1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

TechPowerUp 120 Hz Build Guide

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by btarunr, Oct 23, 2015.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    32,965 (9.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16,681
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 23, 2015
    Jetster and Jack1n say thanks.
  2. chlamchowder

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    50 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Wow, my barely adequate 4k build is rather close in terms of part selection (i5-6600k, 980 Ti). So this build will probably have no problems pushing 40-50 fps @ 4K.

    I'd spend a little less on the motherboard (my Z170-HD3 is working fine) and PSU. I also went for a lower end SSD (BX100), though I went for the 1 TB model so I could fit everything on it.
     
  3. nickbaldwin86

    nickbaldwin86

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Messages:
    515 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    Location:
    Oregon
    @ 2560x1440 @ 144hz :rockout:

    but 120hz is a good start :toast:
     
  4. caleb

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,562 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    209
    Location:
    Poland,Slask
    screw 144hz strobe backling 120hz ftw
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  5. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    32,965 (9.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16,681
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Next week: Mini-ITX high-end gaming build.
     
    Kanan, Tsukiyomi91 and cadaveca say thanks.
  6. mauriek

    mauriek

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Messages:
    212 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    104
    Location:
    Mataram-NTB, Indonesia
    any alternative option for the monitor?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU Crunching for Team TPU
  7. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    32,965 (9.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16,681
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    There's Acer XB270HU. Same specs, but $50 costlier, and vanilla looks.
     
  8. Jetster

    Jetster

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    8,909 (3.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,183
    Location:
    Oregon
    Nice
     
  9. SmokingCrop

    SmokingCrop

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    60 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    The XB270HU is IPS though.
     
  10. Saidrex

    Saidrex

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2010
    Messages:
    165 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    33
    Location:
    Latvia
    120 Hz? But human eye can't see past 2000$! :laugh:
     
    Jack1n, Athlonite and RejZoR say thanks.
  11. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    9,819 (2.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,953
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    I've tried it and I'm not sure if it's that superior. Could be that I have most monitor settings locked out when using strobe mode, but normal 144Hz with Adaptive V-Sync is perfectly fine, super responsive image with minimal blur.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  12. geon2k2

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    144 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    I don't know, I don't like TN monitors. At some point ~year 2000, GPU industry worked hard to bring 32 bit color, some company even went bankrupt for sticking with 16 bit (3dfx) and now 15 years later we go back to ... 18 bit this time.

    At home I have a pretty old by now Dell IPS monitor and every time i come from office where I have TN monitor I'm like wow, colors are really beautiful and viewing angles amazing.

    So I'd rather go with something like this: https://www.asus.com/us/Monitors/MG279Q/overview/ , which is both 100+ US$ cheaper and it has IPS screen, but yeah its freesync, not gsync ...
     
  13. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    9,819 (2.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,953
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    You clearly don't understand how colors work. Desktop bit depth is one thing and display bit depth is another. And we are getting to the audiophiles territory here if we are truly honest...
     
    Athlonite says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  14. Uplink10

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2014
    Messages:
    421 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    72
  15. rooivalk

    rooivalk

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    595 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    203
    Location:
    Pacific Rim
    Current 2-3TB Barracudas have high failure rate. 4TB one (the 5900rpm one) seems better.
    I own two of them and yea... RMAed twice in a year.
     
  16. geon2k2

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    144 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    I don't understand why you need to attack me personally? I only stated that IPS display produce better color than TN and it will be really nice if you could enlighten us on why this is not true in your perspective.

    PS: I did not ask about gpu bit depth or display bit depth. Its clear they are different, but the image quality is dictated by the lowest of them, so even if current GPU render 32 bit, on a typical TN monitor you will see (6 bit * RGB) 18 bit, with some clever dithering to make it look like it has more colors. On typical IPS, you see (8 bit * RGB) 24 bit which is significantly better.

    Quote from wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin-film-transistor_liquid-crystal_display

    "Also, most TN panels represent colors using only six bits per RGB color, or 18 bit in total, and are unable to display the 16.7 million color shades (24-bit truecolor) that are available from graphics cards. Instead, these panels display interpolated 24-bit color using a dithering method that combines adjacent pixels to simulate the desired shade."
     
    Dethroy says thanks.
  17. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    9,819 (2.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,953
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    I'm not attacking anyone personally, simply stating facts.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  18. Kanan

    Kanan

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2015
    Messages:
    1,818 (3.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,005
    Location:
    Europe
    Good build, but Fury X or Fury Tri-X with the Asus MG279Q monitor would be an alternative - IPS + Freesync.
     
  19. thevoiceofreason

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2014
    Messages:
    40 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    In 120Hz territory you'd need to be more careful than ever about input/display lag. Is it comparable to ROG? IPS hints that it isn't.
     
  20. silapakorn

    silapakorn

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    283 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    93
    Been using Acer XB270HU for two months. I'm impressed with 144hz, input lag, response time and G-sync. It excels in these categories.

    What I'm not impressed so far:
    - IPS glow, which makes black rather grey. Watching dark scenes in games/movies becomes less enjoyable for me.
    - Acer's QC (3 dead pixels emerging after purchase).
    - Only one DP connector. You can't use it with anything else.

    My old monitor is Samsung s27a750d 120hz (TN), and I have to say that IPS' color is NO DIFFERENT than TN's whatsoever.
    In fact, I prefer TN's ability to produce deeper & darker black as dark scenes in games/movies look better on my Samsung.
     
  21. Athlonite

    Athlonite

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    2,232 (0.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    629
    this sounds like an ad for nVidia and gstink and intel no sign of AMD alternates if you don't like nVidia
     
    Kanan says thanks.
  22. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    9,819 (2.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,953
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Good thing of having high refresh screens is that you'll hardly ever reach its image tearing threshold. I mean, you can, but if configuration mostly outputs up to 100fps, you'll not even experience image tearing, at least not to extent to be super annoying (there are cases where flickering in-game lights may cause image tearing on that particular part of image, have experienced that in F3AR).

    Or, if you have GeForce, you can use Adaptive V-Sync which works incredibly well. Not sure if AMD has anything similar. I have it on and the games are as smooth and responsive as without V-Sync, but I haven't seen ANY kind of image tearing anywhere. Which is great.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  23. olstyle

    olstyle

    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    Messages:
    74 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    10 Year Member at TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)