- Joined
- Feb 1, 2019
- Messages
- 3,623 (1.69/day)
- Location
- UK, Midlands
System Name | Main PC |
---|---|
Processor | 13700k |
Motherboard | Asrock Z690 Steel Legend D4 - Bios 13.02 |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15S |
Memory | 32 Gig 3200CL14 |
Video Card(s) | 4080 RTX SUPER FE 16G |
Storage | 1TB 980 PRO, 2TB SN850X, 2TB DC P4600, 1TB 860 EVO, 2x 3TB WD Red, 2x 4TB WD Red |
Display(s) | LG 27GL850 |
Case | Fractal Define R4 |
Audio Device(s) | Soundblaster AE-9 |
Power Supply | Antec HCG 750 Gold |
Software | Windows 10 21H2 LTSC |
REFS is the one thats more comparable to ZFS, NTFS has no bit rot detection.Not really, NTFS has similar features built into it's journaling system. Lot's of people have been pushing ZFS as the new hotness, but it's really not. It's good and solid, but no more or less than NTFS. ZFS's main advantage is volume size and file size limits, which far exceeds NTFS and most other file systems. Only Ext4 is comparable in size limits. Sun envisioned a future where truly ginormous data arrays would be a thing and designed ZFS accordingly. That's it. All it's other features are very much on-par with other file systems. For Windows based systems, NTFS has the native support advantage and that fact can not be understated.
It's not new. It was first used on Sun Solaris workstations in 2005. That's nearly 2 decades ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS
Resilient File System (ReFS) overview
Learn more about: Resilient File System (ReFS) overview
learn.microsoft.com
Thats another option for you @AusWolf since Windows seems to be a requirement.