http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=707&model2=855&chart=296 my question is, I have a 8600gt.. I play the game on 1280x1024 with HDR and in my ntune performance panel I add 2x to my AA and 16AF. I play the game MAXED meaning everything on all shadows all distance and 80+ mods to improve visuals alone including more detailed grass more detailed leaves and further distance viewing. Giving it a LOT MORE quality than before to say the least. I get right around 30FPS in the worst parts of the game sometimes in loading I get 15 for about a half of a second. (I think thats because of my lack of ram)Well according to that list I shouldn't be able to play it hardly at all. Does this chart match anyones cards? or is the chart way off? I have an AMD 3600 x2 overclocked to 2.7. Also checking their benchmarks on pcmark05. I get 5900. That is better than a stock 5600? I don't think so. I just want to know how accurate is that site or if I'm just getting good ratings. As far as I know my friend has the amd 6000 stock he won't overclock it and he destroys my overclocked benchmarks getting 6800 I know I've seen people claiming their 7600gt can run the game maxed out @ 1600x1200 with his amd sempron 3000. but honestly what are people FPS on this game and is there any king of benchmark utility for this game I can run?