Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

[wally_1973]

The 17.01.64 CPUID bench shows very different score.

 

[Tomgang]

It looks like CPU-z has updated and change that benchmark. So new results incoming.

I7 980X is what tested.
Stock

4.25 GHz

4.7 ghz

 

[fusseli]

Very tempted to go 7700k

 

[wally_1973]

Very tempted to go 7700k

OR you could go for the Ryzen 5 1600.. also very good. But overclocking.. not yet.

 

[jboydgolfer]

Ryzen what?

View attachment 87226

That's a six years old CPU without OC.

No way that is a legit stock 2500 result cant be, right?

 

[purecain]

haswell 4770k @ 4.5

 

[wally_1973]

For now I'll stick with the FX8320 and FX8350 and I'll wait a little longer. Maybe I'll buy an Intel maybe AMD.. duno yet. Prices of the intel's bound to drop so..

 

[TheHunter]

@
https://valid.x86.fr/2lzkan

 

[dylricho]

Very tempted to go 7700k

I am a little skeptical of your result. Looks like it's throttling due to temperatures (I see the 23 multiplier, and assume 4.60 GHz). I was getting that with my APU beyond 4.80 GHz. Therefore, I'm not too sure how to interpret this for the graph.

 

[birdie]

No way that is a legit stock 2500 result cant be, right?

It's my own PC and the verification data is at the window title bar. I know it's difficult to reconcile with reality but it is what it is.

 

[Kliim]

Software overclocking FTW
If I try overclocking the bclk in the bios over 150, the PC won't start, no matter what I do (several seems to have this prob with these mobo in combination with westmere). So I try overclocking with easytune 6 in windows and I get 178Mhz bclk or 4.272Ghz core speed.
(Srybadengl.)

 

[jboydgolfer]

I know it's difficult to reconcile with reality but it is what it is

no difficulty, i owned that CPU (the K version) , but based off the perf of Much newer higher clocked CPU's, i was surprised to see a 2011 or 2012, 2500 @ stock do 400+ , thats all.

for example a 4770k doing about 80 points better with a extra Ghz of frequency. just seems off is all. its not that i cant belive the chip CAN do it, it just that i had trouble seeing it happen @ stock aka. A max of 3.7 Ghz.& i noticed you didnt run the front screen of cpuz showing actual clocks, so i thought it might be a mistake since cpuz always shows stock clocks on the bench screen

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

Software overclocking FTW
If I try overclocking the bclk in the bios over 150, the PC won't start, no matter what I do (several seems to have this prob with these mobo in combination with westmere). So I try overclocking with easytune 6 in windows and I get 178Mhz bclk or 4.272Ghz core speed.
(Srybadengl.)

View attachment 87386

try dropping the multi to X 22

 

[Kliim]

@CAPSLOCKSTUCK tried it, at 179 Mhz bluescreen without any load @1.344V. Which further voltages you have (QPI,PLL...)?
But it seems that 178 is the highest I can squeeze out of these board.

 

[Xuper]

my PC : CPU-z

ST Score : 135
MT Score : 535

Win7 64bit / Cpu-z 64 bit

when I click "submit and compare", CPU-Z's Web page does not show me score, any idea? bench Just gives me only link with no score.

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

@CAPSLOCKSTUCK tried it, at 179 Mhz bluescreen without any load @1.344V. Which further voltages you have (QPI,PLL...)?
But it seems that 178 is the highest I can squeeze out of these board.

what CPU cooler do you have.?

All my volts are on auto.

 

[droopyRO]

I really want to upgrade to a Ryzen 1600.

 

[Kliim]

Tower cooler with 120mm fan.
Ok, mine too so far, so they seem not the problem. Maybe I'll try it one time without smt.

 

[dylricho]

no difficulty, i owned that CPU (the K version) , but based off the perf of Much newer higher clocked CPU's, i was surprised to see a 2011 or 2012, 2500 @ stock do 400+ , thats all.

for example a 4770k doing about 80 points better with a extra Ghz of frequency. just seems off is all. its not that i cant belive the chip CAN do it, it just that i had trouble seeing it happen @ stock aka. A max of 3.7 Ghz.& i noticed you didnt run the front screen of cpuz showing actual clocks, so i thought it might be a mistake since cpuz always shows stock clocks on the bench screen

Well, the software itself comes with two baselines that don't make sense. The 6700K and 7600K both have the same ST turbo, and yet the i5 is faster in single-thread by 7%.

 

[FilipM]

As @CAPSLOCKSTUCK (or was it someone else?) would say, long live X58

PS. In Single Thread I beat a Ryzen...at least according to CPUZ's database...wow

 

[purecain]

hopefully have realworld ryzen 1800x results tomorrow.
ps.just spotted the run on the last page. those results are crazy.. cant wait...

 

[fusseli]

Very tempted to go 7700k

Aaaaand here we go

vs. old FX-8350 @ 4.4 GHz

 

[dylricho]

I forgot to tell you guys. Last week, I got in contact with the developers and they told me that version 17 of the benchmark still utilizes scalar SSE2 instructions at most. No SSE3, SSE4 or AVX.

(I also contacted to notify them of the "i7-7600K" typo.)

hopefully have realworld ryzen 1800x results tomorrow.
ps.just spotted the run on the last page. those results are crazy.. cant wait...

Awesome. It'll be interesting to have an 1800X result with SMT enabled.

 

[phanbuey]

meh... with 2 games running in the background

 

[purecain]

nice, I'm having to wait a couple more days as I didn't like the replacement back plate for the temporary water cooling. so bought an am4 bracket. just waiting on delivery now...