1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Toshiba shows off 51GB HD DVD

Discussion in 'News' started by zekrahminator, Jan 15, 2007.

  1. zekrahminator

    zekrahminator McLovin

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,113 (2.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    321
    Location:
    My house.
    Single and double layered HD DVD's can reach 15 and 30GB, respectively. While most experts claim this is more than enough for a 1080p movie along with a ton of goodies, Blu-ray fans have been claiming that the HD DVD is no match for the Blu-ray in terms of space. Toshiba is going to enjoy debunking that theory. They sent a three layered HD DVD to the standards overseer, in hope to get this thing patented. If they succeed in making triple-layered HD DVD's a standard, then HD DVD will officially be able to hold more data than a Blu-ray (double layer Blu-ray holds 50GB). The only problem with the triple-layer HD DVD is that it is currently not compatible with any players...but, then again, neither was Blu-ray.
    [​IMG]

    Source: The Register
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2007
    10 Year Member at TPU
  2. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    14,309 (3.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,207
    ROFL! :roll:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  3. error_f0rce

    error_f0rce New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    942 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Location:
    Wisconsin, USA
    Well, props to them... once they make a player.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  4. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,814 (2.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    This is going to be an interesting battle. Hopefully, they will make faster and cheaper drives that support both formats. Now, if they can come down in price on the media, perhaps $2 a disc, then it will be worth getting now.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  5. Corrosion

    Corrosion New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    821 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    74
    Location:
    Maplewood, Mn
    And i thought Blu-ray was gonna be the norm ... o well ill use eather.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  6. Track

    Track New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    314 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Israel
    Uh.. a single layered Blue-Ray disk can hold 25GB of data. How can three layers hold 50GB?
    And also, a triple-layered HD-DVD can only hold 45GB, so how can Toshiba "magically" make one that is 51GB? Then its not HD-DVD, its HD-DVD+ or something.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  7. zekrahminator

    zekrahminator McLovin

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,113 (2.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    321
    Location:
    My house.
    Don't ask me, ask the news source I got this stuff off of :).
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  8. Nyte New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    185 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Location:
    Toronto ON
    Wait a minute, I'm fairly confident that triple-layer Blu-Ray holds 75 GB. Double-Layer is 50 GB.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  9. cdawall

    cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    23,942 (6.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,075
    Location:
    Houston
    thats correct sounds like a typo to me
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  10. zekrahminator

    zekrahminator McLovin

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,113 (2.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    321
    Location:
    My house.
    I'm sorry then, I must have misread the article :eek:.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  11. Batou1986

    Batou1986

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,885 (0.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    626
    Location:
    Baltimore MD
    i jsut wait for a combo drive before i switch over to the "NEW" formats
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  12. Track

    Track New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    314 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Israel
    We dont like it when ppl bad mouth Blue-Ray! ;)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  13. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    23,253 (5.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,211
    I am sure sony will counter with three layered Blu-Ray discs making them at least 75GB, or more if they also increase the data density per layer.

    On fark you would get a nice RTFA, I guess you got one here too.:toast:

     
    10 Year Member at TPU Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  14. Benpi New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    415 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    This is a stupid battle anyway. In 5 years, everyone will be downloading, or watching 1080 res. on demand.
     
  15. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (1.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,509
    A 3 layer disc is going to be hard to copy from. And should cost double any HD-DVD costs now. If they ever do make a burner for it (for backup software needs) it's going be as slow as a 2x on cd-r
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  16. Lazzer408

    Lazzer408

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,550 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Illinois
    I bet it's less then that. Maybe 2. Everyone is pushing for IPTV and whatnot.
     
  17. xylomn

    xylomn

    Joined:
    May 13, 2006
    Messages:
    661 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Newcastle upon Tyne
    While downloading and on-demand are good sometimes personally I like to own physical copies of what I buy.. I'm just shallow like that :p

    One thing I must question however is wheather we really need 75GB discs atm... no doubt we'll need them in the future but for high def video we need nowhere near this, and if I had that much data to back up I wouldn't do it to a slow, easily damaged disc, I'd do it to a hard drive.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  18. cdawall

    cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    23,942 (6.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,075
    Location:
    Houston
    why not just work on bigger flashdrives that would be better IMO
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  19. overcast New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    737 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    So 5 years we are going to have the infrastructure in place for 1080p streams? If not streaming, how long are we going to have to wait for 30GB to download, and where are we going to store it?

    When people purchase something, they want something tangible. Downloadable movies in any type of respectable quality are a long long long way away.

    P.S. Show me a triple layer Bluray disc that isn't someones dream. Two layers is so close to the surface of the disc as it is, triple will be just silly.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  20. Lazzer408

    Lazzer408

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,550 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Illinois
    I d/l good quality movies all the time. oops... I've said too much. :D
     
  21. overcast New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    737 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    No you don't, you just think you do.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)