• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Time Dilation - Help me understand

lyndonguitar

I play games
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
1,857 (0.66/day)
Likes
517
Location
Philippines
System Name X6 | Lyndon-ROG
Processor Intel Core i7-8700k | Intel Core i7 6700HQ
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 5 | Asus ROG-GL552VX
Cooling Deepcool Captain 240EX
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LED | 8 GB
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GTX 1080 8 GB GDDR5X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M 4GB
Storage SSDs: 500GB, HDDs: 2TB, 2TB, 3TB | SSD: 250GB, HDD: 1TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2411 1080p@144Hz, 32" HDTV, 19" Monitor | 15.6"1080p
Case Cougar Panzer Max
Audio Device(s) Corsair Gaming H1500 7.1 | ROCCAT Kave 5.1 | Edifier M3200
Power Supply EVGA 750GQ
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma | Logitech G302 | Mad Catz Cyborg R.A.T. 5
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K70 Cherry MX Red
Software Windows 10
#1
[yt]G-R8LGy-OVs[/yt]

I've been trying to understand the phenomenon called Time Dilation. by reading a couple of sites and watching alot of vids including that one... I finally understood most of it, but somethings really BUGGING me.

Based on what I understand... Time is relative to the observer because it can be bent by 'light' to preserve the absolute rule that light travels at 1c per second.

Relative to your position if you observe that Light travels slower than 1c per sec, time would seem to bend in that particular place to preserve the rule of the speed of light.

I have a question about this...

EARTH PERSPECTIVE:
A spaceship travels fast going to another star, observers from earth, from their point of view, observes that the earth's time is normal, but they observe that the ship's time is going slower. and so for every 2 earth seconds = 1 ship second. (JUST AN EXAMPLE)

10 years had passed on earth and the Spaceship returns.. the astronauts on board had only aged 5 years and the spaceship timer started at the start of the journey also only counted 5 years.

SHIP PERSPECTIVE:
A spaceship travels fast going to another star, observers from the ship, from their point of view observes the ship's time as normal. but earth is going far away, therefore they are observing it as a moving object, and so from their point of view they observed that the earth's clocks are running slower. that would mean for every 2 ship seconds = 1 earth second.

10 years had passed on earth and the Spaceship returns.. the astronauts on board had aged 20 years and the spaceship timer started at the start of the journey also only counted 20 years.

---------------------------------------------

In both scenarios 10 years had passed on earth. however this is the problem, would the astronauts age 5 years, or 20 years? If so what is wrong my examples? :confused: Would this prove the existence of a multi-verse? or what?? :laugh: anyone got better examples?

HELP
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2007
Messages
557 (0.15/day)
Likes
118
Processor i7 920
Motherboard SABERTOOTH X58
Cooling Fans
Memory 24 GB Kingston HyperX 1600
Video Card(s) gtx460
Storage spinners
Display(s) Dell 2001F
Case Lian Li
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply X750
Software win 7 x64 pro
Benchmark Scores fast...
#2
If I remember correctly, it has to do with speed, not direction. A satellite around earth doesn't change its distance, but time dilation still occurs.

Just adding to your confusion I suppose.

Also, the trip towards the other planet will dilate time on that planet, too.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
3,629 (1.09/day)
Likes
938
Location
Vietnam
System Name Gaming System / Laptop / HTPC
Processor i5 8600K @4.6Ghz / i5 540m / i7 970
Motherboard Z370 Aorus Ultra Gaming / Acer / Shuttle sx58j3
Cooling CM Seidon 120 XL / Laptop Cooling / SE-903
Memory T Group Nighthawk (3000 MHz)/ 4GB DDR3 / 12gb DDR3
Video Card(s) Colorful 1080Ti / G210m / 7870XT
Storage 750G MX300 + 3TB HDDs / 250G Ultra II /250G 850 EVO
Display(s) Dell U2515H + Asus VX239H/ 15.6" Laptop Screen / 720p 42" Plasma TV
Case Cooler master HAF 922 / Laptop Case / Corsair Air 240
Audio Device(s) On Board Realtek
Power Supply Andyson N700 Titanium / Laptop Power / ACBell 700 W
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard CM Quickfire XT (Cherry MX Reds)
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Firestrike = xxxxx Timespy = 9097 Heaven = xxxx
#3
The astronauts would have aged 5 years. Time slows down (relatively) for the object travelling at higher speeds.

I.e. The astronauts would have reached the star and come back, and it would appear to them that only 5 years has passed, but everyone on earth would be 10 years older.
 

lyndonguitar

I play games
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
1,857 (0.66/day)
Likes
517
Location
Philippines
System Name X6 | Lyndon-ROG
Processor Intel Core i7-8700k | Intel Core i7 6700HQ
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 5 | Asus ROG-GL552VX
Cooling Deepcool Captain 240EX
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LED | 8 GB
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GTX 1080 8 GB GDDR5X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M 4GB
Storage SSDs: 500GB, HDDs: 2TB, 2TB, 3TB | SSD: 250GB, HDD: 1TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2411 1080p@144Hz, 32" HDTV, 19" Monitor | 15.6"1080p
Case Cougar Panzer Max
Audio Device(s) Corsair Gaming H1500 7.1 | ROCCAT Kave 5.1 | Edifier M3200
Power Supply EVGA 750GQ
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma | Logitech G302 | Mad Catz Cyborg R.A.T. 5
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K70 Cherry MX Red
Software Windows 10
#4
The astronauts would have aged 5 years. Time slows down (relatively) for the object travelling at higher speeds.

I.e. The astronauts would have reached the star and come back, and it would appear to them that only 5 years has passed, but everyone on earth would be 10 years older.
but relative to the astronauts, the earth traveled at high speeds, wouldn't time be slowed down(in earth) in their perspective? what's what the video says :wtf: http://youtu.be/G-R8LGy-OVs?t=7m17s
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2007
Messages
557 (0.15/day)
Likes
118
Processor i7 920
Motherboard SABERTOOTH X58
Cooling Fans
Memory 24 GB Kingston HyperX 1600
Video Card(s) gtx460
Storage spinners
Display(s) Dell 2001F
Case Lian Li
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply X750
Software win 7 x64 pro
Benchmark Scores fast...
#5
Relative to the speed of light, not object
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
419 (0.19/day)
Likes
116
Processor Intel i7-3820 @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte X79-UD7
Cooling Thermaltake Water Pro 2.0
Memory 16GB DDR3 1866
Video Card(s) Leadtek GeForce GTX 670 Reference
Storage Intel SSD530 120GB OS/BOOT, various mechanical drives for storage
Display(s) 2x Dell U2311H
Case Lian-Li PC-V1000
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence ST
Power Supply Cooler Master Silent Pro Modular 600W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
#6
Relative to the speed of light, not object
But relativity says there are no absolute reference frames, and you can't measure your own speed against the speed of light because it's always equal to c no matter how fast you're travelling.

The earth is hurtling around the sun, which is in itself hurtling around the galaxy, and yet we percieve ourselves to be at absolute rest. Would not an observer, on board a particularly energetic planet travelling at an even higher speed, still perceive himself to be at absolute rest and see us as a particularly fast-ageing species/planet when observed through his uncannily powerful theoretical telescope?

:roll:
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
508 (0.20/day)
Likes
108
Location
Upright down-under (Brisbane, Australia)
System Name Frankenstein v7
Processor Intel i7 2600K (@ stock)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V
Cooling Corsair H100
Memory Corsair Vengeance 4x4GB DDR3 @ 1866MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 7870 WindForce 2GB
Storage Samsung F3 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung S24C750
Case Antec P280
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs X-Fi Elite Pro
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 7 Pro - 64-bit
#7
From what I remember, it exactly comes down to the observer - thus, position is most relevant (hence "relativity").
From one point of view, time passes at one rate, from another viewpoint of the exact same event, time passes at a different rate.
They are both correct in their individual observations (they both run at the same time), relative to themselves, but different, when compared to the other's observations.
Time itself does NOT, in & of itself, slow down - this is simply how it looks compared to the observer's observed point.
Perhaps an easy example: the car you see speeding down the road, seems to travel awfully quickly, whilst the 'flying car' high above, seems to take forever to disappear from view.
HOWEVER: in the time it takes these vehicles to disappear from sight, the car may have only travelled (for argument's sake) 1 kilometre, whilst the 'flying car' overhead travelled the same distance, yet seems to have moved very little.
As the 'flying car' is clearly further away, it stands to reason that the closer the observer is to the object observed, the faster it *appears* to be going, when in actual fact, this is not the case at all.

There was once an example given to Einstein about a bus:
"if a bus travelled at the speed of light, but a passenger runs from the back to the front, would that person not travel faster than the speed of light?".
The simple answer is no.
However, if you observed such motion from a different point of view, this may appear to be the case, when, in actual fact, this person only travelled as quickly as possible, within the confines of said vehicle.

Relativity is both the easiest & perhaps the most complex matter to get your head around.
Knowing when to apply this, I think, is probably the trick to work out.
I think NASA & ESA are very close though ;)

BTW: thanks for posting this most intriguing poser ^^
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
499 (0.22/day)
Likes
119
System Name Multipurpose desktop
Processor AMD Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.75Ghz , NB @ 2.5
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 (rev 1.0)
Cooling Prolimatech Megahalems Rev. C, 2x120mm CM Blademaster
Memory Corsair Vengeance LP (4x4GB) @1666Mhz 9-9-9-20-24 1T
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix R7-370 4GB OC
Storage 2x WD Caviar Black 500GB Sata III in RAID 0
Display(s) Acer S211HL 21.5" 1920x1080
Case Cooler Master Centurion 534+, 3x 120mm CM Sickle Flow
Power Supply Seasonic X650 Gold
Software Windows 7 x64 Home Premium SP1
#8
But relativity says there are no absolute reference frames, and you can't measure your own speed against the speed of light because it's always equal to c no matter how fast you're travelling.

The earth is hurtling around the sun, which is in itself hurtling around the galaxy, and yet we percieve ourselves to be at absolute rest. Would not an observer, on board a particularly energetic planet travelling at an even higher speed, still perceive himself to be at absolute rest and see us as a particularly fast-ageing species/planet when observed through his uncannily powerful theoretical telescope?

:roll:
Motion is relative to our frame of reference. In the example of the Astronaut(s), their frame of reference is 'anchored' to the Earth -- so, within that reference frame, the Earth is virtually motionless. There is no universal reference frame, it's all relative motion, there's no use in trying to think of some kind of universal reference frame. If you want to imagine yourself as being in motion at c velocity, then everything in your reference frame would be in motion at the speed of light, everything would have to be in order to preserve causality, so in effect, you and your reference frame are all travelling at c, preserving causality, so that everything works as it should...meaning you and the entire observable universe...then you aren't moving... because everything is moving with you. It all cancels out, figuratively speaking. Stop thinking of universal frames of reference.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
3,629 (1.09/day)
Likes
938
Location
Vietnam
System Name Gaming System / Laptop / HTPC
Processor i5 8600K @4.6Ghz / i5 540m / i7 970
Motherboard Z370 Aorus Ultra Gaming / Acer / Shuttle sx58j3
Cooling CM Seidon 120 XL / Laptop Cooling / SE-903
Memory T Group Nighthawk (3000 MHz)/ 4GB DDR3 / 12gb DDR3
Video Card(s) Colorful 1080Ti / G210m / 7870XT
Storage 750G MX300 + 3TB HDDs / 250G Ultra II /250G 850 EVO
Display(s) Dell U2515H + Asus VX239H/ 15.6" Laptop Screen / 720p 42" Plasma TV
Case Cooler master HAF 922 / Laptop Case / Corsair Air 240
Audio Device(s) On Board Realtek
Power Supply Andyson N700 Titanium / Laptop Power / ACBell 700 W
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard CM Quickfire XT (Cherry MX Reds)
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Firestrike = xxxxx Timespy = 9097 Heaven = xxxx
#9
but relative to the astronauts, the earth traveled at high speeds, wouldn't time be slowed down(in earth) in their perspective? what's what the video says :wtf: http://youtu.be/G-R8LGy-OVs?t=7m17s
If i remember correctly, If it were possible for the people in the spacecraft to view people on earth, they would appear to be moving in slow-motion and vice-versa.
 

Huddo93

New Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
299 (0.13/day)
Likes
57
Location
Perth, WA, Australia
System Name Gaming Rig
Processor i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard Asus Z77 Deluxe-V
Cooling Corsair H100
Memory RipjawsX 8GB @ 2133MHz 11-11-11-30
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX670 SC @ 1300MHz core
Storage OCZ Vertex 4 256GB + 1TB Samsung HDD
Display(s) 23" LG W2343T
Case Corsair 650D
Power Supply Corsiar AX-850
#10
I see your problem, and with the basic idea of time dilation there is no explanation, it is simply a Paradox. Look up "The Twin Paradox" and you can find a way they "solved" the issue. In answer to your question: "When they meet up on earth after the trip, the ages of the space traveler moving close to speed of light and the stationary observer, the space traveler will be seen to be 5 years younger that the observer on earth.

In a little bit of self investigation (wikipedia :p), the difference in time elapsed for the observer and the space traveler is due to the fact that the space traveler goes through a "U turn" acceleration from when he heads away from earth and then turns around the head back. At the point where the space ship comes to rest, before starting to move back towards earth, it must re asses its relative frame to earth and thats where the actual time difference occurs, making the space traveler physically younger.

You must remember when looking into things like Special Relativity that it isn't the whole story. A lot of newer discoveries in string theory, much better fit the laws of general relativity more than that of special relativity (don't be fooled by the names either, general relativity isn't "general" but rather very complex).

Good luck on your journey for knowledge, if your after something else to get your head around, try reading introductory books on string theory and the like. The one I just read about 4 months ago is a small book (around 200 pages) called "The Little Book of String Theory by Steven S. Gubser" and its a good way to start off giving a basic understanding of how the basis of string theory and general/special relativity do and don't fit string theory.
 

lyndonguitar

I play games
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
1,857 (0.66/day)
Likes
517
Location
Philippines
System Name X6 | Lyndon-ROG
Processor Intel Core i7-8700k | Intel Core i7 6700HQ
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 5 | Asus ROG-GL552VX
Cooling Deepcool Captain 240EX
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LED | 8 GB
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GTX 1080 8 GB GDDR5X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M 4GB
Storage SSDs: 500GB, HDDs: 2TB, 2TB, 3TB | SSD: 250GB, HDD: 1TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2411 1080p@144Hz, 32" HDTV, 19" Monitor | 15.6"1080p
Case Cougar Panzer Max
Audio Device(s) Corsair Gaming H1500 7.1 | ROCCAT Kave 5.1 | Edifier M3200
Power Supply EVGA 750GQ
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma | Logitech G302 | Mad Catz Cyborg R.A.T. 5
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K70 Cherry MX Red
Software Windows 10
#11
If i remember correctly, If it were possible for the people in the spacecraft to view people on earth, they would appear to be moving in slow-motion and vice-versa.
That's my problem, from each perspectives, they view the other one as going slow motion = meaning they would both age faster in their perspective

I see your problem, and with the basic idea of time dilation there is no explanation, it is simply a Paradox. Look up "The Twin Paradox" and you can find a way they "solved" the issue. In answer to your question: "When they meet up on earth after the trip, the ages of the space traveler moving close to speed of light and the stationary observer, the space traveler will be seen to be 5 years younger that the observer on earth.

In a little bit of self investigation (wikipedia :p), the difference in time elapsed for the observer and the space traveler is due to the fact that the space traveler goes through a "U turn" acceleration from when he heads away from earth and then turns around the head back. At the point where the space ship comes to rest, before starting to move back towards earth, it must re asses its relative frame to earth and thats where the actual time difference occurs, making the space traveler physically younger.

You must remember when looking into things like Special Relativity that it isn't the whole story. A lot of newer discoveries in string theory, much better fit the laws of general relativity more than that of special relativity (don't be fooled by the names either, general relativity isn't "general" but rather very complex).

Good luck on your journey for knowledge, if your after something else to get your head around, try reading introductory books on string theory and the like. The one I just read about 4 months ago is a small book (around 200 pages) called "The Little Book of String Theory by Steven S. Gubser" and its a good way to start off giving a basic understanding of how the basis of string theory and general/special relativity do and don't fit string theory.
Thanks for the explanation!, now I understand, SO it is called the Twin Paradox!!
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
2,553 (0.84/day)
Likes
1,013
Location
United States
System Name Aluminum Mallard
Processor Intel i7 940
Motherboard ASUS Rampage III: Gene
Cooling Noctua C-12P
Memory 6GB Corsair Dominator DDR3
Video Card(s) ASUS HD5870
Storage OCZ Vertex 2 60GB SSD, 2 x Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 in RAID0
Display(s) HP w2338h
Case Corsair 700D
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Corsair TX850
Software Win7 Ult 64 bit
Benchmark Scores 31 FPS in Dalaran.
#12
[yt]-CIs3jOnfiM[/yt]
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,443 (1.00/day)
Likes
1,868
#13
SHIP PERSPECTIVE:
A spaceship travels fast going to another star, observers from the ship, from their point of view observes the ship's time as normal. but earth is going far away, therefore they are observing it as a moving object, and so from their point of view they observed that the earth's clocks are running slower. that would mean for every 2 ship seconds = 1 earth second.

10 years had passed on earth and the Spaceship returns.. the astronauts on board had aged 20 years and the spaceship timer started at the start of the journey also only counted 20 years.

---------------------------------------------

In both scenarios 10 years had passed on earth. however this is the problem, would the astronauts age 5 years, or 20 years? If so what is wrong my examples? :confused: Would this prove the existence of a multi-verse? or what?? :laugh: anyone got better examples?

HELP
No. You have not set a perspective, and you have gotten the statement in reverse.

Case 1: Earth Reference
Earth Relative Velocity=0
Ship Relative Velocity=V
Earth observer has 10 years of time pass. Traveler has 5 years of time pass.

To an observer on the ship 2 seconds on earth will be observed as 1 second. Earth will appear as if being fast forwarded, while the ship will appear to be moving at normal speed.



Edit:
Time dilation is rarely accounted for in real life. Rarely do bodies on the surface of earth move fast enough to experience appreciable dilation. One place where this is accounted for though is GPS. The observer is stationary, but each satellite is orbiting the earth at a great speed. As such, the triangulation algorithms need to account for the delay due to dilation. If the dilation did not get accounted for you wouldn't be able to use gps to get any more accuracy than a few dozen meters.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
3,629 (1.09/day)
Likes
938
Location
Vietnam
System Name Gaming System / Laptop / HTPC
Processor i5 8600K @4.6Ghz / i5 540m / i7 970
Motherboard Z370 Aorus Ultra Gaming / Acer / Shuttle sx58j3
Cooling CM Seidon 120 XL / Laptop Cooling / SE-903
Memory T Group Nighthawk (3000 MHz)/ 4GB DDR3 / 12gb DDR3
Video Card(s) Colorful 1080Ti / G210m / 7870XT
Storage 750G MX300 + 3TB HDDs / 250G Ultra II /250G 850 EVO
Display(s) Dell U2515H + Asus VX239H/ 15.6" Laptop Screen / 720p 42" Plasma TV
Case Cooler master HAF 922 / Laptop Case / Corsair Air 240
Audio Device(s) On Board Realtek
Power Supply Andyson N700 Titanium / Laptop Power / ACBell 700 W
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard CM Quickfire XT (Cherry MX Reds)
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Firestrike = xxxxx Timespy = 9097 Heaven = xxxx
#14
Another interesting aspect of travel at relativistic speeds is contraction. I forget the correct term for it, but it's when things get smaller the faster they travel.