Tatty_Two
Gone Fishing
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Messages
- 25,801 (3.87/day)
- Location
- Worcestershire, UK
Processor | Rocket Lake Core i5 11600K @ 5 Ghz with PL tweaks |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK |
Cooling | Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120SE + 4 Phanteks 140mm case fans |
Memory | 32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel 4133Mhz DDR4 @ 3600Mhz CL14@1.45v Gear 1 |
Video Card(s) | Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC |
Storage | WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS) |
Display(s) | AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS |
Case | Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1 |
Power Supply | Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular |
Mouse | Coolermaster Storm Octane wired |
Keyboard | Element Gaming Carbon Mk2 Tournament Mech |
Software | Win 10 Home x64 |
Yup, to be clear, I am not happy with it at all, for it to work (force reduction) there has to be a balance between strength, technology and capability, I feel we have lost that balance with regard to strength and like anything in life, once it's gone it won't be coming back .......... until the next huge conflict by which time it is likely too late.That has got to be one of the most disarming and diplomatic things I've ever read(that's a compliment). Well said!
EDIT, sorry about that. No offense was intended.
Ironically, just before the Falklands the Royal Marines were set to lose over 50% of their force strength along with a large part of the Amphibious assault fleet, it is of no surprise that those planned cuts were dismissed after that conflict.