• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Will I be able to upgrade to ivybridge in my laptop?

Fitseries3

Eleet Hardware Junkie
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
15,508 (2.57/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
i know in desktops its seems the ivy requirement is z77 although im not 100% sure.

wondering if the same is true on laptops?

i have only had my SB lappy for a few months. would be nice to just upgrade cpu if the price isnt as much as a new laptop.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2011
Messages
366 (0.08/day)
Location
Baraboo, WI
System Name Dell m6600
Processor i5 2520
Memory 16gb
Video Card(s) ATI 6970m
Storage 128gb agility 3
Power Supply 240w
Software win 7 pro
No. SB laptop chipsets/sockets will not support Ivy.
 

Fitseries3

Eleet Hardware Junkie
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
15,508 (2.57/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
so i should start trying to sell this bad boy...?
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2011
Messages
366 (0.08/day)
Location
Baraboo, WI
System Name Dell m6600
Processor i5 2520
Memory 16gb
Video Card(s) ATI 6970m
Storage 128gb agility 3
Power Supply 240w
Software win 7 pro
For a 5-10% bump in CPU power?:banghead:
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
1,380 (0.29/day)
System Name Desktop
Processor Intel Xeon E5-1680v2
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth X79
Cooling Intel AIO
Memory 8x4GB DDR3 1866MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 970 SC
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB + 2x WD RE 4TB HDD
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Fractal Define XL Black
Audio Device(s) Schiit Modi Uber/Sony CDP-XA20ES/Pioneer CT-656>Sony TA-F630ESD>Sennheiser HD600
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Logitech G613
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,657 (0.56/day)
And why not? :rolleyes: + Ivy will have a lot lower power consumption.

Where are you basing these magic assumptions off of? While the die shrink and 3d transistors do increase performance, the thermal envelope won't recede in laptops. The rule of thumb is that a laptop will always push the thermal envelope, so as to get closer to desktop performance. The effect is having the same thermal envelope, with a 5-10% (numbers based upon transistor count increase) increase in overall capacity.


On topic, when have laptops even been upgradeable? The engineering challenges of fitting everything into such a small profile are huge, let alone making parts interchangeable. I'm still rocking a core 2 quad in a laptop, that suits its purpose well. It doesn't play the latest games, but it can still do 3d rendering and engineering calculations well (despite being 4+ years old). Don't hawk what isn't broken...
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
6,684 (1.43/day)
Processor 7800x3d
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Auros Elite AX
Cooling Custom Water
Memory GSKILL 2x16gb 6000mhz Cas 30 with custom timings
Video Card(s) MSI RX 6750 XT MECH 2X 12G OC
Storage Adata SX8200 1tb with Windows, Samsung 990 Pro 2tb with games
Display(s) HP Omen 27q QHD 165hz
Case ThermalTake P3
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex Titanium
Software Windows 11 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores CB23: 1811 / 19424 CB24: 1136 / 7687
Where are you basing these magic assumptions off of? While the die shrink and 3d transistors do increase performance, the thermal envelope won't recede in laptops. The rule of thumb is that a laptop will always push the thermal envelope, so as to get closer to desktop performance. The effect is having the same thermal envelope, with a 5-10% (numbers based upon transistor count increase) increase in overall capacity.


On topic, when have laptops even been upgradeable? The engineering challenges of fitting everything into such a small profile are huge, let alone making parts interchangeable. I'm still rocking a core 2 quad in a laptop, that suits its purpose well. It doesn't play the latest games, but it can still do 3d rendering and engineering calculations well (despite being 4+ years old). Don't hawk what isn't broken...
I couldn't find the article here on techpowerup but I am pretty sure I read an article where even ivy laptop chips had a lower tdp. It was here on techpowerup though.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.23/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Where are you basing these magic assumptions off of? While the die shrink and 3d transistors do increase performance, the thermal envelope won't recede in laptops. The rule of thumb is that a laptop will always push the thermal envelope, so as to get closer to desktop performance. The effect is having the same thermal envelope, with a 5-10% (numbers based upon transistor count increase) increase in overall capacity.

There are no magic assumptions there, it is industry standard logic. Yes, Ivy Bridge will still push the thermal envelope, Mobile Sandy Bridge processor go up to 55w. However, there are also 45w, 35w, 25w, and 17w processors. There will be Ivy Bridge processor at 55w as well, but they will perform better than the 55w Sandy Bridge. Likewise there will be 45w, 35w, 25w, and 17w Ivy Bridge processors as well. What does that mean? Well it means you can likely take a 45w Ivy Bridge and replace your 55w Sandy Bridge and get the same or better performance(heck, you might even be able to go to a 35w and get the same performance, we don't know yet). Either way, Ivy Bridge will consume a lot less power when performance is the same, or it will consume the same amount of power with greater performance.

On topic, when have laptops even been upgradeable? The engineering challenges of fitting everything into such a small profile are huge, let alone making parts interchangeable. I'm still rocking a core 2 quad in a laptop, that suits its purpose well. It doesn't play the latest games, but it can still do 3d rendering and engineering calculations well (despite being 4+ years old). Don't hawk what isn't broken...

Laptops have been upgradeable for as long as I can remember, as long as you are willing to take them apart to do it. Over the years the process has been made easier in a lot of models, some only require removing the keyboard. I've got a Pentium III laptop that I upgrade the processor on that I bought in 2001, had a Celeron 900 and I put a Pentium III 1200 in it. And that is a perfect example of what will happen with the Sandy to Ivy transition, the Pentium III actually consumed less power due to a die shirnk, and performed way better. Some processor packages are soldered onto the motherboard and aren't upgradeable, but if you get a socketted one you can upgrade it, and most are socketted at this point.
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
1,380 (0.29/day)
System Name Desktop
Processor Intel Xeon E5-1680v2
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth X79
Cooling Intel AIO
Memory 8x4GB DDR3 1866MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 970 SC
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB + 2x WD RE 4TB HDD
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Fractal Define XL Black
Audio Device(s) Schiit Modi Uber/Sony CDP-XA20ES/Pioneer CT-656>Sony TA-F630ESD>Sennheiser HD600
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Logitech G613
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Where are you basing these magic assumptions off of? While the die shrink and 3d transistors do increase performance, the thermal envelope won't recede in laptops. The rule of thumb is that a laptop will always push the thermal envelope, so as to get closer to desktop performance. The effect is having the same thermal envelope, with a 5-10% (numbers based upon transistor count increase) increase in overall capacity.

The Tri gate transistors do not improve performance (the performance increase comes from more transistors and tweaked/optimized design of the chip). It allows you to run the chip at lower V.
You can forget the rule of thumb here because Intel has no competition on CPU segment and thus does not require to push the TDP to the limit. They will rather have the same performance but push down the power consumption.

And here are my magical sources which contain the magic words and graphs:

Tri-gate explained: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4313/...nm-3d-trigate-transistors-shipping-in-2h-2011

35W Quad: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4773/ivy-bridge-will-bring-a-35w-quadcore-i7

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4764/ivy-bridge-configurable-tdp-detailed

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4378/ivy-bridge-a-tick-with-configurable-tdp

Mobile lineup:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5192/ivy-bridge-mobile-lineup-overview
(Note: the 35W quad is missing from the lineup: explained in the article)

\magic
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
2,361 (0.48/day)
Location
Marlow, ENGLAND
System Name Chachamaru-IV | Retro Battlestation
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | Intel Pentium II 450MHz
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX X570-F Gaming | MSI MS-6116 (Intel 440BX chipset)
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE-AM4
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000 (16-20-20-38) | 512MB PC133 SDRAM
Video Card(s) nVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 FE | 3dfx Voodoo3 3000
Storage 1TB WD_Black SN850 NVME SSD (OS), Toshiba 3TB (Storage), Toshiba 3TB (Steam)
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G5 27" @ 1440p144 & Dell P2312H @ 1080p60
Case SilverStone Seta A1 | Beige box
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster AE-7 (Speakers), Creative Zen Hybrid headset | Sound Blaster AWE64
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 750 G2 | 250W ASETEC
Mouse Roccat Kone Air| Microsoft Serial Mouse v2.0A
Keyboard Vortex Race3 | Dell AT102W
Software Microsoft Windows 11 Pro | Microsoft Windows 98SE
Top