• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Threadripper thoughts and impressions

Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
7,939 (3.15/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
I wanted to get TR4 and see how good it really was. I was not happy with the PCI-E lanes available on X470 but was also not happy with the cost of TR4 motherboards and the PCIE layout. I had a specific needs case for PCI_E. I have 2 Vega 64s in crossfire and wanted to have them run on fully wired x16 slots. I also have an Asus M2 riser card that can hold 4 NVME drives and wanted to see the performance of 4 NVME drives in RAID 0. On the X470 the not I could do as the best was x8 so only 2 drives were available, on top of that I could only use 1 because there were only 4 lanes available to use.

About a month ago I saw a review for the As Rock X399 Gaming 6 and as soon as I saw the back of the board I was intrigued. Most Tr4 boards are wired 16x8x8x16 so they were a no go for me. The X399 Gaming is wired as 3x16 slots. On top of that it was listed for $249.99 US so I took the plunge and ordered one. I now needed a CPU to pair with the board, I chose the 1900X. I picked the 1900x because it was on sale for $412.99 CAD which was 50% less than any other TR4 CPU. so about $750 CAD for the board and CPU vs the 2700X for $409.99 and a As Rock 470 Taichi for $329.99 or $739.98......and I got a $50 US MIR for the board too.

I got the board first (they are heavy compared to X470) and the CPU came the next day. When installing I used my existing cooler (Alphacool Esibaer 420 AIO) in the Thermaltake Core X9. The installation process for TR4 is much easier than any previous AMD chipset. It was just a matter of using the TR4 adapter on the EIsbaer pump and screwing down the cooler using the mounting holes on the board. I was using the Alphacool to cool one of my GPUs (Sapphire Nitro Vega 64). I already had 16GB of DDR4 Ram and had another 16 that I had picked up on Black Friday. In total it took about 15 minutes to exchange the X470 board with this one. I then connected the PSU cables, fans and RGB headers. I installed the water cooled GPU into the first slot and the riser card in the 3rd slot. I could not install the 2nd GPU (gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC) because it is a 2.5 slot card and the slots are 2 slot wide on the board. I went ahead with just one card installed.

I went into the BIOS and OC the CPU to 4 GHZ at 1.27 volts set the RAM to XMP profile (3000 MHZ 16-15-15-36) and set the 3rd PCI_E slot to 4x4x4x4 and went to boot. I went into Windows and setup Raid O on the SSDs in the Riser card. A Crystal Disk Mark score of 7000 MB/s sequential and a 4K of over 400 MB/s a second greeted me write speeds were a little lower at 5000 MB/s. I moved Total War Warhammer 2 onto the new drive and loaded a campaign.

I was blown away by the increase in performance. Loading the game took under 20 seconds from the launcher to the launch video. I then loaded a campaign and turns went from 45 seconds to under 25 seconds. The game feels snappier and seems to run much faster so I decided to do a benchmark and wow. At 4K with everything at Ultra (including unit size) a consistent 75 FPS in the battle benchmark at 4K. The 1900X is faster than a OC 1700 (the only 8 core AM4 CPU I owned) and the R5 2600 OC in every way for me.

There are some issues though. I like to use the As Rock Tuning utility to set my fans but on the Gaming 6 I get a CPU temp of 70 C which makes the fans spin at near 100%. I was worried and used Corsair Link software which showed me 40 C, plus the radiator felt cool so I trusted that temp. I also had some issues with Windows Activation but a key for $8 on Amazon solved that. In terms of not being able to use 2 GPUS I found a solution. I got a cheap....well inexpensive XFX reference Vega 64 on Ebay. It does fit but the fan is too loud. I went with reference (I was looking the liquid cooled version but lost the bid) because I am going to add a Alphacool Eiswolf GPU. I have another Eisbaer 420 sitting around and I am going to use that as the RAD to cool my GPUs everything has already been ordered.

Some would ask or comment that crossfire is a waste but Total War is by far and away the game franchise I play most and all of the current ones support crossfire so it is a no brainer for me. Is TR4 worth it for a gamer. Yes and no. No if you are someone that just buys for gaming and is not interested in doing enthusiast parts or workloads. Yes if you are a gamer and like to tinker, try new products, stream and can afford it. There is also the fact that I can put a 2950X in this but I am really looking forward to the 3rd Gen TR4 CPUs. I am glad to be alive in this age of computing because what is now available to the enthusiast is truly mind blowing compared to just 5 years ago.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
40,435 (6.58/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
7,939 (3.15/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
I understand what you are saying; I agree with some of that. If indeed the rumours of clock speed and IPC are true it will be a moot point on the CPU side. The way I see it R3000 CPUs will be more expensive than R 2000 series chips and the R7 2700X has been $409.99 in Canada for as long as I remember, at the least the R 3000 will probably be $499 for their top chip in Canada. I also see X570 boards being a $30-50 premium vs X470 and some X470 boards were truly expensive $300+. With my benefit in bandwidth NVME RAID is a mitigating factor for why I did this. I do not see X570 boards being able to support 3X16 wired slots, plus the eventual intent of having everything running on NVME In the PCI_E arrangements and possibilities TR4 allows hearkens back to the 890FX and 990FX or some nice X99 boards, but regardless, once you have a fast NVME in RAID there is no going back, even SATA RAID does not compare to NVME in my estimate. The way I see it if the 970 is cheaper than the 960 things can only bode well for NVME prices going forward. I had the opportunity to get a Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 1TB for $199.99.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
40,435 (6.58/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
I understand what you are saying; I agree with some of that. If indeed the rumours of clock speed and IPC are true it will be a moot point on the CPU side. The way I see it R3000 CPUs will be more expensive than R 2000 series chips and the R7 2700X has been $409.99 in Canada for as long as I remember, at the least the R 3000 will probably be $499 for their top chip in Canada. I also see X570 boards being a $30-50 premium vs X470 and some X470 boards were truly expensive $300+. With my benefit in bandwidth NVME RAID is a mitigating factor for why I did this. I do not see X570 boards being able to support 3X16 wired slots, plus the eventual intent of having everything running on NVME In the PCI_E arrangements and possibilities TR4 allows hearkens back to the 890FX and 990FX or some nice X99 boards, but regardless, once you have a fast NVME in RAID there is no going back, even SATA RAID does not compare to NVME in my estimate. The way I see it if the 970 is cheaper than the 960 things can only bode well for NVME prices going forward. I had the opportunity to get a Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 1TB for $199.99.
X570 is supposedly implementing pcie 4 and is a AMD inhouse chipset-meaning not touched by ASMedia, it will be the first since 990FX in 2012.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
7,939 (3.15/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
I know. I too am excited. I will probably get a R52400 G ( I love that APU) and get what ever 550 boards with good VRMs. I keep building a computer for my daughter that somehow has turned into 3 PCs I have sold or traded for stuff. That's the thing about AMD for me the modularity makes having AM4 or TR4 truly a joy.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,717 (0.97/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) 32'' 4K Dell
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
VR HMD HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 P
I built 2 TR system, one 1950X and another 2990WX, for scientific computation work. Can they game? Sure. Is gaming performance great? OK~ish.

TR platform are really not geared for gaming or regular workloads. Mainstream RyZen or Intel is what you need for that.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
2,244 (0.40/day)
System Name Budget AMD System
Processor Threadripper 1900X @ 4.1Ghz (100x41 @ 1.3250V)
Motherboard Gigabyte X399 Aorus Gaming 7
Cooling EKWB X399 Monoblock
Memory 4x8GB GSkill TridentZ RGB 14-14-14-32 CR1 @ 3266
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX Vega₆⁴ Liquid @ 1,800Mhz Core, 1025Mhz HBM2
Storage 1x ADATA SX8200 NVMe, 1x Segate 2.5" FireCuda 2TB SATA, 1x 500GB HGST SATA
Display(s) Vizio 22" 1080p 60hz TV (Samsung Panel)
Case Corsair 570X
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Seasonic X Series 850W KM3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Threadripper isn't really a gaming platform, however.. It does net you higher clocked parts.

2950X is the best gaming wise of the TR platform. (as you can disable one die and retain 2700X @ 4.4Ghz performance.

Personally, I am running 1900X and don't have any issue gaming. Most all my games hit 60 FPS or higher with it. I got the 1900X as a placeholder till the 12nm or 7nm models come down a bit more/is released. (I am looking for a $650ish 2950X.)
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
7,939 (3.15/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
It is interesting that
I built 2 TR system, one 1950X and another 2990WX, for scientific computation work. Can they game? Sure. Is gaming performance great? OK~ish.

TR platform are really not geared for gaming or regular workloads. Mainstream RyZen or Intel is what you need for that.

So let me get this straight, if you could get a TR4 CPU and MB for $10 more than an AM4 combo or, less than an I7 combo, even if you were primarily gaming you wouldn't? I had AM4 and for me TR4 feels faster

Currently, here.

https://www.gpucheck.com/en-usd/com...ripper-2950x-vs-amd-ryzen-7-2700x/ultra/ultra.

If anything-if TR 3000 and R3000 are close together in numbers again and you are just gaming, it may not be worth it, wait till they come out and see

I actually looked at that chart and noticed the abysmal 34 FPS in 4K for both CPUs in Total War Warhammer 2. It's too bad we don't have the storage type or memory speed/timings. DId you note that I get 75 FPS @4K using most likely the same benchmark tool.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,717 (0.97/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) 32'' 4K Dell
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
VR HMD HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 P
More core does not mean faster gaming. Faster professional work? Hell yeah. 2990WX all core 4GHz does genome assembly waaaaaaaay faster than my all core 4.2GHz 6950X.

TR’s modular design inevitabily introduces high latency in core-core communications. In gaming you want as little of that as you can. That’s why a single CCX 8core RyZen would be better for gaming any time of the day.

Infinite Fabric is nice. But not for every workload.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
7,939 (3.15/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
More core does not mean faster gaming. Faster professional work? Hell yeah. 2990WX all core 4GHz does genome assembly waaaaaaaay faster than my all core 4.2GHz 6950X.

TR’s modular design inevitabily introduces high latency in core-core communications. In gaming you want as little of that as you can. That’s why a single CCX 8core RyZen would be better for gaming any time of the day.

Infinite Fabric is nice. But not for every workload.

I agree that the 2990WX is definitely not for gamers because of the Infinity fabric and was not marketed as such. I cannot even use that on the board I have anyway (max 180W). The argument that a 8 core Ryzen would be faster does not hold water for me either as my 1900X is definitely faster than my R7 1700 OC. As far as cores goes, while it is not in every engine some and more and more recent and new games do support multi core and may not provide better FPS but other things like loading screens and RAM usage may continue to show better improvement as time passes. As I stated in my original post the number of PCI-E lanes was the mitigating factor for me going to TR4 along with the $12 difference in price vs a top AM4 build.
 
Joined
Nov 27, 2010
Messages
924 (0.19/day)
System Name future xeon II
Processor DUAL SOCKET xeon e5 2686 v3 , 36c/72t, hacked all cores @3.5ghz, TDP limit hacked
Motherboard asrock rack ep2c612 ws
Cooling case fans,liquid corsair h100iv2 x2
Memory 96 gb ddr4 2133mhz gskill+corsair
Video Card(s) 2x 1080 sc acx3 SLI, @STOCK
Storage Hp ex950 2tb nvme+ adata xpg sx8200 pro 1tb nvme+ sata ssd's+ spinners
Display(s) philips 40" bdm4065uc 4k @60
Case silverstone temjin tj07-b
Audio Device(s) sb Z
Power Supply corsair hx1200i
Mouse corsair m95 16 buttons
Keyboard microsoft internet keyboard pro
Software windows 10 x64 1903 ,enterprise
Benchmark Scores fire strike ultra- 10k time spy- 15k cpu z- 400/15000
contrary to TR, high core count xeons also have higher latencies, but thanks to dual qpi links and numa quick memory access, are on fire in gaming
 
Top