• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Samsung Foundry to Become Sole Manufacturer of Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 on 5 nm EUV Manufacturing Process

Raevenlord

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,240 (2.11/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer 120
Memory 16 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200 (2x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) TPU's Awesome MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Storage Boot: Crucial MX100 128GB; Gaming: Crucial MX 300 525GB; Storage: Samsung 1TB HDD, Toshiba 2TB HDD
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case NOX Hummer MC Black
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
Rumors fresh of South Korean shores claim that Samsung has snagged a position as sole provider for Qualcomm's Snapdragon 875 SoC on its 5 nm EUV manufacturing process. The reason for this, according to a supposed industry insider, boiled down to money (as it almost always does): Samsung simply offered lower pricing for chips manufactured under its 5 nm EUV process than TSMC did. The deal has been claimed to be worth some $840M. This makes sense, as Samsung has a considerable product portfolio - including lucrative memory fabrication - from which it can pool resources so as to lower pricing for new manufacturing technologies, whereas TSMC can only count on revenues it brings in from contracted silicon manufacturing deals.

Samsung's 5 nm EUV will still offer the now tried-and-true FinFet transistor design - next-generation GAAFET (gate all-around FET) are reserved for the companies' 3 nm efforts. This piece of news directly contradicts Digitimes' earlier reporting on Qualcomm leaving Samsung as a foundry partner due to lower than adequate yields for Samsung's 5 nm EUV. With Samsung already manufacturing NVIDIA's Ampere on its 8 nm node, and now with a confirmed high-volume client with Qualcomm, this likely means more available capacity for other TSMC clients - of which we could mention AMD and Apple.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,854 (4.23/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
Sketchy.

A couple of weeks ago Samsung was proudly announcing how they plan to make the best SoCs out there after falling behind with each passing year against Qualcomm. Part of that was because Qualcomm was using TSMC's nodes which were always superior, now suddenly we find out they're all going to be on equal footing.

Hmmm ... OK.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
3,190 (0.56/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
Coming so soon after the news that Samsung got NVIDIA, that's a pretty big win - but I wonder if the power characteristics of Samsung's 5nm are going to be equivalent to or better than TSMC's. I'm inclined to say no, which is not really a problem for NVIDIA but is definitely a concern for mobile devices. Perhaps Qualcomm is shooting itself in the foot here or perhaps TSMC is essentially becoming an Apple-only foundry? Considering what has happened to previous Apple partners (IBM, Intel, Imagination Technologies) it might be wise for TSMC not to be too short-sighted in chasing after profits, versus going for a diverse client base.

If TSMC really is that more expensive than going with a relatively unproven fab like Samsung, I'm expecting to see news of AMD CPUs and/or GPUs being manufactured by Samsung sooner or later. AMD does have some announcements coming up next month, so perhaps...

Sketchy.

A couple of weeks ago Samsung was proudly announcing how they plan to make the best SoCs out there after falling behind with each passing year against Qualcomm. Part of that was because Qualcomm was using TSMC's nodes which were always superior, now suddenly we find out they're all going to be on equal footing.

Hmmm ... OK.
Nah, Snapdragon has always simply been a better design than Exynos. No process node advantage is going to magically make the latter good, at this point Exynos is merely a money-draining point of misplaced pride for Samsung.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,854 (4.23/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
Nah, Snapdragon has always simply been a better design than Exynos. No process node advantage is going to magically make the latter good, at this point Exynos is merely a money-draining point of misplaced pride for Samsung.
The node difference definitely has something to do with it. Even though other SoCs used similar CPU cores or GPUs they were all more power efficient than Samsung's, even Apple rather famously used both TSMC and Samsung to source the same SoC once and Samsung's was considerably worse.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
6,804 (1.17/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
@Assimilator I think you misunderstand how big TSMC is. Sure, Apple could potentially have "bought out" the entire 5nm node production for now, considering they're moving to ARM based processors in so many more SKUs of their products. However, TSMC is never going to be an Apple only foundry, it's simply not in their best interest.
TSMC also has a lot of fabs and Apple wouldn't even want to produce on some of the nodes that TSMC manufacturers at.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
3,190 (0.56/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
@Assimilator I think you misunderstand how big TSMC is. Sure, Apple could potentially have "bought out" the entire 5nm node production for now, considering they're moving to ARM based processors in so many more SKUs of their products. However, TSMC is never going to be an Apple only foundry, it's simply not in their best interest.
TSMC also has a lot of fabs and Apple wouldn't even want to produce on some of the nodes that TSMC manufacturers at.
I know full well that TSMC has many fabs on many different nodes, but I'd expect that the majority of their cash comes from their smallest and newest nodes where they can charge a premium (necessary to cover the higher costs of the tech and R&D for said nodes).

And even if it doesn't, if they were to "bet the farm" on Apple taking all their newest node capacity and then get shafted, they'd be sitting with a massive amount of the most expensive node capacity idling. That's a big one, since node manufacturing contracts aren't particularly short-term or flexible.

Unfortunately, "best interests" sometimes take a back seat, particularly when executive compensation is tied to short-term profits.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
155 (0.04/day)
I know full well that TSMC has many fabs on many different nodes, but I'd expect that the majority of their cash comes from their smallest and newest nodes where they can charge a premium (necessary to cover the higher costs of the tech and R&D for said nodes).

And even if it doesn't, if they were to "bet the farm" on Apple taking all their newest node capacity and then get shafted, they'd be sitting with a massive amount of the most expensive node capacity idling. That's a big one, since node manufacturing contracts aren't particularly short-term or flexible.

Unfortunately, "best interests" sometimes take a back seat, particularly when executive compensation is tied to short-term profits.
What would Apple produce? Why would they want all of 5nm? What are they going to sell? TSMC's capacity far exceeds one vendor.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
3,190 (0.56/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
What would Apple produce? Why would they want all of 5nm? What are they going to sell? TSMC's capacity far exceeds one vendor.
If TSMC's cutting-edge node capacity wasn't constrained, we wouldn't have news articles about it, nor would we have mobile SoC vendors (where power is most critical) switching to a less-proven manufacturer.

And Apple is Apple, they don't have to produce anything. If they decide to buy all of TSMC's cutting-edge node capacity (and not use it) just to prevent Qualcomm et al from having it, do you think TSMC would care?
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
155 (0.04/day)
If TSMC's cutting-edge node capacity wasn't constrained, we wouldn't have news articles about it, nor would we have mobile SoC vendors (where power is most critical) switching to a less-proven manufacturer.

And Apple is Apple, they don't have to produce anything. If they decide to buy all of TSMC's cutting-edge node capacity (and not use it) just to prevent Qualcomm et al from having it, do you think TSMC would care?
Of course it's constrained. It's not infinite. But it vastly exceeds one vendor's leading edge products.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
436 (2.73/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
If TSMC really is that more expensive than going with a relatively unproven fab like Samsung, I'm expecting to see news of AMD CPUs and/or GPUs being manufactured by Samsung sooner or later. AMD does have some announcements coming up next month, so perhaps...
Samsung is a huge company, they don't need to make money out of the foundry business yet.
Their price not only is lower, but they also offer special conditions, like the deal they have offered Nvidia where they are selling them only the good chips, not the whole wafer. This makes is a pretty sweet deal financially, with the only risk being availability, but I imagine that they can invest in order to improve yields. Also, from what I understand, the Samsung 5nm node is not so advanced compared to the 8 nm, which should mean that the risk isn't huge either.

Anyway, the fact that Samsung keeps investing and getting deals for the foundry is good for the market, it's keeping it sane and competitive. we wouldn't want a market in which there is only one well-performing foundry, it wouldn't be very good for the final users.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
3,190 (0.56/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
Samsung is a huge company, they don't need to make money out of the foundry business yet.
Their price not only is lower, but they also offer special conditions, like the deal they have offered Nvidia where they are selling them only the good chips, not the whole wafer. This makes is a pretty sweet deal financially, with the only risk being availability, but I imagine that they can invest in order to improve yields. Also, from what I understand, the Samsung 5nm node is not so advanced compared to the 8 nm, which should mean that the risk isn't huge either.

Anyway, the fact that Samsung keeps investing and getting deals for the foundry is good for the market, it's keeping it sane and competitive. we wouldn't want a market in which there is only one well-performing foundry, it wouldn't be very good for the final users.
Oh, I'm by no means upset that Samsung is getting a piece of the pie - especially since GloFo flopped so spectacularly. It's just that NVIDIA using Samsung for all of their consumer Ampere GPU production was very out of left field, especially considering that big green last used Samsung for lower-end Pascal parts, and skipped it entirely for Turing. But yeah, not being charged for defective dies - especially on a chip as large and complex as GA102 - is obviously a big financial win for NVIDIA.

It's just that until now, Samsung didn't really have any big orders from big US semiconductor designers. Now they've got two (NVIDIA and Qualcomm) in a relatively short period of time. While the financial incentive is definitely there, the conspiracy theorist in me wonders if US semiconductor companies are anticipating a China-Taiwan conflict that would impact supply lines...
 
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
6,892 (2.23/day)
Location
Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
System Name Monster Panzer Max [MPM]/Nostalg33k/Huawei Mediapad M5/Xiaomi Mi Box S/TCL 10 Pro
Processor i5-6600K 3.9/E8500/Kirin960 4xA73/4xA53 /S905X 4X1.5 A53/Snapdragon 675
Motherboard Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 7/XFX 650i Ultra/uh?/uh?/uh?
Cooling Corsair H115i /Alphacool Eisberg /aluminum heatsink/Aluminum heatsink/Heatpipe
Memory 4x4gb HyperX Predator 2800 CL14/2gb DDR2 800/4gb LPDDR4/2gb LPDDR3/6gb LPDDR4X dual channel
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 ARMOR 8gb OC/Asus 8800 Ultra/Mali G71MP8/Mali 450MP5/Adreno 612
Storage 120gb VertexIII,1tb/8gb SSHD,2x1tb,NVMe 512gb,ext1tb P1+Arion/none/32gb+256gb/8gb/128gbUFS 2.1+256gb
Display(s) X58222 32"5ms OC 75hz 2880x1620/8.4" 2560x1600/273E3LHSB 27"1ms 1920x1080/~4" 480x800/6.4 inch FHD+
Case Cougar Panzer Max/none/Aluminum and tempered glass/None/alu frame +back/front glass GG5
Audio Device(s) Fiio Q1 Mark II+Logitec Z333/SB Audigy2 Platinum/AK4376+Harman Kardon speaker/HDMI/Fiio Fa1
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 750 /Enermax Coolergiant 480/12v 1.5A/J5 Create QC3.0 9-12V 1.96A
Mouse Speedlink Sovos Vertical-Asus ROG Spatha-Logitech MX Ergo/touch/Xiaomi XMRM-006/touch
Keyboard GMMK TKL+Gateron Red+white keys/touch/none/touch
Software Win10 64/none/Android 5.1.1 custom/Android TV 8.1/Android 9.1.0
Benchmark Scores bench...mark? i do leave mark on bench sometime, to remember which one is the most comfortable. :o
well given how the Snapdragon version of the Note 20 Ultra outperform the Exynos version (and that with a cheaper cooling solution : simple graphite pad versus vapor chamber)by ~ 20%

Samsung should drop all the Exynos manufacturing line and prioritise Qualcomm :laugh: ....

that's quite a laugh to get a Note 20 Ultra same price, which is already too high for what it is, as the other one, but getting an Exynos instead of a SD ....
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
399 (1.92/day)
Coming so soon after the news that Samsung got NVIDIA, that's a pretty big win - but I wonder if the power characteristics of Samsung's 5nm are going to be equivalent to or better than TSMC's. I'm inclined to say no, which is not really a problem for NVIDIA but is definitely a concern for mobile devices. Perhaps Qualcomm is shooting itself in the foot here or perhaps TSMC is essentially becoming an Apple-only foundry? Considering what has happened to previous Apple partners (IBM, Intel, Imagination Technologies) it might be wise for TSMC not to be too short-sighted in chasing after profits, versus going for a diverse client base.

If TSMC really is that more expensive than going with a relatively unproven fab like Samsung, I'm expecting to see news of AMD CPUs and/or GPUs being manufactured by Samsung sooner or later. AMD does have some announcements coming up next month, so perhaps...
I feel the main driver for people moving away from TSMC is likely the cost. I recalled there were some articles out there to say that the SD 865 is actually expensive to manufacture, thus, we see high mobile device prices. Not too sure about the power characteristic of Samsung vs TSMC 5nm, but considering that TSMC is more sought after by those with deep pockets, I would assume TSMC's fab should be better. Otherwise, I feel Intel would have gone with Samsung as well, instead of TSMC's 6nm.

In the short run, I doubt AMD will move anything to Samsung, from TSMC. I sense AMD's strategy to keep cost down at TSMC is to not go with the cutting edge fab, but instead let the bigger players like Apple take the lead. They will then fill in the gap when Apple and big players move on to the newer fab.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
3,190 (0.56/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
that's quite a laugh to get a Note 20 Ultra same price, which is already too high for what it is, as the other one, but getting an Exynos instead of a SD ....
TBH, if you're dumb enough to spend that much on a phone, you deserve to get ripped off regardless of who's making it or what's in it.

But I agree, European customers getting stuck with the POS Exynos while the rest of the world gets the much better Snapdragon is BS. If it was the USA, Samsung would've already been sued.
 
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
6,892 (2.23/day)
Location
Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
System Name Monster Panzer Max [MPM]/Nostalg33k/Huawei Mediapad M5/Xiaomi Mi Box S/TCL 10 Pro
Processor i5-6600K 3.9/E8500/Kirin960 4xA73/4xA53 /S905X 4X1.5 A53/Snapdragon 675
Motherboard Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 7/XFX 650i Ultra/uh?/uh?/uh?
Cooling Corsair H115i /Alphacool Eisberg /aluminum heatsink/Aluminum heatsink/Heatpipe
Memory 4x4gb HyperX Predator 2800 CL14/2gb DDR2 800/4gb LPDDR4/2gb LPDDR3/6gb LPDDR4X dual channel
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 ARMOR 8gb OC/Asus 8800 Ultra/Mali G71MP8/Mali 450MP5/Adreno 612
Storage 120gb VertexIII,1tb/8gb SSHD,2x1tb,NVMe 512gb,ext1tb P1+Arion/none/32gb+256gb/8gb/128gbUFS 2.1+256gb
Display(s) X58222 32"5ms OC 75hz 2880x1620/8.4" 2560x1600/273E3LHSB 27"1ms 1920x1080/~4" 480x800/6.4 inch FHD+
Case Cougar Panzer Max/none/Aluminum and tempered glass/None/alu frame +back/front glass GG5
Audio Device(s) Fiio Q1 Mark II+Logitec Z333/SB Audigy2 Platinum/AK4376+Harman Kardon speaker/HDMI/Fiio Fa1
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 750 /Enermax Coolergiant 480/12v 1.5A/J5 Create QC3.0 9-12V 1.96A
Mouse Speedlink Sovos Vertical-Asus ROG Spatha-Logitech MX Ergo/touch/Xiaomi XMRM-006/touch
Keyboard GMMK TKL+Gateron Red+white keys/touch/none/touch
Software Win10 64/none/Android 5.1.1 custom/Android TV 8.1/Android 9.1.0
Benchmark Scores bench...mark? i do leave mark on bench sometime, to remember which one is the most comfortable. :o
TBH, if you're dumb enough to spend that much on a phone, you deserve to get ripped off regardless of who's making it or what's in it.
aye, i fully agree on that ... which is why my last Samsung phone was a SGS2

(i love my TCL 10 Pro midrange price and spec , flagship build and serve me well for anything i could ask of it )
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2020
Messages
134 (1.72/day)
System Name BUBSTER
Processor I7 8700K
Motherboard ASUS Maximus Hero X
Cooling Deepcool Gamer Storm Captain 240 EX
Memory 32GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB LED DDR4 3866MHz 4x8GB
Video Card(s) SLI 2 x Asus GeForce GTX 1080 ROG Strix Gaming Advanced
Storage Samsung 970 EVO M2 NVME + 2 Tb RAID 0 Samsung 850 EVO 500GB X4 + 12 TB HDD
Display(s) Sony Bravia KD-55X8505C
Case Corsair Carbide Air 540
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar Essence STX II
Power Supply Corsair AX 860i
Mouse Corsair Gaming M65 Pro RGB + Razr Taipan
Keyboard Asus ROG Strix Flare Cherry MX Red + Corsair Gaming K65 lux RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores overall: 13177 Graphics 3d Mark : 15523
Nobody mentioned this but the Chinese have been making strides as semiconductors and chip manufacturing...last i read a couple weeks ago that their main chip manufactures are being sanctioned by the US Gov. while the other manufacturers from Korea or Taiwan are fully booked...
 
Top