I noticed there was a bit of grumbling on the internet over the weekend about this. The demo for Watch_Dogs at E3 last year looked quite amazing, and many people had some great feedback for the game. But recently there was a gameplay trailer, and everybody noticed the graphical fidelity of the game has greatly reduced when you compared both pieces of game footage. Ubersoft released a statement blatantly admitting they had misrepresented the game with their E3 demo, but that gameplay should be more important to people. I wholeheartedly agree that gameplay > graphics, but when you advertise a game for being cutting edge graphically, you can't then turn around and claim they then don't matter. http://www.escapistmagazine.com/vid...h-Dogs-A-Vertical-Slice-Of-Steaming-Bullshots EDIT: After watching that video yesterday, I've now noticed this morning that Ubi are saying the graphics weren't downgraded? Original statement in the video I linked says otherwise. Slightly confused.