• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

TSMC N5P 5nm Node Offers 84-87% Transistor Density Gain Over Current 7nm Node

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
38,863 (8.42/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
A WikiChip analysis of TSMC's next-generation 5 nanometer N5P silicon fabrication node estimates a massive 84-87% increase in transistor densities on offer compared to the company's first commercial 7 nm-class node, the N7 (7 nm DUV). The report estimates an 87% transistor-density increase, even though TSMC's own figure is slightly modest, at 84%. TSMC N5P node is expected to commence production later this year. Its precursor, TSMC N5, began risk production earlier this year, with production on the node commencing in April or May, unless derailed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The N5P node provides transistor densities of an estimated 171.3 million transistors per mm² die area, compared to 91.2 mTr/mm² of N7. Apple is expected to be the node's biggest customer in 2020, with the company building its A14-series SoC on it.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,543 (2.49/day)
Location
Home
System Name Orange!
Processor 3570K
Motherboard ASRock z77 Extreme4
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570
Storage Samsung 840 250Gb + Toshiba DT01ACA300 3Tb
Display(s) LG 22EA53VQ
Case NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange
Power Supply Corsair CXM500w
Interesting. Intel is falling further behind in fabrication again?
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
38,863 (8.42/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Interesting. Intel is falling further behind in fabrication again?
Appears so. "Zen 4" will be N5P based and "Genoa" processors are slated for either 2H-2021 or 1H-2022.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
240 (0.08/day)
Location
South-Africa
Processor i5 4670k @ 4.2 Ghz
Motherboard MSi Z87 GD65 Gaming Motherboard
Cooling Zalman CNPS11 Extreme
Memory 16GB DDR3 Corsair Vengeance @ 2400Mhz
Video Card(s) Gainward GTX580 3GB
Storage 250GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster SA950D
Case Corsair 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar D2X
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Platinum
Mouse Razer Mamba Chroma (2015)
Keyboard Corsair K70 MK.2 Low-Profile Rapidfire
Software Microsoft Windows 10 Enterprise 64-bit
This is very impressive.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,820 (0.82/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
Need a meme of intel shitting bricks.
 

ppn

Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
728 (0.42/day)
N16 - "28,8 mTr/mm² " - - 25 mTr real
N7 - "91.2 mTr/mm²" - 40-50 mTr real
N5P estimated 171.3 - 60-70 mTr real


So AMD shrinked their GPU by exactly 1,6, where it should have been 3.2x, so what can we expect from 84-85%. less than 42%.
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
623 (0.17/day)
Location
Michigan
System Name Daves
Processor AMD Ryzen 3900x
Motherboard AsRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Enermax LIQMAX III 360
Memory 32 GiG Team Group B Die 3600
Video Card(s) Powercolor 5700 xt Red Devil
Storage Crucial MX 500 SSD and Intel P660 NVME 2TB for games
Display(s) Acer 144htz 27in. 2560x1440
Case Phanteks P600S
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Corsair RM 750
Mouse EVGA
Keyboard Corsair Strafe
Software Windows 10 Pro
Interesting. Intel is falling further behind in fabrication again?
Seems so. I think Intel should have scrapped 10 nm and maybe even 7 nm and worked on the 5 nm.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
883 (7.18/day)
System Name ARF System 1 (retro build) | Portable 1 (energy efficient and portable)
Processor AMD Athlon 64 4400+ X2 | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Motherboard ASRock 939A790GMH 790GX SATA2 |
Cooling Arctic Freezer 13 | Dual-fan, dual heat-pipe Acer inbuilt
Memory 4 x 1GB DDR-400 | 2 x 8GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Radeon ASUS EAH4670/DI/512MD3 | Radeon RX 560X 4G & Vega 8
Storage ADATA XPG SX900 128GB SATA3@SATA2 SSD | Western Digital Blue 3D NAND M.2 SSD 500GB
Display(s) | LG 24UD58-B & Panasonic TX-50CX670E
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus | 15-inch notebook chassis
Audio Device(s) Superlux HD681 EVO
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X | Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard | Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7U SP1| Windows 10 Pro 2004
Benchmark Scores CPU-Z 17.01.64 - ST: 387.3, MT: 2060.6 CPU-Z 15.01.64 - ST: 2044, MT: 7766
N16 - "28,8 mTr/mm² " - - 25 mTr real
N7 - "91.2 mTr/mm²" - 40-50 mTr real
N5P estimated 171.3 - 60-70 mTr real
Those "real" numbers are for the average calculated die transistor density.
While the "estimated" is for all types of memory and cache structures.

Going denser means harder to achieve the clock targets, and by default the designs go less dense in order to keep the clocks higher.

You can have a structure of few transistors ticking at insane clocks.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
2,385 (1.97/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
N16 - "28,8 mTr/mm² " - - 25 mTr real
N7 - "91.2 mTr/mm²" - 40-50 mTr real
N5P estimated 171.3 - 60-70 mTr real
These numbers are a mix of things.

All these production processes have a high density and high performance variations. Manufacturer quoted numbers are obviously high density ones. High performance variation is about 30% less dense. Almost all computer CPUs and GPUs are made on the high performance variation (for obvious reasons), high density tends to be mostly mobile chips.

Edit:
Also, @ARF has a good point that logic is less dense than manufacturer quoted numbers that are usually a variation of memory (SRAM seems to be common). This causes additional reduction in density.
From what both AMD and Intel have said about this, IO seems to be another pain point for scaling as it does not scale as well (probably for obvious reasons).

N5P node is expected to commence production later this year.
N5P is expected to commence risk production in Q2 2020.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
212 (0.07/day)
TSMC's 7nm numbers quoted in the post are for the "(mobile) high density" variant of the process, AMD chips use the "high performance" variant which has way lower density, approximately 2/3rds (estimated numbers for each are ~96.5MTr/mm2 and 66.7MTr/mm^2)
 

ppn

Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
728 (0.42/day)
These numbers are a mix of things.

All these production processes have a high density and high performance variations. Manufacturer quoted numbers are obviously high density ones. High performance variation is about 30% less dense. Almost all computer CPUs and GPUs are made on the high performance variation (for obvious reasons), high density tends to be mostly mobile chips.
Both Samsung and TSMC 7NM performance nodes are estiated around 77 mTt, average transistor in RX 5700 - 40 mTr, only 33 mTr difference. It just doesn't deliver.
16NM performance is 28, average transistor in RX 580 - 25 mTr, only 3 mTr difference.

30% less dense means 65, so the ZEN2 comes really close with 50 mTr because of the L3 cache cells that must be the only 77 mTr element in there.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
212 (0.07/day)
Both Samsung and TSMC 7NM performance nodes are estiated around 77 mTt, average transistor in RX 5700 - 40 mTr, only 33 mTr difference. It just doesn't deliver.
16NM performance is 28, average transistor in RX 580 - 25 mTr, only 3 mTr difference.

30% less dense means 65, so the ZEN2 comes really close with 50 mTr because of the L3 cache cells that must be the only 77 mTr element in there.
Where did you get the 77 MTr for 7NM performance nodes? TSMCs is 66.7 MTr, not 77 MTr, and Samsung AFAIK reports only one 7nm node, the 7nm EUV which is 95.3 MTr, next node up is 8nm with 61.2 MTr
 
Top