• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

The Official Thermal Interface Material thread

Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
719 (0.22/day)
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
System Name D30 w.2x E5-2680; T5500 w.2x X5675;2x P35 w.X3360; 2x Q33 w.Q9550S/Q9400S & laptops.
Here is something I never quite understood; look at the temperature drop for a typical power, area, thickness and thermal conductivity

View attachment 360503
P = 100W
A = 3 cm^2
k = 20 W/(m.K)
Dx = 1/20 mm

How then can thermal pastes differ by say 2 to 3°C degrees?
To prepare for this answer, I started reading some other topics here:
But also, have been working on some other topics on my work for thermodynamics. So to answer your questions: Yes & No.
Why?
  1. The deltaX is supposed to be usually thicker then 0,05mm & that thin is ideal. But we should tend to be within 0,1~0,2mm, which is optimal from a thickness perspective, as it would give us the sweet spot of not going too thick with paste (as it is far lower conductive material - will explain later) & not too shallow to have "air gaps".
  2. 1/k is not calculated this way, but like this:
    1726148078221.png
    . Which means k is not equal to lambda!
    If you do calculate if only for this, you will get only conductance of the paste itself. Which is not good at all & you can't get any info from that!

  3. Also, as you do not need 1/alphas, as you do not have transfer to fluids in case of transfer of heat between CPU & Cooler. Actually, you do - but you do not need to know how to do that on side of the cooler base! Why? As most of temperature is conducted by vacuum tubes, not on the top of the cooler based (Cu heat exchanger).
  4. So, you get a formula such as this:
    1726148924389.png
    ; where there is a thickness of CPU IHS lid coming into question with d1 with it's Cu based Ni plated material (which lowers lambda from ~380 to ~315W/mK), where you put your paste with 4~13W/mK conduciveness & you put on that cooler with its base usually Cu heatsink with thickness of around 5~6mm.
Why you do run the formula, you get something like 3K difference between CPU IHS (which is not same as temp. on CPU die) & Cooler.

In order to compare the 4W/mK, 6W/mK & 11W/mK pastes on the same calculation with 0,1mm thickness of paste you get deltaT with 4,8K, 3,9K & 3K.
If you do the same comparison of 4W/mK, 6W/mK & 11W/mK pastes on calculation with achievable 0,2mm thickness of paste you get deltaT with 7,6K, 5,7K & 4K.

So that is where you get your difference in temp., especially if you put more paste.
Why?
Well he Ni plated Cu based CPU IHS lid has conduciveness of ~315W/mK, while Cooler usually has Cu based ~380W/mK. So the paste with 4~11W/mK acts more like a resistance, then a transmitter of temperature. But it is, how it is - maybe we will find better suiting materials in the future?!

Also, do note that Ag (silver) has the far most temperature conduciveness of ~415W/mK. But probably it is too costly to make CPU IHS or CPU Coolers from Ag... :cool:

Hope this fairly engineering explanations gives you more hint about the issues with changes in temperatures between pastes.
 
Joined
Jan 18, 2012
Messages
456 (0.10/day)
Location
Quodam loco Albanianae
System Name The Dark side of the room
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI MEG X570 Unify
Cooling Custom loop watercooling (Bykski CPU-XPR-POM-M-V2, Alphacool Eisblock GPX, Freezemod PU-PWM5B18W)
Memory GSkill Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 CL16 (4 x 16GB)
Video Card(s) XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6700 XT
Storage 1 x Kingston KC3000 1024GB (boot drive) + 2 x Kingston NV2 2TB (games & storage)
Display(s) LG 34WP65C Ultrawide 3440x1440 @ 160Hz freesync premium
Case Thermaltake Core P90 TG (slightly modded)
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek® ALC1220 with Logitech Z906
Power Supply MSI MAG A850GF 80 Plus Gold
Mouse Generic
Keyboard Sharkoon Skiller SGK60 (with brown Kalih switches)
Software Windows 11 pro
Benchmark Scores It's a form of exhibitionism...;-), but fun in a way But showing off is triggering.............
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
719 (0.22/day)
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
System Name D30 w.2x E5-2680; T5500 w.2x X5675;2x P35 w.X3360; 2x Q33 w.Q9550S/Q9400S & laptops.
They do exist and are in this price range: https://shop.aquacomputer.de/Water-...T-VARIO-1700-slate-grey-925-silver::4226.html

But check out this video of Roman Hartung (der8auer) why it does not work in reality as calculated/predicted in theory.
Thanks for the link of silver water cooler! :toast:

About the videos, here is what is wrong:
  1. intel & AMD has Cu IHS lid, but it is Ni plated...& Ni has ~58W/mK, so the CPU IHS lid has about thermal conductivity ~315W/mK.
  2. Cu conductivity is not ~400W/mK, but ~380 +/-10 W/mK! You can't just add 20W/mK of the top of your head.
  3. Combining a thermal & electrical conductivity with Wiedermann-Franz law is needed for deltaT larger then 100K...while we have about deltaT of about 60~70K top, so it is negligible!
  4. He has confirmed that Ni plating has lower conductivity then 100% Cu, while grinded CPU IHS & Ag plate has about larger conductivity then normal.
  5. Also, Ni is also put same as Ag - for surface protection of CPU IHS! He did not mention that at all....
  6. Water-block is .925 Ag, which is the problem...water-block would need to be .99 Ag to have better conductivity!!!
Conclusion: he proved all the science still works...it is the "marketing" who is making a false advertising!

2nd conclusion:
  • If you really want to have better Cooler, check the Cu purity in it. Better suppliers will have it mentioned!
  • If you really plan to get Cu CPU IHS, please DON'T. Just take some find grinding paper & grind of the Ni protection (only top layer) from your CPU. This will give you Cu-paste-Cu advantage, for only 2~5€ cost! :cool:
 
Joined
Jan 18, 2012
Messages
456 (0.10/day)
Location
Quodam loco Albanianae
System Name The Dark side of the room
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI MEG X570 Unify
Cooling Custom loop watercooling (Bykski CPU-XPR-POM-M-V2, Alphacool Eisblock GPX, Freezemod PU-PWM5B18W)
Memory GSkill Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 CL16 (4 x 16GB)
Video Card(s) XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6700 XT
Storage 1 x Kingston KC3000 1024GB (boot drive) + 2 x Kingston NV2 2TB (games & storage)
Display(s) LG 34WP65C Ultrawide 3440x1440 @ 160Hz freesync premium
Case Thermaltake Core P90 TG (slightly modded)
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek® ALC1220 with Logitech Z906
Power Supply MSI MAG A850GF 80 Plus Gold
Mouse Generic
Keyboard Sharkoon Skiller SGK60 (with brown Kalih switches)
Software Windows 11 pro
Benchmark Scores It's a form of exhibitionism...;-), but fun in a way But showing off is triggering.............
Thanks for the link of silver water cooler! :toast:

About the videos, here is what is wrong:
  1. intel & AMD has Cu IHS lid, but it is Ni plated...& Ni has ~58W/mK, so the CPU IHS lid has about thermal conductivity ~315W/mK.
  2. Cu conductivity is not ~400W/mK, but ~380 +/-10 W/mK! You can't just add 20W/mK of the top of your head.
  3. Combining a thermal & electrical conductivity with Wiedermann-Franz law is needed for deltaT larger then 100K...while we have about deltaT of about 60~70K top, so it is negligible!
  4. He has confirmed that Ni plating has lower conductivity then 100% Cu, while grinded CPU IHS & Ag plate has about larger conductivity then normal.
  5. Also, Ni is also put same as Ag - for surface protection of CPU IHS! He did not mention that at all....
  6. Water-block is .925 Ag, which is the problem...water-block would need to be .99 Ag to have better conductivity!!!
Conclusion: he proved all the science still works...it is the "marketing" who is making a false advertising!

2nd conclusion:
  • If you really want to have better Cooler, check the Cu purity in it. Better suppliers will have it mentioned!
  • If you really plan to get Cu CPU IHS, please DON'T. Just take some find grinding paper & grind of the Ni protection (only top layer) from your CPU. This will give you Cu-paste-Cu advantage, for only 2~5€ cost! :cool:
I won't argue the science aspects and material properties as they are given values and comply to the laws of physics. Atm I don't have the energy to dive back into the theory but assume you did your homework ;) . Despite der8auer, according to you, using the wrong laws/formula's thus method in the end it's the actual measured temps in the chips that matters for pc users.

All these fabuleous thermal conductivity numbers of pure metals or even alloys are of no use if you use a louzy TIM, or a good one but apply it wrongly.
Then you create a thermal barrier, that screws up the efficiency of your perfectely picked cooling parts.
There is no way, maybe outside a specialized materials lab, you can have a perfect direct metal-to-metal or metal-to-die connection for optimal thermal conductivity without the need of a TIM.

So considering TIM being the weakest link of the chain, that is where you can gain the most, actually the very reason of existance of this thread (and quite some other simular ones).
That is also why you see the cooling products manufacterers putting the most effort in improving the TIM's and uniform mounting of cold plates and less in applied metals and other aspects.

Little nuance to your advise to sand the Ni off the IHS; as been proven in many practical tests the effect is neglectible but one constant is that the warranty of the chip is void :eek:.

There is also a lot of info (and BS) out there about lapping of IHS/cold plates, it can improve thermal conductivity but is not for everyone.
Better check the pro's & con's before even blindly start with it.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
5,117 (3.75/day)
Location
Colorado, U.S.A.
System Name CyberPowerPC ET8070
Processor Intel Core i5-10400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B460M DS3H AC-Y1
Memory 2 x Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Storage Boot: Intel OPTANE SSD P1600X Series 118GB M.2 PCIE
Display(s) Dell P2416D (2560 x 1440)
Power Supply EVGA 500W1 (modified to have two bridge rectifiers)
Software Windows 11 Home
Also, do note that Ag (silver) has the far most temperature conduciveness of ~415W/mK. But probably it is too costly to make CPU IHS or CPU Coolers from Ag... :cool:

1g is about $1 so quite reasonable, at least in a thermal paste.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
28,121 (6.73/day)
Also, do note that Ag (silver) has the far most temperature conduciveness of ~415W/mK. But probably it is too costly to make CPU IHS or CPU Coolers from Ag... :cool:
Diamond is better, but let's not quibble.

Little nuance to your advise to sand the Ni off the IHS; as been proven in many practical tests the effect is neglectible but one constant is that the warranty of the chip is void :eek:.
This. Unless someone is going to do extreme OCing, modding one's CPU is a wasted effort. And then the only real solution is proper delidding and block pairing. For that kind of thing, one either goes all in or it's best not to bother.

1g is about $1 so quite reasonable.
This is why Arctic Silver 5 is still being made and is still very effective as a TIM.
 
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
21,511 (3.40/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 9950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage Intel 905p Optane 960GB boot, +2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps
Software Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11 Enterprise IoT 2024
Got a 10g syringe of Noctua NT-H2 bundled with components I bought recently. Nothing to complain and what I've read, Noctua's paste is more than fine.
Honestly I never used anything much more than a big tube of MX-2 on most builds until recently. I just feel the gains to be had here in standard pastes are often overplayed. But longevity etc? That sort of stuff is somewhat interesting to me, so worth looking at at least.

This is why Arctic Silver 5 is still being made and is still very effective as a TIM.
I think that stuff is fine too, just always felt it was overpriced for what you got. But well, silver and all that.
 

kanmer

New Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2022
Messages
3 (0.00/day)
why is the toplamp thermal paste not available to purchase anymore? are they about to release a new product?
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
5,549 (1.02/day)
Location
Gougeland (NZ)
System Name Cumquat 2021
Processor AMD RyZen R7 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus Strix X670E - E Gaming WIFI
Cooling Deep Cool LT720 + CM MasterGel Pro TP + Lian Li Uni Fan V2
Memory 32GB GSkill Trident Z5 Neo 6000
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ OC RX6800 16GB DDR6 2270Cclk / 2010Mclk
Storage 1x Adata SX8200PRO NVMe 1TB gen3 x4 1X Samsung 980 Pro NVMe Gen 4 x4 1TB, 12TB of HDD Storage
Display(s) AOC 24G2 IPS 144Hz FreeSync Premium 1920x1080p
Case Lian Li O11D XL ROG edition
Audio Device(s) RX6800 via HDMI + Pioneer VSX-531 amp Technics 100W 5.1 Speaker set
Power Supply EVGA 1000W G5 Gold
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core Wired
Keyboard Logitech G915 Wireless
Software Windows 11 X64 PRO (build 23H2)
Benchmark Scores it sucks even more less now ;)
I think that stuff is fine too, just always felt it was overpriced for what you got. But well, silver and all that.
Yeah it maybe a little overpriced for what you get but it's worth it for it's longevity I've had AS5 last 10 years and still be good
 

Ruru

S.T.A.R.S.
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
12,903 (2.95/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name 4K-gaming / media-PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X / Intel Core i7-6700K
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VII Hero / Asus Z170-K
Cooling Arctic Freezer 50 / Alphacool Eisbaer 240
Memory 32GB DDR4-3466 / 16GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) RTX 3080 10GB / RX 6700 XT
Storage 3.3TB of SSDs / several small SSDs
Display(s) Acer 27" 4K120 IPS + Lenovo 32" 4K60 IPS
Case Corsair 4000D AF White / DeepCool CC560 WH
Audio Device(s) Creative 2.1
Power Supply EVGA G2 750W / Fractal ION Gold 550W
Mouse Logitech MX518 / Logitech G400s
Keyboard Roccat Vulcan 121 AIMO / NOS C450 Mini Pro
VR HMD Oculus Rift CV1
Software Windows 11 Pro / Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores They run Crysis
Honestly I never used anything much more than a big tube of MX-2 on most builds until recently. I just feel the gains to be had here in standard pastes are often overplayed. But longevity etc? That sort of stuff is somewhat interesting to me, so worth looking at at least.
Actually my friend said that the tube was lying for ages so he just gave it to me. Though still seems like new so I guess there's no problem with longetivity.
 
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
21,511 (3.40/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 9950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage Intel 905p Optane 960GB boot, +2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps
Software Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11 Enterprise IoT 2024
Actually my friend said that the tube was lying for ages so he just gave it to me. Though still seems like new so I guess there's no problem with longetivity.
I've heard the Noctua stuff is pretty good for shelf life, though tbh, most paste is if you just stir it a bit.

By longevity I mean more post-application, like how many thermal cycles it can take before performance degrades. THAT is a relevant stat to me. Some may not care as much but it does kind of interest me. That's where these new PTM7950 honeywell pads are supposed to really shine.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
28,121 (6.73/day)
I've heard the Noctua stuff is pretty good for shelf life, though tbh, most paste is if you just stir it a bit.
NT-H2? Yes. NT-H1? Not some much. Once applied, the stuff dries out fast(2 to 3 months) and loses a good 10% of it effectiveness, which is entirely unacceptable. I have seen and measured this personally. I won't touch it again. If you're going to go with a Noctua TIM, go with NT-H2 and avoid the first one like the plague.
 
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
21,511 (3.40/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 9950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage Intel 905p Optane 960GB boot, +2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps
Software Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11 Enterprise IoT 2024
NT-H2? Yes. NT-H1? Not some much. Once applied, the stuff dries out fast(2 to 3 months) and loses a good 10% of it effectiveness, which is entirely unacceptable. I have seen and measured this personally. I won't touch it again. If you're going to go with a Noctua TIM, go with NT-H2 and avoid the first one like the plague.
Well I was commenting exclusively on shelf life in the first paragraph, but yeah that "application longevity" (I guess that'd be the term?) would be an issue for sure.
 

freeagent

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
8,718 (3.82/day)
Location
Winnipeg, Canada
Processor AMD R7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
Cooling Thermalright Frozen Edge 360, 3x TL-B12 V2, 2x TL-B12 V1
Memory 2x8 G.Skill Trident Z Royal 3200C14, 2x8GB G.Skill Trident Z Black and White 3200 C14
Video Card(s) Zotac 4070 Ti Trinity OC
Storage WD SN850 1TB, SN850X 2TB, SN770 1TB
Display(s) LG 50UP7100
Case Fractal Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) JBL Bar 700
Power Supply Seasonic Vertex GX-1000, Monster HDP1800
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard Logitech G213
VR HMD Oculus 3
Software Yes
Benchmark Scores Yes
Is NT-H1 like creamy mashed potaters or is that Ceramique that I am thinking of :confused:
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
719 (0.22/day)
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
System Name D30 w.2x E5-2680; T5500 w.2x X5675;2x P35 w.X3360; 2x Q33 w.Q9550S/Q9400S & laptops.
I won't argue the science aspects and material properties as they are given values and comply to the laws of physics. Atm I don't have the energy to dive back into the theory but assume you did your homework ;) . Despite der8auer, according to you, using the wrong laws/formula's thus method in the end it's the actual measured temps in the chips that matters for pc users.

All these fabuleous thermal conductivity numbers of pure metals or even alloys are of no use if you use a louzy TIM, or a good one but apply it wrongly.
Then you create a thermal barrier, that screws up the efficiency of your perfectely picked cooling parts.
There is no way, maybe outside a specialized materials lab, you can have a perfect direct metal-to-metal or metal-to-die connection for optimal thermal conductivity without the need of a TIM.

So considering TIM being the weakest link of the chain, that is where you can gain the most, actually the very reason of existance of this thread (and quite some other simular ones).
That is also why you see the cooling products manufacterers putting the most effort in improving the TIM's and uniform mounting of cold plates and less in applied metals and other aspects.

Little nuance to your advise to sand the Ni off the IHS; as been proven in many practical tests the effect is neglectible but one constant is that the warranty of the chip is void :eek:.

There is also a lot of info (and BS) out there about lapping of IHS/cold plates, it can improve thermal conductivity but is not for everyone.
Better check the pro's & con's before even blindly start with it.
1st of all, the calculus is right & give out outputs as it should, according to physical law. Not theory, a law!

It also proves that you can have lousy numbers or 1~2°C temperature more on CPU, if you use TIM which has about ~5W/mK. So it is advisable to use ~10W/mK or more.
& yes, I call TIM a "heat barrier", as it has 1/30 the amount of thermal transfer from CPU IHS to Cooler. The science will go forward & we will have better materials (TIMs)...

& yes, we can improve the thermal management with using better TIM. While we hope, as @lexluthermiester said, some day use something far better conductive materials. As diamonds are still taken by girls for their rings. :banghead: Maybe some other sort of material, as Graphite is of no use for this application.

My suggestion still stands about getting that Ni of the CPU IHS to have better thermal conductivity! Warranty is something that people need to check for themselves & is applicable only on single person level, as it differs from case to case. Yes, people need to check their warranty, but many of us use "older computers" without warranty - so no harm in that! ;)

About the lapping: will it increase the surface area of CPU IHS that much, that it would decrease the negative effects of thicker lapping material?
That is the main question here. As the physical law clearly states that using thicker CPU IHS is negative, compared to thinner CPU IHS - which also makes one question a big one: why is AMD making so much thicker CPU IHS, compared to Intel? :confused: Especially considering that it has negative results within physical law. :cool:
 
Joined
Aug 9, 2024
Messages
125 (0.99/day)
Location
Michigan, United States
Processor Intel i7-13700K
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix Z690-E Gaming
Cooling NZXT Kraken Elite 360
Memory G.Skill Trident Z DDR5-6400
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4090 Suprim X Liquid
Storage Western Digital SN850X 4Tb x 4
Case Corsair 5000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Creative AE-5 Plus
Power Supply Corsair HX-1200
Software Windows 11 Pro 23H2
Got a 10g syringe of Noctua NT-H2 bundled with components I bought recently. Nothing to complain and what I've read, Noctua's paste is more than fine.

I'm having really good luck with this on CPUs lately as well, since I don't delid. I used to prefer Gelid GC Extreme for GPU dies, but they're all under PTM7950 now, mainly to reduce maintenance downtime.
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2020
Messages
1,369 (0.91/day)
Location
Tel Fyr
System Name Purple Haze | Vacuum Box
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (-30 CO) | Intel® Xeon® E3-1241 v3
Motherboard MSI B450 Tomahawk Max | Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H
Cooling Dark Rock 4 Pro, P14, P12, T30 case fans | 212 Evo & P12 PWM PST x2, Arctic P14 & P12 case fans
Memory 32GB Ballistix (Micron E 19nm) CL16 @3733MHz | 32GB HyperX Beast 2400MHz (XMP)
Video Card(s) AMD 6900XTXH ASRock OC Formula & Phanteks T30x3 | AMD 5700XT Sapphire Nitro+ & Arctic P12x2
Storage ADATA SX8200 Pro 1TB, Toshiba P300 3TB x2 | Kingston A400 120GB, Fanxiang S500 Pro 256GB
Display(s) TCL C805 50" 2160p 144Hz VA miniLED, Mi 27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, AOC 24G2U 1080p 144Hz IPS
Case Modded MS Industrial Titan II Pro RGB | Heavily Modded Cooler Master Q500L
Audio Device(s) Audient iD14 MKII, Adam Audio T8Vs, Bloody M550, HiFiMan HE400se, Tascam TM-80, DS4 v2
Power Supply Rosewill Capstone 1000M | Enermax Revolution X't 730W (both with P14 fans)
Mouse Logitech G305, Bloody A91, Amazon basics, Logitech M187
Keyboard Redragon K530, Bloody B930, Epomaker TH80 SE, BTC 9110
Software W10 LTSC 21H2
makes one question a big one: why is AMD making so much thicker CPU IHS, compared to Intel?
Two apparent reasons. (Damn) Compatibility with AM4 cooler mounts, and "we don't wanna be Intel, bending IHS..."
 
Joined
Jan 18, 2012
Messages
456 (0.10/day)
Location
Quodam loco Albanianae
System Name The Dark side of the room
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI MEG X570 Unify
Cooling Custom loop watercooling (Bykski CPU-XPR-POM-M-V2, Alphacool Eisblock GPX, Freezemod PU-PWM5B18W)
Memory GSkill Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 CL16 (4 x 16GB)
Video Card(s) XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6700 XT
Storage 1 x Kingston KC3000 1024GB (boot drive) + 2 x Kingston NV2 2TB (games & storage)
Display(s) LG 34WP65C Ultrawide 3440x1440 @ 160Hz freesync premium
Case Thermaltake Core P90 TG (slightly modded)
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek® ALC1220 with Logitech Z906
Power Supply MSI MAG A850GF 80 Plus Gold
Mouse Generic
Keyboard Sharkoon Skiller SGK60 (with brown Kalih switches)
Software Windows 11 pro
Benchmark Scores It's a form of exhibitionism...;-), but fun in a way But showing off is triggering.............
& yes, we can improve the thermal management with using better TIM. While we hope, as @lexluthermiester said, some day use something far better conductive materials. As diamonds are still taken by girls for their rings. :banghead: Maybe some other sort of material, as Graphite is of no use for this application.
There is a form of Carbon that works, the manufactering & application techniques are just not mature enough.
No doubt scientists will find some groundbreaking cooling applications in the (near) future.

Just Google on Graphene.

That's why I'm willing to give Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet a try, the results of several practical tests look promising.

About the lapping: will it increase the surface area of CPU IHS that much, that it would decrease the negative effects of thicker lapping material?
I have to correct you here, it decreases the surface size, if you go from a 'rough' surfaces to a perfectely flat surface ;) . But different than heat dissipiating surface as in cooling fins to air, here the main factor is thermal conductivity. What you do increase (only when perfectely lapped and no effect from convex or concave variables) is, the contact surface for better thermal conditivity but after applying a TIM, even a good one the gain in efficiency is only marginal.

That few micron thickness layer of (porous) Nickel has a neglectible effect in practical scenario's. Theoretical you're right., but it's not worth the effort and risks for the average user.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
6,771 (1.38/day)
Processor 7800x3d
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Auros Elite AX
Cooling Custom Water
Memory GSKILL 2x16gb 6000mhz Cas 30 with custom timings
Video Card(s) MSI RX 6750 XT MECH 2X 12G OC
Storage Adata SX8200 1tb with Windows, Samsung 990 Pro 2tb with games
Display(s) HP Omen 27q QHD 165hz
Case ThermalTake P3
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex Titanium
Software Windows 11 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores CB23: 1811 / 19424 CB24: 1136 / 7687
That's why I'm willing to give Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet a try, the results of several practical tests look promising.
I have tested MX-4, kryonaut extreme, PTM7950, and kryosheet on my 6750xt. The kryosheet has worked best achieving the highest benchmark score with Furmark. Kryosheet also worked well on my CPU but everything was within 2c of each other.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
5,117 (3.75/day)
Location
Colorado, U.S.A.
System Name CyberPowerPC ET8070
Processor Intel Core i5-10400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B460M DS3H AC-Y1
Memory 2 x Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Storage Boot: Intel OPTANE SSD P1600X Series 118GB M.2 PCIE
Display(s) Dell P2416D (2560 x 1440)
Power Supply EVGA 500W1 (modified to have two bridge rectifiers)
Software Windows 11 Home
At 2°C is it worth the trouble, when long term endurance is more important.
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
6,771 (1.38/day)
Processor 7800x3d
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Auros Elite AX
Cooling Custom Water
Memory GSKILL 2x16gb 6000mhz Cas 30 with custom timings
Video Card(s) MSI RX 6750 XT MECH 2X 12G OC
Storage Adata SX8200 1tb with Windows, Samsung 990 Pro 2tb with games
Display(s) HP Omen 27q QHD 165hz
Case ThermalTake P3
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex Titanium
Software Windows 11 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores CB23: 1811 / 19424 CB24: 1136 / 7687
At 2°C is it worth the trouble, when long term endurance is more important.
Is 2c worth the cost of buying multiple pastes and effort to apply them? Absolutely not. I am enjoying this process though. My next test is with TFX which Igor showed having top tier thermal performance but was really hard to apply.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
5,117 (3.75/day)
Location
Colorado, U.S.A.
System Name CyberPowerPC ET8070
Processor Intel Core i5-10400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B460M DS3H AC-Y1
Memory 2 x Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Storage Boot: Intel OPTANE SSD P1600X Series 118GB M.2 PCIE
Display(s) Dell P2416D (2560 x 1440)
Power Supply EVGA 500W1 (modified to have two bridge rectifiers)
Software Windows 11 Home
Fun is a good enough motive.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
719 (0.22/day)
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
System Name D30 w.2x E5-2680; T5500 w.2x X5675;2x P35 w.X3360; 2x Q33 w.Q9550S/Q9400S & laptops.
Two apparent reasons. (Damn) Compatibility with AM4 cooler mounts, and "we don't wanna be Intel, bending IHS..."
I understand the compatibility issue...but not sure about the "we don't wanna be Intel, bending IHS...", like there is an issue with that? Once you put it in, you do not remove it. It is a CPU, not a pecker. :D

But maybe AMD has some other issues with mounting. :cool: (I am still an intel fan!)

There is a form of Carbon that works, the manufactering & application techniques are just not mature enough.
No doubt scientists will find some groundbreaking cooling applications in the (near) future.

Just Google on Graphene.

That's why I'm willing to give Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet a try, the results of several practical tests look promising.
Well, not sure...as Graphene I have looked about & found it is electrically conductive (so that is a no go) & also is very thermally polarized in its conduciveness (more conductive in line with the sheet or straws, less conductive perpendicular to sheets or straws). So although this is a good example & it is an interesting material, it can't solve anything!

Like it can't also solve Space elevator also, but that is another story. :cool:
I have to correct you here, it decreases the surface size, if you go from a 'rough' surfaces to a perfectely flat surface ;) . But different than heat dissipiating surface as in cooling fins to air, here the main factor is thermal conductivity. What you do increase (only when perfectely lapped and no effect from convex or concave variables) is, the contact surface for better thermal conditivity but after applying a TIM, even a good one the gain in efficiency is only marginal.

That few micron thickness layer of (porous) Nickel has a neglectible effect in practical scenario's. Theoretical you're right., but it's not worth the effort and risks for the average user.
You are right, polishing will decrease the surface area. So please, do not polish the Cu, after you get through Ni! As that would negatively effect with thermal conductivity with lesser etta (emission coefficient).

But I do need to differ, as Ni has thermal conductivity (later TC) of ~58W/mK, Cu has TC of about ~380W/mK, while CPU IHS has TC of ~315W/mK.
Why has CPU IHS so much less TC then Cu? Well, because of the Ni plating, which has about 6~7 times less TC.
So putting pure Cu CPU IHS will get you something of more TC, but it is better to scrape down the Ni & to have rougher surface (not polished).
Why? Again, you can so more damage with replacing CPU IHS, then using fine sanding paper & getting rid of that Ni from the top. ;)
 
Top