• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Teamed gigabit adapters don't provide increased bandwidth? Help please.

Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,503 (0.40/day)
Location
State College, PA, US
System Name My Surround PC
Processor Intel Core i9 9900KS
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 Designare
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X / XSPC Rasa CPU / EK GPU block / XSPC 480mm w/ Corsair Fans
Memory 32GB (2 x 16 GB) Team DDR4-3200 CL16-18-18-38
Video Card(s) Gigabyte AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Waterforce WB Xtreme Edition
Storage Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, 4 x 4TB HGST NAS HDD in RAID 10
Display(s) Viotek GFI27QXA 27" 4K 120Hz + LG UH850 4K 60Hz + Acer K272HUL 27" 2.5K 60Hz
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX + Sony MDR-7506 / Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic X-1250 1.25 kW
Mouse Patriot Viper V560
Keyboard Logitech G15
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Mellanox ConnectX-3 10 Gb/s Fiber Network Card
Hi everyone. I have some computers with RAIDs in my network, and they always max out the 1-gigabit connection when transferring files between them. I have upgraded them all to dual-Marvell network adapters (two PCIe x1 Gigabit ethernet cards in each) and configured them to use static teaming through Marvell's network configuration utility. I also have configured my switch (a Dell Powerconnect 2824) to team the two ports connected to each computer.

The adapters all show in Windows that they are connected at 2 Gbit/s, which leads me to believe that I have set up everything correctly. However, when I transfer files from one RAID to another over the network, the connection stays pegged at exactly 50% (1 Gbit/s), and I am sure that the disks can transfer faster than that because the transfer rate never drops below this value.

This leads me to believe that there is some network configuration issue that I am missing. I am having trouble finding what is wrong, however, because it doesn't seem that network teaming is that common so I can't find a similar circumstance on the web that I can reference to troubleshoot the issue. I am looking to see if anyone has suggestions of what to check in my network to allow the transfers to occur at over 1Gbit/s.

Thanks for the help in advance.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
2,631 (0.58/day)
Location
Brisbane, Australia
System Name MRCOMP!
Processor Amd 1090T @ 4200 mhz
Motherboard Gigabyte 890FX UD5
Cooling CNPS Extreme
Memory 32GB OCZ Reapers 1600mhz 6-8-6-24 1.65v
Video Card(s) GTX560 TI 26% overclock
Storage 60GB OCZ vertex 3, 2x1TB Raid 0 2x 640GB Raid 0
Display(s) 30" LG lcd
Case No Case... just sitting on cardboard :D
Audio Device(s) Nvida HDMI - Sony MU TE KE 7.2 1695Rms
Power Supply Silverstone 700watts.
if you start two file transfers does it stay at 50% ?


sounds like its setup two split connections with the same IP address so when you transfer one file it will use one connection, and if you start a second file transfer at the same time it will use the other connection.

i could be wrong however.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,503 (0.40/day)
Location
State College, PA, US
System Name My Surround PC
Processor Intel Core i9 9900KS
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 Designare
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X / XSPC Rasa CPU / EK GPU block / XSPC 480mm w/ Corsair Fans
Memory 32GB (2 x 16 GB) Team DDR4-3200 CL16-18-18-38
Video Card(s) Gigabyte AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Waterforce WB Xtreme Edition
Storage Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, 4 x 4TB HGST NAS HDD in RAID 10
Display(s) Viotek GFI27QXA 27" 4K 120Hz + LG UH850 4K 60Hz + Acer K272HUL 27" 2.5K 60Hz
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX + Sony MDR-7506 / Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic X-1250 1.25 kW
Mouse Patriot Viper V560
Keyboard Logitech G15
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Mellanox ConnectX-3 10 Gb/s Fiber Network Card
I just tried that, transferring one file to one computer and another file to another computer; it still stays at 50%.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
2,753 (0.57/day)
Location
Minnesota
I'm interested in this also. I tried this a few days ago, PC to PC with Intel NICs on one and Marvell NICs on the other. No matter what settings I chose it would always only transfer up to gigabit even though they were teamed properly and showed 2Gb.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
4,265 (0.85/day)
Location
Sanford, FL, USA
Processor Intel i5-6600
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX
Cooling Cooler Master Geminii S524
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2133 16GB (8GB x 2)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9-380X 4GB
Storage Samsung 950 EVO 250GB (mSATA)
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B 2560x1080 IPS
Case Lian Li PC-Q25
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro
Fully utilizing a team comes from multiple clients, at least with the SMB-level hardware I've used. There very well could be higher-end equipment that does what we're after.

Back when I had a couple of servers with quad-port cards and 8-drive arrays, I could get 300MB/s+ with a handful of computers downloading from them. Their onboard NIC's could get about 80-90MB/s, while server to server was 116MB/s.

 
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
172 (0.04/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 5820k
Motherboard MSI X99S-GAMING7
Cooling Corsair H105
Memory 16GB G.SKILL DDR4
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX1070 Gaming G1
Storage Samsung 840 Evo 256GB
Display(s) Acer Predator XB271HU
Case Corsair 800D
Audio Device(s) ASUS XONAR
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Filco Majestouch
Software Windows 10
Teaming the ports will not increase the speed of the connection, however the potential aggregate throughput is higher.

Link aggregation does not use the two 1Gbps pipes simultaneously. It will only use both pipes if you have multiple TCP connections. It's basically a form of load balancing where by if one link has high utilisation new traffic will be directed through the second link.

If you want a higher speed connection you would need to move to a 10 Gbps connection, which isn't really cost viable in a home situation.

IEEE 802.3ad Link Aggregation (LAG): what it is, and what it is not for anyone who wants to read a little more.
 
Top