- Joined
- Aug 6, 2017
- Messages
- 7,412 (3.02/day)
- Location
- Poland
System Name | Purple rain |
---|---|
Processor | 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v |
Motherboard | Zee 490 Aorus Elite |
Cooling | Noctua D15S |
Memory | 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel |
Video Card(s) | RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio |
Storage | SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB |
Display(s) | Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG |
Case | P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans |
Audio Device(s) | K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless |
Power Supply | Superflower Leadex Gold 850W |
Mouse | G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest |
Keyboard | HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker |
Software | Windows 10 |
Benchmark Scores | A LOT |
what's so surprising to you ? do you want ryzen to get worse performance then sure, oc it.5ghz 8700k vs stock 2700x?
from tpu's review
We set a voltage of 1.4 V, which is in line with what a good air cooler can handle, and increased frequencies step by step. The maximum stable overclock ended up at 4.2 GHz. Since the Ryzen 2700X boosts up to 4.3 GHz out of the box, which is higher than our manual overclock, many, especially low-threaded benchmarks show a performance loss after overclocking. This is as expected due to the relatively small OC and AMD's good use of the processor's boost potential.
if the OP has the money for 9900k he should go for it. 9700k would be a great choice too.