• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Tight Squeeze Below $350 as Price of GTX 1660 Ti Revealed

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
36,986 (8.64/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame GTX 1070 Ti Vulcan X
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Antec EarthWatts Pro Gold 750W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
NVIDIA is reportedly pricing the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti at USD $279 (baseline pricing), which implies pricing of custom-designed and factory-overclocked cards scraping the $300-mark. The card is also spaced $70 apart from the RTX 2060, which offers not just 25% more CUDA cores, but also NVIDIA RTX and DLSS technologies. In media reporting of the card so far, it is being compared extensively to the GTX 1060 6 GB, which continues to go for under $230. Perhaps NVIDIA is planning a slower non-Ti version to replace the GTX 1060 6 GB under the $250-mark. That entry would place three SKUs within $50-70 of each other, a tight squeeze. Based on the 12 nm TU116 silicon, the GTX 1660 Ti is rumored to feature 1,536 CUDA cores, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and a 192-bit wide GDDR6 memory interface, handling 6 GB of memory at 12 Gbps (288 GB/s). This GPU lacks RT cores.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
289 (0.63/day)
Location
Arizona
System Name Space Heater MKIII | Space Heater MKII
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | Intel Core i7-2600K
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Pro | ASUS Sabertooth P67
Cooling Cryorig R1 Ultimate, 5x Cryorig XF140 fans | Arctic Freezer i11, 2x Arctic F12 PWM PST
Memory 2x8GB Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4-3000 | 4x4GB Kingston HyperX Fury DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 Gaming | EVGA GTX 780 FTW
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 2+4TB Seagate Barracudas | 240GB Kingston UV400, 1TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) AOC AG241QX, Dell 1908FP, Dell E248WFP | Dell E2009W, Dell 2007WFP
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M | old Antec server case
Audio Device(s) Denon AVR-1909 , Panasonic SB-PM19 speakers, Insignia NS-RSW211 sub | Bose MediaMates
Power Supply EVGA 750 B3, CyberPower CST135XLU | EVGA 600 W1
Mouse Logitech MX Master | Logitech M510
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion Brown | Redragon K551
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Geekbench 4 on i7: 14581 multi, 4225 single @4.5GHz (https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/8441992)
Pascal GDDR6 refresh ?
Nope, it appears to be a proper Turing card. Chip is TU116 which is quite a bit bigger than GP106.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
26,238 (5.28/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K@4.8GHz(Quick and dirty)
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500GB Crucial MX500 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 480GB MX200 SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Turing with bad RTX cores. It's a smart way to get rid of defective GPU dies.

Hopefully they still have the Tensor cores though, so DLSS will still work with them.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
2,187 (1.84/day)
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard MSI B350M Gaming Pro
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu with AM4 bracket
Memory PNY Anarchy-X XLR8 Red DDR4 3200 MHz C15-17-17-17-35
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G
Storage Samsung 970 EVO NVMe M.2 500 GB, SanDisk Ultra II 480 GB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster C27H711 OC refresh rate 110Hz
Case Phantek Eclipse P400S (PH-EC416PS)
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster Audigy Rx
Power Supply EVGA 850 BQ
Mouse SteelSeries Rival 310
Keyboard Logitech G G413 Silver
Software Windows 10 Professional 64-bit v1903
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,298 (0.63/day)
Location
Tokyo, Ota
Processor i5 - 7300HQ
Memory 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) 1060 6GB
Storage 180GB m.2 SATA | 250GB 850Evo SATA
Display(s) FHD 15" Gsync IPS + Acer H243H
Mouse Rival 300
Keyboard Apex m500 (mx red)
I wouldn't call $70 cheaper a tight squeeze. Maybe if the base was 1000 not 350.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,264 (1.25/day)
I wouldn't call $70 cheaper a tight squeeze. Maybe if the base was 1000 not 350.
It leaves more room for those variants Nvidia likes to put out slower memory and the 3GB variant.

Last Gen was a $30 and $20 increment at their launch if they move the initial offering up $30 by calling it a Ti. They can slot in the non-ti -$30 and their lower variants -$30 and so forth.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
24,920 (6.37/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) Sapphire NITRO+ RX 590 Special Edition 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate Exos X12 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Too much money, especially considering the RX 590 which likely competes well with it is priced under $300 with more memory.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2012
Messages
224 (0.08/day)
If this thing comes in over $300 for 3rd party vendors, you might as well go with a 2060. You can get an EVGA 2060 for $349.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
1,041 (0.94/day)
Location
Pristina
System Name My PC
Processor 4670K@4.4GHz
Motherboard Gryphon Z87
Cooling CM 212
Memory 2x8GB+2x4GB @2400GHz
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1425MHz OC+, 8GB
Storage Intel 530 SSD 480GB + Intel 510 SSD 120GB + 2x500GB hdd raid 1
Display(s) HP envy 32 1440p
Case CM Mastercase 5
Audio Device(s) Sbz ZXR
Power Supply Antec 620W
Mouse G502
Keyboard G910
Software Win 10 pro
This crap is not worth more than 250$ but we like your style ngridia.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
2,187 (1.84/day)
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard MSI B350M Gaming Pro
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu with AM4 bracket
Memory PNY Anarchy-X XLR8 Red DDR4 3200 MHz C15-17-17-17-35
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G
Storage Samsung 970 EVO NVMe M.2 500 GB, SanDisk Ultra II 480 GB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster C27H711 OC refresh rate 110Hz
Case Phantek Eclipse P400S (PH-EC416PS)
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster Audigy Rx
Power Supply EVGA 850 BQ
Mouse SteelSeries Rival 310
Keyboard Logitech G G413 Silver
Software Windows 10 Professional 64-bit v1903
Too much money, especially considering the RX 590 which likely competes well with it is priced under $300 with more memory.
This GPU re-spin with 1536 cores and 192-Bit bus to GDDR6 should come out faster than the 1070 which sells for $300 nevermind the 580/590 behind the 1070.
relative-performance_1920-1080.png
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
75 (0.02/day)
Too much money, especially considering the RX 590 which likely competes well with it is priced under $300 with more memory.
RX590 will be competing in performance with GTX1660Ti? RX 590 is nowhere near GTX1070 in performance and this card should be very close to It.

This crap is not worth more than 250$ but we like your style ngridia.
GTX1060 FE started at $299 and this is starting at $279 while performing 25-30% better, that's not so bad.
AMD is selling an old Polaris for $260(RX590) and this should start at only $279 while performing much better(+15-20%). If this is a "crap" not worth the money then what is RX590?
If you are not happy with It then just don't buy It or just buy something else or not buy anything, simple as that.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
4,308 (1.33/day)
RX 590 mostly looks like a bad value compered to the RX 580 that was already at the 199$ price tag here and here. For 199$, it still has a compelling value.

279$ is not terribad, but nothing spectacular.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
3,658 (1.79/day)
Location
Kiev, Ukraine
System Name WS#1337
Processor Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Gigabyte x470 AORUS Ultra Gamin
Cooling Xigmatek Scylla 240 AIO
Memory 2x8GB Kinkston HyperX @2666 CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX1060 SC 6G
Storage Adata SX8200 256GB, Sandisk X400 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U24E590D (4K/UHD)
Case Chieftec AL-01B-OP
Audio Device(s) ALC1220
Power Supply SeaSonic 450W 80+ GOLD
Mouse Logitech G503
Keyboard Zalman K500 modded (Gateron brown)
Software Windows 10, Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
Too much money, especially considering the RX 590 which likely competes well with it is priced under $300 with more memory.
RX590 is an admirable card for the time, but let's not forget that it's essentially an overclocked die-shrink of 580 (with similar performance of factory-OC'ed RX580), and that it's gonna end up ~15-20% slower than 1660Ti at nearly double the power draw. That's not worth $20 savings in my books. If anything, RX580 is a more cost-efficient option.
 
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
162 (0.17/day)
Location
NJ, USA
This sucks...I picked the worst time for a new build (started procuring parts mid December '18). As soon as I bought my 2700X Pascal went out of production, and although numerous tech news outlets claimed there was a surplus of pascal stock, 98% of those were 1060s (3GB ones too) and a handful of 1070 ti's. I was aiming for 1080/Vega 64 tier performance, but now any new 1080s out there have an asking price of upwards of $1000, 1080 ti's are about $1500, and even some 1070s are going between $500-$600. There were some sales on Vega 64 that saw it down to $400, but those were refrence modeld and watercooling, at least for the moment wasnt something I wanted to spend $$$ on. Now Im looking at 1080s and Vega 64s on ebay, but Im hesitant because I dont want to get stuck with a lemon, and if you buy 2nd hand, doesnt that exclude the new owner from warranty/RMA coverage? Not to mention that possibility of getting a mining card that's completed numerous "tours of duty". I could buy a 2070 or 2080, but I really dont care about Ray tracing/DLSS at the moment, and I really dont want to reward Nvidia's upgraded level of avarice.

Best deal I can currently find fir a new 1070 ti is $379, but thay doesnt seem that good to me...and a refurbished 1080 for $400....

Anyone have luck with ebay? Can you alleviate my fears with your successful anecdotes?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
1,590 (0.69/day)
Location
KL, Malaysia
System Name Rainbow RTX 240
Processor Intel Core i5-7600K (stock)
Motherboard ASUS PRIME H270M-PLUS mATX
Cooling Corsair Hydro H55 AIO + 3 x HD120 RGB w/ Commander PRO
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 2400MHz (2 x 8GB kits, Black)
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX2060 6GB Twin Fan (stock)
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 250GB M.2 PCIe SSD | Intel 540s 240GB 2.5in SSD | Seagate Desktop SSHD 3.5in 1TB
Display(s) Dell Ultrasharp U2417H 24-inch 1080p IPS
Case Corsair Carbide Air 240 SFF mATX (Black) + Lighting Node PRO RGB LED Strips (2)
Audio Device(s) ASUS XONAR DX PCIe Sound Card
Power Supply Corsair RM750x 80 Plus Gold Fully Modular
Mouse Corsair M65 RGB (White) + MM800 Polaris RGB Mouse Mat
Keyboard Corsair STRAFE RGB Mechanical (Gen 1 Cherry MX RGB Red switches)
Software Windows 10 Professional x64 October Update. (v1809)
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Time Spy: 7294 (Graphics Score) 3DMark Fire Strike: 18104 (Graphics Score)
$280 is not really a compelling purchase when this toned down Turing core has no RT & Tensor Core in it. Also, aftermarket variants will easily hit $300 mark so the RTX2060 makes it an even better purchase. Not putting hate on a supposedly nerfed Turing core but the way Nvidia positioned it (the 1660Ti) just feels odd at best, as a way to "fill the gap". Waiting for TPU & others to review this weird card is going to answer some questions.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
75 (0.02/day)
RX590 is an admirable card for the time, but let's not forget that it's essentially an overclocked die-shrink of 580 (with similar performance of factory-OC'ed RX580), and that it's gonna end up ~15-20% slower than 1660Ti at nearly double the power draw. That's not worth $20 savings in my books. If anything, RX580 is a more cost-efficient option.
RX570 and RX580 are much better value than RX590. The only thing I admire about RX590 is the frequency It can work at.

$280 is not really a compelling purchase when this toned down Turing core has no RT & Tensor Core in it. Also, aftermarket variants will easily hit $300 mark so the RTX2060 makes it an even better purchase. Not putting hate on a supposedly nerfed Turing core but the way Nvidia positioned it (the 1660Ti) just feels odd at best, as a way to "fill the gap". Waiting for TPU & others to review this weird card is going to answer some questions.
It still has Tensor cores as far as I know. It doesn't have RT cores but I don't consider it as a big disadvantage.
Aftermarket variants for RTX2060 also cost more than the basic $349 RTX2060.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Messages
147 (0.18/day)
System Name Dell Dimension P120
Processor Intel Pentium 120 MHz 60Mhz FSB
Motherboard Dell Pentium
Memory 24 MB EDO
Video Card(s) Matrox Millennium 2MB
Storage 1 GB EIDE HDD
Display(s) Dell 15 inch crt
Case Dell Dimension
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster
Mouse Microsoft mouse, no scroll wheel
Keyboard Dell 1995
Software Windows 95 + Office 95
Perhaps NVIDIA is planning a slower non-Ti version to replace the GTX 1060 6 GB under the $250-mark.
uh wouldn't a slower 1660 non Ti be only marginally faster than the 3yr old gtx 1060 6gb?
so i guess with Turing a replacement means either very little performance gains at the same msrp or significantly higher msrp for ~30-40% improvement, 1080 vs 2080 & 1080ti vs 2080ti
how much faster is the 1060 6gb than the gtx 960 again or gtx 960 over the 760?
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
368 (0.43/day)
RX590 is an admirable card for the time, but let's not forget that it's essentially an overclocked die-shrink of 580 (with similar performance of factory-OC'ed RX580), and that it's gonna end up ~15-20% slower than 1660Ti at nearly double the power draw. That's not worth $20 savings in my books. If anything, RX580 is a more cost-efficient option.
While I agree with you and THANATOS (if the performance of the 1660Ti will reach what you wrote), do not forget you get 3 games worth of $150-180 with an RX590 purchase, while I think you will get ZERO games with the 1660Ti (as it is GTX, not RTX, where you can choose from BFV or Anthem - 2060 and 2070, and get both for 2080 and 2080Ti - though even if you get both games is less than RX590's and Vega"s 3 games). Overall, an RX580 is a better price/performance card even with 1 less game.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
3,658 (1.79/day)
Location
Kiev, Ukraine
System Name WS#1337
Processor Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Gigabyte x470 AORUS Ultra Gamin
Cooling Xigmatek Scylla 240 AIO
Memory 2x8GB Kinkston HyperX @2666 CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX1060 SC 6G
Storage Adata SX8200 256GB, Sandisk X400 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U24E590D (4K/UHD)
Case Chieftec AL-01B-OP
Audio Device(s) ALC1220
Power Supply SeaSonic 450W 80+ GOLD
Mouse Logitech G503
Keyboard Zalman K500 modded (Gateron brown)
Software Windows 10, Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
do not forget you get 3 games worth of $150-180 with an RX590 purchase
3 games is not really a good reason to buy a GPU, especially if only one of those games is worthwhile (technically it was 3 pre-order keys, so you actually got jack shit at the time of purchase).
It's a limited-time offer and by the time 1660Ti rolls out it may not include a single game (Just like Ryzen CPUs/APUs are no longer bundled with anything). According to AMD the offer is valid 'till April 6th(redeemable by early May).
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
72 (0.03/day)
Too expensive especially when you take DMC5 and RE2 into account which come with AMD's cards.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
9,152 (5.25/day)
Location
Too Long to fit in a single line here.
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
This sucks...I picked the worst time for a new build (started procuring parts mid December '18). As soon as I bought my 2700X Pascal went out of production, and although numerous tech news outlets claimed there was a surplus of pascal stock, 98% of those were 1060s (3GB ones too) and a handful of 1070 ti's. I was aiming for 1080/Vega 64 tier performance, but now any new 1080s out there have an asking price of upwards of $1000, 1080 ti's are about $1500, and even some 1070s are going between $500-$600. There were some sales on Vega 64 that saw it down to $400, but those were refrence modeld and watercooling, at least for the moment wasnt something I wanted to spend $$$ on. Now Im looking at 1080s and Vega 64s on ebay, but Im hesitant because I dont want to get stuck with a lemon, and if you buy 2nd hand, doesnt that exclude the new owner from warranty/RMA coverage? Not to mention that possibility of getting a mining card that's completed numerous "tours of duty". I could buy a 2070 or 2080, but I really dont care about Ray tracing/DLSS at the moment, and I really dont want to reward Nvidia's upgraded level of avarice.

Best deal I can currently find fir a new 1070 ti is $379, but thay doesnt seem that good to me...and a refurbished 1080 for $400....

Anyone have luck with ebay? Can you alleviate my fears with your successful anecdotes?
I think you've missed your chances (more than one) with the past gen of cards. Right now, the best buy really is a 2060, as much as I hate to tell you. You can't really be picky anymore.

Just to be clear, this 1660ti will most certainly not be a good buy either. I think it mainly exists to allow Nvidia to push more 2060's with RTX featureset across the counter to increase adoption rates. It is the 2060 that needs to do that, there is nothing else in the entire Turing stack even remotely interesting.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,607 (0.41/day)
System Name Lailalo / Edelweiss
Processor Ryzen 1700 @ 3.8Ghz / i7 3610QM @2.3-3.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus X370 Prime/ Lenovo Y580
Cooling Noctua / Big hunk of copper
Memory 16GB DDR4 3200 Ripjaws with Samsung chips / 8GB Hyundai DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) XFX R9 390 / GTX 660M 2GB
Storage Crucial 1TB MX500 SSD, Segate 3TB, 64GB Synapse SSD as Pagefile drive / Western Digital 1TB 7200RPM
Display(s) LG Ultrawide 29in @ 2560x1080 / Lenovo 15.6 @ 1920x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper / Lenovo Y580
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DG / Whatever Lenovo used
Power Supply Antec Truepower Blue 750W + Thermaltake 5.25in 250W / Big Power Brick
Mouse G602
Keyboard G510s
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows 10 Home
Turing with bad RTX cores. It's a smart way to get rid of defective GPU dies.

Hopefully they still have the Tensor cores though, so DLSS will still work with them.
If AMD was doing it, they'd "accidentally" allow the initial models to be unlocked to full versions. Which later gets "fixed" but lasts just long enough to create a frenzy and drive up sales.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
75 (0.02/day)
uh wouldn't a slower 1660 non Ti be only marginally faster than the 3yr old gtx 1060 6gb?
so i guess with Turing a replacement means either very little performance gains at the same msrp or significantly higher cfor ~30-40% improvement, 1080 vs 2080 & 1080ti vs 2080ti
how much faster is the 1060 6gb than the gtx 960 again or gtx 960 over the 760?
GTX 1660 should be ~16% faster than GTX 1060. The same difference as is between RTX2060 vs GTX1070.

GTX960($199; 28nm) vs GTX760($210; 28nm)
Performance(FullHD): +10.5% for GTX960

GTX1060($299; 16nm) vs GTX960($170; 28nm)
Performance(FullHD): +89% for GTX1060

RTX2060($349; 12nm) vs GTX1060($210; 16nm)
Performance(FullHD): +56% for GTX2060

Just to be clear, this 1660ti will most certainly not be a good buy either. I think it mainly exists to allow Nvidia to push more 2060's with RTX featureset across the counter to increase adoption rates. It is the 2060 that needs to do that, there is nothing else in the entire Turing stack even remotely interesting.
And what is a good buy at this time or in the near future? Nvidia probably won't release anything on 7nm this year. AMD is supposedly planning to release midrange 7nm Navi at the end of 3Q of 2019, but I don't expect miracles from the new architecture although 7nm will help a lot.
 
Last edited:
Top