1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Sapphire Radeon RX 580 Nitro+ Limited Edition 8 GB

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Apr 18, 2017.

  1. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    16,772 (3.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17,520
    The Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ Limited Edition is a highly overclocked custom variant of the just-launched AMD Radeon RX 580. Performance now beats the NVIDIA GTX 1060, and in the box, Sapphire has bundled two user-replaceable semi-transparent fans with blue LEDs, if you want a little bit more bling.

    To read this review go to: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Sapphire/RX_580_Nitro_Plus/
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2017
    gupsterg, Dethroy, Alduin and 13 others say thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  2. Nokiron

    Nokiron

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    357 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    229
    Location:
    Sweden
    That's quite the increase in power consumption...
     
  3. ShurikN

    ShurikN

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    Messages:
    565 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    495
    Location:
    Tokyo, South Side
    Consumes 100W more to achieve 5% more perf than a 1060. Guess which chip you wont see in a laptop... again.
    Not to mention that it's trading blows with an equally priced custom 1060. And those cards were out for a while.

    Wanted to say I'm disappointed, but my expectations were extremely low to begin with. And boy were those expectations met.
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2017
    rruff, 1c3d0g, dalekdukesboy and 10 others say thanks.
  4. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    11,612 (2.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,361
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Would be nice if news also mad it into the Forum headlines section. I miss bunch of reviews because I forget to look down here or I miss a tweet that has been sent out for the review...
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  5. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    23,930 (5.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,114
    Location:
    Indiana, USA
    Not to mention the worse price to performance and worse overclocking.
     
    blibba says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  6. KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,818 (1.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    626
    The Max Power Delivery Limit and TDP increased over the RX 480 Nitro(TDP increased drastically 110W --> 180W) in the bios, thats probably why it consumes so much power.

    If the Gaming X version has the same PCB as the 480's then I would probably try to flash my card to 580 to get the reduced clocks though to lower the idle power consumption.
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2017
  7. darklm

    darklm

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2016
    Messages:
    6 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    I didn't expect anything and I'm still disappointed

    This rebranding is worse than the 300 series
     
    birdie, bug, Nihilus and 1 other person say thanks.
  8. sith'ari

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2014
    Messages:
    88 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Location:
    Emperor's retreat/Naboo Moenia
    From a 1st glimpse it seems like a good mid-range GPU (*and it is a good mid-range GPU).
    BUT....
    1) Extremely high power consumption compared to the competition (*GTX1060) or even its predecessor (RX480)
    2) Its 5% average ahead of GTX1060 reference, but that means that it will be equal with the aftermarket GTX1060s.
    3) In addition to comment 2), if we add the fact that NVidia will be launching a refreshed line of GTX1060s with faster memory, then......
    the results that come from thoughts 1) , 2) , 3) aren't very encouraging for AMD.
     
    blibba says thanks.
  9. horsemama1956

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    17 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    I don't believe the power consumption is an issue with this class of card unless you're running a tiny it build or something. It's not 290/390 territory.

    It is a nice selling point to say it's more efficient but in reality I don't really think people care when the card is under gaming load. People will whine about it on the internet but it shouldn't be a. Deal breaker for someone that just wants to game. The price is my main issue in terms of making it competitive with the 1060, nVidia can easily afford to drop the price knowing they have the 1070 and beyond basically untouchable until Vega.
     
    medi01 and HD64G say thanks.
  10. Solid State Brain

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2012
    Messages:
    35 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Where did the multi-monitor idle consumption improvements go? That was the thing I was looking forward to seeing.
     
  11. ShurikN

    ShurikN

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    Messages:
    565 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    495
    Location:
    Tokyo, South Side
    The power consumption is not an issue if the difference is up to 40W or so. But when you consume almost twice the power to achieve the same performance as your competitor ... you gotta ask yourself where you went wrong.
     
    medi01, Nima and 64K say thanks.
  12. Dimi

    Dimi

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2009
    Messages:
    233 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    89
    I'm just wondering how you got such low numbers on the 1070 Doom 1080p benchmark. I am constantly hitting the frame limit with mine on nightmare settings throughout the entire game. (yes i finished it lol).
     
  13. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    14,524 (3.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,248
    Thing is if cards A and B perform about the same, cost about the same and make about the same kind of noise, shaving off 80W in gaming is not a small thing.

    So, the 4GB RX580 is the bang/buck card to get, or the 4GB RX480 if priced lower.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  14. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    16,772 (3.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17,520
    second chart on the power page?

    play it again to find a better test scene :D
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  15. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    11,612 (2.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,361
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    It's funny how people obsess over power consumption all of a sudden. I only see that as a problem if that affects actual heat and overall noise (which is usually connected with heat). Considering this card is one of the quietest cards, who really cares? And it overclocks kinda decent. I mean, 1480MHz is quite nice clock for Polaris. And now someone will throw an miniATX or ITX build in my face. How many people seriously use those compared to normal id or high towers? They are tiny minority no one cares about.
     
    INSTG8R and HD64G say thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  16. 80-watt Hamster

    80-watt Hamster

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Messages:
    26 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Location:
    North Dakota
    Design choices. AMD has kept the compute resources intact over GCN revisions, while Nvidia was able to dial some of it back, along with the memory subsystem, when they introduced the new compression algorithms with Maxwell. If you go back and look at Kepler and earlier, power vs. performance was darn close from both companies. AMD hasn't found an equivalent "magic bullet" to Nvidia's delta compression, so they're stuck with primarily process gains to this point.
     
    N3M3515 and SIGSEGV say thanks.
  17. Basard

    Basard

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,050 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    270
    Location:
    Oshkosh, WI
    It's an overclocked card so the power usage looks higher than it should.
    Compare it to a higher than reference clocked 480 and the consumption will look more in line.
     
    HD64G says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU Crunching for Team TPU
  18. Nokiron

    Nokiron

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    357 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    229
    Location:
    Sweden
    The magic bullet is the tile-based rasterization, the compression does not matter that much in comparsion. Especially not in regards to efficiency.

    I think the point really is that these results are worse than when Hawaii got a refresh.

    That increased power consumption by quite a bit as well, but the price dropped by like 20 percent.
     
    Alduin and 80-watt Hamster say thanks.
  19. Solid State Brain

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2012
    Messages:
    35 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    I did check out the graph; unfortunately I saw no improvements compared to the RX480 although apparently it was supposed to be one of the points of the improved process.

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
  20. OneCool

    OneCool

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,065 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    194
    Location:
    Look behind you!!
    Wow. It's even worst than I expected.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  21. NdMk2o1o

    NdMk2o1o

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    4,618 (1.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Location:
    Redditch, Worcestershire, England
    Guess I might grab an 480 when they drop in price, was looking forward to 580 but not so much now....
     
  22. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    16,772 (3.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17,520
    yeah, amd promised but didn't deliver. it's not exactly an effect of the new process, but they supposedly added intermediary power states that should be active in multi-monitor for example.

    If you look at the temps page, table at the end you'll see that the card still runs full memory clocks in multi-monitor. compare that to blu-ray, where the clocks are lower and look like they reflect what AMD intended to do.
     
    HD64G says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  23. kruk

    kruk

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    367 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    355
    The power of this card is high, but it should be no surprise as it's clocked much higher than Polaris 10 optimum is:

    [​IMG]

    Reference had 0.980 - 1.070 V, this one has 1.125 V. It surprises me however that they only increased the GPU clocks but kept the RAM speed at the same level. I thought that the RAM speed was the bottleneck for Polaris 10 ...
     
    HD64G and TheGuruStud say thanks.
  24. 80-watt Hamster

    80-watt Hamster

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Messages:
    26 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Location:
    North Dakota
    Thanks for the correction. I had a feeling I'd gotten that wrong.
     
  25. etayorius

    etayorius

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    101 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    Location:
    Israel
    What a useless rebrand, just grab an aftermarket RX480 and OC the hell out of it. What was AMD thinking? PowerConsumption actually went up, blegh!

    If they had drop the price to $220 Max, it would had been something, also push the naming scheme one notch down and sold it as RX570. It just makes absolutely no sense.
     
    Nima says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)