I find the criticism of W11's UI being boring puzzling.
Are folks just sitting there, staring at the UI/desktop waiting to be entertained by the OS? I have to wonder, if bored, what kind of "excitement" are they looking for? Bells and whistles and pretty flashing lights?
I use my OS to launch programs - like my browser to view and reply to this TPU thread. I don't need (or even want) W11 to entertain me while I am waiting for my browser to load the thread. In fact, I expect the OS to immediately step out of the way. And W11 does.
The purpose of any OS is to facility communications between the various hardware components, to run our applications, and to do it all safely. W11 does that. Is that boring? Maybe. But why care? I don't use any computer so the OS can ease my boredom. If I want to be entertained, I fire up Pandorian (a great Pandora client app, BTW), play a game, or watch a video - something W11 lets me do with ease - without getting in the way!
Is there a learning curve that makes the new OS a bit awkward?
Of course! Just like there was when upgrading from DOS to Windows 3, W3 to W95, W95 to W98, W98 to XP, XP to W7, W7 to W10 and now W10 to W11. Just like there was upgrading from an old android OS to a new android OS. Just like there was upgrading from the old MS Office to the new MS Office. Yet in each case, once folks gave it chance, the new UI became intuitive too.
People don't like change - I get that. I'm no exception. And it certainly is frustrating when change forces us to spend money (like I was forced to get a new cell phone because my old, reliable was 3G and my ISP is shutting 3G off in a couple weeks

).
@Maximiliano - We've upgraded quite a few "current" Ryzen processors here with no problems. But you did not specify which Ryzen (or other hardware - like your motherboard) you have. Many first gen/early models are not supported. See Microsoft's list of
Windows 11 supported AMD processors (for Intel users, see
Windows 11 supported Intel processors).