• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

VIA Launches VIA Nano Processor Family

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
46,211 (9.51/day)
Likes
13,701
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name Daddy Long Legs
Processor Ryzen R7 1700, 3.9GHz 1.375v
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming PRO carbon
Cooling Fractal Celsius S24 (Silent fans, meh pump)
Memory 16GB 2133 generic @ 2800
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS modded to Gaming Z - faster and solved black screen bugs!)
Storage 1TB Intel SSD Pro 6000p (60TB USB3 storage)
Display(s) Samsung 4K 40" HDTV (UA40KU6000WXXY) / 27" Qnix 2K 110Hz
Case Fractal Design R5. So much room, so quiet...
Audio Device(s) Pioneer VSX-519V + Yamaha YHT-270 / sennheiser HD595/518 + Corsair Void RGB
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G403 + KKmoon desk-sized mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
#26
i've always had bad luck with via chipset motherboards (nearly always driver related) but these low power systems do intruige... 99% of the time, i use my main big rig simply for anime. I'd love to get a media capable PC for ultra low power use, with blu ray capabilities (a standalone player cant do it, as i also have a crapload of avi/MKV files)

I guess my next build, will be a pure media system with native HDMI... hehe. and i will definately be looking at these via's as a base - that chart showed isaiah, is that the nano? or is the nano even faster again (they mention 4x faster in the press release)
 
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
490 (0.14/day)
Likes
29
#27
the driver problems in my exp only effect systems that arent using via cpu's, 100% via platforms tend to have no problems like amd/intel via setups did/do
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
6,377 (1.53/day)
Likes
984
System Name ICE-QUAD // ICE-CRUNCH
Processor Q6600 // 2x Xeon 5472
Memory 2GB DDR // 8GB FB-DIMM
Video Card(s) HD3850-AGP // FireGL 3400
Display(s) 2 x Samsung 204Ts = 3200x1200
Audio Device(s) Audigy 2
Software Windows Server 2003 R2 as a Workstation now migrated to W10 with regrets.
#28
I have a lot of experience with VIA chipsets in mini ITX format. Used to build quite a few of them for NAS, mini-server, and productivity workstations.

However, I junked them and replaced them with Intel Dothan, due to the fact that the performance of the dothan was SO MUCH better, and the net total power consumption, incl. HDD, chipset, etc. was not a lot different. With the Dothan you can run any app., dual screens, video, even encode. With the VIA they were really a pain as a sit-and-use-it PC, although fine for NAS, simple server, etc. TBH, the old VIA couldnt really cope with running MS Office. With the Dothans you can photoshop and more.

***
LOL
***

I just ran CrystalMark2004R3 on my PC for comparison.

ALU 46,545
FPU 56,159

I'll run the benchmarks on the Dothan box later, and add them to this post. Unfortunately I cant run them on the old VIA boxes... they've been decommissioned.



If the new VIA nano matches the Dothan, or more, then great. I'd be very interested.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
243 (0.07/day)
Likes
46
Location
Antwerp, Belgium
Processor Intel Xeon X5650 @ 3.6Ghz - 1.2v
Motherboard Gigabyte G1.Assassin
Cooling Thermalright True Spirit 120
Memory 12GB DDR3 @ PC1600
Video Card(s) nVidia GeForce GTX 780 3GB
Storage 256GB Samsung 840 Pro + 3TB + 3TB + 2TB
Display(s) HP ZR22w
Case Antec P280
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DS
Power Supply Antec HCG-620M
Software Windows 7 x64
#29
I have a lot of experience with VIA chipsets in mini ITX format. Used to build quite a few of them for NAS, mini-server, and productivity workstations.

However, I junked them and replaced them with Intel Dothan, due to the fact that the performance of the dothan was SO MUCH better, and the net total power consumption, incl. HDD, chipset, etc. was not a lot different. With the Dothan you can run any app., dual screens, video, even encode. With the VIA they were really a pain as a sit-and-use-it PC, although fine for NAS, simple server, etc. TBH, the old VIA couldnt really cope with running MS Office. With the Dothans you can photoshop and more.

***
LOL
***

I just ran CrystalMark2003R4 on my PC for comparison.

ALU 46,545
FPU 56,159

I'll run the benchmarks on the Dothan box later, and add them to this post. Unfortunately I cant run them on the old VIA boxes... they've been decommissioned.



If the new VIA nano matches the Dothan, or more, then great. I'd be very interested.
Can you post CrystalMark2004R3 results so they would be comparable!
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
6,377 (1.53/day)
Likes
984
System Name ICE-QUAD // ICE-CRUNCH
Processor Q6600 // 2x Xeon 5472
Memory 2GB DDR // 8GB FB-DIMM
Video Card(s) HD3850-AGP // FireGL 3400
Display(s) 2 x Samsung 204Ts = 3200x1200
Audio Device(s) Audigy 2
Software Windows Server 2003 R2 as a Workstation now migrated to W10 with regrets.
#30
Last edited: