- Joined
- Mar 23, 2016
- Messages
- 4,839 (1.64/day)
Processor | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI B450 Tomahawk ATX |
Cooling | Cooler Master Hyper 212 Black Edition |
Memory | VENGEANCE LPX 2 x 16GB DDR4-3600 C18 OCed 3800 |
Video Card(s) | XFX Speedster SWFT309 AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT CORE Gaming |
Storage | 970 EVO NVMe M.2 500 GB, 870 QVO 1 TB |
Display(s) | Samsung 28” 4K monitor |
Case | Phantek Eclipse P400S (PH-EC416PS) |
Audio Device(s) | EVGA NU Audio |
Power Supply | EVGA 850 BQ |
Mouse | SteelSeries Rival 310 |
Keyboard | Logitech G G413 Silver |
Software | Windows 10 Professional 64-bit v22H2 |
I think it might have something to do with the FPU Julia bench it depends on for the frames encoded with the VP8 codec.
Also the instruction set extensions are having and effect.
FPU VP8 Benchmark
The content of the frames are generated by the FPU Julia fractal module.
The code behind this benchmark method utilizes the appropriate MMX, SSE2, SSSE3 or SSE4.1 instruction set extension.
FPU Julia Benchmark
The code behind this benchmark method is written in Assembly, and it is extremely optimized for every popular AMD, Intel and VIA processor core variants by utilizing the appropriate x87, 3DNow!, 3DNow!+, SSE, AVX, AVX2, FMA, and FMA4 instruction set extension.
Edit: Ryzen has a more capable FPU perhaps compared to the previous Bulldozer?
Also the instruction set extensions are having and effect.
FPU VP8 Benchmark
The content of the frames are generated by the FPU Julia fractal module.
The code behind this benchmark method utilizes the appropriate MMX, SSE2, SSSE3 or SSE4.1 instruction set extension.
FPU Julia Benchmark
The code behind this benchmark method is written in Assembly, and it is extremely optimized for every popular AMD, Intel and VIA processor core variants by utilizing the appropriate x87, 3DNow!, 3DNow!+, SSE, AVX, AVX2, FMA, and FMA4 instruction set extension.
Edit: Ryzen has a more capable FPU perhaps compared to the previous Bulldozer?