• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Will You Be Buying Radeon VII ?

Will You Be Buying Radeon VII ?

  • Yes

    Votes: 25 14.9%
  • No

    Votes: 105 62.5%
  • Maybe (Depending on Performance)

    Votes: 38 22.6%

  • Total voters
    168
Joined
May 3, 2014
Messages
964 (0.48/day)
System Name Sham Pc
Processor i5-2500k @ 4.33
Motherboard INTEL DZ77SL 50K
Cooling 2 bay res. "2L of fluid in loop" 1x480 2x360
Memory 16gb 4x4 kingstone 1600 hyper x fury black
Video Card(s) hfa2 gtx 780 @ 1306/1768 (xspc bloc)
Storage 1tb wd red 120gb kingston on the way os, 1.5Tb wd black, 3tb random WD rebrand
Display(s) cibox something or other 23" 1080p " 23 inch downstairs. 52 inch plasma downstairs 15" tft kitchen
Case 900D
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply xion gaming seriese 1000W (non modular) 80+ bronze
Software windows 10 pro x64
its just how you should price a gpu lol. like i said the numbers are to illustrate a point.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
15,407 (4.31/day)
pricing a gpu should be done on a whole system value basis..
It should? To me, it should be done on how a user plans to utilize their system. If its for gaming, obviously it makes more sense to drop more on the GPU than say, faster RAM/SSD etc... I personally dont care much about value on a whole system basis, but build for my needs and sacrifice other parts for the primary need.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
4,644 (5.79/day)
Location
Poland
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
Joined
May 3, 2014
Messages
964 (0.48/day)
System Name Sham Pc
Processor i5-2500k @ 4.33
Motherboard INTEL DZ77SL 50K
Cooling 2 bay res. "2L of fluid in loop" 1x480 2x360
Memory 16gb 4x4 kingstone 1600 hyper x fury black
Video Card(s) hfa2 gtx 780 @ 1306/1768 (xspc bloc)
Storage 1tb wd red 120gb kingston on the way os, 1.5Tb wd black, 3tb random WD rebrand
Display(s) cibox something or other 23" 1080p " 23 inch downstairs. 52 inch plasma downstairs 15" tft kitchen
Case 900D
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply xion gaming seriese 1000W (non modular) 80+ bronze
Software windows 10 pro x64
lol,it absolutely should not.
if overall system value to performance isn't a concern then i guess not.

The example also works backwards by the way..
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,621 (4.11/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 G.Skill
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 128 and 256GB OCZ Vertex4, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Chieftec BX01
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
if overall system value to performance isn't a concern then i guess not.

The example also works backwards by the way..
Well, for me that's not it. I keep a limit on how much I spend on CPU and GPU because that's how I keep the cost of the whole system under control. The "problem" is I do have the cash to build a HEDT, but I'm happy with a system with half that power that can be had for 25% of the cost (give or take).
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
15,407 (4.31/day)
I mean a budget is a budget that needs to be followed, but the needs of the user drives the parts requirement within that budget. Clearly, without crunching numbers, if I game, a better GPU is going to give me the best 'value for my money' than any other part so it makes sense to spend more on a better performing card that fits my needs. I don't put percentages on it... I can't live in that minutia. If I see my budget is unable to fulfill my needs, I save and wait.


Anyway, since this poll wasn't stopped nor a new poll put up (boy I would have loved to see the difference after launch), the No's have increased by almost 4% so far.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
2,130 (1.27/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 4770K @ 4.4
Motherboard MSI Z97 Gaming 7
Cooling Water
Memory 16GB DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 1TB SSD, forgot which one. Evo maybe?
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake T81
Power Supply Seasonic 750 Watt Gold
its just how you should price a gpu lol. like i said the numbers are to illustrate a point.
Negative, needs and budget determine what you spend. If you don't have the budget for your needs, you wait.
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
1,376 (0.45/day)
Location
US of A
System Name gaming
Processor Intel i7-9700k @ 4.9ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 3
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1660 Ti OC 6G
Storage Crucial MX500, Samsung 850 Evo , Crucial P1 NVMe
Display(s) Dell - SE2717HR 27" IPS LED FHD FreeSync Monitor
Case Phanteks P400S w/ Noctua fans
Audio Device(s) Klipsch pro-media 2.1 speakers
Power Supply Seasonioc Focus Plus 650w
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G15 original
Software Win 10
Benchmark Scores i can finally play crysis
pricing a gpu should be done on a whole system value basis..
people look at it as per item value for money when you should add up the system value to get the bigger picture,
If you have a $300 gpu and the system overall is $1200.. But a $600 GPU would gain you 80% better performance.
that would take your system over all to $1500 so technically that's 80% more performance for 25% more overall cost..
but if you looked at it at a per item cost then you are spending 100% more..

Obvious example numbers should not be taken as gospel its to illustrate a point.
Assuming one is building an entire PC from scratch and not carrying over PC parts (case, power sully, HSF, etc.,) like most PC builders. Also assuming one needs (or can use) the 80% graphic performance increase, otherwise the initial $300 card will do the job very well for the time being (2-4 years) and then the next $300 card will give you that extra 80%+ graphic increase.

If I see my budget is unable to fulfill my needs, I save and wait.
One should always budget for the performance one wants. Some people need to play at 140FPS ultra settings 4k, some people have a blast on medium settings 30 FPS 1080p. Quantitative data does not translate to qualitative analysis.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
398 (0.16/day)
Location
Babylon 5
System Name DaBeast! DaBeast2! HTPC
Processor AMD AM4 Ryzen 9 3900X/Intel LGA2011 i7 3960X/LGA 1150 i7 4770K
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Xtreme/Asus ROG Rampage IV Extreme/ASRock Z87 Extreme6
Cooling Thermaltake Water 3.0 360/Corsair H150i Pro/Thermaltake Floe Riing 360
Memory 32GB XPG D60G DDR4 3200/DDR3 2133Mhz Corsair Dominator Plat/RipJawsX 16GB 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) PowerColor Vega 64 Red Devil/CF 2x Gigabyte RX VEGA 64 Gaming OC/Leadtek GTX 1080
Storage 256GB Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 + 2TB Samsung QVO + 4TB Samsung EVO + 6TB WD Black
Display(s) Acer XR341CK 75Hz Freesync/Samsung LC49HG90DMEX 32:9 Freesync 2/Panasonic 65" UHD TV
Case CoolerMaster H500M/Caselabs Magnum M8/Tt View 31
Audio Device(s) Oppo HA-1 + Philips Fidelio HTL9100/iFi Micro iDSD Black Label/Fostex HPA4
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Platinum/Seasonic X-1250/Enermax MaxRevo 1500W
Mouse Tecware Vector Pro/Logitech G703I/Logitech G603 WL
Keyboard Armaggeddon MKA-5R RGB Hornet/Logitech G613/Logitech K345
Software 64bit Win10 Pro/64bit Win10 Pro/64bit Win10 Pro
The hardcore AMD fanboy in me overwhelmed my self-control....
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
7,380 (2.05/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name New Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 1700X @ 3.82Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho & custom GPU loop
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
26,474 (5.21/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K@4.8GHz(Quick and dirty)
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500GB Crucial MX500 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 480GB MX200 SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Maybe drivers will give it a nudge in the right direction as performing just around the RTX 2070 is very sucky and wouldn’t be worth it for me. Now 2080 performance would have been acceptable
Honestly, even RTX2080 performance wouldn't have been acceptable to me. If you are going to price RVII the same as the RTX2080, and it has less features than the RTX2080, it better damn well consistently outperform the RTX2080. Otherwise your just ripping people off.

I have a strict $225 max budget for video cards and CPUs (good thing for amazon warehouse and microcenter). After that price point I don't see a value for my investment.
That used to be my limit, but over the years, it's gone up. Heck, everything just gets more expensive. $350 is my limit for CPUs, but GPUs I'll go up to $500 now.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
7,441 (3.24/day)
Honestly, even RTX2080 performance wouldn't have been acceptable to me. If you are going to price RVII the same as the RTX2080, and it has less features than the RTX2080, it better damn well consistently outperform the RTX2080. Otherwise your just ripping people off.
16GB HBM2 ram counts for a lot.. AMD knows what they're doing.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
2,130 (1.27/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 4770K @ 4.4
Motherboard MSI Z97 Gaming 7
Cooling Water
Memory 16GB DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 1TB SSD, forgot which one. Evo maybe?
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake T81
Power Supply Seasonic 750 Watt Gold
and it has less features than the RTX2080,
What are those features you can use right now, this very day? RTX in BFV that makes it look like everything is a light film of oil and DLSS in FFXV that makes the IQ worse? Anything that I am missing? If you don't play either of those games, what are those features worth?
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,621 (4.11/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 G.Skill
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 128 and 256GB OCZ Vertex4, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Chieftec BX01
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
That used to be my limit, but over the years, it's gone up. Heck, everything just gets more expensive. $350 is my limit for CPUs, but GPUs I'll go up to $500 now.
Well, you have to at least account for inflation (plus fight the temptation as your income goes up over time). But yes, that's not a hard limit for me either, I believe I paid close to $300 for my 660Ti. And I'm about to pull the trigger on an RTX 2060. It's more of a guideline to keep the overall expense in check.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
7,441 (3.24/day)
If you don't play either of those games, what are those features worth?
Future proofing. There are more games in development for RTRT and DLSS. As in all technological developments, the hardware always comes first and the software follows.

And I'm about to pull the trigger on an RTX 2060
That card seems to be a good way to get your feet wet in RTX without pulling the trigger on the pocketbook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 64K
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
2,130 (1.27/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 4770K @ 4.4
Motherboard MSI Z97 Gaming 7
Cooling Water
Memory 16GB DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 1TB SSD, forgot which one. Evo maybe?
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake T81
Power Supply Seasonic 750 Watt Gold
Future proofing.
The argument against AMD's FineWine is that you don't buy GPUs for what they do in the future, you buy them for what they do today. We can't turn this around for NV because there is a feature we happen to like.

Everyone knows that future proofing is a fallacy. There are two approaches (except for those with limited budgets): you buy mid-range every generation or you buy the top and hold for at least one.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,427 (0.93/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 512GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STX II
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Future proofing. There are more games in development for RTRT and DLSS. As in all technological developments, the hardware always comes first and the software follows.
That is assuming the 2080 will have enough power for future games when or if RTRT becomes common.
You have cards that are barely powerful enough to run those features right now, by then the Turing cards would have become obsolete.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
15,407 (4.31/day)
That is assuming the 2080 will have enough power for future games when or if RTRT becomes common.
You have cards that are barely powerful enough to run those features right now, by then the Turing cards would have become obsolete.
and throughout that whole time, zero possibility for hardware based ray tracing for amd. A 2080 in bf v does RT at 1440p 60 fps...

This argument is the same for any GPU regardless of feature though. And by the time amd has a card with HW RT (which isnt navi) nvidia will have the next gen ray tracing cards which will likely be even more powerful. ;)
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
26,474 (5.21/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K@4.8GHz(Quick and dirty)
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500GB Crucial MX500 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 480GB MX200 SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
16GB HBM2 ram counts for a lot.. AMD knows what they're doing.
If it doesn't help with performance, it doesn't count for squat. It's just wasted, and enthusiasts know that the only reason AMD put 16GB on the card was because they had to to get the 4096-bit memory bus. If there were 2GB HBM2 stacks available, AMD would have used those.

Future proofing. There are more games in development for RTRT and DLSS. As in all technological developments, the hardware always comes first and the software follows.
Ironically, the same future proofing argument will be used to justify the 16GB of VRAM too, even though the likelyhood of it being necessary in a game that this card can actually comfortably render is next to nill.

What are those features you can use right now, this very day? RTX in BFV that makes it look like everything is a light film of oil and DLSS in FFXV that makes the IQ worse? Anything that I am missing? If you don't play either of those games, what are those features worth?
DLSS doesn't make the IQ worse if you actually compare it like it to the scenarios it is replacing. 1440p upscaled to 4k(which is what DLSS does) looks a heck of a lot better using DLSS than any other upscaling method.

RTX and DLSS might be IQ features that aren't necessary, but the reality is they are features. And AMD held onto FreeSync, pretty much the only feature they had over nVidia, like it was the next coming of christ, so now nVidia gets to do the same with DLSS and RTX. And if the AMD card can't offer those features, you either lower the price or make sure the performance is consistently better.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,427 (0.93/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 512GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STX II
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
and throughout that whole time, zero possibility for hardware based ray tracing for amd. A 2080 in bf v does RT at 1440p 60 fps...

This argument is the same for any GPU regardless of feature though. And by the time amd has a card with HW RT (which isnt navi) nvidia will have the next gen ray tracing cards which will likely be even more powerful. ;)
Yes then you buy that new more powerful card, not hoping that some 10 year old card by then would run new games well.
And speaking of DXR in BF V, you get grainy shadows on your gun barrel that might be more accurate in position etc, but looks worse than AO.
When future cards that are MUCH MUCH more powerful runs RT, it would be glorius, but not what we have right now.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
15,407 (4.31/day)
If it doesn't help with performance, it doesn't count for squat. It's just wasted, and enthusiasts know that the only reason AMD put 16GB on the card was because they had to to get the 4096-bit memory bus. If there were 2GB HBM2 stacks available, AMD would have used those.
High res texture packs @ 4K, n00b... :p

Being serious. It's useful in 4k video editing and compute...but much over 8-11GB is a waste, particularly at QHD... they could have saved some money going with 8GB and it would be a much more attractive gaming card with a lower price point.

Yes then you buy that new more powerful card, not hoping that some 10 year old card by then would run new games well.
True... but, that doesnt help your point out. Either you have zero chance of HW RT and dont care with AMD or you have a card that is plenty capable (on the one game) of running it.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,427 (0.93/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 512GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STX II
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
True... but, that doesnt help your point out.
My point is the whole future proving arugement is garbage, I don't give an F about who buys what they want.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 7, 2018
Messages
69 (0.14/day)
System Name 8700K Rainbow Blast
Processor Intel i7-8700K overclocked to 4.9GHz at 1.278v
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus Z370 Gaming 7
Cooling Corsair H150i Pro
Memory Corsair Vengeance Pro RBG 4 x 16GB 3000
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 2080 GAMING X TRIO
Storage Adata XPG SX8200 480GB M.2-2280 SSD
Display(s) 4K 50 inch TV
Case MasterCase H500P Mesh
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX Kratos S5 - Corsair VOID PRO RGB Gaming Headset
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 850w Gold
Mouse Corsair M65 Pro RGB Optical FPS Gaming Mouse
Keyboard Corsair STRAFE MK2 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro
The hardcore AMD fanboy in me overwhelmed my self-control....
Good on you....Even though I am a happy, happy RTX 2080 user, nothing wrong with your buying choice as it is yours and yours alone...hope you enjoy it to the max....And keep us posted on the experience...
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
26,474 (5.21/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K@4.8GHz(Quick and dirty)
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500GB Crucial MX500 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 480GB MX200 SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Being serious. It's useful in 4k video editing and compute...but much over 8-11GB is a waste, particularly at QHD... they could have saved some money going with 8GB and it would be a much more attractive gaming card with a lower price point.
Even with 4k video editing, the video card doesn't need 16GB of RAM, it just doesn't help, and that is a pretty niche area anyway. But I definitely agree that going with 8GB being the better option for this card, but like I said, the problem is AMD couldn't do that and keep the 4096-bit memory bus. And for some reason AMD is using the "pump as much memory bandwidth as possible into the GPU to make up for the weak GPU itself" method of video card design. Maybe if they could get one of the memory manufacturers to make 2GB HBM2 stacks we'll get an 8GB variant that is priced more attractively.
 
Top