"I go fast!1!11!1!"
- Oct 13, 2008
- 21,101 (6.22/day)
- IA, USA
|Processor||Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on|
|Motherboard||MSI Z170A GAMING M7|
|Memory||2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB|
|Video Card(s)||PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI|
|Storage||Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM|
|Display(s)||Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)|
|Case||Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay|
|Audio Device(s)||Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+|
|Power Supply||Enermax Platimax 850w|
|Mouse||SteelSeries Sensei RAW|
|Software||Windows 10 Pro 64-bit|
|Benchmark Scores||Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.|
On topic: Skyrim could benefit a ton from tesselation on all those trees, bushes, flowers, etc. Yet, they didn't because as long as it is playable, people just don't care. The only benefit, really, is higher average FPS.
It boils down to a simple question: is it worth fundamentally changing the engine to support Direct3D 10/10.1/11 features or are we okay with what we can do without? Answer is always the latter unless you commoditize the engine (like Epic and id software).