• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Sony PlayStation 4 "Orbis" Kits Shipping to Developers, Powered by AMD A10 APU

Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
523 (0.25/day)
Likes
122
Processor Intel Core i7-5930k @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99-A
Cooling Corsair H110
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR4-2666
Video Card(s) 2x Titan X @ 1450/8000
Storage WD Black 4TB + Agility 3 240GB + Seagate 600 240GB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos 4k LC-60UD27U
Case Corsair Obsidian 450D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
10 pages later and you admit it.
You REALLY haven't read the thread, have you? Multiple times, even beginning in post #19, I've stated we will find out i.e. "know" in a year or two, when the hardware is released, what it can do.



:shadedshu
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,401 (4.84/day)
Likes
5,481
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
+1 to the # of people who don't understand my point has nothing to do with hardware

You have to churn out ~4x the pixels at 1080p60 as you do at 720p30. That's basic math.

Now, I understand (and have stated from very early on in this argument) that when you actually go look at how things perform in the real world, this breaks down and is not linear. But there's all sorts of various reasons for that and none of them have to do with the fact that you're putting out a different ratio of pixels at 1080p60 vs 720p30 than ~4x.

Why does it take dozens of posts to explain such a stupidly over-simple point? Go read the thread - I was making a picky point because of a lack of clarity in one of mailman's posts, and you guys have taken it to a whole other level.

Wow.
That's because it isn't as basic as you claim it to be and what you're describing is completely false. Just stop posting before you make yourself look more like a fool than you already have. What you're talking about isn't the performance of this custom APU for Sony's new console, but rather how GPUs work.

4x as many pixels doesn't imply 4x more work. Just stop posting, because how 3D is rendered is clearly beyond you and you're not willing to do the research and change your stance based on the information provided.
You REALLY haven't read the thread, have you? Multiple times, even beginning in post #19, I've stated we will find out i.e. "know" in a year or two, when the hardware is released, what it can do.

http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm288/larryo340/Funny gifs/7c35013f.gif

:shadedshu
That isn't what you've been talking about for the majority of your posts...
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
84 (0.02/day)
Likes
5
Location
Canada
System Name Fishy's Computer
Processor Intel e8400 3.0 ghz
Motherboard Asus p5k-e
Cooling Air
Memory 4 gb Mushkin hp2
Video Card(s) XFX 9800GTX Artifact Edition
Storage 640 gig Western Digital, 200 gig Samsung
Display(s) LG W2242P
Case Cooler Master 690
Audio Device(s) Onboard ftw!
Power Supply Corsair hx 520
Software what ever i run.
Benchmark Scores none yet
Mathematical proof (for like the 4th time):

(1920*1080)/(1280*720) = 2.25
60/30 = 2

Put them together... 2.25*2 = 4.5

Hence, 1080p60 is ~4x as demanding as 720p30.

That's not a point about hardware. In fact, strictly speaking my point here has nothing to do with hardware. It's a point about math which is apparently too simple for many of the elite minds in this thread to grasp. :shadedshu
With the resolution of my monitor I'm a shade under 3 times the resolution of 1080p, with 1 gtx 570 in pretty much every game I could get 60 fps. Now 1 570 doesn't power the new monitor quite so well.. Do I need 3 570s to get 60fps? Nope, in fact i only need 2 570s but I get stutter due to running out of vram. So I need nearly 3x the power to run the resolution at 60fps, why does only boosting my power by under 2x work fine??
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.23/day)
Likes
1,049
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
You REALLY haven't read the thread, have you? Multiple times, even beginning in post #19, I've stated we will find out i.e. "know" in a year or two, when the hardware is released, what it can do.

:shadedshu
Fair enough. Then wait 2 years and bump the thread.

You, if your post was complete in #19, why are we still having this debate at post #254?


+1 to the # of people who don't understand my point has nothing to do with hardware

You have to churn out ~4x the pixels at 1080p60 as you do at 720p30. That's basic math.
I'm not disputing the increase in pixels won't increase processing requirements, I'm disputing that 4x pixels translate to a 4x powerful GPU in the real world.

For example, a GPU 1 is 4x more powerful than GPU 2.

GPU 1 has access to 512MB of dedicated, 1GB of system memory
GPU 2 has access to 2GB of dedicated, 8GB of system memory

Despite, GPU 1 having increase clock speeds, higher shader count, wider memory bus it only gets only gets 20FPS in Crysis @ 1080p

However the slower GPU 2, gets 35FPS in Crysis @ 1080p due to having access to a more lucrative memory reserve thus helping it outperform the faster GPU at a higher resolution.
 

hooj

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
398 (0.11/day)
Likes
18
Location
Londinius
System Name First and last Custom build cus it was just too tedious.
Processor i5 2500k
Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V LX
Cooling Stock
Memory G.Skill RipJaw X 2x 2GB
Video Card(s) Inno3D 9600GT 512MB
Storage Seagate Momentus XT 320GB
Display(s) 17" Proview LCD/ 19.5" Viewsonic Optiquest/ 19" LG Flatron LCD TV with the Red bit on it
Case NZXT Source 220
Audio Device(s) None
Power Supply Corsair TX750 V2
Software Windows XP Professional
Benchmark Scores N/A
So this whole argument started because some nab doesn't think the PS4 with APU will run all of it's games at 1080p @ 60fps?
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,401 (4.84/day)
Likes
5,481
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
Despite, GPU 1 having increase clock speeds, higher shader count, wider memory bus it only gets only gets 20FPS in Crysis @ 1080p

However the slower GPU 2, gets 35FPS in Crysis @ 1080p due to having access to a more lucrative memory reserve thus helping it outperform the faster GPU at a higher resolution.
+1 (kind of): Actually the performance hit from running out of memory is much more steep than that, but it's an accurate representation.
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.23/day)
Likes
1,049
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
So this whole argument started because some nab doesn't think the PS4 with APU will run all of it's games at 1080p @ 60fps?
Yes,

And the crazy thing is Sony never said it would run all games at 1080p @ 60fps.

The other crazy thing is we don't know what the specification of the GPU portion of the APU is.

We don't even know if the games lined up on PS4 are intensive.

We know nothing. #11 pages of argument based on little data. ahhhhh.
 

hooj

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
398 (0.11/day)
Likes
18
Location
Londinius
System Name First and last Custom build cus it was just too tedious.
Processor i5 2500k
Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V LX
Cooling Stock
Memory G.Skill RipJaw X 2x 2GB
Video Card(s) Inno3D 9600GT 512MB
Storage Seagate Momentus XT 320GB
Display(s) 17" Proview LCD/ 19.5" Viewsonic Optiquest/ 19" LG Flatron LCD TV with the Red bit on it
Case NZXT Source 220
Audio Device(s) None
Power Supply Corsair TX750 V2
Software Windows XP Professional
Benchmark Scores N/A
Yes,

And the crazy thing is Sony never said it would run all games at 1080p @ 60fps.

The other crazy thing is we don't know what the specification of the GPU portion of the APU is.

We don't even know if the games lined up on PS4 are intensive.

We know nothing. #11 pages of argument based on little data. ahhhhh.
Well as long as the games that need 60fps get 60fps then well it doesn't matter because i'm still buying one!:roll:
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
1,891 (0.86/day)
Likes
813
Location
Brisbane QLD, Australia
System Name Белая коробка | Alienware 13R3 | Asus T300 Chi | Synology DS416 w/ 4X6TB WD Red | Huawei P10
Processor Intel i7-7700k @ 4.8GHz | Intel i7-7700HQ
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix Z270G | Dell/Alienware thing
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S w/ A15 & F12 | Double fan
Memory G.Skill 2X8gb Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000mhz | DDR4 2X8GB 2400mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 500GB, Crucial MX200 500GB, 1X WD 4TB Black | 256gb M.2 SSD, 512GB Intel 600p M.2
Display(s) LG 27UD68 & BenQ FP241W (ANCIENT!) | 13" 1080p IPS & Sony X7000E 49" 4K HDR TV
Case InWin 301 (white) | Alienware 13R3
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z | onboard sound -Onkyo 808 Receiver
Power Supply InWin Classic Series 900W | Dell 180W brick
Mouse Logitech G403 Wireless | Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G810 | Red Square OLD SCHOOL TKL - Gateron Blue
Software Windows 10 Home | Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores Citroen DS3 THP155 DSport6-spd manual|
DAYUM, been away from the forums for one day and this thread has already over 250 posts! :eek:

Reading the past couple of pages it seems to me most of the posts seem to be about the hardware of the "PS4" not being able to run games @ 60fps 1080p 3D. I don't think the majority of console gamers will really care or even notice the performance increase or the fact that not EVERY game will run @ 60fps 1080p 3D.

I'm sure that most people that are that concerned about this issue could just go out and buy a decent computer to run most of the games and be happy that way.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,401 (4.84/day)
Likes
5,481
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
We don't even know if the games lined up on PS4 are intensive.
Sony hasn't used the term PS4 yet, so I'm reluctant to call it a PS4. It's possible that their next gaming console will not be named PlayStation. Sony might be trying to re-brand it and shift the audience for this console. It's looking more like a HTPC than a console so far, and that definitely intrigues me.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
523 (0.25/day)
Likes
122
Processor Intel Core i7-5930k @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99-A
Cooling Corsair H110
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR4-2666
Video Card(s) 2x Titan X @ 1450/8000
Storage WD Black 4TB + Agility 3 240GB + Seagate 600 240GB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos 4k LC-60UD27U
Case Corsair Obsidian 450D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
That isn't what you've been talking about for the majority of your posts...
The majority of my posts have been spent explaining basic math to people like yourself who don't understand I'm not talking about real world hardware/software. You said it yourself. It's 4x more pixels. That's my point. Right there. End of story. It was never a major point until a dozen people started failing to read and/or do math.

I'm not disputing the increase in pixels won't increase processing requirements, I'm disputing that 4x pixels translate to a 4x powerful GPU in the real world.
I am not and never was talking about the real world. How many times do I have to explain this? 50? 100? I made a nit-picky post about how many pixels have to get crunched out at 1080p60 vs 720p30, due to a lack of clarity in another post, in order to be facetious, and it apparently went about a mile over the heads of all the brainiacs in here.

Here, since you all are so good at reading, let me just take the time to say that again:

I am not and never was talking about the real world. It was a nit picky-post about how many more pixels have to get crunched out at 1080p60 vs 720p30, and it was in response to another post which could have been more clear (and which the author did later clarify).

Maybe I'll say it a third time, just to be sure?

I am not and never was talking about a real world performance scenario. I made a nit picky post about how many more pixels need to be output at 1080p60 vs 720p30 in response to another poster.

Now, there are implications there for how much more powerful your hardware needs to be, and if I implied it's as simple as "your GPU needs to be 4x better", then I apologize - I know that's a horrid oversimplification. I thought that was clear from one of my early posts about how non-linearity related to the argument I was trying to make. You DO need 4x more pixel crunching power, but that doesn't necessarily have to come from a 4x more powerful GPU - you could have 2x better software optimization + 2x better GPU, etc.

Now, if YOU read my posts and implied "oh he's arguing that the PS4 needs to be 4x more powerful than the PS3" or something like that, then that's YOUR problem with reading comprehension, and I don't apologize.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.23/day)
Likes
1,049
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
The majority of my posts have been spent explaining basic math to people like yourself who don't understand I'm not talking about real world hardware/software. You said it yourself. It's 4x more pixels. That's my point. Right there. End of story. It was never a major point until a dozen people started failing to read and/or do math.



I am not and never was talking about the real world. How many times do I have to explain this? 50? 100? I made a nit-picky post about how many pixels have to get crunched out at 1080p60 vs 720p30, due to a lack of clarity in another post, in order to be facetious, and it apparently went about a mile over the heads of all the brainiacs in here.

Here, since you all are so good at reading, let me just take the time to say that again:

I am not and never was talking about the real world. It was a nit picky-post about how many more pixels have to get crunched out at 1080p60 vs 720p30, and it was in response to another post which could have been more clear (and which the author did later clarify).

Maybe I'll say it a third time, just to be sure?

I am not and never was talking about a real world performance scenario. I made a nit picky post about how many more pixels need to be output at 1080p60 vs 720p30 in response to another poster.

Now, there are implications there for how much more powerful your hardware needs to be, and if I implied it's as simple as 4x, then I apologize - I know that's a horrid oversimplification. I thought that was clear from one of my early posts about how non-linearity related to the argument I was trying to make.
You keep talking about "reading". But I don't see anyone disputing the math or anyone disputing that there isn't a 4x pixel difference between 720p and 1080p. If somebody said on the contrary quote it for all to see. So you are arguing a point which we are not disputing, this isn't good use of your time.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
4,059 (1.07/day)
Likes
1,123
Location
Geneva, FL, USA
Processor Intel i5-6600
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX
Cooling Cooler Master Geminii S524
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2133 16GB (8GB x 2)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9-380X 4GB
Storage Samsung 950 EVO 250GB (mSATA)
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B 2560x1080 IPS
Case Lian Li PC-Q25
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro
In conclusion,

Given what is known about Orbis, Sony's goals (resolution/fps, lost cost) are very possible.

/thread
 

hooj

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
398 (0.11/day)
Likes
18
Location
Londinius
System Name First and last Custom build cus it was just too tedious.
Processor i5 2500k
Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V LX
Cooling Stock
Memory G.Skill RipJaw X 2x 2GB
Video Card(s) Inno3D 9600GT 512MB
Storage Seagate Momentus XT 320GB
Display(s) 17" Proview LCD/ 19.5" Viewsonic Optiquest/ 19" LG Flatron LCD TV with the Red bit on it
Case NZXT Source 220
Audio Device(s) None
Power Supply Corsair TX750 V2
Software Windows XP Professional
Benchmark Scores N/A
Sony hasn't used the term PS4 yet, so I'm reluctant to call it a PS4. It's possible that their next gaming console will not be named PlayStation. Sony might be trying to re-brand it and shift the audience for this console. It's looking more like a HTPC than a console so far, and that definitely intrigues me.
Rebrand the playstation? LMAO Nah it's PS4.
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
175 (0.09/day)
Likes
19
System Name For now
Processor Intel i7-4790K
Motherboard ASRock Extreme9 Z97
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory Kingston HyperX
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 980 Strix x 2
Display(s) Overlord
Case Corsair 900D
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
I really don't understand why a person in this thread is arguing about this :rolleyes:

Consoles have always been closed platforms that are optimized to do one thing and one thing only - Play Games.

Being a closed platform in the hardware sense, developers can maximize optimization for said platform since they are developing for one set of hardware and one set of hardware alone. I really don't see why the PS4 can't deliver 1080p24 for movies and 1080p60 for video games. Same for the Xbox 720 that should be pushed out around the same time.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,286 (0.93/day)
Likes
528
Location
Burlington, VT
Processor Intel i5-2500k
Motherboard MSI P67A-GD65
Cooling Deep Cool Gammax 400
Memory 8GB (4x2GB) G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1060 Windforce OC 6GB
Storage Samsung EVO 850 256GB / WD Caviar Black 1TB
Display(s) Acer GD235HZbid 120hz LCD
Case Rosewill Challenger Mid-Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 650W 650-TX
Software Windows 10
If they are using a GPU built into a modified APU, I'm willing to be Sony will muck it up by using really slow RAM so the GPU runs much worse than it should...
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
523 (0.25/day)
Likes
122
Processor Intel Core i7-5930k @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99-A
Cooling Corsair H110
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR4-2666
Video Card(s) 2x Titan X @ 1450/8000
Storage WD Black 4TB + Agility 3 240GB + Seagate 600 240GB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos 4k LC-60UD27U
Case Corsair Obsidian 450D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
So you are arguing a point which we are not disputing, this isn't good use of your time.
So why are you arguing with my posts, again? Is it a good use of your time?

I've been trying to explain for a while that people are responding like I'm making an argument that I'm not making, hence my repeated calls to actually read.

The appropriate response to my initial post, if someone had taken the time to read + think (and mailman & others at the time got this fairly quickly), would have been "OK fine there's 4x the pixels that need to get crunched out but there's a more than one way to get that".

It was never a big deal until people started trying to put a straw man argument in my mouth and I had to clarify (over and over and over).
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,401 (4.84/day)
Likes
5,481
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
The majority of my posts have been spent explaining basic math to people like yourself who don't understand I'm not talking about real world hardware/software. You said it yourself. It's 4x more pixels. That's my point. Right there. End of story. It was never a major point until a dozen people started failing to read and/or do math.



I am not and never was talking about the real world. How many times do I have to explain this? 50? 100? I made a nit-picky post about how many pixels have to get crunched out at 1080p60 vs 720p30, due to a lack of clarity in another post, in order to be facetious, and it apparently went about a mile over the heads of all the brainiacs in here.

Here, since you all are so good at reading, let me just take the time to say that again:

I am not and never was talking about the real world. It was a nit picky-post about how many more pixels have to get crunched out at 1080p60 vs 720p30, and it was in response to another post which could have been more clear (and which the author did later clarify).

Maybe I'll say it a third time, just to be sure?

I am not and never was talking about a real world performance scenario. I made a nit picky post about how many more pixels need to be output at 1080p60 vs 720p30 in response to another poster.

Now, there are implications there for how much more powerful your hardware needs to be, and if I implied it's as simple as "your GPU needs to be 4x better", then I apologize - I know that's a horrid oversimplification. I thought that was clear from one of my early posts about how non-linearity related to the argument I was trying to make. You DO need 4x more pixel crunching power, but that doesn't necessarily have to come from a 4x more powerful GPU - you could have 2x better software optimization + 2x better GPU, etc.

Now, if YOU read my posts and implied "oh he's arguing that the PS4 needs to be 4x more powerful than the PS3" or something like that, then that's YOUR problem with reading comprehension, and I don't apologize.
I have a degree in Computer Science. I have a job as a System Administrator and Developer and I contribute occasionally to open source projects in my free time so I like to think I know what I'm talking about you twit. As far as "this is what I actually was saying," you're full of shit. You did mention hardware, and you did say it requires 4x more power. Stop changing your story and stop posting because it's very obvious that just about everyone here is frustrated with your lack of common sense and education. You're overbearing, ignorant, and think that you know your shit when you really do not.

Let me quote you:
Hence, 1080p60 is ~4x as demanding as 720p30.
Stop being a fucking tool and realize that people who actually work in the field and work on software for a living are telling you that you're wrong. So unless you're in the same position I am and work with computers professionally from a management and development standpoint, then you really need to stop spewing out all this garbage that you think is correct.

Now I recommend that you drop it and and stop defending your flawed position because at this point you're just making an ass out of yourself and obviously pissing people off in this thread.
So why are you arguing with my posts, again? Is it a good use of your time?

I've been trying to explain for a while that people are responding like I'm making an argument that I'm not making, hence my repeated calls to actually read.

The appropriate response to my initial post, if someone had taken the time to read + think (and mailman & others at the time got this fairly quickly), would have been "OK fine there's 4x the pixels that need to get crunched out but there's a more than one way to get that".

It was never a big deal until people started trying to put a straw man argument in my mouth and I had to clarify (over and over and over).
It's because you're a liar and dent is doing the right thing by calling you out.
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
175 (0.09/day)
Likes
19
System Name For now
Processor Intel i7-4790K
Motherboard ASRock Extreme9 Z97
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory Kingston HyperX
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 980 Strix x 2
Display(s) Overlord
Case Corsair 900D
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
If they are using a GPU built into a modified APU, I'm willing to be Sony will muck it up by using really slow RAM so the GPU runs much worse than it should...
Depends. PS1~3 development Sony was heavy handed in picking which parts that they wanted. This time around kind of sounds like AMD has the reigns on the main components on the cpu/gpu.

Also to note, the Wii U which is also another AMD product comes with 2GB of shared ram. I'm sure they won't muck things up for the "higher end" PS4.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
523 (0.25/day)
Likes
122
Processor Intel Core i7-5930k @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99-A
Cooling Corsair H110
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR4-2666
Video Card(s) 2x Titan X @ 1450/8000
Storage WD Black 4TB + Agility 3 240GB + Seagate 600 240GB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos 4k LC-60UD27U
Case Corsair Obsidian 450D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
[sooooooooooooooo ANGRYYYYYYYYYY]
#1) You're taking the internet too seriously. Chill out.

#2) I already apologized if I made statements about precisely how 4x the pixels would need to be applied to a hardware/software solution. All I meant was that somehow you need to get 4x the pixels produced. If I implied that requires a single solution (e.g. a 4x more powerful GPU), then I was wrong. If you took the time to read, maybe you wouldn't be raging so bad. I'm not trying to move the goalposts here - it's quite possible I said something that was poorly worded and wrong or which needed more clarification (I haven't gone back to read all my posts to check).

In fact, given the extent of discussion on this, the post you quoted does need more clarification:

#3) 1080p60 IS 4x more demanding than 720p30, in terms of the requirements of pixel output. That doesn't necessarily mean you need a CPU that's 4x as powerful, or a GPU that's 4x as powerful, or anything else (and I don't think I ever claimed any of those things?). But it does mean that your hardware/software implementation needs to meet 4x the pixel output demand as if it were running at 720p30. Hence, it's not wrong, per-se, to say that 1080p60 is 4x as demanding as 720p30, but perhaps it begs the question "in what respect is it 4x as demanding?".
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.23/day)
Likes
1,049
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
To be fair, over the course of this thread you've switched your argument to your own convenience when you are losing. Now you are saying you were merely highlighting the pixel count difference, however post #70 you clearly state that 1080p @ 60fps is 4x demanding than 720p @ 60FPS. This is the part most of us, if not all are disputing.

BigMack70: "Also, just to be picky... 1080p 60fps is more than 4x as demanding than what current consoles do, which is ~720p ~30fps."
Post #70: http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2765070&postcount=70

So why are you arguing with my posts, again? Is it a good use of your time?

No, this isn't good use of my time either. I'm man enough to admit that.


The appropriate response to my initial post, if someone had taken the time to read + think (and mailman & others at the time got this fairly quickly), would have been "OK fine there's 4x the pixels that need to get crunched out but there's a more than one way to get that".

It was never a big deal until people started trying to put a straw man argument in my mouth and I had to clarify (over and over and over).
Your mistake was keep repeating the same fact and then changing arguments as pointed out above. Mailman and a few others stopped responding, yet you continued.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
523 (0.25/day)
Likes
122
Processor Intel Core i7-5930k @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99-A
Cooling Corsair H110
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR4-2666
Video Card(s) 2x Titan X @ 1450/8000
Storage WD Black 4TB + Agility 3 240GB + Seagate 600 240GB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos 4k LC-60UD27U
Case Corsair Obsidian 450D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
^^ See clarification #3 above. The claim 1080p60 = ~4x more demanding than 720p30 isn't necessarily wrong. I've clarified what I meant by it, and I don't think I ever implied anything beyond what I've here clarified.

Seriously, guys. Read!

Is this a good use of my time? Probably not. But I'm not going to apologize for defending my arguments against straw man attacks from people who fail to read my posts.
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
1,155 (0.47/day)
Likes
466
System Name Desktop
Processor Intel i7-3930k
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth X79
Cooling Intel AIO
Memory 8x4GB 1866MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 970 SC
Storage Adaptec 2405 SAS controller> Hitachi SAS 15k 450GB|2xSeagate 2TB|WD Black 4 TB|HP Ultrium 1760 LTO4
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Fractal Define XL Black
Audio Device(s) Schiit Modi Uber>Schiit Asgard 2>Sennheiser HD600
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Logitech G613
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Is this a good use of my time? Probably not.


I must say I'm surprised to see that a thread about a console gets this much attention on TPU.

Carry on :laugh:
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2008
Messages
105 (0.03/day)
Likes
20
System Name The Stop Light
Processor Xeon X5650
Motherboard EVGA X58
Cooling Thermalright Spirit 140 Power
Memory OEM ECC DDR 1333
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX570
Storage Samsung 830 240GB
Display(s) Asus 24"
Case Corsair 400R
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply CM 1000W
^^ See clarification #3 above. The claim 1080p60 = ~4x more demanding than 720p30 isn't necessarily wrong. I've clarified what I meant by it, and I don't think I ever implied anything beyond what I've here clarified.

Seriously, guys. Read!

Is this a good use of my time? Probably not. But I'm not going to apologize for defending my arguments against straw man attacks from people who fail to read my posts.
Nobody failed to read your posts, so stop saying that.

I was excited to read what a "Tech" forum had to say about this news regarding an APU, but it's come down to 10 pages of "kindergarten" math.

Next time, if you are going to use Kindergarten math as your defense, go troll here instead:

http://www.nickjr.com/home/messageboard/
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.23/day)
Likes
1,049
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
^^ See clarification #3 above. The claim 1080p60 = ~4x more demanding than 720p30 isn't necessarily wrong. I've clarified what I meant by it, and I don't think I ever implied anything beyond what I've here clarified.
It is wrong. Here you go defending an invalid statement again. What you meant and what you said are two different things.

Your statement implies it requires 4x the horsepower in hardware, thus 4x more powerful CPU, GPU, RAM or subcomponent(s) of either three.


^^
Seriously, guys. Read!
You said it yourself, this is a Kindergarten right? If you have graduated leave the forum.


^^
But I'm not going to apologize for defending my arguments against straw man attacks from people who fail to read my posts.
Yes but what are you defending?

The 4x the pixel count?

or

4x demanding.

If you was defending one weak statement I would respect your argument. But can't respect somebody that flip flops between two statements at their own convenience.