• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

OFFICIAL Tomb Raider (Discussion)

Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
5,891
Likes
6,551
how does it compare to the Old Tomb Raider games? better? great re-imagining? similar? or they messed it up?

I loved all of the games up until the last two.
It's hard to say exactly. They are fundamentally different so it's virtually impossible to compare them. However, here are some aspects (good and bad):

1) It has lame elements from Underworld, such as:
white ledges, invisible walls, linearity, blackouts, no free climbing, no open world, no sprint, no tough secrets, no swimming! That was the biggest letdown about this game. It killed realism.

2) It's relatively easy game, at least for those who used to beat tough puzzles from old games. I remember that I've spent months (!) playing The Last Revelation and Angel of Darkness (for those who have no idea: it's Tomb Raider 4 and Tomb Raider 6) but TR2103 is indeed million times harder and better than LAU trilogy.

3) (for the first time) TR has day/night cycles which is amazing. You can revisit areas in different periods of time. It also has amazing weather effects. This is a big plus for TR.

4) This game is a total reboot but you can still recognize some nice elements from previous TR games which is really good. Even though Lara is no longer an anti-heroine, she's now just a good girl killing everyone around.

5) Characters are kinda lame in this game but the main protagonists Lara and Roth are quite cool. :cool: However Lara suffers way too much in this game but in the next second she's good to go lol. Wish I had such regeneration abilities.

6) Level design is beautiful. Beach, shanty town, forest, mountains are amazing. However there are some really crappy booooooring and cartoonish places like rivers of blood and shores of skulls :rolleyes: Like they literally killed billion people on that damn island. Laboratory was a lame place as well. A huge building with zero equipment, what a lab is that. Geothermal caverns ain't good either with some cartoonish green gas lol.

7) This game lacks sense of danger. It's full of QTE and automatism. In 99% Lara won't miss ledge, you're virtually unable to throw her from the cliff. You no longer need to carefully choose timing and spacing to make a jump. You just jump and Lara will grab automatically. It's really lame. Sometimes she can't die lol.

8) Really amazing elements are not there: no monkey swing, no commando crawl, no tightrope walking, no rope swinging and all those good ol' acrobatics. Instead just lotsa ledge hopping like in Underworld .. meh.

9) Autoheal and checkpoints killed realism. You no longer need to care about HP. It reduces challenge.

10) No proper stealth system. So you just grab a gun and see how Lara turns to Rambo.

Verdict: 8.5/10

It's still a nice game. Must-play game for a TR fan. It's better than Underworld. I like this new direction. If the next game will have more puzzles and tombs and less shooting it will rock.
 
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
3,257
Likes
315
System Name Mercury KM-81
Processor Phenom II x4 B50
Motherboard ASUS M4A89GTD PRO
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX3
Memory 6GB Ram (4GBx1 Corsair 2GBx1 Nanya)
Video Card(s) PowerColor AX6770 V2.0
Storage 2TB WD Black, 1TB Hitachi, 500 GB WD Blue
Display(s) Philips 247E-LPH 24" 1920x1080
Case Mercury
Audio Device(s) Integrated Realtek
Power Supply Corsair 750TX
Software Windows 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Maybe it is time to benchmark :D
@lyn
The old tomb raider games were a whole another game. I think they are better.
Video games are becoming tremendously corrupted lately, so even without any swimming, running, Lara's home, medipacks, vehicles and much more, this game is the best of the moment.

The last two tomb raider games, were not games at all.
 
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
5,157
Likes
1,704
Processor Intel i7 950 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard ASUS P6X58D-E
Cooling Corsair H50 push/pull
Memory Kingston HyperX 1600 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD 7970 OC
Storage Plextor M5P 128GB/WD Black 2x1TB,1x6TB/Seagate 1TB
Display(s) Panasonic TC-L32U3
Case Antec DF-85
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V371 AVR
Power Supply XFX 850w Black Edition
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech K120
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
how does it compare to the Old Tomb Raider games? better? great re-imagining? similar? or they messed it up?

I loved all of the games up until the last two.
Hard to say what you loved most in the older ones when the two you mentioned a dislike for are pretty much polar opposites. I can only assume that you don't care much about the elaborate death trap relic puzzles and intricate platforming Anniversary had, because Underworld went a very tame direction in that regard.

This one is tame in most every regard, and feels like an eye candy graphics/physics demo with lots of linear, scripted cinematic on rails segments that are very repetetive. The only sense of open world play is the fast travel feature, which allows you to complete collectible and tomb challenges more expediently, and that quickly becomes boring.

At first the combat and nav tools feel more visceral, realistic and innovative than the random creatures and terrain features of past titles, but the constant idiocy of the weak willed cult followers, reuse of the same contrived tools and weaponry, along with an abundant supply of weapons and ammo, make it more repetetive and casual than dynamic and challenging.

The real disappointment however comes in the form of very, very underwhelming tombs. Instead of say one elaborate tomb per area like we're used to seeing, there's at least twice as many micro tombs, each having one simple, easy to figure and navigate puzzle.

By the time you've gotten 100% completion on one run through, there's no incentive to play through most of the tombs on subsequent runs, unless they happen to be directly on your path. You can also skip a lot of the challenges and still have plenty for upgrades.

This game over equips you even on the Hard mode, and it's RPG elements are as over sold as is the feeling of challenge. They start out leading you to believe you'll need to be a hunter/gatherer to survive, stopping at camps to eat, heal, etc, but in reality there's only a couple scripted moments in the game where Lara has to look for food and med supplies. The rest is optional hunting/gathering for mere small amounts of added XP.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
2,417
Likes
1,332
The real disappointment however comes in the form of very, very underwhelming tombs. Instead of say one elaborate tomb per area like we're used to seeing, there's at least twice as many micro tombs, each having one simple, easy to figure and navigate puzzle.

By the time you've gotten 100% completion on one run through, there's no incentive to play through most of the tombs on subsequent runs, unless they happen to be directly on your path. You can also skip a lot of the challenges and still have plenty for upgrades.
Hello, DLCs

Outfits. You have to complete the game wearing different outfits see which one makes you look best.
High heel challenge, No dirt on tank-top challenge. How long you can go without panting challenge.


The only real disappointment I had was
when a certain someone dies and you have 2 pistols and you decide to hand one away. I was like NO!!!

The ending says it all...

Hopefully the next one adds to this making it a bit more challenging because it was a good reboot into Laaarah becoming Lara Croft
 
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
5,157
Likes
1,704
Processor Intel i7 950 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard ASUS P6X58D-E
Cooling Corsair H50 push/pull
Memory Kingston HyperX 1600 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD 7970 OC
Storage Plextor M5P 128GB/WD Black 2x1TB,1x6TB/Seagate 1TB
Display(s) Panasonic TC-L32U3
Case Antec DF-85
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V371 AVR
Power Supply XFX 850w Black Edition
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech K120
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
The only real disappointment I had was
when a certain someone dies and you have 2 pistols and you decide to hand one away. I was like NO!!!

The ending says it all...

Hopefully the next one adds to this making it a bit more challenging because it was a good reboot into Laaarah becoming Lara Croft
Yeah, I didn't even tocuh on the disappointing ending, the game was underwhelming enough without that. I kept thinking through my disappointment of the game that the ending might at least...
...offer a boss fight against this mighty Sun Queen they kept going on about, but they couldn't even manage that. :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
5,822
Likes
618
Processor Core I7 3770K@4.3Ghz
Motherboard AsRock Z77 Extreme
Cooling Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Memory 12Gb G.Skill Sniper
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070
Storage Sandisk SSD + 1TB Seagate Barracuda 7200
Display(s) IPS Asus 26inch
Case Antec 300
Audio Device(s) Xonar DG
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 650 G2
Software Windows 10/Windows 7
I have just finished playing it and I think that the game is kinda easy, in my opinion the previous tomb raiders(not the one before this one) were more fun and challenging then this one. This game feels like uncharted to me with a tomb raider twist and I don't like that, that said I don't think its a bad game, its a game that will hold your hand till the end with an iron grip but I had some fun with it.

Its not that video games are becoming corrupted, the problem is that the majority of people have probably not played the previous titles, and do not see that games in a whole have become easier, less imaginative, and more linear and their are many many many examples of this, but its not corruption this is just an "evolution(sadly)" of the current generation. Kids of today don't like hard games that you have to lose and learn in.
 
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
5,157
Likes
1,704
Processor Intel i7 950 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard ASUS P6X58D-E
Cooling Corsair H50 push/pull
Memory Kingston HyperX 1600 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD 7970 OC
Storage Plextor M5P 128GB/WD Black 2x1TB,1x6TB/Seagate 1TB
Display(s) Panasonic TC-L32U3
Case Antec DF-85
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V371 AVR
Power Supply XFX 850w Black Edition
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech K120
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
Kids of today don't like hard games that you have to lose and learn in.
Yup, sadly that's the reality. Such players have become the target audience it seems.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
2,241
Likes
1,327
Location
Riverside, California
System Name Red Monster
Processor Intel Core i7 7800X @ 4.7GHz
Motherboard MSI X299 Gaming M7 ACK
Cooling Corsair Hydro Series H115i 280mm
Memory Corsair Vengeance LED 32GB DDR4 3466
Video Card(s) evga GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 iCX
Storage Intel 535 Series 2.5" 480GB SATA /WD Blue 1TB SSD /Radeon R7 240GB SSD /1TB, & 4TB HHD
Display(s) Samsung UN55KS8500 55" 4K & Oculus Rift CV1
Case Corsair Carbide Series Air 540
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster ZX > Pagoda DAC > multiple amps
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G600
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherri MX
Software Windows 10
The original couple of Tomb raiders were great games. #1 being the best of the bunch, mind blowing at the time of release for me.

This TR game is more like Uncharted +

And that is perfectly fine with me. I am loving every %#$@*!& second of this game.
But it isn't as challenging but meh...that doesn't bother me any.
 
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
5,157
Likes
1,704
Processor Intel i7 950 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard ASUS P6X58D-E
Cooling Corsair H50 push/pull
Memory Kingston HyperX 1600 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD 7970 OC
Storage Plextor M5P 128GB/WD Black 2x1TB,1x6TB/Seagate 1TB
Display(s) Panasonic TC-L32U3
Case Antec DF-85
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V371 AVR
Power Supply XFX 850w Black Edition
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech K120
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
I really don't see why they couldn't have appealed to a broader audience with this game. For instance most of the tombs are optional vs manadatory, so why not put in at least half a dozen tombs that aren't even accessible unless you play on Hard, and very challenging in puzzles and platforming like the old ones.

Instead they completely flip flopped to the new generation of players whom don't really care whether a game has such challenges, and that makes it clear they care more about the profit margin than their traditional TR fanbase.
 
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
3,257
Likes
315
System Name Mercury KM-81
Processor Phenom II x4 B50
Motherboard ASUS M4A89GTD PRO
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX3
Memory 6GB Ram (4GBx1 Corsair 2GBx1 Nanya)
Video Card(s) PowerColor AX6770 V2.0
Storage 2TB WD Black, 1TB Hitachi, 500 GB WD Blue
Display(s) Philips 247E-LPH 24" 1920x1080
Case Mercury
Audio Device(s) Integrated Realtek
Power Supply Corsair 750TX
Software Windows 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Maybe it is time to benchmark :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
2,417
Likes
1,332
That player deserves to die if he fails at staying on pier platforms and the boat. :laugh:

I tried playing the game again without TressFX and got 4 zones in before it got annoying to see her screwed up hair. It just doesnt have the same effect. Might aswell just play the game in LOW settings.
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Messages
587
Likes
104
System Name New / Breakin' the Lol
Processor i5 2500k / Athlon64 X2 4200+ (65W)
Motherboard P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3 / Asus M2N4-SLI
Cooling / Air (1 x 250mm, 2 x 120mm, 1 x 90mm)
Memory DDR3-1600 (8GB) / Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC2-6400 (2gb)
Video Card(s) / Visiontek 4870
Storage HD103SJ /
Display(s) Viewsonic 22" VX2240W
Case Xigmatek Midgard II / Thermaltake VA8003SWA
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
An update for Tomb Raider was released.

Steam

I thought this was neat:

"While we expect this patch to be an improvement for everyone, if you do have trouble with this patch and prefer to stay on the old version we made a Beta available on Steam, Build718.4, that can be used to switch back to the previous version." Kudos to Square Enix/Crystal Dynamics for going the extra distance on that one.
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
2,066
Likes
1,154
System Name Zimmer Frame Rates
Processor Intel i7 920 @ Stock speeds baby
Motherboard EVGA X58 3X SLI
Cooling True 120
Memory Corsair Vengeance 12GB
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 980 Ti Super JetStream
Storage Of course
Display(s) Crossover 27Q 27" 2560x1440
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Don't be silly
Power Supply XFX 650W Core
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Epic
Joined
Mar 11, 2007
Messages
681
Likes
83
Processor AMD Phenom II x6 1090T @ 3.8GHz
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth 990FX
Cooling Corsair H80i GTX
Memory Patriot Gamer 2 Series 8GB DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB
Storage 1TB WD Red
Display(s) 1920x1080 HDTV
Case NZXT Phantom 240
Power Supply Corsair CX750M 750w
Software Win7 Professional though I hate it, I want XP back!
I just picked this up this weekend and all I have to say is TressFX sucks balls! Her hair looks totally shit, it hovers several inches above her shoulders in some cases, and still clips right through her in others. It is total crap. Plus with TressFX turned off I get a steady 60FPS, with it on it drops to 30FPS and sometimes dips lower than that. A 30FPS drop isn't worth hair that looks like spaghetti noodles glued to Lara's head...
 

MxPhenom 216

Corsair Fanboy
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,129
Likes
3,697
Location
Seattle, WA
System Name The Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.2GHZ 1.275v
Motherboard MSi Z97 Gaming 5
Cooling EK Supremacy w/ EK Coolstream PE360
Memory G. Skill Trident X 16Gb (4x4GB) 2400mhz @ 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSi GTX1070 Gaming X 8GB @ 2GHz
Storage Samsung 830 128GB SSD, Crucial MX200 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2x 1TB Partitions)
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 27" 2560 x 1440 PLS @ 100hz
Case Phantek Enthoo Evolv ATX TG
Audio Device(s) MSi Gaming AudioBoost ALC1150 w/ Sennheiser Game Ones
Power Supply Seasonic Flagship Prime Platinum 850
Mouse Steelseries Rival 310 w/ QCK Mass mat
Keyboard Corsair K70 w/ MX Browns and Red Backlit
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 15439
I just picked this up this weekend and all I have to say is TressFX sucks balls! Her hair looks totally shit, it hovers several inches above her shoulders in some cases, and still clips right through her in others. It is total crap. Plus with TressFX turned off I get a steady 60FPS, with it on it drops to 30FPS and sometimes dips lower than that. A 30FPS drop isn't worth hair that looks like spaghetti noodles glued to Lara's head...
Its a new technology, give it time for Christ sake.

And its an improvement over the way hair is done in games since about 2005
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
5,157
Likes
1,704
Processor Intel i7 950 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard ASUS P6X58D-E
Cooling Corsair H50 push/pull
Memory Kingston HyperX 1600 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD 7970 OC
Storage Plextor M5P 128GB/WD Black 2x1TB,1x6TB/Seagate 1TB
Display(s) Panasonic TC-L32U3
Case Antec DF-85
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V371 AVR
Power Supply XFX 850w Black Edition
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech K120
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
I just picked this up this weekend and all I have to say is TressFX sucks balls!
Are you even using the patch just released? One of the main things it fixes is excessive TressFX movement and the hair no-clipping you mentioned. Also, Tessselation causes the most FPS drop, not TressFX.

Trivia:

Did you guys know originally they were going to call this game Tomb Raider Ascension, and it was to have giants, horseback riding and a little girl that tags along with you? That would have sucked even worse.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
3,257
Likes
315
System Name Mercury KM-81
Processor Phenom II x4 B50
Motherboard ASUS M4A89GTD PRO
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX3
Memory 6GB Ram (4GBx1 Corsair 2GBx1 Nanya)
Video Card(s) PowerColor AX6770 V2.0
Storage 2TB WD Black, 1TB Hitachi, 500 GB WD Blue
Display(s) Philips 247E-LPH 24" 1920x1080
Case Mercury
Audio Device(s) Integrated Realtek
Power Supply Corsair 750TX
Software Windows 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Maybe it is time to benchmark :D
^
Lol, looks like they are so empty with ideas, they are just combining games together.
It feels so Skyrim with assassin's creed and I laughed at this game so much.
Anyway, I have heard that Assassin's Creed new game, is going to be a girl...
Maybe pasting Tomb Raider's models too?

Tomb Raider's most important point was not the open world, but a closed world, where they can add extremely difficult puzzles.

Now that I think of it, it is not Tomb Raider the only one who completely lost it, but even Syphon Filter. (I know its old)
Other games are not heard anymore, like Vagrant Story.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
5,157
Likes
1,704
Processor Intel i7 950 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard ASUS P6X58D-E
Cooling Corsair H50 push/pull
Memory Kingston HyperX 1600 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD 7970 OC
Storage Plextor M5P 128GB/WD Black 2x1TB,1x6TB/Seagate 1TB
Display(s) Panasonic TC-L32U3
Case Antec DF-85
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V371 AVR
Power Supply XFX 850w Black Edition
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech K120
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
Yeah I was telling somone on another forum the same. He seems to think Crystal Dynamics can do no wrong lately and wants horses in the next one. I say they are experimenting and struggling to come up with sound ideas that actually fit the TR universe well.
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2007
Messages
681
Likes
83
Processor AMD Phenom II x6 1090T @ 3.8GHz
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth 990FX
Cooling Corsair H80i GTX
Memory Patriot Gamer 2 Series 8GB DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB
Storage 1TB WD Red
Display(s) 1920x1080 HDTV
Case NZXT Phantom 240
Power Supply Corsair CX750M 750w
Software Win7 Professional though I hate it, I want XP back!
Its a new technology, give it time for Christ sake.

And its an improvement over the way hair is done in games since about 2005
I don't care how new it is. People give PhysX crap for dropping framerates 10 FPS when it is generating a bunch of extra stuff on the screen, and no one gives a crap that TressFX is rendering one thing and one thing only and it is killing performance.

And going back to normal looks better, so no it isn't an improvement over the way hair has been done.

Are you even using the patch just released? One of the main things it fixes is excessive TressFX movement and the hair no-clipping you mentioned. Also, Tessselation causes the most FPS drop, not TressFX.
Yes I'm using the latest patch. And I can leave tesselation on and say above 60FPS and it affects everything in the environment. I turn TressFX on and performance tanks and it affects one useless thing in the game. Screw that.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
2,417
Likes
1,332
I don't care how new it is. People give PhysX crap for dropping framerates 10 FPS when it is generating a bunch of extra stuff on the screen, and no one gives a crap that TressFX is rendering one thing and one thing only and it is killing performance.

And going back to normal looks better, so no it isn't an improvement over the way hair has been done.

Yes I'm using the latest patch. And I can leave tesselation on and say above 60FPS and it affects everything in the environment. I turn TressFX on and performance tanks and it affects one useless thing in the game. Screw that.
People give PhysX crap because its only accelerated through CUDA API which only works if you have a certain type of GPU. Plus the effects it acceleratates arent always on screen.
Lara Crofts hair is 99.9% of the time on screen. :rolleyes:

TressFX is DirectCompute which will work on any GPU that supports DirectX 10/11 so if your performance drops blame which ever GPU you have that its not strong enough at the resolution your playing at.

Normal hair is horrible and no differant then the hair seen in games the past decade.

Its like saying low resolution textures are better because high resolution textures slow down my computer and take up more memory.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
5,157
Likes
1,704
Processor Intel i7 950 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard ASUS P6X58D-E
Cooling Corsair H50 push/pull
Memory Kingston HyperX 1600 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD 7970 OC
Storage Plextor M5P 128GB/WD Black 2x1TB,1x6TB/Seagate 1TB
Display(s) Panasonic TC-L32U3
Case Antec DF-85
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V371 AVR
Power Supply XFX 850w Black Edition
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech K120
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
Yes I'm using the latest patch. And I can leave tesselation on and say above 60FPS and it affects everything in the environment. I turn TressFX on and performance tanks and it affects one useless thing in the game. Screw that.
You don't really get an idea of how resource hungry each feature is until you disable them one at a time while running the bench. I did that with TressFX (vs Normal) , SSAO Ultra (vs High), VSync, Precision and Tesselation. The one that caused the lowest min FPS in the benchmark was Tesselation by far. Average FPS doesn't tell the whole story.
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2007
Messages
681
Likes
83
Processor AMD Phenom II x6 1090T @ 3.8GHz
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth 990FX
Cooling Corsair H80i GTX
Memory Patriot Gamer 2 Series 8GB DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB
Storage 1TB WD Red
Display(s) 1920x1080 HDTV
Case NZXT Phantom 240
Power Supply Corsair CX750M 750w
Software Win7 Professional though I hate it, I want XP back!
People give PhysX crap because its only accelerated through CUDA API which only works if you have a certain type of GPU. Plus the effects it acceleratates arent always on screen.
Lara Crofts hair is 99.9% of the time on screen. :rolleyes:

TressFX is DirectCompute which will work on any GPU that supports DirectX 10/11 so if your performance drops blame which ever GPU you have that its not strong enough at the resolution your playing at.

Normal hair is horrible and no differant then the hair seen in games the past decade.

Its like saying low resolution textures are better because high resolution textures slow down my computer and take up more memory.
People constantly complain about PhysX having horrible performance.

And PhysX effects involve the environment, so just because it goes of the screen that doesn't mean it doesn't need to be accelerated, because when it comes back on the screen it has to be in the right location.

And it is nothing like saying low resolution textures are better because high resolution hurts performance.

My argument is multifaceted.

High resolution textures actually make the games look better.

TressFX doesn't make the game look better, I already said that.

It makes her hair look like crap, it looks like Medusa, it looks worse than setting it to normal.

And I'm running a 660Ti, if that isn't strong enough then the technology is worthless.

You don't really get an idea of how resource hungry each feature is until you disable them one at a time while running the bench. I did that with TressFX (vs Normal) , SSAO Ultra (vs High), VSync, Precision and Tesselation. The one that caused the lowest min FPS in the benchmark was Tesselation by far. Average FPS doesn't tell the whole story.
That is fine, but with Tesselation on I can maintain 60 FPS.

When I enable TressFX, even with Tesselation off, any time Lara is on screen the game never goes above 30FPS.

The cut scenes make this obvious.

When another character is talking the framerate is over 60FPS at all times.

The instant the camera goes to Lara the framerate drops below 30.

TressFX is complete crap.

If it kills performance just to render hair, it is useless, period.
 

MxPhenom 216

Corsair Fanboy
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,129
Likes
3,697
Location
Seattle, WA
System Name The Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.2GHZ 1.275v
Motherboard MSi Z97 Gaming 5
Cooling EK Supremacy w/ EK Coolstream PE360
Memory G. Skill Trident X 16Gb (4x4GB) 2400mhz @ 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSi GTX1070 Gaming X 8GB @ 2GHz
Storage Samsung 830 128GB SSD, Crucial MX200 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2x 1TB Partitions)
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 27" 2560 x 1440 PLS @ 100hz
Case Phantek Enthoo Evolv ATX TG
Audio Device(s) MSi Gaming AudioBoost ALC1150 w/ Sennheiser Game Ones
Power Supply Seasonic Flagship Prime Platinum 850
Mouse Steelseries Rival 310 w/ QCK Mass mat
Keyboard Corsair K70 w/ MX Browns and Red Backlit
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 15439
People constantly complain about PhysX having horrible performance.

And PhysX effects involve the environment, so just because it goes of the screen that doesn't mean it doesn't need to be accelerated, because when it comes back on the screen it has to be in the right location.

And it is nothing like saying low resolution textures are better because high resolution hurts performance.

My argument is multifaceted.

High resolution textures actually make the games look better.

TressFX doesn't make the game look better, I already said that.

It makes her hair look like crap, it looks like Medusa, it looks worse than setting it to normal.

And I'm running a 660Ti, if that isn't strong enough then the technology is worthless.



That is fine, but with Tesselation on I can maintain 60 FPS.

When I enable TressFX, even with Tesselation off, any time Lara is on screen the game never goes above 30FPS.

The cut scenes make this obvious.

When another character is talking the framerate is over 60FPS at all times.

The instant the camera goes to Lara the framerate drops below 30.

TressFX is complete crap.

If it kills performance just to render hair, it is useless, period.
Look at your system specs, and maybe try the new beta drivers from NVidia that boost performance in Tomb Raider with TressFX by about 60% on average.

Also TressFX is DirectCompute accelerated. your GTX660ti like my 680 but even worse are weak with DirectCompute which is why performance is hit so hard with it enabled. :shadedshu
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Messages
587
Likes
104
System Name New / Breakin' the Lol
Processor i5 2500k / Athlon64 X2 4200+ (65W)
Motherboard P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3 / Asus M2N4-SLI
Cooling / Air (1 x 250mm, 2 x 120mm, 1 x 90mm)
Memory DDR3-1600 (8GB) / Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC2-6400 (2gb)
Video Card(s) / Visiontek 4870
Storage HD103SJ /
Display(s) Viewsonic 22" VX2240W
Case Xigmatek Midgard II / Thermaltake VA8003SWA
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
People constantly complain about PhysX having horrible performance.

And PhysX effects involve the environment, so just because it goes of the screen that doesn't mean it doesn't need to be accelerated, because when it comes back on the screen it has to be in the right location.

And it is nothing like saying low resolution textures are better because high resolution hurts performance.

My argument is multifaceted.

High resolution textures actually make the games look better.

TressFX doesn't make the game look better, I already said that.

It makes her hair look like crap, it looks like Medusa, it looks worse than setting it to normal.

And I'm running a 660Ti, if that isn't strong enough then the technology is worthless.



That is fine, but with Tesselation on I can maintain 60 FPS.

When I enable TressFX, even with Tesselation off, any time Lara is on screen the game never goes above 30FPS.

The cut scenes make this obvious.

When another character is talking the framerate is over 60FPS at all times.

The instant the camera goes to Lara the framerate drops below 30.

TressFX is complete crap.

If it kills performance just to render hair, it is useless, period.
So far, given the way you write and especially your avatar, I've read all your posts in my head in Cartman's voice. Even if your arguments aren't successful, you are. :rockout: