• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

World Community Grid/F@H: Crunching for the Cure... or are we?

Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
1,644 (0.54/day)
Likes
1,037
Location
I'm roomates with Corey Feldman
Processor W3520 Xeon
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth X58
Cooling Cool it Vantage
Memory 6gb Dominators
Video Card(s) GTX 460
Storage 60Gb Vertex II 500Gb storage
Display(s) LG 42LH40 42" 1080P
Case 932 HAF
Audio Device(s) Voices in my head
Power Supply Raidmax730/
Software Win7Pro64
Benchmark Scores Pretty High one's. but it's not a contest/ I just read them for the articles.
#26
your all folding and crunching to help north korea build nuclear weapons you just dont know it yet
Do you have something to back this claim up?:laugh::laugh::laugh:
 

Athlon2K15

HyperVtX™
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
7,867 (1.85/day)
Likes
2,325
Location
O-H-I-O
Processor Intel Core i3 8350K @ 4.8GHz
Motherboard Asus Prime Z370
Cooling Corsair H115i
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 1050Ti 4GB
Storage Intel DC P3700 1.6TB / Intel Optane
Display(s) LG 34UC98 Curved Ultrawide
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Asus Strix Evolve
Keyboard Asus Strix Claymore
#27
how else do you think they figured it out?
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
1,644 (0.54/day)
Likes
1,037
Location
I'm roomates with Corey Feldman
Processor W3520 Xeon
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth X58
Cooling Cool it Vantage
Memory 6gb Dominators
Video Card(s) GTX 460
Storage 60Gb Vertex II 500Gb storage
Display(s) LG 42LH40 42" 1080P
Case 932 HAF
Audio Device(s) Voices in my head
Power Supply Raidmax730/
Software Win7Pro64
Benchmark Scores Pretty High one's. but it's not a contest/ I just read them for the articles.
#28
how else do you think they figured it out?
If you have something to say on the topic of the thread we'd love to hear it... otherwise...:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 

theonedub

habe fidem
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
7,920 (2.39/day)
Likes
5,133
Location
Northern CA, USA
System Name Erakith || Asus UX305FA
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.2ghz 1.068v || Intel Core M 5Y10 @ 800mhz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X-UP4 TH || ASUS OE
Cooling EK Supremacy, D5 w/ EK Top, 2X EK-CoolStream XTX 360 & Photon 270 Res || !PASSIVE!
Memory 16GB Samsung 'Wonder' RAM || 8GB LPDDR3 1600
Video Card(s) EVGA 780Ti Classified HydroCopper || Intel HD Graphics 5300
Storage 256gb Corsair Performance Pro, 2TB Caviar Green, 2TB Samsung F4 || Toshiba 256GB SSD
Display(s) DELL Ultrasharp U2715H 27" || 13.3" 1080P IPS
Case CaseLabs Merlin SM8 || Aluminum Unibody
Power Supply NZXT Hale-90-1000-M
Mouse Logitech M705 Marathon
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB w/ Cherry MX Silent
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 || WIndows 10 Home x64
Benchmark Scores WCG & F@H Only
#29
The fact that you are taking someone's good intentions and equating it to "Playing with people's lives" is shameful. :slap: You have no right to call someone else lazy, you are not them. Lighten up.
Geez take it easy E. All he is saying is that this is important work that, in the end, we hope will save lives. There is no point in wasting CPU time or sending in bad results if they can be prevented by stability testing.

Yes its true that participating in Distributed Computing is a volunteer act that people do with good intentions, and that's great. However, just because your intentions are good or because you are donating the resources doesn't mean you should cut corners or not hold yourself to a minimum/required standard. Is it okay to donate broken toys to a toy drive, not wash your hands when volunteering at a soup kitchen, or to donate just the muffin tops? No, and I think sending WUs on an untested OC is a near equivalent.

I will agree that its unfair to call someone lazy for not stability testing though, more often then not getting WCG and F@H running right is a lot more work intensive then opening OCCT or LinX and pressing go while you watch TV, go out, or sleep :laugh:

In the end though, if you want to ensure you are going to be giving worthwhile results to the project, get your stability test in :D
 

erocker

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
42,774 (9.89/day)
Likes
18,667
Processor i7 8700K
Motherboard Asus Maximus Hero X WiFi
Cooling Water
Memory 16GB G.Skill 3200Mhz CL14
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Storage SSD's
Display(s) Nixeus EDG27
Case Thermaltake Core X5
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Zx
Power Supply Corsair H1000i
Mouse Zowie EC1-B
#30
I guess you missed my point, it doesn't matter. Regardless, continue doing what you are doing for the good of others.
 

Chicken Patty

WCG Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Messages
28,599 (7.47/day)
Likes
12,629
Location
Miami, Florida
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Motherboard ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)
Cooling EK Water blocks P280 Water Cooling Kit
Memory G.SKILL TridentZ RGB Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 3600MHz
Video Card(s) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD (OS)// OCZ Vertex 4 128GB // WD Black 2TB
Display(s) Samsung 40" LED 4K TV
Case Corsair Obsidian 900D
Audio Device(s) Onboard Sound
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G2 120-G2
Software Windows 10 64 Bit Home Edition
Benchmark Scores Real man crunch for TPU! :)
#31
You are doing it wrong. I very strongly argue against this. I don't care what you do with your own data, but if you're handling work units on a possibly unstable computer, you're possibly playing with lives because you were too lazy to run a good test for a while. One day max of time spent testing and not computing work units is nothing compared to a lifetime of corrupt results generated from a bad overclock.
Once again, everybody is entitled to their own opinions. No need to take it so seriously. That's what "error" units are for, they don't count, you don't get credited for them. I have never ever primed either of these rigs or stress tested. My i7 was crunching at 4.3 Ghz earlier for about 1.5 hours in the afternoon from a bench session, I lowered it back to 3.8 Ghz due to temps, was just too lazy to restart earlier. Anyhow, your opinion is your opinion. Here's proof that new school or ol school you can crunch without stability testing.

Zero Errors! My i7 has a new windows install so that's why there is two devices for it.



 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
18,754 (4.46/day)
Likes
3,298
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i5 2400 :: Athlon II x4 630
Motherboard MSI H67-G43-B3 :: GIgabyte GA-770T-USB3
Cooling Corsair H70 :: Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Memory 4x2GB DDR3 1333 :: 2x1GB DDR3 1333
Video Card(s) 2x PNY GTX1070 :: GT720
Storage Plextor M5s 128GB, WDC Black 500GB :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, WD RE3 1TB
Display(s) Acer P216HL HDMI :: None
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - iLive IT153B Soundbar (optical) :: None
Power Supply Corsair CX600w :: Unknown
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
#32
Sorry if you think I'm coming across as harsh, and this post will probably come across as harsh as well, but if you are going to read this, I plead with you to read all the way until the end—don't stop midpoint in my post carrying the thought of "wow, hat's really an asshole" with you. I truly believe that to run a project like Folding@Home or WCG on an overclocked computer without sufficient stability testing is asinine. Sure, it may say zero errors, but what if there is an error somewhere in one of those work units, and it happens to slip through the cracks? Think of a complex math equation with many steps. What happens if you slip up and change a sign somewhere, slip up on your arithmatic? Sure, all the other stuff might be right, but there was a "stability error", per se, and the whole effort is wasted when you get the wrong answer. What if that is what we are doing... what if our possibly unstable computers are making a miscalculation somewhere, and it slips through the cracks?

As I said before, we could be holding future lives in our hands. When you overclock and get subtle stability errors over time because you never tested and you find out your computer is behaving abnormally, possibly not able to boot to windows because a critical system file got corrupted, there is no real harm done. Sure, it sucks reinstalling windows and all those programs and getting everything set up the way you had it, but at the end of the day when it's all said and done, it's no big deal; however, when an overclocked effort to cure cancer or another disease goes awry like an installation of windows that was slowly knocked off its feet by a slightly unstable system overtime, the effects could be disaterous.

I am not equating anyone's effort to "playing with lives", or at least, I am not trying to, even though it may seem that way. We all run distributed computing projects to help others. Many of us have spent our money to upgrade computers that run these projects to get more work done, and similarly, we overclock knowing that the higher speed will get more work done, and that's great. One of the main reasons I overclock is to get more work done. I'm just saying that if proper tests aren't done to verify the stability of our computers doing this magnificent work, it could be all for naught—or even having adverse effects.

Again, please don't take me the wrong way. I've been here since 2006; if I were a troll, asshole or otherwise, I'm sure someone would have noticed by now. I intend to do no harm to my readers, emotional or otherwise. I think we're a great bunch of people and we have a very tight-knit community for being a tech forum as large as we are. I am friends with many of you, and some of you have helped me with many things. I recall getting a 17" LCD monitor off one of you for free, and I don't think you even asked me to pay shipping (if you're reading this, I havn't forgotten your name, I remember exactly who you are, but I remember you not wanting me to give your name out by publically thanking you). I just believe very strongly that everyone should test thier overclocks, if they are running a distributing project, such as F@H and WCG, the two projects many of us have become so fond of. If you are still reading at this point, and you are one of the ones who are running F@H or WCG without having properly stability tested your computer, I strongly encourage you to do so.
 

Chicken Patty

WCG Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Messages
28,599 (7.47/day)
Likes
12,629
Location
Miami, Florida
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Motherboard ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)
Cooling EK Water blocks P280 Water Cooling Kit
Memory G.SKILL TridentZ RGB Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 3600MHz
Video Card(s) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD (OS)// OCZ Vertex 4 128GB // WD Black 2TB
Display(s) Samsung 40" LED 4K TV
Case Corsair Obsidian 900D
Audio Device(s) Onboard Sound
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G2 120-G2
Software Windows 10 64 Bit Home Edition
Benchmark Scores Real man crunch for TPU! :)
#33
Sorry if you think I'm coming across as harsh, and this post will probably come across as harsh as well, but if you are going to read this, I plead with you to read all the way until the end—don't stop midpoint in my post carrying the thought of "wow, hat's really an asshole" with you. I truly believe that to run a project like Folding@Home or WCG on an overclocked computer without sufficient stability testing is asinine. Sure, it may say zero errors, but what if there is an error somewhere in one of those work units, and it happens to slip through the cracks? Think of a complex math equation with many steps. What happens if you slip up and change a sign somewhere, slip up on your arithmatic? Sure, all the other stuff might be right, but there was a "stability error", per se, and the whole effort is wasted when you get the wrong answer. What if that is what we are doing... what if our possibly unstable computers are making a miscalculation somewhere, and it slips through the cracks?

As I said before, we could be holding future lives in our hands. When you overclock and get subtle stability errors over time because you never tested and you find out your computer is behaving abnormally, possibly not able to boot to windows because a critical system file got corrupted, there is no real harm done. Sure, it sucks reinstalling windows and all those programs and getting everything set up the way you had it, but at the end of the day when it's all said and done, it's no big deal; however, when an overclocked effort to cure cancer or another disease goes awry like an installation of windows that was slowly knocked off its feet by a slightly unstable system overtime, the effects could be disaterous.

I am not equating anyone's effort to "playing with lives", or at least, I am not trying to, even though it may seem that way. We all run distributed computing projects to help others. Many of us have spent our money to upgrade computers that run these projects to get more work done, and similarly, we overclock knowing that the higher speed will get more work done, and that's great. One of the main reasons I overclock is to get more work done. I'm just saying that if proper tests aren't done to verify the stability of our computers doing this magnificent work, it could be all for naught—or even having adverse effects.

Again, please don't take me the wrong way. I've been here since 2006; if I were a troll, asshole or otherwise, I'm sure someone would have noticed by now. I intend to do no harm to my readers, emotional or otherwise. I think we're a great bunch of people and we have a very tight-knit community for being a tech forum as large as we are. I am friends with many of you, and some of you have helped me with many things. I recall getting a 17" LCD monitor off one of you for free, and I don't think you even asked me to pay shipping (if you're reading this, I havn't forgotten your name, I remember exactly who you are, but I remember you not wanting me to give your name out by publically thanking you). I just believe very strongly that everyone should test thier overclocks, if they are running a distributing project, such as F@H and WCG, the two projects many of us have become so fond of. If you are still reading at this point, and you are one of the ones who are running F@H or WCG without having properly stability tested your computer, I strongly encourage you to do so.
This post was much better than your last couple of posts bro, not harsh at all. That you encourage us to do so is totally fine. However, just because you passed OCT or Prime doesn't mean your computer is stable, you might pass 8 hours, but let it go 8.5 hours and crash. Might take longer, but the errors will still arise and it does not warrant anything. Even at stock clocks, a error can happen for no apparent reason and squeeze through the cracks. It's just something you can't control. I really appreciate your efforts and making this thread in the first place and your efforts toward helping the team and anybody who runs a distributed computing project as a whole, but you can't come in here expecting to change everyone's opinion which is what it seemed like a few posts back. Don't think there is nothing else to really say much as we both voiced our opinions and discussed them much already. Just don't want this back and forth to continue as like I said it's your opinion and then mine, they won't change. Hopefully somebody else chimes with some feedback of their own. :toast:
 
Likes: hat

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
18,754 (4.46/day)
Likes
3,298
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i5 2400 :: Athlon II x4 630
Motherboard MSI H67-G43-B3 :: GIgabyte GA-770T-USB3
Cooling Corsair H70 :: Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Memory 4x2GB DDR3 1333 :: 2x1GB DDR3 1333
Video Card(s) 2x PNY GTX1070 :: GT720
Storage Plextor M5s 128GB, WDC Black 500GB :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, WD RE3 1TB
Display(s) Acer P216HL HDMI :: None
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - iLive IT153B Soundbar (optical) :: None
Power Supply Corsair CX600w :: Unknown
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
#34
Yes, even stock cpus can be unstable, or overclocks that pass say 24 hours of LinX, the the likelihood of that happening when stacked up againt a "set it and forget it" untested OC are slim to nil.

That aspect of my argument having been argued, I agree, I think we've both made our points, and there's not much left to discuss.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
1,644 (0.54/day)
Likes
1,037
Location
I'm roomates with Corey Feldman
Processor W3520 Xeon
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth X58
Cooling Cool it Vantage
Memory 6gb Dominators
Video Card(s) GTX 460
Storage 60Gb Vertex II 500Gb storage
Display(s) LG 42LH40 42" 1080P
Case 932 HAF
Audio Device(s) Voices in my head
Power Supply Raidmax730/
Software Win7Pro64
Benchmark Scores Pretty High one's. but it's not a contest/ I just read them for the articles.
#35
Plus these are doctors and graduate students we are dealing with... They have to factor in an error percentage anyways! Its just good science to do so!!!
 
Top