Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

[harm9963]

Under normal conditions do I understand that 5950x over 690? hahaha or these data with what weather are we talking at 0 degrees?

Room temp 75F ,AIO X360 , liquid metal .

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @ 4598.93 MHz - CPU-Z VALIDATOR

[8ne4fy] Validated Dump by reset (2021-01-16 16:45:31) - MB: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - RAM: 16384 MB

valid.x86.fr

 

[phanbuey]

Room temp 75F ,AIO X360 , liquid metal .

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @ 4598.93 MHz - CPU-Z VALIDATOR

[8ne4fy] Validated Dump by reset (2021-01-16 16:45:31) - MB: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - RAM: 16384 MB

valid.x86.fr

That's nuts.

 

[harm9963]

That's nuts.

Water loop next !

 

[phanbuey]

Water loop next !

Pretty sure that 360 AIO will beat a 360 open loop with a gpu in pretty soundly. Esp with that push into restrictive grate combination that's going on in that youtube.

 

[harm9963]

Pretty sure that 360 AIO will beat a 360 open loop with a gpu in pretty soundly. Esp with that push into restrictive grate combination that's going on in that youtube.

Pretty sure that 360 AIO will beat a 360 open loop with a gpu in pretty soundly. Esp with that push into restrictive grate combination that's going on in that youtube.

https://www.ekwb.com/shop/ek-coolstream-ce-420-triple FTW !

 

[Toretobcn]

That's nuts.

crazy that, of a lot or a few points?

I'm not fluent in Ryzen but I understand that this score is "normal"? Or is it well above the average of other AMD 5950x?

 

[shadow3401]

 

[Det0x]

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @ 4798.88 MHz - CPU-Z VALIDATOR

[dl125q] Validated Dump by ERLEND (2021-01-23 01:00:38) - MB: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) - RAM: 32768 MB

valid.x86.fr

Single-Thread 725
Multi-Thread (32T) 14147

Screenshot in the cinebench r23 thread, but can post here also if needed.

 

[Felix123BU]

5800X with some light PBO

Single -695.1
Multi - 6968.5

PBO actually is useful this gen

 

[Chloe Price]

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 @ 4403.7 MHz - CPU-Z VALIDATOR

[iy3clt] Validated Dump by Maenad (2021-01-25 19:56:44) - MB: MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89) - RAM: 16384 MB

valid.x86.fr

 

[Felix123BU]

Broke 700 in single, the 5800X reminds me of my late 4790K

 

[Toretobcn]

Broke 700 in single, the 5800X reminds me of my late 4790K

View attachment 185650

I imagine that was in an ideal condition right?? Everything clean, fresh And top priority

 

[Felix123BU]

I imagine that was in an ideal condition right?? Everything clean, fresh And top priority

Ideal as in PBO + 200, negative manual curve, normal windows, closed all non essential apps, boost to 5.05 Ghz single, 4.775 multi, 280mm AIO, 25 celsius ish room temp (so on the warm side), so not super ideal, but normal-ideal. Have not fiddled with priority setting, normal, might be that Real Time might get a few extra points, but was not going for absolute max but something I could use all day long, even though I wont use this as a daily setup

 

[kapone32]

I don't want to paste the entire HTML or text file but I got 651.2 for single core and 4943.7 for multi on my 5600x and 461.4 single and 7238.5 Multi core for my 2920X.

 

[Toretobcn]

No quiero pegar todo el archivo HTML o de texto, pero obtuve 651.2 para un solo núcleo y 4943.7 para varios en mi 5600x y 461.4 solo y 7238.5 para varios núcleos para mi 2920X.

I didn't understand what you mean hahaha

 

[bobbybluz]

Here's two oldies I just ran across. Check out the temps & voltages along with the clock speeds.

Intel Core i7 4790K @ 4968.98 MHz - CPU-Z VALIDATOR (x86.fr)

CPU-Z Validator 3.1

CPU-Z Validation Checker (by canardpc.com)

valid.canardpc.com

 

[Felix123BU]

Here's two oldies I just ran across. Check out the temps & voltages along with the clock speeds.

Intel Core i7 4790K @ 4968.98 MHz - CPU-Z VALIDATOR (x86.fr)

CPU-Z Validator 3.1

CPU-Z Validation Checker (by canardpc.com)

valid.canardpc.com

hot damn, 5Ghz on that chip, I just gave my 4790K away this week to a friend in need, but could only go 4.6 allcore on a decent voltage, and it was delidded

 

[mortenserv]

Hey there,

I need a bit of advice. I have this 3+ year old build that have been running like this since the beginning and is stable:

- i7-8700K running 5.3GHz @ 1.400V. No AVX and delidded so under stress test temps max out at 72C-ish.
- Asus Z390-F mobo (originally a Z370-E)
- NZXT Kraken Z63 AIO cooler
- 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3333MHz
- AORUS GTX 1080Ti Xtreme Edition

Obviously I was lucky with my 8700K as it OC's very good. Now I'm considering going for a Rocket Lake 11900K upgrade. I mainly play one game called iRacing which is a weird creature in terms of performance. It really just craves single thread performance hence my upgrade thoughts. But....even though no reliable benchmarks have been released I'm just not sure if it makes sense. From what I have heard the 11900K should be able to hit 700 in CPUZ. Looks like the AMD X5XXX's can hit the same area. I had never benched my CPU but to my surprise it hits 634 points. Naturally it's getting obliviated in multi thread, but I really don't care about multi thread.

- So is there something wrong with my numbers making my 634 score not valid? With the IPC gains made over the years it just seems odd my ol' 8700K still rocks so good.
- Is there another benchmark which is better for gaming?
- Will a never CPU give me other gains for gaming a benchmark doens't take into account? Apart from PCIE 4.0 with better possible M.2 speeds.

 

[QuietBob]

Now I'm considering going for a Rocket Lake 11900K upgrade. I mainly play one game called iRacing which is a weird creature in terms of performance. It really just craves single thread performance

If those leaked benchmarks are anything to go by, you'd be looking at 14% ST boost in SSE2:

iRacing is currently recommending an octa core CPU with 32 GB RAM for playing in high detail. You may see better minimum frame rates and less frame time variation with two extra cores.
You can test your current CPU and GPU usage by setting CPUMeter=1 in your app.ini file and pressing "F" in-game. That should tell you whether your current setup is CPU-bound: enabling meter box

And welcome to TPU forums!

 

[mortenserv]

If those leaked benchmarks are anything to go by, you'd be looking at 14% ST boost in SSE2:

View attachment 189554View attachment 189555

iRacing is currently recommending an octa core CPU with 32 GB RAM for playing in high detail. You may see better minimum frame rates and less frame time variation with two extra cores.
You can test your current CPU and GPU usage by setting CPUMeter=1 in your app.ini file and pressing "F" in-game. That should tell you whether your current setup is CPU-bound: enabling meter box

And welcome to TPU forums!

Thx Bob

It just seems so crazy that more than 3 years later Intel can only offer a 14% improvement. Where did Moore's Law go? I know my 8700K OC's well, but still Of course this is only single thread.

I have the CPUMeter enabled. Playing on a 5120 x 1440 monitor with a little above medium settings my CPU and GPU seems almost on par - maybe with the GPU a tad more stressed. I'm looking for a 3080 (like the rest of the world...) but my "fear" is that once I get it, my 8700K will be the bottleneck. That's why I began to look into Rocket Lake. I guess I will have to wait for official benchmarks, but for a 14% increase it just seems like too much money to spend and then I might as well have to wait and see what Alder Lake can do...even though I don't have that high expectations for the first generation.

 

[Toretobcn]

that 11900k throws me a lot I hate that it has so much in single core! I'm at 640 scores with the 10900k .... 712scores is going to be a big difference in games.

I was stung ... I managed to put 1 core of the 10900k to 5.6! and even so...

 

[mortenserv]

that 11900k throws me a lot I hate that it has so much in single core! I'm at 640 scores with the 10900k .... 712scores is going to be a big difference in games.

I was stung ... I managed to put 1 core of the 10900k to 5.6! and even so...

View attachment 189696

So a 10-15% gain in CPUZ will be more than 10-15% worth for gaming?

 

[Toretobcn]

I have no idea, but it is clear that it is innalcalzble for a 10900k in monocore!

I do not know how much difference there will be but it is clear that it will be better playing almost certainly ..

how much? no idea also the 11900k say that it gives those values without doing oc, bone stock, so I imagine that there will still be more gap!

10900k oc!

 

[storm-chaser]

Dell Workstation (dual CPU)

My other Z820 is geared more towards single core performance, hence I went with the ultra rare 2673 v2 chip, with turbo up to 4.0GHz. Keep in mind this is a dual processor rig.

 

[AZUTAROU]

I would like to thank Amzon.com and AMD.

It's just $ 240 to sell this amazing CPU ^^