ScienceMark thread (with score list)

[mandelore]

got the thread up, hopefully things will be clarified, and i can really know how far to push these modules

 

[Alec§taar]

ScienceMark 2.0 Benchmark Test Competition Standings/Results on 08-17-2006

REPOSTING AMENDED NEW SCORECHART TO LAST PAGE... apk

 

[mandelore]

Alec, errm, my score hasnt been updated.. and u still have old scores posted

also alec, just a suggestion, not telling any1 wot to do, but from poor Casheti's ordeal , maybe editing services.msc not a good idea for every1, u can do it far easier using msconfig and booting in diagnostic mode.. just a thought

 

[Alec§taar]

Alec, errm, my score hasnt been updated.. and u still have old scores posted

You just have to be a bit patient is all, new people joined & I have to format this tags for bolds & lists, & also make sure all the scores from the pictures are set & all that (takes time)...

APK

 

[pt]

Here is the real list, a lot better than mine, just noticed i'm going down on the score, luckily i will probabily have a new PSU this monday and a cooler in September, then i'm going up

 

[mandelore]

Also, i have new score!! 1577.41

lowered mem timings and upped core speed/memspeed, still dont think i have hit a brick wall yet, woohoo

Oh alec, sorry, my bad, 4get how long it takes

 

[giorgos th.]

you can do more.use the settings i gave you and give it a try.

 

[Alec§taar]

from poor Casheti's ordeal , maybe editing services.msc not a good idea for every1, u can do it far easier using msconfig and booting in diagnostic mode.. just a thought

First of all, He said he fixed it iirc...

Secondly, imo @ least?

There is no REAL big difference doing this with services.msc or msconfig REALLY, when you come down to it!

Heck, if you set your services to MANUAL startup in services.msc (as I noted earlier in this thread), instead of disabling them?

He should NEVER HAVE HAD A PROBLEM! It's VERY important to pay attention to the details involved, because as the saying goes? The "devil's are in the details", everytime...

IMO, above ALL else?

Heck, if you aren't sure of yourself in something?

Simple - DON'T DO ANYTHING!

APK

P.S.=> Either way works I suppose, to each his own, but it is the principle that matters... that's all!

(& THAT is to gain higher scores)...

And, as we can ALL see? IIRC, ALL OF YOU THAT HAVE FOLLOWED THIS PRINCIPLE OUTLINED BY MYSELF HAVE GAINED, & thus the whole forums team, gains... by the average scores! apk

 

[mandelore]

i thought those were based on the ram chips being tccd, i have lowered them slightly, im getting there, havin one or two issues getting it to work from bios, but works stable from systool, again,

"All praise Systool, for it bringith the bounty of overclock"

Oh, and thankyou, you have helped me push further than i ever thought, the last few changes i only expected a few points from 1560, but to over 1570 ,wow

 

[mandelore]

There is no real difference with services.msc or msconfig REALLY, when you come down to it!

totally agreed, identical, just maybe an idea for those wanting higher scores but unsure about changing services.msc, anyhoo, its another option, and the more the merrier

 

[giorgos th.]

they might work your chips.just give it a shot.with what voltage are they?

 

[Alec§taar]

ScienceMark 2.0 Standings/Results on 08/17/2006

Reposting Scores To Last Page...

 

[mandelore]

i will, may have to try it from systool tho, im running 1.85V, have had it higher, upto 1.95, but if i cant get ur suggestions to work will up the voltage

 

[giorgos th.]

wait you`ve got 1.85V to your mem?Vcore i guess right?

 

[mandelore]

sciencemark2 results by score only u have swapped Urlyin and giogos around

yes, 1.85 i "think" to my mem, at least thats what it shud b atm, gonna do a reset n double check, up it and lower sum more values

Edit: had preamble to 5ns already from wot u said previously, no probs so far

 

[giorgos th.]

there is absolutely no way you are using 1.85V to DDR sticks.there`s a mistake here.probably 2.85??

 

[Alec§taar]

sciencemark2 results by score only u have swapped Urlyin and giogos around

Corrected.

APK

 

[mandelore]

there is absolutely no way you are using 1.85V to DDR sticks.there`s a mistake here.probably 2.85??

LOL yes, ofcourse, silly me, 2.85 is wot i ment "Do'h"

 

[giorgos th.]

try with 2.9V and the settings i gave.also a little bit risky but with 2.9V try cas 2.5..
if you have you can put a fan in front them for better cooling.

 

[mandelore]

im using ur settings now at 2.85, running s-mark2 again now. tried cas 2.5 earlier wouldnt boot, will try higher V for that shortly


Edit: hmmm, dropped 2 points


Hell yeah! 3v to ram and 2.5 cas boot up from bios, tho 1st attempt gave me msg saying i had zero memory?? err, im worried, i really need to know wot max Voltage my ram can support,

Edit Edit: no joy, just looping boots, dropping the voltage, if i knew it could happily support higher voltages id up it more to see if that helps, tho till i get proof im not risking increasing the vcore on the mem, tho the fact i got some sort of boot may b promising...

 

[giorgos th.]

leave it then and try finding the max performance with 2.9V

 

[mandelore]

yup agreed, have it at 2.9 perfect boot, had to increase cas to 3 tho. so im gonna fiddle with it from here. Thanx for your help btw

 

[Alec§taar]

ScienceMark 2.0 Benchmark contest Current Standings/Scores 08/17/2006

REPOSTING TO LAST PAGE... apk

 

[gR3iF]

i guess i did well ^^

 

[mikelopez]

My spec should read:

(via 7x mult. X 450mhz FSB - Intel Core2Duo E6300@3150mhz)

Thanks.