1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

SUPER PI scores

Discussion in 'Overclocking & Cooling' started by pt, Aug 3, 2006.

  1. pt

    pt not a suicide-bomber

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,956 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    208
    Location:
    Portugal
    Just got super pi and decided to run it at the CPU/MEM stock speeds

    Edit: can't upload image

    the time for the 16K was of 00.279s
    and for the 32K was of 00.718s

    Is this a good result for a AMD 3000+ at 1800mhz?
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2006
    10 Year Member at TPU
  2. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    One thing to note about "Std." version of SuperPI:

    It's a SINGLE-THREADED program, & will NOT fully extoll the abilities/virtues present/inherent in DualCore/SMP/HyperThreaded CPU bearing systems!

    (Keep this in mind)

    IIRC, there IS a way to "rig" the std. model to fully exploit the virtues of SuperPi std. build, but I cannot recall the specifics needed though... sorry on that account/note!

    Could I think of a "rig job"? Sure - when you start 1 instance of it?? Using taskmgr.exe to set its affinity to a particular CPU core prior to starting the test will do it... you would run 2 instances of the single thread model of it this way, 1 to each core...

    :)

    * There IS a version that IS "multi-threaded" designed, & thus, inherently SMP/DualCore ready & capable coded, but, on a single CPU machine?

    ALSO, do keep THIS point in mind as well:

    Technically, single threaded code RUNS FASTER, & has less overheads in the process scheduler than multithreaded code would, on a SINGLE cpu system (single core that is). The single threaded model will be the "Best/Better" performer on a single core system!

    (InfraRed I am fairly certain, has D/L links for that model... name of file is: SuperPi 2004 (download filename = sp2004exe_20060405.cab) iirc! Double-Check w/ InfraRed)

    APK
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2006
    10 Year Member at TPU
  3. pt

    pt not a suicide-bomber

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,956 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    208
    Location:
    Portugal
    i used the one on the TPU download section, i have a single core cpu, so i think it works fine, what i want is to compare times on AMD cpu's, but thanks for the advice
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  4. cdawall

    cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    26,211 (6.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,240
    Location:
    Houston
    50s stock 41s w/ oc -1m
    .343s stock .282s w/ oc -16k
    .718s stock .594s w/ oc -32k

    for a64 3000+ (s754)
    2ghz stock ram timings 2.5-2-2-6 1T ddr2100 266mhz
    2.44ghz oc ram timings 2.5-2-2-6 1T ddr2100 326.6mhz
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2006
    10 Year Member at TPU
  5. dccool879

    dccool879 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    340 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    my amd 3000+ @ 2.6 ghz is 35 sec for 1M, not sure what it is stock
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  6. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,476 (2.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,695
    heres my pi score-

    [​IMG]
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  7. infrared

    infrared Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    3,971 (0.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,429
    Location:
    Southampton, UK
    P4 640 @ 4.88ghz = 27.000 superpi :D

    memory 1:1, 650mhz 4-4-4-9

    I can do better still when i get some better memory. My target is 26s

    [​IMG]
     
    10 Year Member at TPU Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  8. pt

    pt not a suicide-bomber

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,956 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    208
    Location:
    Portugal
    for 1m at stock speeds it took 52.9
    Pretty good times Infrared, how much did it do at 5.0?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  9. infrared

    infrared Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    3,971 (0.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,429
    Location:
    Southampton, UK
    5ghz isn't stable :(
     
    10 Year Member at TPU Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  10. pt

    pt not a suicide-bomber

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,956 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    208
    Location:
    Portugal
    with an overclock it does 35,4 s in 1M, a 17 seconds increase
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  11. mikelopez New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    168 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
  12. pt

    pt not a suicide-bomber

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,956 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    208
    Location:
    Portugal
    Nice overclock and nice CPU, i want one too :(
    It's yours?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  13. magibeg

    magibeg

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,083 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    268
    lol, i just find it funny a low end conroe just beat the crap out of everyones scores :p (yes i realize it is overclocked but still!)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  14. mikelopez New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    168 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    10 Year Member at TPU
  15. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    Well, single-threaded or not (DualCore user here) I gave it a go, w/ diff. builds too

    I took this test, single-threaded code or not (see my first post in regards to my thoughts on that), & used the "stock/oem" model 1.4, & ones also geared to speed up its calculations via the SSE2 &/or SSE3 instruction sets for floating point calculations.

    Here are my results:

    Super-Pi 1.4 stock/oem model:

    [​IMG]

    Super-Pi 1.4 SSE2 enhanced model:

    [​IMG]

    Super-Pi 1.4 SSE3 enhanced model:

    [​IMG]

    :)

    * Oddly, though the SSE2 &/or SSE3 enhanced models in theory OUGHT TO HELP imo, more than they did?

    Well - I don't see radical increases, yes some (small) but nothing "mind-blowing" either, about 1.1 seconds diff.!

    APK

    P.S.=> I kept it @ the 1M calculations mark/19 iterations... & MAN!

    You guys have some FAST machines boy... whew! apk
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  16. cdawall

    cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    26,211 (6.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,240
    Location:
    Houston
    well you all still beat my crummy best of 41s though i am going to try super pi at 2.5ghz :)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  17. cjoyce1980 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2006
    Messages:
    714 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    see below
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  18. Lekamies New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    Messages:
    152 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    [​IMG]
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  19. pt

    pt not a suicide-bomber

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,956 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    208
    Location:
    Portugal
    What cooling are you using on your 3000?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  20. dccool879

    dccool879 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    340 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    is it safe to go to 1.7 volts on the 3000+??? :wtf:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  21. pt

    pt not a suicide-bomber

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,956 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    208
    Location:
    Portugal
    if you have proper cooling you can go higher than 1.7
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  22. dccool879

    dccool879 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    340 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    i thought it was rule of thumb that over 1.6 starts to reduce ur cpu's life
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  23. Lekamies New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    Messages:
    152 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Watercooling like this(only pump is different), Idle temp 26-28c and 100% cpu usage 36-40c (after over 9 hour divx packing temp was 42c)

    over 10 months it has been 1,7v 24/7 without problems ;)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  24. cdawall

    cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    26,211 (6.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,240
    Location:
    Houston
    well i still have a stock amd hsf run at a little over 1.7v and the highest temp i have seen was 55C so you should be plenty safe at 1.7v just dont try what i got witha stock hsf you will toast your s939
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  25. Boneface

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,497 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    100
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario, Canada
    heres mine at 38s at 1m
     

    Attached Files:

    10 Year Member at TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)