- Jun 12, 2007
- 4,815 (1.24/day)
- Wangas, New Zealand
|System Name||Darth Obsidious|
|Processor||Intel i5 2500K|
|Cooling||Cooler Master Hyper 212+ in Push Pull|
|Memory||2X4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600|
|Video Card(s)||ASUS R9 270x TOP|
|Storage||128GB Samsung 830 SSD, 1TB WD Black, 2TB WD Green|
|Case||Corsair Obsidian 650D|
|Audio Device(s)||Infrasonic Quartet|
|Power Supply||Corsair HX650w|
|Software||Windows 7 64bit and Windows XP Home|
|Benchmark Scores||2cm mark on bench with a razor blade.|
Mistakes happen at conventions all the time. I do think Intel should have clarified it was a video from the beginning and explained the whole time constraints thing. They clearly tried to be a little deceptive which is just wrong...
I recall nVidia and one of their cards being a false slap together which used wood screws back in the day so it's not unheard of.
I say it's a loss to them but not necessarily to use unless the person watching is a fanboi and it hurts THEM to see such failure on the manufacturers behalf.
Ultimately this is NOT the end result.
I personally have no allegiance to Intel or AMD.
I really hoped for Bulldozer to be a kick ass CPU but the ES showed otherwise so I posted that this is what we ARE going to get.
Of course this upset the fanbois, whenever I posted as such.
Best thing to do is not favor any brand, wait for the end result and choose which is the better within regards to bang for buck.