Unigine Superposition Benchmark - post your results!

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

4.4 ghz CPU..................................................................................................................................................2.93 ghz CPU

BOLLOCKS ....i forgot to check if the CPU boosted to 3.3ghz


AAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh

EDIT
i checked. It didnt turbo.

 

[jboydgolfer]

Unigine has never been very good when I comes to reading actual frequencies

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

Unigine has never been very good when I comes to reading actual frequencies

and o/s

 

[tvamos]

1080 medium
8270 - tvamos / i5 4670k 4.2GHz / AMD RX 470 Nitro+ 8GB @ 1410MHz / 2100MHz

1080 high
5854 - tvamos / i5 4670k 4.2GHz / AMD RX 470 Nitro+ 8GB @ 1410MHz / 2100MHz

1080 extreme
2524 - tvamos / i5 4670k 4.2GHz / AMD RX 470 Nitro+ 8GB @ 1410MHz / 2100MHz

4K optimized
3524 - tvamos / i5 4670k 4.2GHz / AMD RX 470 Nitro+ 8GB @ 1410MHz / 2100MHz

8K optimized
1428 - tvamos / i5 4670k 4.2GHz / AMD RX 470 Nitro+ 8GB @ 1410MHz / 2100MHz

 

[EarthDog]

Unigine has never been very good when I comes to reading actual frequencies

Which is why these threads should require gpuz and cpuz..

Anyhoo, oddities aside, here are 10 offerings. 5 from the 1080/6950x(4.0GHz) and 5 from 1080ti/7700k(4.2GHz). The 6950x should run this at 4.4 GHz, and the 7700K I am sure will do 5.1 on this...

1080p MED
17722 - Earthdog / 6950x 4.0 GHz / 1080 FTW2 @ 2101MHz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 5812 MHz


1080p HIGH
12798 - Earthdog / 6950x 4.0 GHz / 1080 FTW2 @ 2101MHz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 5812 MHz



1080p EXT
4692 - Earthdog / 6950x 4.0 GHz / 1080 FTW2 @ 2101MHz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 5812 MHz



4K
7674 - Earthdog / 6950x 4.0 GHz / 1080 FTW2 @ 2101MHz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 5812 MHz



8K
3514 - Earthdog / 6950x 4.0 GHz / 1080 FTW2 @ 2101MHz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 5812 MHz




MSI GTX 1080Ti Gaming X Results:

1080p MED
22616 - Earthdog / 7700k 4.2 GHz / 1080Ti Gaming X @ 2038MHz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 6024 MHz



1080p HIGH
16364 - Earthdog / 7700k 4.2 GHz / 1080Ti Gaming X @ 2038MHz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 6024 MHz



1080p EXT
6126 - Earthdog / 7700k 4.2 GHz / 1080Ti Gaming X @ 2038MHz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 6024 MHz



4K
9830 - Earthdog / 7700k 4.2 GHz / 1080Ti Gaming X @ 2038MHz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 6024 MHz



8K
4525 - Earthdog / 7700k 4.2 GHz / 1080Ti Gaming X @ 2038MHz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 6024 MHz





More suggestions and other musings............

* Users should post thumbnail images instead of big jenky images...
* That 1080 EXT test is a killer for the resolution... sits between 4K and 8K...
* This many resolution options is DUMB... at least for the poor OP that has to sort through all this garbage. I literally have one benchmark and setting and about 1/4 bork the formatting/requirements in some way... you may want to prune this back, or you will burn out quick and so will the thread because it won't be updated.

 

[johnspack]

Not sure why such a low score.. here's mine at medium...
Cpu at 4.7Ghz. Video card at 1550/4000

 

[MrGenius]

6949 - MrGenius / i5-3570K 5.0 GHz / MSI R9 280X Gaming 3GB @ 1225 MHz / 1850 MHz

5015 - MrGenius / i5-3570K 5.0 GHz / MSI R9 280X Gaming 3GB @ 1225 MHz / 1850 MHz

2195 - MrGenius / i5-3570K 5.0 GHz / MSI R9 280X Gaming 3GB @ 1225 MHz / 1850 MHz

3063 - MrGenius / i5-3570K 5.0 GHz / MSI R9 280X Gaming 3GB @ 1225 MHz / 1850 MHz

376 - MrGenius / i5-3570K 5.0 GHz / MSI R9 280X Gaming 3GB @ 1225 MHz / 1850 MHz

Yeah...that's a lot of scores to tackle. I would ditch 1080p Medium and High at least. DPI Scaling also pretty much makes 720p Low irrelevant too(no "need" to run it due to monitor resolution). So I would disallow that as well. I'm somewhat surprised nobody's submitted any 720p Low scores yet. Since the current rules state "any preset". BTW...technically Custom is a "preset" too.

EDIT: Just realized I SMOKED a GTX 780 Ti at 8K Optimized. How the hell is that possible?

 

[johnspack]

This test likes vram speed. Just upped my vram to 4010:

 

[cdawall]

SOOOO close to beating that titan X pascal with the fury's only one of the cards will unlock to fury x so didn't bother with that and they clock like garbage. The 980Ti however is pretty dope for a single card lol


6481 - cdawall / i7 4770K - 4.4 GHz / XFX/Asus Fury 1120 MHz / 500 MHz

4229 - cdawall / i7 5960X - 4.4 GHz / EVGA GTX 980Ti 1490-1509MHz / 4106MHz

 

[Slizzo]

Superposition 1080P Medium

17126 - Slizzo / i7 6800K 4.2 GHz / GTX 1080 @ 2050 MHz / 5400 MHz



Superposition 1080P Exreme

4445 - Slizzo / i7 6800K 4.2 GHz / GTX 1080 @ 2050 MHz / 5400 MHz



Superposition 4K Optimized

7140 - Slizzo / i7 6800K 4.2 GHz / GTX 1080 @ 2050 MHz / 5400 MHz

 

[BarbaricSoul]

not bad for 3 generations old. 3930k @3.8GHz and a GTX780ti @ 1150core/3500mem

 

[lyra]

6316 - Lyra / CPU 4.0 GHz / GPU @ ACTUAL 1474 MHz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 4101 MHz

im pretty happy with that i think

 

[Athlonite]

Please follow the rules. (#5) I need the informations in the correct format.

Enter in the correct format please.

Follow rule #5 please.

GPU Memory clock please, not DDR3/DDR4 clocks.

Done.


Updated!

I would but it wasn't an preset bench I have been getting an error trying to run them so I had to use custom run instead hence why I didn't think it fair to put my score in the list

 

[Kanan]

4798 - Reny900 / CPU i5 3450 3.1 GHz / GPU @ ACTUAL 900 MHz | Memory clock 1250 MHz - 1080p Medium

1550 - Reny900 / CPU i5 3450 3.1 GHz / GPU @ ACTUAL 9300 MHz / Memory clock 1300 MHz - 1080p Extreme

Need more information on the GPU. And please have a look at Rule #5 again.

My score with the CPU @ 4.8Ghz and the GPU 2088/5524Mhz

The good old GTX 760
View attachment 86322 View attachment 86323

Not sure why such a low score.. here's mine at medium...
Cpu at 4.7Ghz. Video card at 1550/4000

This test likes vram speed. Just upped my vram to 4010:

not bad for 3 generations old. 3930k @3.8GHz and a GTX780ti @ 1150core/3500mem

All of the above: Please follow Rule #5.

Rule #5 got also updated with different formating. Please reread.

Updated (done work on outdated formating mostly myself -.-)!

 

[cdawall]

Need more information on the GPU. And please have a look at Rule #5 again.








All of the above aside from Reny900: Please follow Rule #5.

Rule #5 got also updated with different formating. Please reread.

Updated (done work on outdated formating mostly myself -.-)!

My 980ti score is single gpu sli doesn't work...lol

 

[Kanan]

My 980ti score is single gpu sli doesn't work...lol

Corrected.

 

[Kanan]

17980 - Live Or Die - i7 5930K @ 4.4GHz / EVGA GTX 1080 Ti FE @ 1752/1439

6017 - Live Or Die - i7 5930K @ 4.4GHz / EVGA GTX 1080 Ti FE @ 1752/1439

Look at rule #5 for correct formating please.

@ll: formating got changed because the data system is used now instead of simply writing it down.

 

[LiveOrDie]

Look at rule #5 for correct formating please.

@all: formating got changed because the data system is used now instead of simply writing it down.

Ill re-post later on with the correct format and CPUz/GPUz along side.

 

[_MissBehave_]

3810. _MissBehave_ CPU-4.4GHz. GPU- 1441Mhz. GPU RAM-1752.8MHz. *Fixed*

 

[Kanan]

Ill re-post later on with the correct format and CPUz/GPUz along side.

Aight.

My results.

Please follow the rules.

 

[_MissBehave_]

Aight.

Please follow the rules.

Fixed

 

[RejZoR]

Using 4K or 8K optimized shaders makes better performance than using Extreme shaders preset. I don't get it, one would think 4K and 8K would mak eit even more demanding...

 

[Kanan]

Fixed

Well it was a mess, but I fixed it myself - just this time.

Using 4K or 8K optimized shaders makes better performance than using Extreme shaders preset. I don't get it, one would think 4K and 8K would mak eit even more demanding...

I think 1080p Extreme has way higher settings than 4K Optimized, that's why. Resolution isn't everything.

 

[RejZoR]

Well, resolution is just that. The amount of pixels you get during rendering phase of the wireframe models with textures and effects. You could take Quake 1 and run it at 8K if engine allowed. It really has no connection to the game itself. Shaders however, that has everything to do with it. They are "static" thing, you can't just upscale them like you can resolution.

I just wonder what makes 4K Optimized shaders to be less demanding than normal Extreme. Are they optimized in terms that they make less load when applied to 4K resolution because something changes when rendering that at 4K? Dunno, coz visually, I couldn't tell a difference...

 

[Melvis]

5127 | Melvis | AMD FX-8350 @ Stock | ASUS GTX 970 @ 1089 | 1753

1909 | Melvis | AMD FX-8350 @ Stock | ASUS GTX 970 @ 1089 | 1753