• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Wintel Alliance Slowly Crumbling, ARM To Eventually Rule The Desktop?

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#1
The writing has been on the wall for a while now, that the close relationship between Microsoft and Intel (and by extension AMD) is crumbling into dust. In fact, they have never really been the best of friends. It has been clear since Microsoft unveiled that Windows 8 would run natively on ARM processors that things would never be quite the same again. Apart from some niche server variants of Windows, which could run on Itanium and other processors, all the previous desktop versions, including Windows 7, have run on x86 (and x64 for the last 6 years or so) processors.

Show full news post
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
20,922 (6.24/day)
Likes
10,023
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#2
Intel has a huge process advantage on most ARM offerings. I think Intel could make an x86 processor that is highly competitive in the smartphone market. It kind of makes me wonder why they haven't.

ARM doesn't have much hope of competing on desktops. All the applications you currently use won't work (including all games previously made).
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
4,315 (1.23/day)
Likes
1,015
Location
Multidimensional
System Name Derp!
Processor i7 7700 @ 4.2Ghz Turbo On
Motherboard Gigabyte B250 Phoenix Wifi ITX Motherboard
Cooling Noctua NH-L9i LP Cooler || Cooler Master Fan Pro RGB 120mm x 2
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400mhz RAM
Video Card(s) AMD Reference RX 480 8GB
Storage 250GB SS 960 Evo M.2 || WD Blue 500GB SSD || 2TB SG FC SSHD
Display(s) Hisense 1080p Smart LED HDTV 40inch
Case Fractal Node 202 Mini ITX Case
Audio Device(s) Realtek HD Audio / HDMI Audio Via GPU
Power Supply Corsair SFX 600W PSU
Mouse CoolerMaster Masterkeys Lite L RGB Mouse
Keyboard CoolerMaster Masterkeys Lite L RGB Mem-Chanical Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Home 64bit
Benchmark Scores Later
#3
The Skynet program has been authorised ^_^
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
7,646 (2.71/day)
Likes
1,983
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
System Name micropage7
Processor Intel G4400
Motherboard MSI B150M Bazooka D3
Cooling Stock ( Lapped )
Memory 16 Gb Team Xtreem DDR3
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX460
Storage Seagate 1 TB, 5oo Gb and SSD A-Data 128 Gb
Display(s) LG 19 inch LCD Wide Screen
Case HP dx6120 MT
Audio Device(s) Stock
Power Supply Be Quiet 600 Watt
Software Windows 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Classified
#4
one that intel or amd fail is the low powered processor in smartphone and we can see that ARM holds the smart phone level and intel/amd stay in desktop and laptop or tablets
i guess it will be like that. ARM strong enough in smart phone market, they wont risk their future with battling in desktop/laptop against intel or amd.
edit: if they plan to get in maybe they gonna put in low or mid range, i think its pretty reasonable since they have power in it
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.94/day)
Likes
3,682
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
#5
ARM will never fully take over on the desktop while still maintaining it's power efficiency. It's reduced instruction sets allow for reduced consumption. Start adding instruction sets that our current apps can take advantage of, and it will start to lose it's edge in power efficiency.

We use x86 on the desktop because they are more powerful, not because they are the most power efficient.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,230 (1.48/day)
Likes
661
Location
IRAQ-Baghdad
System Name MASTER
Processor Core i7 3930k run at 4.4ghz
Motherboard Asus Rampage IV extreme
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 4x4G kingston hyperx beast 2400mhz
Video Card(s) 2X EVGA GTX680
Storage 2X Crusial M4 256g raid0, 1TbWD g, 2x500 WD B
Display(s) Samsung 27' 1080P LED 3D monitior 2ms
Case CoolerMaster Chosmos II
Audio Device(s) Creative sound blaster X-FI Titanum champion,Creative speakers 7.1 T7900
Power Supply Corsair 1200i, Logitch G500 Mouse, headset Corsair vengeance 1500
Software Win7 64bit Ultimate
Benchmark Scores 3d mark 2011: testing
#6
I guess it's miss typo in title or maybe im wrong 'Wintel'.
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.94/day)
Likes
3,682
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
#7

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,287 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,395
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 GTX1060 6GB
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#8
That is nice for a smartphone, basically allowing a smartphone/tablet to run an full OS. Of course you have to find a way to cram enough space into a smartphone to run a full OS. Smartphones generally have a 16GB or 32GB SD card at best, good luck fitting Win8 on that with any usable space left over.

The x86 architecture isn't going anywhere in the desktop market. Look how long it took for x64 to take over.

And lets talk about performance. The video only shows me one thing, how slow ARM is. I guess it is fine if you are rendering a few low end sites with no moving flash/HTML5 elements. And that is generally the site type accessed by smartphones. However, even rendering generic sites with just text and some graphics the ARM processor was noticeably slower. I'd hate to see it handle some flash sites, or even youtube with HD video running. I bet it would fall on it's face compared to the Atom.

Is there anyone here that honestly thinks Intel couldn't created an x86 processor that competes with ARM processors in performance and power consumption?

Look at what we already have. The Cortex-A9 has a TDP of 1.9w @2Ghz, the Atom Z550@2GHz is only at 2.5w. That isn't a huge margin for Intel to make up. Hell, Intel could probably make that up by cutting out the Hyperthreading silicon, dropping a few instruction sets and the silicon related to those, and cutting the L2 in half.

Or better yet, carve out a new product using the things they've learned with Sandybridge. I don't have a doubt they could manage very close to 2GHz with the same or better performance to what ARM can offer.
 

p3ngwin1

New Member
Joined
May 12, 2011
Messages
24 (0.01/day)
Likes
8
#9
Intel has a huge process advantage on most ARM offerings. I think Intel could make an x86 processor that is highly competitive in the smartphone market. It kind of makes me wonder why they haven't.

ARM doesn't have much hope of competing on desktops. All the applications you currently use won't work (including all games previously made).
atually no, Intel has had MASSIVE trouble getting any x86 processor to work with the power efficiencies needed for smartphones. they've been trying for YEARS.

they made the ATOM chip, by castrating existing desktop architectures (cutting cache, pipelines, atc) and still they couldn't get a chip to perform for use in a smartphone or tablet that would sip less than a WATT of power under load, and less than 1/4 WATT at idle.

there process advantage does not make them magically have an architecture that performs efficiently in netbooks, tablets and smartphones. they tried for years, and only now they have a decent processor offering approaching tablet form with good battery life. they still have years to go before they enter the smartphone market.

ARM is encroaching on x86 in a bif way, because it's easier for them to evolve their architecture for more performance at the desktop and enterprise/server than it is for Intel to figure out how to make portable efficient chips for smartphones, etc.

with Microsoft making Windows on ARM, a whole new generation of apps and games will be made, that means market share AWAY from x86. the more developers that make ARM software, the less that x86 dominates.

you think that just because x86 is massive it is too big to lose it's crown?

you would do well to read up on some history, as well as notice what is happening in the portable OS and device market right now. would you have said Apple's iOS would always dominate because it had the most developers and software ? or would you realise that Android would take everything from Apple's mobile market and dominate around the world ?

things change, and right now there are HUGE changes happening in the OS and processor architecture worlds. the last 30 years of x86 are already eroding, and the same is happening for the desktop and mobile OS shares.

wintel is dying quicker than ever.
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Messages
3,340 (1.04/day)
Likes
1,097
Location
Ohio
System Name Spanky
Processor Ryzen 1400
Motherboard MSI 350 gaming pro
Cooling NZXT Kracken X42
Memory 8gb Crucial 2133 at 2667
Video Card(s) Nvidia 1060
Storage 250gb WD blue
Display(s) Acer 32" 2560x1440
Case Raidmax Sigma
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Audigy FX
Power Supply Seasonic
Mouse Epicgear
Keyboard Razer Deatstalker
Software Windows 10Pro x64
#10
No....WIntel will stay strong because of newer battery technologies and smaller die size....It might not seem plausible now but neither did Today's smartphones 10 years ago
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,287 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,395
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 GTX1060 6GB
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#11
atually no, Intel has had MASSIVE trouble getting any x86 processor to work with the power efficiencies needed for smartphones. they've been trying for YEARS.

they made the ATOM chip, by castrating existing desktop architectures (cutting cache, pipelines, atc) and still they couldn't get a chip to perform for use in a smartphone or tablet that would sip less than a WATT of power under load, and less than 1/4 WATT at idle.

there process advantage does not make them magically have an architecture that performs efficiently in netbooks, tablets and smartphones. they tried for years, and only now they have a decent processor offering approaching tablet form with good battery life. they still have years to go before they enter the smartphone market.
I disagree. Atom was based on an extremely modified Core architecture, AFAIK. And is a product that they kind of threw together a few years ago, and haven't really done anything with it. And they still managed to get the processor power consumption down to the 2 watt range.

Now look at the current Sandybridge and what it is capable of. They have dual-core Sandybridge processors, full powered full featured chips, that sip just 17w. Image what they could get that down to just by ditching the silicon for HT, and the 3MB of L3 cache? And that is with a graphics processor, drop that and what does the power consumption numbers drop to? Cripple the memory controller(who needs dual channel 32GB RAM on a smart phone?), cut out the PCI-E lanes(don't need those on a smart phone), drop the unused instruction sets and the silicon related to those. What would the power consumption numbers look like then?

If Intel was worried, and they wanted to put their effort into it, I have no doubt they could put out an x86 processor today based on an extremely modified Sandybridge that could pull under 1w under load, and idle at under 0.25w and outperform the competition.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2005
Messages
431 (0.09/day)
Likes
62
#12
All of you are getting your panties in a twist over tech specs.

Guess what - it doesn't matter.

I can Skype, Facebook, send emails and play Angry Birds with a small fraction of the power already available today.

The only relevant 'tech specs' are that Intel is currently incapable of competing with ARM on the all-important idle power consumption. If they are able to address that then they can enter the smartphone race (albeit very late to the party). Intel is currently working very hard at this.

And to Wile E, people use Wintel because that's what the market determined was popular from the 1980s. They didn't choose it because of any tech related specification or power consumption.

Dorks bought a 386sx33mhz w/ 2mb of ram, a 80mb HDD and a Trident video card sitting on an ISA bus. People bought IBM-compatible PCs.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
14,886 (3.45/day)
Likes
5,416
System Name A dancer in your disco of fire
Processor i3 4130 3.4Ghz
Motherboard MSI B85M-E45
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 4 x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Sport 1400Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Crucial BX100 120GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case AeroCool DS Cube White
Power Supply Cooler Master G550M
Mouse Intellimouse Explorer 3.0
Keyboard Dell SK-3205
Software Windows 10 Pro
#13
I can Skype, Facebook, send emails and play Angry Birds with a small fraction of the power already available today.
But I can't play a buttload (all of them actually) of games, do web design, render movies or anything on an ARM system. The problem I have with it has nothing to do with hardware, but with software. There's a gargantuan library of programs for Windows, all from nonsense to very advanced and everything in between. As long as any ARM system does not have that, I'm not interested, at least not as a desktop.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,576 (0.65/day)
Likes
510
Processor Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard Intel 865
Cooling Custom block made in workshop
Memory Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card(s) FireGL X3-256
Display(s) 1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software Windows 2003
#14
When Windows for ARM is released.... the Atom is dead. Intel have failed over the last 3 years to sufficiently improve the Atom and its chipset. (Improvement being performance or power consumption according to Moores law). The Atom chipset was Intels real failing. FOr the sake of one $, they should have paired Atom with mobile ULV chipset from the outset. UNFORTUNATLEY, it was the result of large corporation silo mentality, one department not cooperating with another.
 
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
1,940 (0.62/day)
Likes
409
Location
Singapore
System Name penguin
Processor i3-4160
Motherboard Asus H81 Mini-ITX
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x4GB Kingston 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Saphire Radeon 7850 2GB
Storage Plextor M5S 120GB+1TB Seagate
Display(s) 23' Dell
Case CM Elite 130
Audio Device(s) stock
Power Supply Corsair CX430m
Software W7/Lubuntu
#15
That is nice for a smartphone, basically allowing a smartphone/tablet to run an full OS. Of course you have to find a way to cram enough space into a smartphone to run a full OS. Smartphones generally have a 16GB or 32GB SD card at best, good luck fitting Win8 on that with any usable space left over.

The x86 architecture isn't going anywhere in the desktop market. Look how long it took for x64 to take over.

And lets talk about performance. The video only shows me one thing, how slow ARM is. I guess it is fine if you are rendering a few low end sites with no moving flash/HTML5 elements. And that is generally the site type accessed by smartphones. However, even rendering generic sites with just text and some graphics the ARM processor was noticeably slower. I'd hate to see it handle some flash sites, or even youtube with HD video running. I bet it would fall on it's face compared to the Atom.

Is there anyone here that honestly thinks Intel couldn't created an x86 processor that competes with ARM processors in performance and power consumption?

Look at what we already have. The Cortex-A9 has a TDP of 1.9w @2Ghz, the Atom Z550@2GHz is only at 2.5w. That isn't a huge margin for Intel to make up. Hell, Intel could probably make that up by cutting out the Hyperthreading silicon, dropping a few instruction sets and the silicon related to those, and cutting the L2 in half.

Or better yet, carve out a new product using the things they've learned with Sandybridge. I don't have a doubt they could manage very close to 2GHz with the same or better performance to what ARM can offer.
Just to clarify a bit here, the ARM chip is a SoC - a system of a chip it has all the peripherals on the same chip (I yhink some of them even integrate the ram on die) while Atom is still mostly a multi chip solution(I think they've shrunk it to just 2 or 3 chips in its latest iteration) and once you combine the power use of all of the chips it's still in the 8-10w range.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
12,374 (2.56/day)
Likes
5,819
Location
Europe\Slovenia
System Name Dark Silence 2
Processor Intel Core i7 5820K @ 4.5 GHz (1.15V)
Motherboard MSI X99A Gaming 7
Cooling Cooler Master Nepton 120XL
Memory 32 GB DDR4 Kingston HyperX Fury 2400 MHz @ 2666 MHz
Video Card(s) AORUS GeForce GTX 1080Ti 11GB (1950/11000 OC Mode)
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 2TB SSD (3D V-NAND)
Display(s) ASUS VG248QE 144Hz 1ms (DisplayPort)
Case Corsair Carbide 330R Titanium
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 + Altec Lansing MX5021 (HiFi capacitors and OPAMP upgrade)
Power Supply BeQuiet! Dark Power Pro 11 750W
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard Cherry Stream XT Black
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Fall Creators Update)
#16
Since when does GMA950 anything to the web content? And they are bullshitting about netbook having artificial advantage. GMA950 does NOTHING to web content, it doesn't acccelerate Adobe Flash and it doesn't even accelerate web content in Firefox through HW acceleration. So what kind of advantage does it give to netbook? None at all... How do i know it's GMA950? Because that's what they are comparing it to is the first generation ACER Aspire One with Atom N270 and GMA950. Which quite frankly wasn't anything to brag about even when it was released. I had it and it was fine, but compared to AMD Fusion, it's like bringing a toothpick to a katana fight... Power usage is not all that different, yet battery lasts much longer and i can work with much more demanding apps.

I like ARM because it's a comeptition and as such it can only be good for users but sometimes it's better to say nothing than talk BS...
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 16, 2011
Messages
1,430 (0.59/day)
Likes
460
Location
A frozen turdberg.
System Name Runs Smooth
Processor FX 8350
Motherboard Crosshair V Formula Z
Cooling Corsair H110 with AeroCool Shark 140mm fans
Memory 16GB G-skill Trident X 1866 Cl. 8
Video Card(s) HIS 7970 IceQ X² GHZ Edition
Storage OCZ Vector 256GB SSD & 1Tb piece of crap
Display(s) acer H243H
Case NZXT Phantom 820 matte black
Audio Device(s) Nada
Power Supply NZXT Hale90 V2 850 watt
Software Windows 7 Pro
Benchmark Scores Lesbians are hot!!!
#17
qubit, I won't quit loving your news posts even if I don't agree with them. When ARM has something that can compete with Llano, or an I3, wake me up. Atom was a failure to me the moment it wasn't released in the cell phones it was intended for.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,287 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,395
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 GTX1060 6GB
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#18
Just to clarify a bit here, the ARM chip is a SoC - a system of a chip it has all the peripherals on the same chip (I yhink some of them even integrate the ram on die) while Atom is still mostly a multi chip solution(I think they've shrunk it to just 2 or 3 chips in its latest iteration) and once you combine the power use of all of the chips it's still in the 8-10w range.
The Cortex A9 chip they are comparing it to is not a SoC, it is just the processor, probably with a lot of integrated aspects compared to the Atom, but still relies a lot on outside help as well. But as I said, Atom was something they just threw together using the old Core architecture, and then just kind of left it alone.

Doing the same based on Sandybridge, where everything except for data I/O is on the die already, and they still manage 17w, gives a good example of what Intel can do. And if they put their minds to it, and see ARM as a serious threat, there is no doubt in my mind they could put something out using a highly modified Sandybridge that consumes 1W or less and idles at a fraction of a W.

But either way you look at it, they are still trying to compare 2 products that aren't meant to be compared. Atom is a full fledged processor for a laptop/desktop computer, while ARM is really a smartphone processor. And if ARM every does make a serious move to desktops/laptop, they will be nothing more than web/media devices at best, certainly not something that will rule the market.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
12,374 (2.56/day)
Likes
5,819
Location
Europe\Slovenia
System Name Dark Silence 2
Processor Intel Core i7 5820K @ 4.5 GHz (1.15V)
Motherboard MSI X99A Gaming 7
Cooling Cooler Master Nepton 120XL
Memory 32 GB DDR4 Kingston HyperX Fury 2400 MHz @ 2666 MHz
Video Card(s) AORUS GeForce GTX 1080Ti 11GB (1950/11000 OC Mode)
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 2TB SSD (3D V-NAND)
Display(s) ASUS VG248QE 144Hz 1ms (DisplayPort)
Case Corsair Carbide 330R Titanium
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 + Altec Lansing MX5021 (HiFi capacitors and OPAMP upgrade)
Power Supply BeQuiet! Dark Power Pro 11 750W
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard Cherry Stream XT Black
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Fall Creators Update)
#19
The specific example with Atom N270 and 945GS chipset is especially funny because just chipset alone consumes as much power as all the remaining components alone. Atom itself consumes a ffraction of a power where chipset was like 8W if not more.
 

paralityk

New Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
5 (0.00/day)
Likes
0
#20
That is nice for a smartphone, basically allowing a smartphone/tablet to run an full OS. Of course you have to find a way to cram enough space into a smartphone to run a full OS. Smartphones generally have a 16GB or 32GB SD card at best, good luck fitting Win8 on that with any usable space left over.

The x86 architecture isn't going anywhere in the desktop market. Look how long it took for x64 to take over.

And lets talk about performance. The video only shows me one thing, how slow ARM is. I guess it is fine if you are rendering a few low end sites with no moving flash/HTML5 elements. And that is generally the site type accessed by smartphones. However, even rendering generic sites with just text and some graphics the ARM processor was noticeably slower. I'd hate to see it handle some flash sites, or even youtube with HD video running. I bet it would fall on it's face compared to the Atom.

Is there anyone here that honestly thinks Intel couldn't created an x86 processor that competes with ARM processors in performance and power consumption?

Look at what we already have. The Cortex-A9 has a TDP of 1.9w @2Ghz, the Atom Z550@2GHz is only at 2.5w. That isn't a huge margin for Intel to make up. Hell, Intel could probably make that up by cutting out the Hyperthreading silicon, dropping a few instruction sets and the silicon related to those, and cutting the L2 in half.

Or better yet, carve out a new product using the things they've learned with Sandybridge. I don't have a doubt they could manage very close to 2GHz with the same or better performance to what ARM can offer.
Sorry but it's simple as that: they can't. ARM is superior on very base level + dedicated processing units spread across SoC make the case even worse for x86.

"The Cortex-A9 has a TDP of 1.9w @2Ghz, the Atom Z550@2GHz is only at 2.5w."
This means that atom would be trashed by ARM performace wise, GPU is already way faster, not to talk about rest of SoC, oh, yeah, SoC, no slow buses etc.
 

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,377 (3.19/day)
Likes
2,101
Location
Home
System Name Asus K50-X5DAB \\ Orange!
Processor Athlon QL-65 2.2Ghz \\ 3570K
Motherboard Laptop \\ ASRock z77 Extreme4
Cooling Laptop \\ H100i
Memory 1x1GB + 1X2GB \\ 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3
Video Card(s) Mobility Radeon HD4570 512mb \\ Zotac 660Ti OC 2Gb
Storage 250Gb \\ Samsung 840 250Gb + Toshiba DT01ACA300 3Tb
Display(s) 15.6" 1366x768 \\ LG 22EA53VQ
Case Laptop Chassis \\ NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange
Power Supply Power Brick \\ Corsair CXM500w
#21
Sorry but it's simple as that: they can't. ARM is superior on very base level + dedicated processing units spread across SoC make the case even worse for x86.

"The Cortex-A9 has a TDP of 1.9w @2Ghz, the Atom Z550@2GHz is only at 2.5w."
This means that atom would be trashed by ARM performace wise, GPU is already way faster, not to talk about rest of SoC, oh, yeah, SoC, no slow buses etc.
When ARM's FLOPs catch up with x86, it might pose a challenge. Otherwise, we will still see x86 everywhere, perhaps in less places than before as machines for simpler tasks like surfing the web gets replaced by ARM. The deciding battle will be of course tablets vs netbooks, which is why Intel is pushing for cheap ultrabooks to take tablets head on.
 
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
6,571 (1.42/day)
Likes
1,164
Location
Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
System Name Red Spy
Processor FX 8350 @ 4.35 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0
Cooling TT Water 3.0 Performer + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 1 x 120mm Blue LED, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1333 16GB
Video Card(s) Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage ADATA 128GB Sata III SSD for OS, WDC Black - 1TB Storage, OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD - Games
Display(s) AOC 23" 1080P LCD
Case AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s) Built-in Realtek
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
Benchmark Scores BF4 with Mantle on Ultra settings gets around 60 FPS.
#22
That is nice for a smartphone, basically allowing a smartphone/tablet to run an full OS. Of course you have to find a way to cram enough space into a smartphone to run a full OS. Smartphones generally have a 16GB or 32GB SD card at best, good luck fitting Win8 on that with any usable space left over.

The x86 architecture isn't going anywhere in the desktop market. Look how long it took for x64 to take over.

And lets talk about performance. The video only shows me one thing, how slow ARM is. I guess it is fine if you are rendering a few low end sites with no moving flash/HTML5 elements. And that is generally the site type accessed by smartphones. However, even rendering generic sites with just text and some graphics the ARM processor was noticeably slower. I'd hate to see it handle some flash sites, or even youtube with HD video running. I bet it would fall on it's face compared to the Atom.

Is there anyone here that honestly thinks Intel couldn't created an x86 processor that competes with ARM processors in performance and power consumption?

Look at what we already have. The Cortex-A9 has a TDP of 1.9w @2Ghz, the Atom Z550@2GHz is only at 2.5w. That isn't a huge margin for Intel to make up. Hell, Intel could probably make that up by cutting out the Hyperthreading silicon, dropping a few instruction sets and the silicon related to those, and cutting the L2 in half.

Or better yet, carve out a new product using the things they've learned with Sandybridge. I don't have a doubt they could manage very close to 2GHz with the same or better performance to what ARM can offer.
Thats exactly what I was thinking, Intel has money and technology, if they want to they can spin out an entire low TDP line for mobile devices. If the need comes those little monsters will be unleashed.
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
1,885 (0.67/day)
Likes
549
System Name The Stone that the Builders Refused / Perception Forge version III
Processor i5 4570 /i7-6800k
Motherboard Msi Z87m / Asus x99M-WS
Cooling H80i / nh-d14
Memory 32 gigs patriot 1866 / 16gigs G skill ddr4
Video Card(s) MSI r9 270 / 970 windforce
Storage 120gig 840 evo, 120gig adata sp900 / 2 Samsung 840 raid zero 2tb seagate alot +
Display(s) 23'' asus lcd 29" Lg(r.i.p.) 42" nec monitor
Case Fractal desisn Node 804 / Fractal Design Node 804
Power Supply seasonic G 650 gold / Be Quiet Dark power pro 650 platinum
Mouse corsair vengence M65 / Func Ms3
Keyboard corsair k70 cherry blue /corsair k95 cherry red
Software Window 10 pro / windows 10 pro
Benchmark Scores meh... feel me on the battle field!
#23
When ARM's FLOPs catch up with x86, it might pose a challenge. Otherwise, we will still see x86 everywhere, perhaps in less places than before as machines for simpler tasks like surfing the web gets replaced by ARM. The deciding battle will be of course tablets vs netbooks, which is why Intel is pushing for cheap ultrabooks to take tablets head on.
The netbook phase is over. Tablets took over when Steve called them a pad and put an I in front of it. intel is aiming for somewhere in the middle. Success will be determined by the masses...not the learned. Without an "it" factor or cultural icon promoting it and because of the use of the word Ultra... intel has a mountain to climb with this one. Their greatest hope is that without Steve the pad phase will fade into FAD-dom.

Intel should however invest heavily in a serious answer to arm.... things change. Just ask the dinosaurs.
 
Last edited:

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,377 (3.19/day)
Likes
2,101
Location
Home
System Name Asus K50-X5DAB \\ Orange!
Processor Athlon QL-65 2.2Ghz \\ 3570K
Motherboard Laptop \\ ASRock z77 Extreme4
Cooling Laptop \\ H100i
Memory 1x1GB + 1X2GB \\ 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3
Video Card(s) Mobility Radeon HD4570 512mb \\ Zotac 660Ti OC 2Gb
Storage 250Gb \\ Samsung 840 250Gb + Toshiba DT01ACA300 3Tb
Display(s) 15.6" 1366x768 \\ LG 22EA53VQ
Case Laptop Chassis \\ NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange
Power Supply Power Brick \\ Corsair CXM500w
#24
The netbook phase is over. Tablets took over when Steve called them a pad and put an I in front of it. intel is aiming for somewhere in the middle. Success will be determined by the masses...not the learned. Without an "it" factor or cultural icon promoting it and because of the use of the word Ultra... intel has a mountain to climb with this one. Their greatest hope is that without Steve the pad phase will fade into FAD-dom.

Intel should however invest heavily in a serious answer to arm.... things change. Just ask the dinosaurs.
"MobileOS-pad" is here to stay, whether you like it or not. Its very efficient at what it does. I should have rephrase my "netbook", what I mean is a thin and light windows/mac/linux device with long battery and is price competitive against tablets. You cannot get rid of x86 easily yet, but when most of the utility programs migrate over we might be seeing ARM become more dominant over the others. Its still not feasible to ditch Wintel in favour of running ARM exclusively (server or consumer).

Intel's answer to ARM are Ultrabooks. Whether its their final answer, or the beginning of a series of answers I do not know. Either way their server business is still doing great, and I forsee them being the next IBM style company in a few more years(or decades).
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
4,988 (1.76/day)
Likes
1,553
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.8ghz1.525c NB2.64ghz Ht2.84ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 32Gb @1333 cas9
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Rx580 waterblockedEK
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, samsung 40" 1080p
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1000Rmx
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far
#25
i dont think it will kill off intel amd or anyone , it might squeeze proffits but intel and amd will if neccessary go with the flow of what will make them doe, either way x86/x64 architecture isnt going extinct anytime soon as corporate purchasing depts around the world wont be swithcing to arm just mobile devices