• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Sapphire Radeon RX 5500 XT Pulse 4 GB

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
26,956 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Sapphire's factory-overclocked Radeon RX 5500 XT Pulse comes with an amazing cooler that delivers excellent temperatures and unbelievable noise levels at the same time. Idle fan stop and a dual BIOS are included, too, for a very reasonable price increase of $10.

Show full review
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
788 (0.22/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Proper
Processor 5900X + OC
Motherboard GB X570s Elite AX
Cooling WC Heatkiller 3.0 LT
Memory G.Skill 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 3070 Ti Trinity LC'ed + OC
Storage KC2500 1TB + A2000 1TB
Display(s) GB M32Q
Case Fractal Define R6 USB C
Audio Device(s) Creative AE-7 + Phonic AM120
Power Supply Seasonic Prime PX-850
Mouse Log G502 X LS
Keyboard Keychron K5 Opt.brown
W1zz - thanks for the review, as always. :)

About the card - got a bit mixed feelings. While the performance is on par with 1650 Super, the latter wins in efficiency, which can matter when talking about low/mid-end.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,141 (0.56/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 3600
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Deepcool AG400
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 470 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / NV2 512
Display(s) 24G2U
Case NR200P
Power Supply Ion SFX 650
Mouse G703
Keyboard Keychron V1 (Akko Matcha Green) / Apex m500 (gateron milky yellow)
Software W10
Simply too expensive for what it offers. Both 4 and 8GB should be launching at $20 less than current msrp.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
7,798 (3.13/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
Simply too expensive for what it offers. Both 4 and 8GB should be launching at $20 less than current msrp.

Well it is cheaper than the 580 was at launch.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
957 (0.20/day)
System Name Better than before
Processor 10400
Motherboard B460 Pro4
Cooling Id-Cooling 224
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) 1650 Super
Storage Swordfish 500 GB
Display(s) AOC G2
Case Coolermaster Ammo 533
Audio Device(s) Micca MB42X
Power Supply Pure Power 11
Mouse G403
Keyboard Sidewinder x4
Software Windows 10 (ugh)
I'm amazed at how handily this beats the gaming X cooler, and for a mere 10 dollars over msrp. Nearly 10c cooler with the same noise level.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,141 (0.56/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 3600
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Deepcool AG400
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 470 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / NV2 512
Display(s) 24G2U
Case NR200P
Power Supply Ion SFX 650
Mouse G703
Keyboard Keychron V1 (Akko Matcha Green) / Apex m500 (gateron milky yellow)
Software W10
Well it is cheaper than the 580 was at launch.
Yeah but with current pricing it's $20 more expensive than a 580 for marginally more performance. Not impressive tbh.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
7,798 (3.13/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
Yeah but with current pricing it's $20 more expensive than a 580 for marginally more performance. Not impressive tbh.

I know what you mean and fully agree. That is why I am hoping for "Big Navi" tbh I would have got the 5700XT but I did not because of no Crossfire support.
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
134 (0.03/day)
Looks like a 580 but with lower power consumption... I have mixed feelings about this even as an AMD fan.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
3,475 (0.85/day)
System Name Skunkworks
Processor 5800x3d
Motherboard x570 unify
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory 32GB 3600 mhz
Video Card(s) asrock 6800xt challenger D
Storage Sabarent rocket 4.0 2TB, MX 500 2TB
Display(s) Asus 1440p144 27"
Case Old arse cooler master 932
Power Supply Corsair 1200w platinum
Mouse *squeak*
Keyboard Some old office thing
Software openSUSE tumbleweed/Mint 21.2
Well it is cheaper than the 580 was at launch.
And it is no faster then the 580, hell at 4k its on average SLOWER then the 580!

Three years, a major die shrink, and a new arch later, and AMD has BARELY moved the price/perf bracket. All for 20$ less. WOO000OOO!!11!

You could have bought a 1060 or 480 3 years ago and gotten this same performance for just a few $$$ more. Not even $100-150 more, just $20 more three years ago would have gotten you this. Hell you can get a 580 right NOW on newegg for $164, or a 590 for $179. Absolutely pathetic showing. 5500xt should have been $150 for 8GB, full stop. Anything higher is a ripoff.

I know what you mean and fully agree. That is why I am hoping for "Big Navi" tbh I would have got the 5700XT but I did not because of no Crossfire support.
At this rate, "big navi" would probably offer 2080 super performance, at 2080 super pricing. Dont hold your breath.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 28, 2018
Messages
299 (0.14/day)
So, basically a RX 580 level performance card, at the price we could already buy the RX 580. And this, more than two and a half years later.

Man, this GPU market is really upside down! No wonder so many people are turning to the gaming consoles.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
7,798 (3.13/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
And it is no faster then the 580, hell at 4k its on average SLOWER then the 580!

Three years, a major die shrink, and a new arch later, and AMD has BARELY moved the price/perf bracket. All for 20$ less. WOO000OOO!!11!

You could have bought a 1060 or 480 3 years ago and gotten this same performance for just a few $$$ more. Not even $100-150 more, just $20 more three years ago would have gotten you this. Hell you can get a 580 right NOW on newegg for $164, or a 590 for $179. Absolutely pathetic showing. 5500xt should have been $150 for 8GB, full stop. Anything higher is a ripoff.

I am not disagreeing that this is a meh release. I know that this card is no better overall than the 580 and that you can get better deals on older cards but a new buyer would not know that and might want to pair up his/her new 7NM CPU with a 7NM based GPU.


At this rate, "big navi" would probably offer 2080 super performance, at 2080 super pricing. Dont hold your breath.

I don't look at the budget cards to garner performance of high end cards. The fact that the 5700XT is faster than the Vega 64 is what gives me hope for "Big" Navi card(s).
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
2,223 (0.46/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Miami
Processor Ryzen 3800X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VII Formula
Cooling Ek Velocity/ 2x 280mm Radiators/ Alphacool fullcover
Memory F4-3600C16Q-32GTZNC
Video Card(s) XFX 6900 XT Speedster 0
Storage 1TB WD M.2 SSD/ 2TB WD SN750/ 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) DELL AW3420DW / HP ZR24w
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 1000W+750W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar/Glorious Model O-
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro
Price is very disappointing, looks like pricing is tied directly to performance and not the tier of the card.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
3,475 (0.85/day)
System Name Skunkworks
Processor 5800x3d
Motherboard x570 unify
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory 32GB 3600 mhz
Video Card(s) asrock 6800xt challenger D
Storage Sabarent rocket 4.0 2TB, MX 500 2TB
Display(s) Asus 1440p144 27"
Case Old arse cooler master 932
Power Supply Corsair 1200w platinum
Mouse *squeak*
Keyboard Some old office thing
Software openSUSE tumbleweed/Mint 21.2
I don't look at the budget cards to garner performance of high end cards. The fact that the 5700XT is faster than the Vega 64 is what gives me hope for "Big" Navi card(s).
How about the fact that by the time Big navi stumbles out the door Nvidia's 7nm chips will be close to release? If you wanted 2080 super performance, you could have had it 3.5 years ago with the 1080ti, and likely for the same price that "big navi" will be sold at.

Most 5700xts are going for north of $400. The vega 64 could easily be found for $400 when it was new, and the 5700xt is hardly an upgrade. A whopping 15-20% increase in performance for the same price isnt worth it, again see turing. Navi so far is a dissapointment, for a new arch on 7nm it really isnt showing up nvidia, and seems to have trouble showing up previous AMD cards! I was expecting more kepler VS fermi, or GCN VS evergreen numbers, instead of microwaved GCN.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
951 (0.19/day)
System Name Little Boy / New Guy
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X / Intel Core I5 10400F
Motherboard Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate / Asus H410M Prime
Cooling ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 280 A-RGB / ARCTIC Freezer 34 eSports DUO
Memory TeamGroup Zeus 2x16GB 3200Mhz CL16 / Teamgroup 1x16GB 3000Mhz CL18
Video Card(s) Asrock Phantom RX 6800 XT 16GB / Asus RTX 3060 Ti 8GB DUAL Mini V2
Storage Patriot Viper VPN100 Nvme 1TB / OCZ Vertex 4 256GB Sata / Ultrastar 2TB / IronWolf 4TB / WD Red 8TB
Display(s) Compumax MF32C 144Hz QHD / ViewSonic OMNI 27 144Hz QHD
Case Phanteks Eclipse P400A / Montech X3 Mesh
Power Supply Aresgame 850W 80+ Gold / Aerocool 850W Plus bronze
Mouse Gigabyte Force M7 Thor
Keyboard Gigabyte Aivia K8100
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Bits
Same price than 2 year old rx 590, and performs less? tell me about a shoot in the foot.

Edit, price.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,648 (0.56/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux
The RX5500 series need a $20 price reduction to become super competitive.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
I've been using the 8 GiB variant of the card for a while now and despite playing lots of games at 1920x1200 60 Hz, I have not heard the fans spin once. I'm very impressed with it. RX 590 fans would run about half of the time.

From my experience, I think RX 5500 XT 8 GiB has smoother frame times than RX 590 8 GiB so even though the RX 590 may be able to churn out 3-4% more frames, it is not a better experience compared to the RX 5500 XT.

If you game a lot (like me), you'll save your $20 cost difference on the power bill. RX 5500 XT consumes about half the power RX 590 does.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
2,223 (0.46/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Miami
Processor Ryzen 3800X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VII Formula
Cooling Ek Velocity/ 2x 280mm Radiators/ Alphacool fullcover
Memory F4-3600C16Q-32GTZNC
Video Card(s) XFX 6900 XT Speedster 0
Storage 1TB WD M.2 SSD/ 2TB WD SN750/ 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) DELL AW3420DW / HP ZR24w
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 1000W+750W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar/Glorious Model O-
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro
How about the fact that by the time Big navi stumbles out the door Nvidia's 7nm chips will be close to release? If you wanted 2080 super performance, you could have had it 3.5 years ago with the 1080ti, and likely for the same price that "big navi" will be sold at.

Most 5700xts are going for north of $400. The vega 64 could easily be found for $400 when it was new, and the 5700xt is hardly an upgrade. A whopping 15-20% increase in performance for the same price isnt worth it, again see turing. Navi so far is a dissapointment, for a new arch on 7nm it really isnt showing up nvidia, and seems to have trouble showing up previous AMD cards! I was expecting more kepler VS fermi, or GCN VS evergreen numbers, instead of microwaved GCN.

While I agree the that pricing should be lower. Turing was a 15-20% increase for a 50% increase in price, not the same price. I don't see an angry mob storming that figurative castle, Shouldn't you be bashing Nvidia, instread of AMD that delivered same perf for the same money?
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
7,798 (3.13/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
How about the fact that by the time Big navi stumbles out the door Nvidia's 7nm chips will be close to release? If you wanted 2080 super performance, you could have had it 3.5 years ago with the 1080ti, and likely for the same price that "big navi" will be sold at.

Most 5700xts are going for north of $400. The vega 64 could easily be found for $400 when it was new, and the 5700xt is hardly an upgrade. A whopping 15-20% increase in performance for the same price isnt worth it, again see turing. Navi so far is a dissapointment, for a new arch on 7nm it really isnt showing up nvidia, and seems to have trouble showing up previous AMD cards! I was expecting more kepler VS fermi, or GCN VS evergreen numbers, instead of microwaved GCN.

I would love to have been able to buy a Vega 64 for $400 when they were new. Perhaps you mean the Vega 56? It must be nice to be able to buy a Vega 64 for the same price as the 5700XT though because they have always been more expensive in Canada. Is there a $400 Nvidia card that can compete with the 5700XT? The fact that the 5700XT is much less powerful in terms of Specs than the Vega 64 is my thought process on why "Big Navi" is what I am waiting for. The last Nvidia card I owned was the GTS 450. The reason I don't buy NVidia cards is because they disabled SLI on my GTS 450(s). 20% is nothing to scoff at. I will put it to you like this. The 580s felt to me no different than my 7950(s) when I actually felt a performance lift was gong from the 580 to Vega 64. If the 5700XT is 15% to 20% faster than the Vega 64 and "Big Navi" is a further 15% to 20% faster than the 5700XT would that not be in the range of the 2080TI?






 
D

Deleted member 158293

Guest
Card looks ok, needs market forces to push pricing down to a proper level which usually happens with AMD. Just not at launch apparently.
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
409 (0.14/day)
System Name Baxter
Processor Intel i7-5775C @ 4.2 GHz 1.35 V
Motherboard ASRock Z97-E ITX/AC
Cooling Scythe Big Shuriken 3 with Noctua NF-A12 fan
Memory 16 GB 2400 MHz CL11 HyperX Savage DDR3
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2070 Super Black @ 1950 MHz
Storage 1 TB Sabrent Rocket 2242 NVMe SSD (boot), 500 GB Samsung 850 EVO, and 4TB Toshiba X300 7200 RPM HDD
Display(s) Vizio P65-F1 4KTV (4k60 with HDR or 1080p120)
Case Raijintek Ophion
Audio Device(s) HDMI PCM 5.1, Vizio 5.1 surround sound
Power Supply Corsair SF600 Platinum 600 W SFX PSU
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G613 and Microsoft Media Keyboard
I thought that maybe I was making a mistake by buying my SO a 570 4GB back in March, since I knew that other cards were around the corner. I don't have that concern anymore. At $130, that card is still approximately 15% better performance per dollar. And since this was mainly a Civ 6 build for her, it doesn't bother me that the Polaris cards will probably be missing out on extra optimizations in the future. I was really expecting AMD to put out something with a bit more of a competitive advantage, such as the 5700 XT vs 2060 Super or 2070 Super situation. The fact that they can only approximate Nvidia's card in the bunch is a bit sad. I know that AMD forced Nvidia to put out the 1650 Super and eat their own 1660 lunch, but still. AMD was supposed to be the king at this price range.

The only saving grace is that the Navi 14 chip is, for the first time, letting AMD put out some competitive laptop designs. I can see this chip slotting in where the old laptop king, the 1050 Ti, did. AMD may get a share of the market in the desktop space by providing a comparable product to Nvidia, and be able to enter a market where they've been honestly as good as nonexistent for 5+ years. Unfortunately, this is not a good sign for the new consoles. The Xbox One X has a GPU component that can be broadly compared to an RX 580, which has 5700 million transistors. This chip has 6400 million transistors and isn't performing any better. All the improvement has been on power efficiency and fabrication node cost savings, and those cost savings are suspect with 7 nm being so popular, and with the increase in video RAM adding to the overall cost of the console as well.

We may be looking at a chip that will be broadly comparable to the cheaper Xbox Scarlett option. If that's true, then targeting 1080p on that console instead of 4k could lead to a 3-4x relative increase in graphics performance, but where does that leave the top Scarlett option? AMD doesn't have a 4x faster chip. So they could instead use a cut down or even smaller version of this chip and target 2x performance increase over the Xbox One S at 1080p, but then they would be forced to put the full Navi 10, or something similar, in a console to equal the same performance at 4k. Which means those consoles are going to be very expensive (let's not forget they're supposed to have raytracing silicon too), or AMD is going to take one hell of a haircut on the sales of the chips.

This is all pretty far out speculation, but I think my main point stands. The fact that AMD didn't increase performance per transistor at the lower end means that they're going to have to offer bigger chips for the consoles. And that means that without Navi 2 pulling a rabbit out the hat, these new consoles aren't going to provide any better results than last time, when the PS4 and Xbox One ended up being about as powerful as a budget graphics card.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Messages
1,475 (0.29/day)
Location
Azalea City
System Name Main
Processor Ryzen 5950x
Motherboard B550 PG Velocita
Cooling Water
Memory Ballistix
Video Card(s) RX 6900XT
Storage T-FORCE CARDEA A440 PRO
Display(s) Samsung UE590
Case QUBE 500
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z623
Power Supply LEADEX V 1KW
Mouse Cooler Master MM710
Keyboard Huntsman Elite
Software 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://hwbot.org/user/damric/
The last time there was an Apple exclusive variant, the shaders were able to be unlocked on the non-apple version.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,717 (0.98/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) 32'' 4K Dell
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
VR HMD HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 P
No need to get worked up on this piss poor pricing. W1zzard wrote it in the article. This pricing will help clearing out the super overstocking of Polaris due to mining crash.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
3,413 (1.07/day)
System Name M3401 notebook
Processor 5600H
Motherboard NA
Memory 16GB
Video Card(s) 3050
Storage 500GB SSD
Display(s) 14" OLED screen of the laptop
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores 3050 scores good 15-20% lower than average, despite ASUS's claims that it has uber cooling.

Juankato1987

New Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
20 (0.01/day)
Location
Honduras
580 was a mid-hig tier card, this is an mid-entry level card, but with this prices it's fair to compare them.
saddly this should be an $130-140 card, that now goes up to $210, same for the 1650 super just a little cheaper.
 
Top