Processor i5-8400 uVolted | Snapdagon 660
Motherboard Clevo H170 | -
Cooling Stock w/ AC MX-2 | -
Memory 16GB DDR4 2400 | 4GB LPDDR4
Video Card(s) GTX1050Ti uVolted | Adreno 512
Storage 275GB SSD + 500GB SSHD | 64GB int. + 128GB uSD
Display(s) 15.6" 100Hz + LG 34" 75Hz | 6" 18:9 1080p
Case Clevo W650 | Nokia 7 Plus
Power Supply 180W Delta Electronics | 3800mAh Battery
Mouse Fujitsu LX901 Wireless | -
Keyboard Fujitsu LX901 Wireless | GBoard
Software W10 Pro x64 | Android 10
A 6700K and a Z170 Motherboard.
Looks good. I would wait for the official reviews and if you like it, just sell them and get some shiny new stuff. Intel is loved by mostly everyone, you will sell them no problem imo.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
2,242 (1.22/day)
System Name My all round PC
Processor i5 750
Motherboard ASUS P7P55D-E
Memory 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire 380 OC... sold, waiting for Navi
Storage 256GB Samsung SSD + 2Tb + 1.5Tb
Display(s) Samsung 40" A650 TV
Case Thermaltake Chaser mk-I Tower
Power Supply 425w Enermax MODU 82+
Software Windows 10
I still hope AMD manages to get to 4.5Ghz mark with 4/6 core offerings.

you saying that AMD 8C/16T win against Intel 4C/8T?
well, duh !
Yep.
$329 8C CPU with 3.7Ghz boost clock beats $349 4 Core CPU with 4.5Ghz boost clock in certain benchmark.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
2,437 (1.94/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
They were comparing 6900K with R7 1800X, they run at the same clocks so that means IPC is pretty much identical.
6900k runs at 3.2/3.7, 1800x runs at 3.5/4.0+xfr

edit:
i was wrong, 6900k does have 4.0ghz max clock.

The "games will catch up to the corecount" argument have been heard since i7-920 vs i7-960 but it havent caught up yet. Sure now 4 cores are better than 2, but nothing above this so far.
we are further along than that. games with good use of 4-6 threads are now common enough. only few examples of scaling further than this though.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.39/day)
6900K turbos to 3.7GHz and maxes out at 4GHz. Besides, trust me, some 100MHz only make a difference to declare one "king of the hill" by few points or 1 frame per second. Insignificant. The fact is, IPC is pretty much identical for Intel and AMD now.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
2,437 (1.94/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
6900K turbos to 3.7GHz and maxes out at 4GHz. Besides, trust me, some 100MHz only make a difference to declare one "king of the hill" by few points or 1 frame per second. Insignificant. The fact is, IPC is pretty much identical for Intel and AMD now.
what does 'maxes out' mean, overclocking?
amd slides do not mention anything about clocks which would have to mean cpus running stock. which in case of 6900k is the boost clock of 3.7ghz for single thread.

edit:
i was wrong, 6900k does have 4.0ghz max clock.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
2,437 (1.94/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
you are right and i was wrong.
good correction.
(y)
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
1,061 (0.25/day)
Location
I live in Norway
System Name 3 sys spec seperated by "|"
Processor R9 3900x| R7 1700 @3.75 | 4800H
Motherboard Asrock X570M | AB350M Pro 4 | Asus Tuf A15
Cooling Air | Air | duh laptop
Memory 64gb G.skill SniperX @3600 CL16 | 64gb | 16gb
Video Card(s) EK-FC - RX Vega 64 | server | RTX2060M
Storage MP510 2TB, 660P 2TB, 2x860 evo 1tb | 960 500gb Intel 660P 1tb PM871 4x256gb ++| 1TB 660+ 1tb A1000
Display(s) AOC 28" 4K something + 1440p AOC 144hz something.
Case Phanteks EvolvX M-Atx
Power Supply Corsair RM850
Mouse g502 Lightspeed
Keyboard TT Meka G1
6900k runs at 3.2/3.7, 1800x runs at 3.5/4.0+xfr

we are further along than that. games with good use of 4-6 threads are now common enough. only few examples of scaling further than this though.
I see efficient use of my current 1055T 6 core in most scenarios.

Bought R7 1700 as it's value!

Other system is intel 10 core and I don't primarily game so more cores = better.

My web browser use all 6 cores, my games use 4 cores well, if I have 2 extra it's a bonus as less chance of background tasks swallowing cpu time away from what the game requires.

My conclusion and recommendation
if you think you need 4 cores go for 6.

If you think you need 6 go for 8.

If you have nothing up except the game, dualcore is mighty fine for many actually, but as soon as a skype convo is running in the background the lag spikes shoot through the roof!
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2012
Messages
2,946 (0.96/day)
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
System Name Windows 7 64-bit Core i5 3570K
Processor Intel Core i5 3570K @ 4.2 GHz, 1.26 V
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z77MX-D3H
Cooling Scythe Katana 4
Memory 4 x 4 GB G-Skill Sniper DDR3 @ 1600 MHz
Video Card(s) Gainward NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Phantom
Storage Western Digital Caviar Blue 1 TB, Seagate Baracuda 1 TB
Display(s) Dell P2414H
Case CoolerMaster Silencio 550
Audio Device(s) VIA HD Audio
Power Supply Corsair TX v2 650W
Mouse Steelseries Sensei
Keyboard CM Storm Quickfire Pro, Cherry MX Reds
Software MS Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit SP1
... skype convo is running in the background the lag spikes shoot through the roof!
I say dual screen setups are the culprit ... they encourage people to use games as yet another multitasking app and unlike other apps (unless they're capped) games are designed to greedily and instantly consume all available resources until bottlenecked, but thankfully for all you power multitaskers out there, all is ok if the game renderer is multithreaded and bottleneck is gpu.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
479 (0.10/day)
System Name Ed-PC
Processor Intel i5-3570k
Motherboard Asus P8Z77 V-Pro
Cooling CM 212 evo
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer DDR3 1600 8GB
Video Card(s) Nvidia MSI 660ti PE OC
Storage WD black 500gig
Case Corsair 500R
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair 650TX V2
Software Win7 Pro 64bit
Reality sets in though, all this hype every day. All the users of 2xxxK and above will have same upgrade issues as with Intel 7700k.
The IPC is close but not surpassing, its would be very helpful on something that uses heavy multi-threaded app, like video encoding or something.
Good thing it does bring competition to market ,

You still are dealing with a whole new unproven platform, its not just CPU in this case its MB, memory compatibility ,stability etc and we don't know how OC is yet.

So for me and my uses not much changed, but hopefully it pushes Intel a bit which is good.
 
Joined
Nov 12, 2013
Messages
612 (0.25/day)
System Name Headshot
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.8GHz 1.35V
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair VI Hero ROG
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE
Memory 2x16GB Corsair Vengence LPX DDR4 @ 2666 16-18-18-18-36
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix ROG RX 480 8GB OC
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB, Seagate 1TBx2 (Home/Data), 2TB Seagate (Games)
Display(s) 2x LG IPS235
Case Phanteks Enthoo Luxe White
Audio Device(s) Schiit Stack (Schiit Audio Modi 2 DAC + Magni 3 AMP)
Power Supply eVGA Supernova 1000 G2
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Solus - Budgie 64bit (No Windows)
the AMD PR machine are definately in high gears.

Faster than 7700k in what? cinebench? thats not very surprising since its multithreaded. However people that buy the 7700k with mostly be gamers, and will the 1700 beat a 7700k in games? i very highly doubt that.

The "games will catch up to the corecount" argument have been heard since i7-920 vs i7-960 but it havent caught up yet. Sure now 4 cores are better than 2, but nothing above this so far.

Im happy AMD is finally showing some actual promise, but they are really laying it on thick.
Single threaded performance has already been shown to be very close. Overclocking will bring that even. What AMD is showing with the 1700, is you get more processing power for streaming, due to more cores, at a cheaper price.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2012
Messages
2,946 (0.96/day)
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
System Name Windows 7 64-bit Core i5 3570K
Processor Intel Core i5 3570K @ 4.2 GHz, 1.26 V
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z77MX-D3H
Cooling Scythe Katana 4
Memory 4 x 4 GB G-Skill Sniper DDR3 @ 1600 MHz
Video Card(s) Gainward NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Phantom
Storage Western Digital Caviar Blue 1 TB, Seagate Baracuda 1 TB
Display(s) Dell P2414H
Case CoolerMaster Silencio 550
Audio Device(s) VIA HD Audio
Power Supply Corsair TX v2 650W
Mouse Steelseries Sensei
Keyboard CM Storm Quickfire Pro, Cherry MX Reds
Software MS Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit SP1
... unproven platform ...
Fear, uncertainty and doubt ... the fact they have been running open comparison intel vs. amd rigs at shows for some time, really helps their case. Also, way too many motherboard manufacturers have several X370 AM4 models, for it to be unproven platform.
First engineering sample had one bug affecting performance in the platform code that was fixed by a simple flash. I wouldn't expect any crippling bugs by now at launch, only future architecture microcode optimizations and platform updates through bios flashing ... and some time until people start compiling code with latest compilers that have zen optimizations (all ipc tests so far have been on intel optimized executables).
 
Last edited:
Top