• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Warzone fps increase with Ryzen 9 5900HX / 3070 130W laptop

crypto5

New Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2021
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
thanks for sharing the results. I'm going to upgrade the ram to 32g as well!
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
258 (0.05/day)
System Name ASUS ROG Strix G17 G713QR-HG022T
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
Motherboard G713QR
Cooling Liquid Metal
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 2x16GB 3200MHz CL22 1.2v (F4-3200C22D-32GRS)
Video Card(s) NVIDIA RTX 3070 130W
Storage HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
Display(s) 17.3" FHD 300MHz 3ms 100% sRGB (+External 1080p 144Hz)
Power Supply 240W power-brick
Mouse Deltaco DM210
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores CINEBENCH R20: CPU 5442, Single Core 589 - Unigine Superposition Extreme: 7103, Medium: 20821
OK, Season 3 is here with 80's version of the map, but I was more interested in DLSS. Tested briefly and didn't like what I saw, even DLSS Quality looked blurry, got 141 fps in the first round. 2nd round I disabled DLSS and visited same areas (near Downtown) and got 145 fps with more clarity, still there is a yellowish tint to the image I kinda still think is a blur/smear LOL . Both runs gave really great GPU usage, 95.5% but GPU power was lower than the usual ~112W, 108W in S03. All with RWC=5, 2x16GB, normal settings, internal monitor. 3rd run was with RWC=4 and 133 Render Resolution, giving closest to 1440p rez: could say it's 99% GPU usage, but still "only" 116 W, could imagine 125W from 99% usage. Balcony door and a window open, fans at max, GPU 66C :)


EDIT: 4th run was same as 3rd run but with RWC=6...it was a short run but FPS was the same, CPU watts increased some, GPU watts lowered some, BUT: I felt input/mouse lag!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
258 (0.05/day)
System Name ASUS ROG Strix G17 G713QR-HG022T
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
Motherboard G713QR
Cooling Liquid Metal
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 2x16GB 3200MHz CL22 1.2v (F4-3200C22D-32GRS)
Video Card(s) NVIDIA RTX 3070 130W
Storage HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
Display(s) 17.3" FHD 300MHz 3ms 100% sRGB (+External 1080p 144Hz)
Power Supply 240W power-brick
Mouse Deltaco DM210
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores CINEBENCH R20: CPU 5442, Single Core 589 - Unigine Superposition Extreme: 7103, Medium: 20821
Wow ! Connected the external monitor and ran Warzone, ~17 fps more (~12%) than with internal monitor, first time I've seen this on regular BR :)



 
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
258 (0.05/day)
System Name ASUS ROG Strix G17 G713QR-HG022T
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
Motherboard G713QR
Cooling Liquid Metal
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 2x16GB 3200MHz CL22 1.2v (F4-3200C22D-32GRS)
Video Card(s) NVIDIA RTX 3070 130W
Storage HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
Display(s) 17.3" FHD 300MHz 3ms 100% sRGB (+External 1080p 144Hz)
Power Supply 240W power-brick
Mouse Deltaco DM210
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores CINEBENCH R20: CPU 5442, Single Core 589 - Unigine Superposition Extreme: 7103, Medium: 20821
I tested 133 Render resoultion on 1080p again, should be the same as 1440p and 100 Render resolution.
All the same settings as two post above (2x16GB, normal settings, hwacc etc) but with External monitor and+150/+300 overclock on GPU:

13 fps more (nearly 11%) - a 20 minute run

 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
258 (0.05/day)
System Name ASUS ROG Strix G17 G713QR-HG022T
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
Motherboard G713QR
Cooling Liquid Metal
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 2x16GB 3200MHz CL22 1.2v (F4-3200C22D-32GRS)
Video Card(s) NVIDIA RTX 3070 130W
Storage HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
Display(s) 17.3" FHD 300MHz 3ms 100% sRGB (+External 1080p 144Hz)
Power Supply 240W power-brick
Mouse Deltaco DM210
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores CINEBENCH R20: CPU 5442, Single Core 589 - Unigine Superposition Extreme: 7103, Medium: 20821
So I installed the original 2x8GB RAM and wanted to compare them with 2x16GB, also with and without external monitor, took me hours and Warzone was patched like 5 times, from old to new, to old, to new... but I think all the short runs were with the newer patch.

West Downtown area, close to Stadium, from this location it takes 18 seconds to run to the roundabout. I aim, don't move mouse after that, press H once to run continiously.

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QR-HG022T - AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, RTX 3070 8GB 115+15W (stock clocks, my normal graphics settings in Warzone, DLSS disabled)

2x8GB original memory, internal monitor: 117.5 FPS (100%)
2x8GB original memory, external monitor: 136.1 FPS (116%)
2x16GB RipJaws memory, internal monitor: 138.1 FPS (118%)
2x16GB RipJaws memory, internal monitor: 144.3 FPS (123%) rerun with RendererWorkerCount = 5 and disabled hardware accelerating GPU, stock clocks, high GPU usage, 96-97%
2x16GB RipJaws memory, external monitor: 162.2 FPS (138%) avg FPS was inconsistent, were 150, 154, 156, 161 and best run was 162 FPS, for that I disabled hardware accelerated GPU in Windows Games and used RWC=5

Before each test I did CPU and Memory benches to check all were performing well (AIDA64 Extreme CPU Queen and Memory Latency in particular, but also CPU-Z bench as well as CINEBENCH R20 Multi)
Many times scores were lower than expected, then I shut down and let laptop cool a while. I had only +16C on the table and +9-10C on the floor :D

With 2x8GB original memory and internal monitor the CPU Time (displayed by Warzone) was high, 9ms when GPU Time was 6ms.
The two tests after were CPU Time 7ms and GPU Time 6ms.
Last test showed a balanced 6ms on both. EDIT // Added another run with 2x16GB and internal monitor

BTW: If you're gonna swap memory, do it with only internal monitor connected. When I had swapped from 2x8GB to 2x16GB none of the monitors showed image. I had to put back 2x8GB again to get image, then deselect external monitor (Fn+F9) , and swap mem after that.


 
Last edited:

Rhegion

New Member
Joined
May 17, 2021
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
So I installed the original 2x8GB RAM and wanted to compare them with 2x16GB, also with and without external monitor, took me hours and Warzone was patched like 5 times, from old to new, to old, to new... but I think all the short runs were with the newer patch.

West Downtown area, close to Stadium, from this location it takes 18 seconds to run to the roundabout. I aim, don't move mouse after that, press H once to run continiously.

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QR-HG022T - AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, RTX 3070 8GB 115+15W (stock clocks, my normal graphics settings in Warzone, DLSS disabled)

2x8GB original memory, internal monitor: 117.5 FPS (100%)
2x8GB original memory, external monitor: 136.1 FPS (116%)
2x16GB RipJaws memory, internal monitor: 138.1 FPS (118%)
2x16GB RipJaws memory, internal monitor: 144.3 FPS (123%) rerun with RendererWorkerCount = 5 and disabled hardware accelerating GPU, stock clocks, high GPU usage, 96-97%
2x16GB RipJaws memory, external monitor: 162.2 FPS (138%) avg FPS was inconsistent, were 150, 154, 156, 161 and best run was 162 FPS, for that I disabled hardware accelerated GPU in Windows Games and used RWC=5

Before each test I did CPU and Memory benches to check all were performing well (AIDA64 Extreme CPU Queen and Memory Latency in particular, but also CPU-Z bench as well as CINEBENCH R20 Multi)
Many times scores were lower than expected, then I shut down and let laptop cool a while. I had only +16C on the table and +9-10C on the floor :D

With 2x8GB original memory and internal monitor the CPU Time (displayed by Warzone) was high, 9ms when GPU Time was 6ms.
The two tests after were CPU Time 7ms and GPU Time 6ms.
Last test showed a balanced 6ms on both. EDIT // Added another run with 2x16GB and internal monitor

BTW: If you're gonna swap memory, do it with only internal monitor connected. When I had swapped from 2x8GB to 2x16GB none of the monitors showed image. I had to put back 2x8GB again to get image, then deselect external monitor (Fn+F9) , and swap mem after that.
Hi Triton.se, I follow your advise, but with the same specs (only 16gb single rank ram) I've very different performance, I use manual mode in armoury crate.

My fps never go further 100...why?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Immagine 2021-07-08 205944.jpg
    Immagine 2021-07-08 205944.jpg
    430 KB · Views: 93

Adamdan

New Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2022
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
I know this is a very old post but I’m wondering if you have tried warzone 2.0? I’m getting very off fps. Sometimes I’m at 110-130 at max setting dlss quality at 1600p then other days I’ll fire it up and I’ll be at 70fps. Sometimes I’ll be sitting at the menu and my fps will be low then jump back up to 140fps and then it will play fine for hours. I hope it’s just a driver update.
 
Top