• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

want opinions on 120-144Hz monitors

Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
4,481 (2.09/day)
Likes
3,640
Location
Boca Raton, Florida
System Name natr0n-PC
Processor Phenom II X6 1100T @ 3.7 GHz - NB 3.0 GHz | Xeon E3-1290
Motherboard MSI 970 Gaming | Asus Sabertooth Z77
Cooling TRUE 120 |Deep Cool Assassin
Memory Gskill Ripjaws X - 16GB DDR3 (4x4GB)
Video Card(s) MSI 7970 Twin Frozr III BE OC - 1100/1500
Storage Crucial MX300 525GB + Multiple Mechs
Display(s) SyncMaster 2343BWX 23" 2048x1152 / Dell 1909W 19" 1440x900
Case Sunbeam Transformer Silver - frame is built like a tank
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Extreme Music | X-Fi Titanium - Bookshelf system
Power Supply Corsair TX650 v1
Software Windows XP/7/8.1/10
Benchmark Scores Xeon E3-1290 cpuz world record
#1
I'm interested in getting one.
I would like to know who has one and your opinions/experience with them.
This is in relation to PC gaming btw.
:)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
175 (0.11/day)
Likes
35
System Name Parts Arriving Now...
Processor Intel i7-4770k
Motherboard Asus Maximus VI Formula
Cooling Noctua u14s w/push-pull
Memory Corsair Vengeance Pro 16gb 1866
Video Card(s) 2x EVGA GTX 780ti Superclocked
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256gb, WD black 2TB
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 LED Evolution II 1440p
Case Corsair 750D
Audio Device(s) Creative Soundblaster X-FI xtrememusic
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Software Window 7 Ultimate
Benchmark Scores n/a, system being built this week
#2
I don't have one (yet) but the biggest thing is to make sure you understand the downsides of a TN panel. If you currently have one then you won't have a problem, however, if you have an IPS panel you're going to see a pretty significant drop in picture quality.

Here are some of the main points:

1) max resolution is usually 1920x1080, you won't find 1900x1200 or 2650x1440 unless you go to an IPS panel. Not a big deal if you aren't currently over 1080p.

2) most of the current selections are matte finish, if you have a glossy panel now you're going to be very disappointed as most of the anti-glare finishes are pretty heavy.

As for the 120hz itself, it makes a TREMENDOUS difference in gameplay. The picture refreshes twice as fast so that means there is significantly less lag between frames and even if you aren't above 60fps you will see a smoother picture. Most people don't realize how much framerate varies even if it looks to be stable because they display average framerate not realtime. If you want the technical nitty gritty a 60hz monitor has a lag of 16ms between each frame no matter how many FPS your video card is outputting, a 120hz cuts that in half to 8ms. You'll see the most benefit above 60fps, but even below that you can see some benefit because frames aren't generated evenly by the graphics card. IE: If you video card generates 60 frames in a second it doesn't always generate them 16ms apart, you might get half the frames twice as fast and half the frames twice as slow. That's why 120hz is ALWAYS better, because the frames that do arrive quicker will be displayed twice as fast as a 60hz monitor. Anyone who tells you 120hz only matters above 60fps isn't worth listening to because they don't understand the technology.

With that being said, running at 120fps @ 120hz is the way to go. For gameplay turning down the settings a little bit (1080p @ high instead of ultra) is better than maxxing out AA and the other graphical goodies. You'll enjoy the gameplay a lot more if your framerate is higher.

If you want a 24" (the sweetspot for 1080p resolution) I'd look at the Asus VG248QE, the anti-glare is pretty bad (not Dell bad, but still bad) but if you currently have a matte monitor you probably won't notice. It's a 144hz screen (i'd run at 120hz which is more reasonable for framerate, you can't really notice above 120hz anyway) and it has a good stand/bezel, is great for picture once you calibrate (for a TN panel) and has no input lag to speak of with a blazing fast 1ms response GTG. For gaming it is probably the best on the market. Early next year they are re-releasing it with the newly announced nVidia G-Sync too, it's currently around $279 and the re-release will be $399.


Edit: If you have a dual GPU (think dual 780 GTX) setup the other option to consider if you are ok with a bit of risk is one of the Korean IPS panels that you can overclock to 120hz. The QNIX or XSTAR 2710, the Overlord TempestOC or the Yamasaki Catleap 2B are all 1440p (2650x1440) IPS/PLS panels that come in glossy/matte finishes and can be overclocked. The risk is as follows:

1) most of the panels overclock well but it is not 100%. Most of the people I've seen post were able to get to at least 96hz (which is considerably better than 60hz) and a good portion got to 110-120, but you might not get one that goes all the way to 120hz without artifacts. It's not a huge gamble, but keep it in mind.

2) most of these panels are ones that were declined by QC by Apple, Samsung and LG. They are A and A- panels instead of A+, that means there is a slightly higher chance of backlight bleed or dead pixels. With that being said, at 2650x1440 even a couple dead pixels are almost un-noticable because you have a couple million extra pixels on the screen above 1080 and they are much smaller. The backlight bleed thing is a bigger concern, a lot of panels come with some backlight bleed because the bezel is cheap and they don't do a very good job of seating the panel. A lot of people have been able to open up the monitor and fix it with a bit of electrical tape to push the monitor into place more security, but if you don't want to open your panel you might end up with some bleed.

3) pretty much anyone you buy these monitors from has no warranty support. If it shows up DOA you'll have no problem getting a replacement, but if some pixels die within the first year you will have a harder time getting a replacement because these sellers are shipping them from Korea. This can be mitigated though, you can buy them on Amazon/Newegg if you watch for the right model to be available and if you really want to protect yourself you can buy a Squaretrade warranty for 50-60 dollars that will give you replacement cost back for 3 years if it breaks.

4) if your machine is not VERY powerful you will not be able to run your games at 1440p with a decent framerate. These panels only have dual link DVI and no scaler, so you cannot run in another resolution without having issues. I would honestly only recommend going this route if you have a beastly machine and the 300-400 dollars one of these would cost is completely disposable to you. If it isn't, then I'd recommend just going with the Asus I mentioned before, which is a totally reasonable monitor.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
1,205 (0.41/day)
Likes
364
Location
The Netherlands
System Name PC || Laptop
Processor AMD FX-8350 @ 4,8GHz || i7 6700HQ
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth 990FX || default
Cooling Corsair H100i Push-Pull|| Stock
Memory Samsung 30nm 4x4GB @ 1930MHz|| 2x8GB LVDDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) AMD R9 290 @ 1060MHz / 1600MHz || Nvidia Geforce 960M
Display(s) Samsung S23A750D 120Hz + others|| 15,6" 1080P
Case Corsair 500R Fans Galore ||
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX/XD ||
Power Supply Corsair AX860i || 120Watt 19V OEM adaptor
Software Win 10 64bit || Win 10 64bit
#3
as a 120Hz screen user, I can say it definitely makes the difference, and if you have the money I'd go for it!

With my screen I however also tried out lightboost, and I can say it also makes a very big difference. Its hard to explain easily, but it basically means that instead of images being slightly blurry when they're moving on the screen, the image stays crystal clear. It really makes the difference between watching a computer screen, and having the idea you're watching a scene play out. Even with the ghetto way I tried it out on my screen resulting in sub-optimal colors and a bad white balance it was superior in gaming by a mile.

Normally you can only use lightboost with Nvidia cards. However, with a tool found here, you can also use lightboost with AMD cards on lightboost enabled monitors. (not sure if this is "legal" though, everyone feel free to comment).
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
922 (0.28/day)
Likes
281
Location
Akron, OH
System Name Main Rig
Processor Athlon 5350
Motherboard AsRock mITX
Memory 4gb
Storage 120gb Kingston HyperX SSD
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster 740N
Power Supply Corsair 430 watt
#4
I would hold off on buying one. Nvidia has just announced new G-Sync gaming monitor technology that looks promising.
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
1,205 (0.41/day)
Likes
364
Location
The Netherlands
System Name PC || Laptop
Processor AMD FX-8350 @ 4,8GHz || i7 6700HQ
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth 990FX || default
Cooling Corsair H100i Push-Pull|| Stock
Memory Samsung 30nm 4x4GB @ 1930MHz|| 2x8GB LVDDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) AMD R9 290 @ 1060MHz / 1600MHz || Nvidia Geforce 960M
Display(s) Samsung S23A750D 120Hz + others|| 15,6" 1080P
Case Corsair 500R Fans Galore ||
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX/XD ||
Power Supply Corsair AX860i || 120Watt 19V OEM adaptor
Software Win 10 64bit || Win 10 64bit
#5
I would hold off on buying one. Nvidia has just announced new G-Sync gaming monitor technology that looks promising.
He doesn't have an Nvidia card though
 
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
175 (0.11/day)
Likes
35
System Name Parts Arriving Now...
Processor Intel i7-4770k
Motherboard Asus Maximus VI Formula
Cooling Noctua u14s w/push-pull
Memory Corsair Vengeance Pro 16gb 1866
Video Card(s) 2x EVGA GTX 780ti Superclocked
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256gb, WD black 2TB
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 LED Evolution II 1440p
Case Corsair 750D
Audio Device(s) Creative Soundblaster X-FI xtrememusic
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Software Window 7 Ultimate
Benchmark Scores n/a, system being built this week
#6
I would hold off on buying one. Nvidia has just announced new G-Sync gaming monitor technology that looks promising.
They also have said you can buy the board and mod your existing monitor, so I'm assuming it's basically a plug and play module that will fit inside the current bezel. It's actually cheaper that way too since you can pick up the Asus VG248QE for $279 and the mod is $100 but the "new" version with G-Sync is going to be $399. Honestly, while I think G-Sync sounds cool, I wouldn't be waiting until next year for a new monitor unless that was already my timeframe.
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
964 (0.42/day)
Likes
554
Location
Porto
System Name No name / Purple Haze
Processor Phenom II 1100T @ 3.8Ghz / Pentium 4 3.4 EE Gallatin @ 3.825Ghz
Motherboard MSI 970 Gaming/ Abit IC7-MAX3
Cooling CM Hyper 212X / Scythe Andy Samurai Master (CPU) - Modded Ati Silencer 5 rev. 2 (GPU)
Memory 8GB GEIL GB38GB2133C10ADC + 8GB G.Skill F3-14900CL9-4GBXL / 2x1GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC4000
Video Card(s) Asus R9 Fury X Strix (4096 SP's/1050 Mhz)/ PowerColor X850XT PE @ (600/1230) AGP + (HD3850 AGP)
Storage Samsung 250 GB / WD Caviar 160GB
Display(s) Benq XL2411T
Audio Device(s) motherboard / Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer Fatal1ty Pro + Front panel
Power Supply Tagan BZ 900W / Corsair HX620w
Mouse Zowie AM
Keyboard Qpad MK-50
Software Windows 7 Pro 64Bit / Windows XP
Benchmark Scores 64CU Fury: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11269229 / X850XT PE http://www.3dmark.com/3dm05/5532432
#7
I have been using 120Hz since Samsung 2233RZ came out. I am using the BenQ XL2411T atm. Absolutely recommend 120Hz, specially if you like fast paced games like the quake series.