Eh? You can see differences in milliseconds? That's impressive, especially at your age...
Huh? Now what are you talking about? I never said I could see it. And if you had watched the video, it showed such differences could not be perceived by us humans either. That was the whole point of the test.
And no, I don't trust anything that comes out of that persons cake hole.
Just because you don't trust someone, that does not mean everything that person says or stands for is untrue. If anything, your comment just proves and illustrates how biased a person you are.

And for the record, just because you do trust someone, the opposite is true too - that does not mean everything that person says or stands for is true.
The facts are, Logitech and Corsair do make those claims. So are they lying too because Linus reports about those
manufacturers' claims?
I'd also like to ask, why are you defending him so vehemently?
I am not defending him. I am defending the content of the video. But sadly, you and your followers are so focused on the person, you can't see past the person to see the facts. Your prejudices towards the messenger have gone so far as to twist your perception completely even of those who accept the message of the video as fact. For example, even after quoting me, you claimed I said I could see differences in milliseconds. No where did I
ever say, imply, or suggest that!
You claim I was defending him. No I didn't. Starting with the first line in my first post in this thread, it was all about the content of the video, i.e., the message not the messenger.
TheLostSwede said:
He's biased to whomever pays him the most and that's that.

Wow! You just illustrated again how your hate and biases towards an individual blinds and drives you.

So according to your logic, Logitech's wireless mouse department paid Linus more than Logitech's wired mouse department, right?
Did you provide any shred of evidence whatsoever in your rants against the messenger that anything he said in that video was wrong? Nope.
So you twist around what others say and imply others said something they didn't and we are supposed to trust what comes out of
your pie hole?
Is Linus perfect? Nope.
Are his mannerisms sometimes abrasive? Yes.
Do the methodologies used in some of his videos some times leave questions unanswered or even lead to misleading conclusions? Yes.
Do that mean nothing he says can be trusted? No.
Does liking a person determine if they are stating fact or fiction? Nope.
For the record, I will defend any person, place or thing that is unjustly accused of wrong-doings - even if I don't like them. Just as I will defend your right to express your opinions (at the right place and time), regardless how biased I think they are. I didn't spend 24 years in the military defending yours and my rights only to trample on them myself. But having the right doesn't give one the right to express them any time they want, or in a way that tramples unjustly on others.
For the last time, the intent of the video was to verify or refute manufacturers' (not advertisers

and not Linus') claims by comparing results "from mouse movement to object movement on the
screen". Not from mouse movement to USB port, but to object movement on the "screen". And to eliminate human bias and human limitations, they used a mechanical method to initiate mouse movement and the clock, and the high-speed camera to detect the object movement on the screen. Then they used a computer to measure the latency. And yes, with my background, it is my opinion this was a valid test - if for no other reason than it took Linus and other humans out of the test.
Now please, let's move on.